sda2.jpg

May 4, 2007

If The Taliban Didn't Have Jack

They'd have to invent him.

Another fine capture by No-Libs

UDPATE: Jack Layton's office releases a statement late Friday - "THIS OUTRAGE CANNOT STAND AND THIS GOVERNMENT OF TORTURE MONKEYS IS NO BETTER THAN THE TALIBAN AND CONSERVATIVES ARE DESTROYING KILLING WARMONGER MACHINES SACRIFICING CHILDREN AND RUINING THE COUNTRY AND LOSING OUR NATION'S SOUL AND OH THE PEACEKEEPING! KILLING US ALL WITH THEIR GLOBAL WARMINGIST FOLLIES AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO DO EVERYTHING IN OUR POWER TO STOP THESE NEOCONBUSHITLERCLONES SHORT OF DEFEATING THEM ON A CONFIDENCE MOTION AND GOING TO THE POLLS... "

Posted by Kate at May 4, 2007 3:35 PM
TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5234

Comments

Hmmmm, let's see....demand a course of action that would unquestionably threaten our national security and put our troops let alone our very country at further risk as long as it might also cause damage to the Conservative Party. To idiots like Taliban Jack, such is considered a worthwhile trade off. Scary indeed.

Posted by: Ross at May 4, 2007 5:36 PM

I suppose for war mongering scum ... the concepts Layton brings forward are too complex for your puny, nasty, petty, little right wing brains to comprehend.

Your desire for death and destruction is the western equivalent of what the Taliban and Al Qaeda are doing to their own people.

I fart in your general direction.

Posted by: leftdog at May 4, 2007 5:44 PM

Somebody left the door to the computer room in the asylum unlocked again.

Posted by: Ross at May 4, 2007 5:53 PM

Leftdog,
If you can't be civil, don't bother posting.

Posted by: Trent at May 4, 2007 5:55 PM

Better to be war mongering scum keeping lowlife animals like the Taliban from subjugating one half of the human race, the female half, than to be a cowardly sack of shat posting under an alias.

Posted by: Greg Grandy at May 4, 2007 5:56 PM

You have to wonder if Taliban Jack has any limits at all. I think that man would jump on any wagon at all if he believed it would take him closer to 24 Sussex.

Posted by: Trent at May 4, 2007 5:59 PM

Trent, taliban jack will never attain power in this country, that's why he's free to say what ever,(a freedom he has thanks to the warmongers). He knows that he will never have to make any of the hard decisions.

Posted by: Greg Grandy at May 4, 2007 6:05 PM

Leftdog said:

"I fart in your general direction."

Isn't that a quote from a Frenchman in Monty Python's Holy Grail?.....are you a surrender monkey leftdog?

Posted by: John at May 4, 2007 6:11 PM

The guy on the left in this, is my MP.
I wish to apologize to the people of Canada for his presence there today. I further wish to apologize to the Canadian people for not doing a better job of preventing him from being there today.
As for Jack, well.....as the people of Ontario have been told to say....Flick Off.

Posted by: Rattfuc at May 4, 2007 6:25 PM

When people start contemplating that which comes from their rectal region we know they've come to an end.

Posted by: Liz J at May 4, 2007 6:29 PM

When Der Jackass says, "Moi ist der master race"

We HEIL! FTTT HEIL! FTTT

Right in Der Jackass face.

H/T Spike Jones
...-


Der Fuehrer's Face. Spike Jones and the City Slickers. When Der Fuehrer says, "We ist der master race" We HEIL! HEIL! Right in Der Fuehrer's face ...-
(ocap-ca)

Posted by: maz2 at May 4, 2007 6:33 PM

The look on Peter Van Loan's face tells you how easy that one was. The interesting question is, when did Jack Layton realize he'd just made a royal ass of himself? Before he sat down or after Van Loan blew him away?

Posted by: Blackadder at May 4, 2007 7:01 PM

But will Jack ever come to that realization? Or will he continue to speak fo the lefty troll and others who think it is ok for terrorists to kill and torture, and don't know (or don't want to know )what Canadian soldiers are doing in Afghanistan. Would Jack squawk like that if there were canadian soldiers in the room?

Posted by: vf at May 4, 2007 7:26 PM

Taliban Jack should spend a weekend in Kandahar. He'd be at risk from his compatriots over there more than the Taliban, I'm sure.

Perhaps that's why he doesn't go.

Posted by: Wimpy Canadian at May 4, 2007 7:28 PM

Taliban Jack never saw a train wreck he didn't try to run in front of. Quebec has Malo and Toronto has taliJack. Looks like a match made in heaven being such sophisticates you realize.

