sda2.jpg

October 26, 2007

Some Former NDP Candidates

Never learn....

Posted by Kate at October 26, 2007 12:36 PM
Comments

Some of the comments on that thread are hilarious.
One however sticks out and pretty much sums up rabble.
From Michelle (moderator)

"Just a quick reminder - people don't HAVE to support the NDP on babble. People are allowed to support the Green Party and still post on babble without being called trolls."

Posted by: Largs at October 26, 2007 1:33 PM

The people posting there make me seem like much less of a whack-job! Check out the full blown leftist-vote-splitting denial:

"The Greens are the real voice of the left these days!"

"How would you take it if someone told you the federal NDP split the left vote with the liberals, meaning a vote for the NDP is a vote for the Conservatives. This is the same kind of crap the liberal party trots out at election time, and I can't see how someone who calls themselves progressive can spout this kind of sh*t."

Posted by: Knight of Good Mr. Iron Man at October 26, 2007 1:44 PM

Hopefully, there is a full blown falling out amongst all the different parties of the left, and they concentrate and spend much effort savaging each other.

Posted by: Kevin at October 26, 2007 1:47 PM

Please Kate, a warning that the link could lead the reader to the "twitlight zone" would have been nice.
A real bunch of nutbars there and that includes michelle the moderator(?). The fact that the Sask Party han't asked her to remove the libalous comments somehow sigifies there is something to hide or ulterior motives. They are indeed a sad bunch.

Posted by: Texas Canuck at October 26, 2007 2:05 PM

talk about folks that are stuck on stupid . . .

Posted by: Fred at October 26, 2007 2:13 PM

Famouspipeliner made the comment that
"It's reich wing scare tactics."
so, I always thought that Nazi stood for national SOCIALIST party, doesn't that make his statement factually incorrect?

mungman

Posted by: mungman at October 26, 2007 2:14 PM

Being progressive means never having to say you are sorry (have class, do the right thing, have integrity,etc).

Posted by: LynnH at October 26, 2007 2:19 PM

This former candidate has about as much credibility as Putin and Imadinnerjacket.

Posted by: a different Bob at October 26, 2007 2:21 PM

Politicians being dragged out onto the street? Potts is a real class act.

Posted by: david at October 26, 2007 2:25 PM

.

'Hopefully, there is a full blown falling out amongst all the different parties of the left, and they concentrate and spend much effort savaging each other.'


Just like the Muslims that they admire so much.


.

Posted by: John West at October 26, 2007 2:32 PM

from the moderator of the thread in question

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by SaskCommie:
Balancing the budget in Saskatchewan has been as easy as getting laid in a whorehouse with a fistful of fifties....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Um, no, I don't frigging think so. Take this sexist crap to some other forum. Not appropriate here.

Posted by: mungman at October 26, 2007 2:35 PM

Speaking of how people got politically connected jobs, someone should ask Jeff how he happened to get a job as a research assistant for a conservative MP in Ottawa when Mulroney was in power.

As far as Jeff is concerned he has the "oilpatch" under NDP thrall with a bunch of thugs ready to "take a few dirty politicians (presumably SP politicians) into the street". He vastly overestimates his power of pursuasion (and their predilection to left wing politics)as he always did.

Posted by: DT at October 26, 2007 3:18 PM

If Famouspipeliner is anything to go by then I'm guessing that an NDP leadership convention looks a lot like the Special Olympics.

Posted by: Sean at October 26, 2007 3:53 PM

Don't insult the special olympics. Those guys are serious athletes in every sense of the word.

Posted by: Kevin at October 26, 2007 4:02 PM

"I always thought that Nazi stood for national SOCIALIST party, doesn't that make his statement factually incorrect?

mungman"

Mungman, no it doesn't, because the Nazis were not socialists. They were fascists. Look it up. They could have called themselves the Tinkerbell Party, and they still would have been fascists.

Posted by: saskboy at October 26, 2007 4:13 PM

A rose by any other name....Kind of like the NDP,neither new or democratic or much of a party.

