TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5672
Speaking of enlarge:
http://thesuperficial.com/image.php?path=/2007/07/britney-spears-underwear-beach-10.jpg
Posted by: joe smuck at July 20, 2007 4:15 PMHeck, I didn't need that lunch anyhow....
Posted by: Texas Canuck at July 20, 2007 4:38 PMThey're not kissing. One is ripping the tongue out of the mouth of the other. Rugby is a rough sport don't cha know.
Posted by: Reid at July 20, 2007 4:42 PMI will never -- I say NEVER -- be able to watch rugby again.
Posted by: Sleepy Old Bear at July 20, 2007 5:03 PMA'men.
Posted by: Vitruvius at July 20, 2007 5:20 PMAs the Sea Captain would say, "Arrr...That'll replace the whale in my nightmares."
Posted by: bryceman at July 20, 2007 5:28 PMThat's not Paris, it's Toronto, you fools!
Posted by: ralph at July 20, 2007 5:38 PMWish I had not seen it, but glad I didn*t miss it. More culture. French culture. A photographer with money or influence or both. = TG
Posted by: TG at July 20, 2007 5:44 PMThey're waaaaay overcompensating for the Zinadine Zidane incident.
Posted by: DrD at July 20, 2007 6:08 PMAnd trust the French to come up with a 'yellow' jersey for the lead bike in the tour de France.
Appropriate.
Posted by: John at July 20, 2007 6:29 PMYuck.
Posted by: 'been around the block at July 20, 2007 7:26 PMPretty risky picking up the soap in that locker room shower...or does this team use the "bath house".
Posted by: WL Mackenzie Redux at July 20, 2007 7:38 PMThat's sooo gay!
Posted by: richfisher at July 20, 2007 8:01 PMWords fail me.
Posted by: dmorris at July 20, 2007 8:05 PMMost repugnant. Off to the bathhouse for a friendly dip, dunk, whatever.
Posted by: Liz J at July 20, 2007 8:11 PMNot to worry. That's the NDP and Libs at their annual scrum.
Posted by: Micha Plodski at July 20, 2007 8:12 PMI (foolishly) clicked the link and now I am wondering.......
Will the warranty on my LCD monitor be void if I run it through the dishwasher to sanitize it?
Posted by: ZiLLa at July 20, 2007 8:48 PMWell.there goes a waste of money eating out.
I just got my "ROI" across my keyboard......
Posted by: notasocialist at July 20, 2007 8:56 PMEr, uh, seems that rugby has changed a bit since I last watched it twenty or thirty years ago.
Posted by: MikeM at July 20, 2007 9:04 PMOne good turn deserves another:
Hillary Clinton shows cleavage:
There was cleavage on display Wednesday afternoon on C-SPAN2. It belonged to Sen. Hillary Clinton.
She was talking on the Senate floor about the burdensome cost of higher education. She was wearing a rose-colored blazer over a black top. The neckline sat low on her chest and had a subtle V-shape. The cleavage registered after only a quick glance. No scrunch-faced scrutiny was necessary. There wasn't an unseemly amount of cleavage showing, but there it was. Undeniable.
It was startling to see that small acknowledgment of sexuality and femininity peeking out of the conservative -- aesthetically speaking -- environment of Congress.
Pics and video of Hillary Clinton's cleavage:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/19/AR2007071902668.html
Posted by: Andrew at July 20, 2007 9:07 PMAhh, the French Follies. One way to separate the men from the umm...., er...., umm..... I give up!
Posted by: maggyymayy at July 20, 2007 9:22 PMDouble dribble.
Posted by: Bernie at July 20, 2007 9:46 PMI so hope that whole thing was a photo-shopped image, all of the "participants" actually being computer generated images. Imagine if you were a straight model and you had to do that. They couldn't pay me enough to ever pose like that.
Posted by: Schwarze Tulpe at July 20, 2007 10:20 PMSure they could. A million bucks, if everyone knows it's a joke? There are three possibilities, Schwarze. It is possible that the shot is just an extreemly lucky camera angle, but the odds are against it. It could be a staged event for deliberate comedic effect. Or, it could be a digitally constructed post-hoc phenomenon. Whichever way, the liklihood that it is anything like the intented interpretation is vanishingly small.
That's why I wrote A'men, because I could have meant abdomen, acumen, agnomen, albumen, alumen, amtmen, archflamen, or a number of other possibilities.
Posted by: Vitruvius at July 20, 2007 10:35 PMEwwwwwwwwww
Posted by: missing link at July 20, 2007 11:58 PMThat was just wrong...
Posted by: Richard Evans at July 21, 2007 1:01 AMas a rugby player I take offence at disrespect being shown to this most honorable sport. I'm not going to open up the link again so I don't know what this photo is trying to promote but whoever is responsible should be ashamed. disgusting.