Posted by: joe at May 4, 2007 7:29 PM

I do hope the lefties in PQ that cannot bear the stench of the Librano sect give serious consideration to voting for Taliban Jack next time out.

Posted by: shaken at May 4, 2007 7:34 PM

The NDP in Canada is trying to turn Afghanistan into Vietnam/Iraq, with absolute no success. I haven't heard the "bring them home" chant for a while, I guess their pollsters and spin doctors told them to back away from that one.

I would suggest to the NDP that they should realize Canada is NOT a part of the U.S of A and Afghanistan is NOT a part of Iraq, but they wouldn't listen. It is probably a good thing they don't listen; keeps them out of power.

Posted by: Trent at May 4, 2007 7:40 PM

Well, since the separatists have a party in Parliament I guess it makes sense for the Taliban to have representation too.

Posted by: Belisarius at May 4, 2007 7:50 PM

Hehe. Sweet title, as always Kate.
It's only a matter of time before the NDP pulls the "war crime" card out of their sleeve, and plays with it...

Posted by: Knight of Good Mr. Iron Man at May 4, 2007 8:18 PM

It should be a rule that whenever a member of the NDP wishes to speak in the H of C that they have to first inhale a hit of helium.

And they should all be wearing little munchkin hats.

Posted by: Pd at May 4, 2007 8:37 PM

hahahahahahahaha
the name fits the little nazi so well.....
hahahahahaha.........heheheheheheheh
I can hardly stand it!!!!
hahaha

Posted by: sumbuddy at May 4, 2007 8:48 PM

"I suppose for war mongering scum ... the concepts Layton brings forward are too complex for your puny, nasty, petty, little right wing brains to comprehend."

Ohhhh we have a winner here!! Jose just lost the contest to this typically insightful moonbat guano.

Congrats leftdog, you are SDA's winner of the onanist of the week award...enjoy your prize...a condom that is as leaky as your reasoning. :)

Posted by: WL Mackenzie Redux at May 4, 2007 9:21 PM

"I fart in your general direction."

For those who can't muster the intestinal fortitude to face the mustard gas, trying to muster the gas for intestinal flatulence is the best that one can hope for.

Posted by: Mark Steyn at May 4, 2007 9:22 PM

WLMR never fails to entertain. Sadly, I lost a large quaffage of exilir due to his rejoinder to the weepy moonbat leftdog. WLMR, you owe me a pint!

Posted by: shaken at May 4, 2007 9:31 PM

CLEAN UP THE LANGUAGE. I HAVE ENOUGH TO DO AS IT IS, WITHOUT HAVING TO SIFT THROUGH YOUR STUPID COMMENTS AND DELETE PROFANITY

Posted by: Kate at May 4, 2007 10:11 PM

If Jack is supporting the Taliban and supporting the disenfranchisement of women then Harper is doing him one better? Why hurt one gender when you can indiscriminately hurt everyone?

The Conservative response is the same as always (also the same as the Bush Administration). War, death, fighting, destroying. These are the things that peace is made of. And if questioned then it is an issue of National Security even if our National Security is not actually in danger.

Even if it were in danger, it would be because we put it in danger by being there in the first place.

Posted by: Elijah Rintrah at May 4, 2007 10:29 PM

Elijah
Most commenters here are quite satified that the Taliban and their ilk are the villains of the war; but if you wish to assume a measure of responsibility, please feel free to indulge in self-flagellation.

As for your accusations of culpability against Mr Harper, Conservatives, et al, you might provide some evidence beyond stale Dippers talking points.

Cheers

Posted by: J.M. Heinrichs at May 4, 2007 11:10 PM

You right "Elijah Rintrah"

We should just pull out. Bring them all home next month. Who cares about the Afghanis anyway. There just a bunch of backward clowns on the other side of the globe. So what if the women are torchered or the kids can't go to school. Doesn't affect us in the least. It just costs us money to fight over there. If you don't think too much about it it doesn't even bother your conscience. Besides, if we weren't over there fighting we wouldn't have detainees so that would eliminate that debate in parliament. As for those soldiers who already died,well, thats just the way it goes. You win some, you loose some.

Horny toad

Posted by: Horny Toad at May 4, 2007 11:10 PM

Its good to know that the libs to the north are as vile, self loathing and craven in their emulation of of the appeasers and collabarationists of pre WW2 France.

Last time I checked Canadian soldiers and intellegence officers aren't pouring acid in the faces of girls wearing makeup.