Posted by: wallyj at October 26, 2007 4:34 PM

saskboy:

Nice try.

Mussolin was fascist. Hitler's party was National Socialist.

There is no difference between National Socialists, communists and Fabian socialists.

They all evolved from a common ancestor.

Posted by: set you free at October 26, 2007 4:39 PM

National Socialist German Workers Party
Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei

Posted by: Celina at October 26, 2007 4:56 PM

Set,
Care to cite a credible source on this interesting political science tidbit you've uncovered?

Posted by: saskboy at October 26, 2007 4:58 PM

Let's not do the Nazi thing again, okay?

Posted by: Yukon Gold at October 26, 2007 5:00 PM

saskboy,

Herr Hitler said of the National Socialist German Workers Party: "We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance."
Joseph Goebbels and Mjölnir, Die verfluchten Hakenkreuzler. Etwas zum Nachdenken (Munich: Verlag Frz. Eher, 1932)

Look it up.

Posted by: L'il Walter at October 26, 2007 5:08 PM

saskboy:

Some day you'll understand.

Just look at the starting point and the inspirations for all these socialist/class warfare ideas.

The key word is evolution.

Posted by: set you free at October 26, 2007 5:11 PM

Oh, and Saskboy:

One more clue.

Let me go on record that I believe in pure, provable scientific facts. Science is never settled and is an ongoing discovery of the world around us and pure science is a beautiful thing.

But, I am against using science as a means to manipulate the populace. Call it political science if you will, the word science in the phrase political science does not make it morallly correct.

Posted by: set you free at October 26, 2007 5:19 PM

AGAIN:

The only difference between the Fascists and the Communists is that Fascism is NATIONAL socialism and Communism is INTERNATIONAL socialism.

Evyerthing they do is EXACTLY the same, but one wishes to keep its work within its borders, the other wishes to "evangelize" to the rest of the world.

LOOK IT UP, PinkoBoy.

Posted by: Doug at October 26, 2007 5:22 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

Some differences but not much....

Posted by: Wiki Lover at October 26, 2007 5:26 PM

that thread hurt my brain. One guy on there asked for proof of Spudco and Murdoch Carrier (sp?). He claimed they didn't happen because proof could not be provided...

I hope the NDP lose, but it's looking less definate as the days go on.

Posted by: Lore_Weaver at October 26, 2007 5:43 PM

Dr Linda Haverstock called in to the Murray Wood radio show this afternoon and stated she was going to vote Sask Party. She talked about the contrast between the Sask Party ads to the NDP's. She said she really liked the ad showing Brad Wall on the football field with kids he coaches talking about Saskatchewan and all the good things we have here and wanting to make sure that the kids have opportunity. Dr Haverstock then compared that ad to the sheep in wolf's clothing being run by the NDP and decided right there that she could support Brad Wall. Now there is a smart Liberal!

Posted by: a different Bob at October 26, 2007 5:45 PM

FYI...Bob, that wasn't Lynda Haverstock. It was a member of my People's Panel. I was told this had been posted so came to check it out.

Ms.Haverstock would NEVER phone in to a political talk show and make that sort of claim.

Posted by: Murray Wood at October 26, 2007 6:53 PM

Mussolin was fascist. Hitler's party was National Socialist.

There is no difference between National Socialists, communists and Fabian socialists.

They all evolved from a common ancestor.
Posted by: set you free at October 26, 2007 4:39 PM

You forgot the other thing they have in common. All three were conceived thru anal sex.

Posted by: notasocialist at October 26, 2007 7:05 PM

Actually the difference between the fascists and the communists is that the communist state does not allow private ownership of property, whereas the fascists allow private property but use state corporations to bully them into adherence to govt social and business programs.

Trudeau was a big fan of fascism as shown by his expansion of the number of state corps from 28 when he took office to over 400 when he left office.

They were used in a huge way to impose French language laws and metric measurement.
To do business with the feds, you had to follow their artificial and quirky ethnocentric laws.

