But let's be real here. The fact is, Hillary was wearing a fairly low cut summer top. She was not displaying cleavage, as the shot on Drudge indicates. Someone else wearing the same outfit might have done. But Hillary Clinton does not have cleavage to display. Period. Indeed, Hillary never forgave her mother-in-law, Virginia Kelly for pointing this out decades ago to the young Bill Clinton, a cleavage man if ever there was one.Posted by Kate at July 29, 2007 8:19 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5728
Gag me with a spoon! That's another vision of Her Thighness that I did not need.
Posted by: Jeff in Pullman, WA at July 29, 2007 10:57 AMHillary Clinton's cleavage, and indeed her whole self, is irrelevant. This will become crystal clear after the DNC next year. Oh, and the Magic Negro as well.
Posted by: rattfuc at July 29, 2007 11:06 AMNow if she was wearing low rise jeans, she'd be showing plenty of cleavage, only the butt kind.....ooooohhh!!
Posted by: Joanne at July 29, 2007 11:27 AMLet's face it– Hillary does not have a great rack. This should not disqualify her from being president. With the exception of William Howard Taft, no American president has had a great rack.
Posted by: Mystery Meat at July 29, 2007 11:50 AMAnd Bill didnt have great legs either.
"Pasty white thighs, pasty white thighs .......cant get enough of those pasty white thighs" from the David Letterman show.
Posted by: cal2 at July 29, 2007 1:34 PMBill Clinton still a skirtchaser
Posted by: spurwing plover at July 29, 2007 2:57 PMDidn’t seem to hurt what was her name "Kim Campbell" in '93. http://archives.cbc.ca/IDC-1-73-2084-12979/politics_economy/kim_campbell/clip5
Maybe she'll take a page from Janet Jackson’s playbook for a success game next?