Posted by: The Real Sporer at May 4, 2007 11:25 PM

CHEERS Kate!

Thank you for the link!

Posted by: Richard Evans at May 4, 2007 11:51 PM

Probably a bad time to bring up the possibility of a stuck caps lock key. Why does everyone hate me?

Posted by: ural at May 4, 2007 11:57 PM

Kate
I understand you frustration but you putting this in wrong direction
This guy Taliban jack
Should not be in this country
He is enemy of mine
So please take your energy to move him out from CANADA
I came to this country because of people like him …and I find this guy here …how come you allow to happen
I keep you responsible for it
So kate don’t rise your voice …it was your country I like
And I came
And now what we going to do?

Posted by: george at May 5, 2007 12:29 AM

I'll bite on this.

I think this whole thing is presented in an intellectually dishonest way. If I hear Layton correctly, I think his issue is with the Attorney General instructing witnesses to use a generic "national security" excuse to avoind giving testimony. The implication seems to be that some of these claims of "national security" are bogus and just a way out of giving testimony. He isn't actually suggesting that military secrets be given away, as this clip would lead you to believe. Now, I have no opinion one way or the other about the legitimacy of the national security claims, and Layton may very well be barking up the wrong tree, but the accusation that he wants to reveal state secrets is tenuous at best and a smear at worst.

Posted by: TruthSeeker at May 5, 2007 12:36 AM

NDP = Taliban = similar out come = central control = no freedom.

I'm keeping my molds, furnace and loading press.

The freedoms you keep are the ones you are prepared to fight and die for.

Posted by: Dave_RoA at May 5, 2007 12:55 AM

I would never in a million years vote for the NDP or Liberal party, but when a judge asks a question and is denied an answer for reasons of security, the government should be asked why and be on record in the House that it is for security. It attaches responsibility for the action to the government and that is how it should be. Jack, of course, pumped up his question for the audience.

Posted by: Iain at May 5, 2007 1:45 AM


"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it."

ODE To TALEBAN-JACK
from Monty Python (appropriate all things considered!)

I'm a (dapper)lumberjack and I'm OK
I sleep all night and I whine all day.

Chorus:
He's a lumberjack and he's OK
He sleeps all night and he whines all day.

I cut down trees, I make you hurl your lunch
I go to the lavatory.
On Wednesdays I go shopping and say piss on you and me

Mounties:
He cut down trees, hurls his lunch
He goes to the lavatory.
On Wednesdays he go shopping and has buttered scones for tea.

Chorus:
He's a lumberjack and he's OK
He sleeps all night and he works all day.

I cut down trees, I skip and jump
I like to press wild flowers.
I put on my wifes clothing and hang around in bars.

Mounties:
He cuts down trees, he skips and jumps
He likes to press wild flowers.
He puts on women's clothing and hangs around in bars?!

Chorus:
He's a lumberjack and he's OK
He sleeps all night and he works all day.

I cut down trees, I wear high heels
Suspenders and a bra.
I wish I'd been a girlie, just like my dear papa!!

Mounties:
He cuts down trees, he wears high heels?!
Suspenders...and a bra?!...

Just the Lumberjack:
I wish I'd been a girlie, just like my dear ma'ma!!

Yeah I just can't get enough of old Taleban loving Jack (Laydown and bendover) Laid-ton.
Politic would be dull without him.

C'mon you gotta admit: He IS amusing, but tht's about it!

Posted by: eastern paul at May 5, 2007 2:02 AM

Another smear job by the Cons...the same people who can't get their stories straight about what is happening with Afghani prisoners and what kind of policies are in place to deal with these prisoners.

Posted by: lberia at May 5, 2007 2:06 AM

Layton cannot even find a new idea for making
some very stupid and intended rants to make Canada and Canadians look terrible.
He just borrows the American liberal ideas and
changes the names.
It is all the same idiotic blather here and there,
it is too bad people believe it.
Like liberals....there is no reason for anyone
to think the liberals will actually look for
the truth, it is easier to let Jack do their
dirty work.

Posted by: Carole at May 5, 2007 3:00 AM

iberia says

**************Another smear job by the Cons...the same people who can't get their stories straight about what is happening with Afghani prisoners and what kind of policies are in place to deal with these prisoners.*******


iberia did you every stop and think that the whole prisoner mess is due to the fact the the lieberals wanted to dis the americans because of their treament of captives at Gitmo


they saved the captured from the "damn yankees"

Posted by: GYM at May 5, 2007 3:53 AM

Hmm, that update looks statement oddly like the work of our operative DemocracyRules...

