sda2.jpg

April 17, 2007

That Must Have Been Quite The Photo Op

I have to ask - how did a "national magazine" get a picture of Sheila Copps' vagina?

Posted by Kate at April 17, 2007 10:01 AM
TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5106

Comments

euch... too much taquila, Sheila

Posted by: Bushman at April 17, 2007 10:10 AM

"Enter Belinda. With the rare combination of business pedigree and money, she turned a deadly dull Tory leadership into a fight."

Business pedigree? She sat in the cockpit, so to speak, of daddy's airplane while it was on autopilot and the real professionals watched over.

As for the Tory leadership campaign, anyone here in favour of baking economic pies?

Posted by: John B at April 17, 2007 10:15 AM

Gaaahhh.... There's an image to go along with breakfast. As for making Belina Stronach the designated victim/sympathy object of the day before nose diving into a litany of personal grievances (gotta get the Me! in there somewhere), I'd suggest Ms. Copps send a demo tape of herself to the producers of The View. The afternoon hen party may have an opening soon.

Posted by: Blackadder at April 17, 2007 10:18 AM

Please God make it stop. Blood is going to start coming out of my eyes. AHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

Posted by: Talkinghead at April 17, 2007 10:28 AM

Her vagina? In a national newspaper? In a country that won't even teach sex-ed in school? Is she confusing herself with Maggie? Now there was a shot to do our national symbol proud.

Posted by: Justthinkin at April 17, 2007 10:31 AM

Is Sheila trying to tell us that Stephane Dion's really a woman? or the Paul Martin was a lesbian?

Posted by: Robert at April 17, 2007 10:32 AM

At a very tender recall an old farmer neighbour telling me that if "you've seen one lad, you've seen them all."

Not having seen the photo of Sheila's vagina in a 'national magazine' I doubt if I missed much.
Besides I though only Maggie Trudeau made it nationally in the vagina photo department.

Many of the women mentioned in the Copps piece never were near to a Margaret Thatcher equivalent.

Sheila by now should no most people judge politicians by what's between their ears and not their legs.

Posted by: Joe Molnar at April 17, 2007 10:33 AM

"At 28, much more was written about my looks than my ideas."

You give yourself WAAAYYY too much credit, Sheila!

Posted by: clair voyant at April 17, 2007 10:39 AM

Is it any wonder the beaver is our national symbol?

Posted by: wallyj at April 17, 2007 10:42 AM

Thanks for wrecking my breakfast :(

Posted by: ZiLLa at April 17, 2007 11:01 AM

moviewavs.com/0028375953/MP3S/Movies/Waynes_World/hurl.mp3

Posted by: Wayne's World at April 17, 2007 11:18 AM

Enough already Sheila,.. that was a picture of the Red Rock Canyon.

Posted by: Brian S. at April 17, 2007 11:23 AM

Who cares HOW they obtained a picture of Copp's vagina. I wanna know WHY.

Posted by: Rattfuc at April 17, 2007 11:24 AM

Now why would Shelia take being called a lesbian as an insult, unless of course she sees lesbians as something not quite normal.

Who would want a picture of Shelia's twat? It couldn't have been too impressive if no one was talking about it. Does anyone remember seeing Shelia's twat in a national newspaper? I don't remember that. You know if she climbed over a table to punch Crosbie in the face for calling her Tequila Shelia, you would think a picture of her twat in a national newspaper would have had her choking the life out of someone.

Posted by: Honey Pot at April 17, 2007 11:24 AM

Yikes! A revealing bit of journalism exposing a double standard for women, sexism and printed by the Sun. Right beside a link to the "Sunshine Girl".

Priceless.

Posted by: Colt at April 17, 2007 11:30 AM

This thread is useless without pictures.

Posted by: artwilliams at April 17, 2007 11:33 AM

Bimbo Belinda quits politics and it is my fault? The only thing this commentary shows is that Tequila Sheila is still trying to be in the limelight. This is so blatantly a piece of editorial fluff that I'm surprised the Sun let it see light of day. BS gets bored at having to wait to be Prime Minister and dumps politics and that is somehow related to Rutgers??? I don't see any knappy hair here... oh wait, are we talking about Sheilla's wazoo?

Sorry about that chief.

Posted by: texas canuck at April 17, 2007 11:33 AM

A good example of the infantile personality that kept Copps from any real political power...still hung up on personal ladies plumbing obsessions...can't move pas blaming her failures on sexual politics.