Posted by: bdogginit at July 21, 2007 1:19 AMas a rugby player I take great offence at the disrespect of this most honorable sport. I don't know what this photo is trying to promote, and I'm sure as hell not opening the link again, but whoever is responsible should be ashamed (although I'm sure they are just the opposite). disgusting.
Posted by: bdogginit at July 21, 2007 1:25 AMAs A rugby player...well...i'm a little insulted.
Posted by: Griff at July 21, 2007 1:32 AM:the fact the possibility this could be 'shopped"
No way. The hookers (really) are leaving the ball completely alone. That would never happen in a Rugby game. I've played the game, both my daughters played.
Nope. Setup shot. Guaranteed.
Double ewww. Bet the kissers eat hot dogs with a knife and fork like dat Canadiene pussyboy Stephane.
Double eeewwwww.
Posted by: geothermal at July 21, 2007 1:32 AM:the fact the possibility this could be 'shopped"
No way. The hookers (really) are leaving the ball completely alone. That would never happen in a Rugby game. I've played the game, both my daughters played.
Nope. Setup shot. Guaranteed.
Double ewww. Bet the kissers eat hot dogs with a knife and fork like dat Canadiene pussyboy Stephane.
Double eeewwwww.
Posted by: geothermal at July 21, 2007 1:33 AMwhoops sorry about the double post, I thought I lost the first one.
Posted by: bdogginit at July 21, 2007 1:35 AMThe comments remind me of the episode of "All In The Family" when Archie had a heart to heart with his tough guy friend in the pub. Psychiatrist friend says it also runs in biker gangs. Disrespect for women a sure sign. But I'm getting too serious.
This was unexpected!
Not to put too fine a point on it, Wannabe, yet speaking as a professional computing scientist with over 35 years of experience in the field, please let me note that we practitioners of the art have been thinking about the various problems that digital technology presents to forensic, jurisprudential, and indeed, bibliographic and archeologic evidence, for some decades now. To the best of my knowledge we don't have a generic solution to the problems, at least not yet.
But then, we humans have never had, have we; we're always losing and faking evidence, aren't we? That's at least partly why we keep admiring ancient things that don't even work any more. Or at least, I know I do. Undoubtedly we will eventually muddle through it, as we always have, modulo a few tens of millions dead here or there.
Am I wrong? And if not, the ultimate question then becomes: do you think it is principally your job to save those tens of millions, or is your first concern to not be one of them? After all, if you are one of them, and so you are dead, how can you help them? Don't look at me, I'm just askin' questions.
(PS: I may be dead, but I took ten of them with me, may be a valid counter argument under certain extreme circumstances, depending on whether or not it's a valid counter argument.)
Posted by: Vitruvius at July 21, 2007 2:25 AMOops. Also sorry for the double post. Something weird going on tonight, either that or I am the idiot Andrew thinks I am.
Posted by: geothermal at July 21, 2007 3:28 AMFake...yes.
rugby...no.
Amazing pic...you bet.
I want Sean to tell us how it was done.
Posted by: Jay Currie at July 21, 2007 5:45 AMdidn't need to see that
Posted by: jmorrison at July 21, 2007 7:05 AMSo just to summarize the comments thus far:
Texas Canuck: "Barf!"
ZiLLa: "Barf!"
notasocialist: "Barf!"
'been around the block: "Yuck!"
Liz J: "Repugnant!"
bdogginit: "Disgusting!"
missing link: "Ewwwwwwwwww!"
geothermal: "Double eeewwwww!"
borderguardwannabe: "The Government!"
Posted by: A'dam at July 21, 2007 7:34 AMLighten up guys/gals. It is,afterall,Gay Paree!
Posted by: Justthinkin at July 21, 2007 8:00 AMThere's something we're all forgetting, it must be a Gay rugby team they like to kiss and grope in public, they are so proud, so emotional.
May as well continue with the fun, any thoughts on a name for the team?
Posted by: Liz J at July 21, 2007 8:00 AMTo all the offended Rugby players.
I got some ice time coming up!
Dudes relax!!
Or we can put the boot to it!
Your choice!
I beleve this was a toung in cheek report.
I don't know about you guys, but I immediately thought the entire thing was CGI. Played any games on the XBox 360 lately? Some of the frames from modern video games come close to being this good. There's just something about the feel of the pic that reminded me of an XBox football game.
Posted by: Adune at July 21, 2007 9:39 AMMy thoughts on that would be off topic.
Posted by: Vitruvius at July 21, 2007 4:18 PMDon't like that photo eh? Is somebody forcing you to look at it?
Posted by: Lancer at July 21, 2007 10:33 PMWhich is worse, collie flowered ears or whisker burn?
Posted by: multirec at July 22, 2007 3:04 PMSorry Kate, anything stiff is now limp ! Puke...
Posted by: Orlin at July 22, 2007 4:51 PMSorry -- can't post what I think. The Canadian thought police might fine and have me extradited. Have a nice day...Orlin from Marquette.
Posted by: Orlin at July 22, 2007 4:55 PM