Posted by: Dudley Morris at May 5, 2007 4:41 AM

Is this the same Layton that was outrage when canadian media printed articles about Arar that alleged he had ties to terrorism, coached Arar to Sue canada for $400'000'000.00 and settle for $10'000'000.00 , defended a convicted felon to run for the NDP while on medication for depression and stress from Homophobia, the same Layton opposed to Trans-fats while MP Libby Davies
needs the Paliamentry doors smeared with tallow and a ram-rod to force her through , the same Layton that attended a fund raiser in February hosted by a Islamic Org. with members in Prison for funding Hamas and Hezbollah, the same Layton that endorses a parade where he and Olivia overlook the naked men flaunting their penis in front of little boys, the 2 income MP's crying about the prosperity gap between rich and poor, Layton who's wife support the "No one is Illegal" idiots that engage in Human Smuggling into canada, the Layton that propped up the Corrupt Liberals even after Chretien send our Navy into the Iraq war in the gulf, the layton that knew Liberals were handing over POW's to the Afghans forces for 3 years, the layton that used Arar's wife as the Ottawa Candidate while knowing she was a Pro-Sharia law/Anti-gay/anti-abortion Muslim with a husband Suing canada, the same Layton and Chow that engaged in Tax-fraud by not reporting to canadians that Chretien hid his tax increases by making Toronto pay for a Federal Refugee Policy via Property-taxes they both approved and stayed mute about , the same Layton who worships Al Gore and support a Green member comparing Harper to Chamberlain.

Oh THAT Jack Layton

Lets send Olivia ,Libby,Bill Siksay, Svend Robinson, and a few other yahoos over to talk to the Taliban about anger issue and a abusive children that makes them act-out with violence.
If everything works our right we'll see the videos of them getting beheaded as the Taliban praises Allah and blesses them for murdering homosexuals to keep paradise pure for the peaceful tolerant Muslims to be with Muhammed and his child bride he raped at 10 year olds with permission from Allah.

Go ahead jack , make my day.


Posted by: roger daly at May 5, 2007 5:27 AM

I don't understand the logic of the left - Liberal, Dippers, or the Bloc.

They want us, Canada, out of Afghanistan as soon as possible - some immediately. Yet, they are constantly screaming about human rights abuses in Afghanistan.

So I would love our media to ask these "protecters" these questions:

If Canada, and other NATO forces pull out of Afghanistan, who will protect human rights abuses then? Or they suggesting that after NATO's pull out, abuses will stop?

And another question for them: Why are they not asking questions about our soldiers - like, do our soldiers have everything they need? They seem to be more interested in prisoners comforts than about our military!

Posted by: Catherine at May 5, 2007 6:21 AM

Leave it to clowns like Iberia to take a Liberal "scandal," the prisoner exchange agreement they made (spare me the Hillier made us do it BS), and accuse others of trying to get their story straight. Tories again are having to clean up mess left by Libs.

Once again, these lefty wackos want Canada to adhere to a hyperstandard, just like Kyoto, that puts our soldiers and our country in peril.

Iberia, please start advocating for election now. That way, joe and mary sixpack can vote for the conservatives and wacko lefty idiots can spread their vote around the Libs, dippers, blockheads and redgreens.

C'mon Libs you're tied in the polls, go for it. You won't get a better opportunity. Tories will change momentum soon with Lib, dipper supplied talking points - maybe our soldiers are war criminals, looking other way at mistreatment of murdering, raping, circumcising Taliban nutbars, whose human rights we must protect. Yeah, baby, go for it.

Posted by: Shamrock at May 5, 2007 7:31 AM

No, no, no, Catherine, you don't get it. If eight year old Afghani girls are beaten for holding a book, say, that's a cultural expression; if the men who beat those children complain about their treatment after being apprehended, that's an international incident and it becomes a test of our moral character to defend those men. Can't you see the difference? What's wrong with you?

I have to say that after reading the transcript in Kate's update, I suddenly have a lot more respect for Jack Layton. Although he has made that exact same point he made whenever it's been his turn to stand up and make his point, this time he puts it all in one corporeal lump, and he finally capitalized the capital issues, in a moment of honesty that fairly screams "Yes, this is what I egest. Now, cradle it in your hands...what?...okay then, get a teaspoon...now, take a good long look...do you now see what I'm getting at? That I'm backed up by suffering? Alright? Okay?"

In terms of support, his new found Khonesty will only cost him the dull few who for some reason thought he was saying something else, and that's a very small group. His actual consituency is not only international but and regenerating, and increasingly well-represented in western politics.