Seems this BXXXXH can't even make a go of it as an MSM opion scribbler in Canada's tabloid toilet.

It would seem there is just not enough Tequila on the planet to make this brainless shrew less obnoxious.

Posted by: WL Mackenzie Redux at April 17, 2007 11:41 AM

eeeeeuuuuuuuuuu........scraping ....picture.... out...... of....head....with....fork

Posted by: Albertaman at April 17, 2007 11:53 AM

[quote]I have to ask - how did a "national magazine" get a picture of Sheila Copps' vagina?[/quote]

Um... a brown paper bag full of cash, slipped a cross a table?

Posted by: SDC at April 17, 2007 11:53 AM

Sheila, Imus, Howard Stern, understand shock fame.

Just push that envelope and the copy will fly, keeping you in the public eye. = TG

Posted by: TG at April 17, 2007 11:57 AM

Criticism of treatment of BS strange coming from Sheila Copps who:

- paid her dues, unlike BS
- was victimized by top down sabotage in her riding, kind of like how BS victimized Harper with surprise defection

At least Sheila Copps made a contribution to polical affairs and, even though, I don't agree with her politics, she went in the trenches and fought the good fight, unlike BS who thought she could buy leadership and acumen.

Posted by: Shamrock at April 17, 2007 12:07 PM

Better to ask this question in response to all posed and implied in this post: Who cares? Who would want to?
Good God!

Posted by: OMMAG at April 17, 2007 12:26 PM

Belinda had my support until she jumped ship. If she had been willing to wait, pay her dues, and get the experience, she might have done very well in the Conservative party.
But she was unwilling to wait. So she played right into all the stereotypes that Copps talks about. Her downfall was her own doing.

Posted by: Dan at April 17, 2007 12:27 PM

Sheila herself has placed this zinger in today's column. She is definitely giving the impression that someone may actually have taken such a picture at some point of her actual living member and then printed it in a "national magazine" for all the world to see. The truth is somewhat more prosaic.

Years back, when Sheila was a minister in the Cretch government, she was going on ad nauseam about the need to protect Canadian journals etc. etc. The publisher of a notorious American skin mag decided to have a little fun at her expense by printing a picture of what was purported to be hers in the magazine. I believe it was Hustler magazine. Of course all the right people were all outraged at the time, including Sheila herself.

Now, however, she seems to be wearing it with pride as the ultimate proof that the whole sexist world is conspiring against her.

Posted by: felis corpulentis at April 17, 2007 12:39 PM

Belinda was mine till the time that I found her,
Holding Jim, loving him.
Sue came along loved me strong that's what I thought,
Me and Sue, that died too.

Don't know if I will but until I can find me,
Girl who will stay and won't play games behind me.
I'll be what I am.
Solitary man.
Solitary man.

Posted by: Tie Domi at April 17, 2007 12:41 PM

As if we need any more proof of Sheila's delusions of grandeur, now she is thinking that when a magazine publishes pictures of her vagina it is an issue of whether she is taken seriously as a politician or not. Because it is obvious that whenever pictures of Britney Spears' or Paris Hilton's or Lindsay Lohan's vaginas are shown it is a matter of publishers not taking them seriously as actresses, right?

I'm sorry, but the reason why Sheila, Belinda and Kim Campbell (note to Sheila: Kim Campbell -- like Alexa McDonough, Marlene Jennings, Hedy Fry and many other women in politics -- has always been addressed by both names, no matter what your delusional mind thinks) is because they have painted too many targets ON THEMSELVES! Nobody did it for them, they did it all by themselves.

Belinda's problem was not that she butchered the English language, but rather that she had nothing intelligent to say.

Sheila's problem wasn't that she was sidelined, but rather that she picked the wrong fights, ones that saw her having to grovel publicly to be taken back (GST promise anyone?).

Kim Campbell's problem was that she made herself look like a party girl throughout the election that ended her political career. It's no different than Stockwell Day's swimsuit calendar. But nobody's complaining about Stock getting a hard time, right?

It's writings like Sheila's that just go to show that women in politics worst enemy isn't men, but rather their own demeaning self-loathing. I have one name for Sheila to remember: Margaret Thatcher.