Posted by: rockyt at October 26, 2007 7:56 PM

Er, okay, Mr. Famousonehander, how does working for three cabinet ministers who were convicted of crimes prove anything at all about Brad Wall? And since we're on the subject of guilt-by-association irrelevancies, how many of your campaign workers or associates plan to use you as a reference in the future?

Posted by: GDW at October 26, 2007 9:26 PM

Let's get back to Babble. The NAZI stuff is endless and the lefties will never concede.

I found this posting by famouspipeliner:
"It'd be interesting to see if there were any links between the specific contributors at the two events.
Anyway, 3 sners in and cracking number four...going to call Mandryk about the Chamber."
I can only assume that the Mandryk he is referring to would be now other than Star Phoenix political reporter and neo-socialist propagandist, Murray Mandryk.
It is interesting the way fp refers to Mandryk as if they have a relationship of some sort. I have always thought Mandryk goes hard on the Sask Party, like he should, but he is far too soft on the NDP, often providing excuses for their behavior.

Posted by: Trent at October 26, 2007 9:38 PM

I paid my first visit to Babble. Famouspipeliner is wwwwaaaayyyy out there. How can you be taken seriously when you threaten to "Tar & Feather politicians?" He needs to relax a wee bit.

Posted by: Bri C at October 27, 2007 12:24 AM

The Sask Party constituency where I volunteer is made up of mainly ex-NDPer's. They all come around eventually.

Posted by: Trent A. Lalonde at October 27, 2007 12:43 AM

As I've said elsewhere,

Jeff Potts as a candidate:

(_._)

As an individual:

(_O_)

'nuff said.

more rants and comments at:http://www.nodemocraticprocess.com

Posted by: MrPaulDecker at October 27, 2007 1:52 AM

But largs that is the way things work at babble. A young guy at CKA who leans right wanted to join to liven up the discussion ;)

He got his login and made an introdutory post, clearly stating he leans to the right and was NOT there to troll, but have honest discussions. The result? Come on we all know the result.

Posted by: Jim at October 27, 2007 7:37 AM

Oh yeah, the good old banned button comes out hard. If you disagree in the slightest, banned! Freedom of speech and free thought, its NOT allowed on THAT board.

Posted by: Citizen Wilson at October 27, 2007 10:01 AM

"Oh yeah, the good old banned button comes out hard. If you disagree in the slightest, banned! Freedom of speech and free thought, its NOT allowed on THAT board." Citzen Wilson

I noticed. But really, aren't we all use to the left trying to muzzle anyone who contradicts their opinions? That is why rational thinkers have embraced the blogshere; here, we can actual converse and provide the real facts on issues that the MSM chooses to omit.
We also allow left wingers to post and don't censor them unless they are completely whacked out. Actually, the whack jobs can still post, I think it is just the ones that get vulgar and profane that get banned.
To be honest, I think most rational thinkers on this site enjoy the left wingers the most; it is interesting, and more than just a little disturbing, to see how they think.

Posted by: Trent A. Lalonde at October 27, 2007 10:23 AM

Damn - could have sworn it was Linder!!!

Posted by: a different Bob at October 27, 2007 10:40 AM

What happened to Dan Harder? He dropped out. Why??

Posted by: ok4ua at October 28, 2007 8:25 PM

ok4ua,

Dan Harder obviously said some very harsh and inappropriate words that he should not have. His behavior in the past has cost him. I am surprised he made it through the Big Brothers screening program. I volunteered with BB for 5 years and the screening program is very intense; they go so far as to interview your friends and family. One friend called me afterwards and commented on how deep and probing the questions were. Perhaps as an employee Dan didn't go through the screening program, but he should have.
I think Brad Wall did the right thing. As did Lorne Calvert and David Karwacki.

Posted by: Trent at October 29, 2007 12:12 PM

Let's hear it for former Tories. Dick Culver, truely a great leader,Grant Devine and Brian Mulroney,great visionaries."Colon" Thatcher a real lady killer. And let's not forget the Tory MLA caught with the 14 year old hooker. Hold your heads up high. You guys should be proud of your past!!!

Posted by: ok4ua at October 30, 2007 3:38 PM
Site
Meter