This world is a lot bigger than Canada, and the anger out there will never die but will remain a very real force for corroboration. The Jack Laytons of the world are not only obligated -- in a profoundly honourable and courageous way -- but destined to "go for it" on behalf of this constituency.

Thanks for the update, Kate, that was a good one.

Posted by: EBD at May 5, 2007 7:49 AM

I keep saying why do people vote for these socialist(NDP,Sep)idiots if they did not we would be better off, only problem with my theory is that they don't go away, They just become Liberals.

Posted by: bryanr at May 5, 2007 8:57 AM

"They want us, Canada, out of Afghanistan as soon as possible - some immediately. Yet, they are constantly screaming about human rights abuses in Afghanistan"

Thank you Cathrine for asking the most pertenent question in the Afghan debate.

Lib-dip logic makes no sense on the Afghan issue because it is of no direct concern to them to seek a resolution...the Afghan people nor global stability matter ...all that matters is an opportunity to mindlessly natter in front of the public...Afghanistan is not an issue as mich as an opportunity for the Lib-dps to engage in the only thing they can do; natter.

And natter they do...day in day out volumous discordent incohesive natter...this is the new left..talk...all they do is talk...they have become so unhinged from gravity that they actually belive that constant nattering, by a cloistered nattering class, done in a sanctimonious way, will solve all problems and usher in the new left utopia...and of course the left's utopia is most certainly all talk because no one has seen it yet.

As you dicovered Catherine, anttering endlessly to the point of producing a circular argument which condems all options and precludes a real solution is the hallmark of a new left that has nattered and talked itself into surreal obscurity.

There is no logic in leftist circular argument...there is no dicourse...there is no dialectic...just raw unhhinged unstructure thought defined by endless chatter.

Posted by: WL Mackenzie Redux at May 5, 2007 9:23 AM

"Better to die standing up than live on your knees"

Posted by: Bob Wood at May 5, 2007 9:42 AM

"...If everything works our right we'll see the videos of them getting beheaded as the Taliban praises Allah and blesses them for murdering homosexuals to keep paradise pure for the peaceful tolerant Muslims to be with Muhammed and his child bride he raped at 10 year olds with permission from Allah."

Roger, good post. The only minor point on which I'd disagree is that according to all the Islamic writings, Muhammed's "bride" was actually nine years old, not ten. Muhammed "married" her when she was five and "consummated the marriage" when she was nine. This is a generally accepted historical fact in the Muslim world.

Of course, there's an English word for a man who commits such an act. It begins with the letter P but it isn't Prophet.

Posted by: Dave at May 5, 2007 10:28 AM

Ok, so who thought that taking a big ciddy councillor, like Taliban Jack, and putting him in the HoC was a good idea?

Kinda hard to wrap your head around worldly democratic principles when all you had to do for the last 20 yrs is worry about garbage, traffic lights, and subsidized housing.

And it shows.

Posted by: rockyt at May 5, 2007 11:10 AM

Finally, after thirty-odd years, someone else who knows the words to Der Fuehrer's Face, and where it came from. Whee!

Posted by: T. Robert Wolfram at May 5, 2007 10:30 PM

Remember that this is the same Jack(off) Layton that continued to live for several years in highly subsidized Toronto city housing after both he and his wife were drawing double salaries as Toronto city counselors, all the while bleating about the homeless and the lack of available low-cost housing. Hypocrite.
Sincerely,
Robert Albin
Calgary

Posted by: Robert Albin at May 5, 2007 11:14 PM

If GWB and friends didn't have the Taliban, Al Qaeda, Baathists and Shiite extremists they'd have to invent them ... no wait ... they practically did.

Ironies abound. Supporters of Taliban Jack should be pretty pleased. The Conservatives are implementing his domestic policies far more faithfully than the Liberals ever did.

And nobody in or connected to the government has any right to complain. No matter what party gets elected, the amount of government jobs and porkbarrel spending just keeps geting bigger and bigger. If there wasn't an interminable list of crises that only government can solve, like instability in the Middle East, climate change, chicken flu, tainted pet food ... they would have to invent them.

Posted by: Ugh at May 6, 2007 12:31 AM

I wonder if, just maybe, Jacko was appointed to be the Afghanistan ambassador, would he take it? I know he has IMPORTANT work to do in the HOC, but.. d'ya think he'd go?

"Afghanistan needs you jack!!"

Posted by: eastern paul at May 6, 2007 2:24 AM
Site
Meter