Why? Because Sheila doesn't even know why she'll never be spoken in the same breathe as Thatcher. And it's all about the fact that Thatcher believed in what she could do, whereas Sheila and Belinda and Kim Campbell are too spoiled and too whiny to realize that success is built in spite of obstacles.

Her article reminds me of a certain commercial recently: "That's not fair!" Yeah... what in life is fair my wimpy friends?

Posted by: Surecure at April 17, 2007 12:49 PM

And we have that strong proud woman, Elizabeth May, needing a helping hand from a MAN to get herself elected. I would say that's thrown the cause of women back a bit. You can say the same for all of those appointed candidates. Be strong ladies, stand on your own two feet, and fight your own battles. What about that, Sheila?

Posted by: Soccermom at April 17, 2007 12:53 PM

Not surprising that someone somewhere would have a pic of Copps' vagina. Liberals have a habit of taking their clothes off in public -, see Briony Penn, Liberal candidate here in BC. I'm sure her two young sons are proud.

Posted by: Soccermom at April 17, 2007 12:59 PM

Likely Frank Magaizine.....I am sure it was one of those Britney like shots of her getting out of a car.....I think.....trust me it isnt seared in my memory...

Posted by: Stephen at April 17, 2007 1:01 PM

I guess everybody missed the real reason belinda quit politics...to home-school her children.

Posted by: David Brown at April 17, 2007 1:02 PM

I like how she throws out the bit re the vagina without an explanation. Like Preston Manning was just having photos of his penis taken and it's no big deal?

Well at least when things went bad with the libs Sheila didn't jump to the CPC for a cabinet post. So it makes her better than Belinda in my books. I don't think thats saying a lot though,

And it was libs whose unopen and undemocratic process she championed that shut women out. No one on the conservative side was ever shut out for backroom shenanigans. Belinda or Dianne Ablonsczy.

When she says she wants equality that means that if she isn't the best for the job she should still get it right? Hiring quotas et al.

I heard them call her guilty of child abuse for letting her child swim in hamilton harbour,

Re the dog for letting it be locked in her car

Plus there was the point pelee incident.

If these are wrong I'm curious.

Posted by: DrWright at April 17, 2007 1:19 PM

How would anyone get a picture of Sheila's Vagina?
Seems to me she'd have to be in stirrups on her GYN's examining table. Don't remember her suing anyone for that shot.

Posted by: Liz J at April 17, 2007 1:20 PM

And in the Vancouver Sun we have a pic of a female?? Liberal MP wannabee parading naked as Lady Godiva.

Posted by: Pissdoff at April 17, 2007 1:29 PM

I think I've found that picture:

http://www.yampavalley.info/media/ag_and_envir/porcupine.jpg

Posted by: surly at April 17, 2007 1:35 PM

What is it with liberal women and taking off their clothes. We had the strippers for Judy, Belinda (unless she follows muslim law re sex), Margaret Trudeau, the lady godiva (is she advertising, in case she gets elected) and S.Copps having pics of her vagina in the press. Maybe it was for an ad for that play some woman wrote. Lets hope Hedy Fry and May don't get into the act. How embarassing for all their children, now and in the future. Wonder what dion's wife thinks of the may/dion affair.

Posted by: mary T. at April 17, 2007 1:36 PM

Why does BS get to collect her TAXPAYER funded salary if she has decided to quit her job? I'm sure my boss would kick my butt out the door as soon as I told her that I was going to devote my energy to a different company.Also.will Ms. Copps be issuing a retraction if it is found out that she is confused about her cooze."Ms.Copps sincerely regrets any discomfort that she may have caused by writing about her vagina. The article should have read her angina."

Posted by: wallyj at April 17, 2007 1:37 PM

Glad you didn't link to the picture!

I thought this was going to be a funny joke, instead I got whining about sexism and a defense of Belinda. hat do any of these women expect? They want to be equals, but to who?

In my opinion they have to be the one's setting the bar. Anything less makes them appear weak. Set the example for colleagues and tax payers that you would for your own children. Elizabeth May with rue the day she made the deal to limit her competition. If she can't make it on her own, she has no business being an MP or the leader of a party, any party.

p.s. David Brown re: your 1:02 - Is that an admirable endeavor in your view?

Posted by: Cheri at April 17, 2007 1:49 PM

That reminds me -I'm doing a trip to the Grand Canyon this summer.

Posted by: bob at April 17, 2007 1:58 PM

Wow, besides the huge chip on her shoulder, Sheila seems to have and incredible amount of sand in said vagina.

Posted by: Jim at April 17, 2007 2:06 PM

I love how Belinda keeps getting described as a "supporter or women." LOVE IT! Because it IS very supporting of your fellow women to steal their men.

Belinda get's called a b*%&h and a wh@re, not because she's a woman and there's sexism, but because, ya know, she's a b*%&h and a wh@re.

Posted by: Reid at April 17, 2007 2:29 PM

Since my mother and father were both raised in Hamilton, and many of my aunts and uncles live there, I can say Vic Copps was like a god there, and Sheila lives on his reputation. What a useless mouthpiece she is.

Posted by: KevinB at April 17, 2007 3:03 PM

Wow, and I thought the ships in Hamilton had a lot of barnicles. At least they periodically get scraped off once in a while.

Posted by: Angry West at April 17, 2007 3:06 PM

You had to know this thread would deteriorate, just too tempting, especially since Sheila's the one who really asked for it by the mere mention of her vagina.
Couldn't be as big as her mouth.

Posted by: Liz J at April 17, 2007 3:27 PM

It's a bit of an exageration to say a pic of her vagina has seen the light of the public prints. Copps' face was photoshopped onto the torso of a rudely-posed naked woman in the short-lived Quebec-produced Canadian edition of Hustler magazine about five years ago, when Copps was fighting with the magzaine industry over split-run(!) editions. Copps complained and the magazines were pulled(!). I wrote a story about it and have a copy of the magazine in a bin in the basement. It was pretty silly, just high-school quality trash.

Posted by: Mark Bourrie at April 17, 2007 3:27 PM

Right now there are burning vaginas on the lawns of houses in Hamilton.

In Canada , Im not making this up: Hedy Copps.

Posted by: cal2 at April 17, 2007 3:31 PM

They still havn't got the smell out of the fish in Hamilton harbour since that swim with her kid.

Posted by: Dead Carp at April 17, 2007 3:45 PM

cal2...you slay me..and here I'm missing it in Edmonton.

Posted by: Justthinkin at April 17, 2007 3:50 PM

Bourrie: "Copps' face was photoshopped onto the torso of a rudely-posed naked woman"

Finally we get the real story: Copps is lying, as usual.

Posted by: Bob at April 17, 2007 5:00 PM

Vagina? I can't get by that bulbous nose.
It's like watching W.C. Fields in drag.

Posted by: multirec at April 17, 2007 5:05 PM

In all seriousness, I think she's referring to the spat she had with Hustler magazine:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/1999/03/05/copps990305.html
She was proposing tax changes that would have harmed them and other American magazines, if I recall.

Posted by: Kevin Jaeger at April 17, 2007 5:16 PM

I live in Hamilton so I want you to all to be kind to me. No more talk about the COPPS COOTER-please!
It's hard enough living here without dredging up bad memories.

Posted by: Rattfuc at April 17, 2007 5:22 PM

rattfuc...I'll be nice when you stop electing Liberals. Fair deal?

Posted by: Justthinkin at April 17, 2007 6:10 PM

I think that sheila really believes that it was her privates shown in the mag. Poor thing,she must have been drinking lots back then.

Posted by: wallyj at April 17, 2007 6:41 PM

I clicked on the Sun Girl instead of reading her diatribe.

Posted by: Ben Dover at April 17, 2007 6:59 PM

Belinda is a nappy head ho.

Posted by: Don Imus at April 17, 2007 7:01 PM

I remember that picture,but at the time thought nothing more about it than there is a pic of Shiella Copps & she has shaved off her moustache.Second thought, maybe it was just an erotic dream with the prettiest liberal maidens of the time!

Posted by: dougie at April 17, 2007 8:39 PM

Not to be outdone, Elizabeth May's next move will be to hold a topless press conference and prove her Liberalness.

Posted by: Soccermom at April 17, 2007 8:50 PM

Next time wear panties before exiting the car...

Posted by: Knight of Good Mr. Iron Man at April 17, 2007 10:41 PM

I hope hubby doesn’t have to endure too many monologues.

Posted by: Bernie at April 17, 2007 10:56 PM

Copps was actually good politician when she started out. When she jumped up on that table, that was cool, then it was down hill from there. When Crosby made that statement about tequila, instead of some kind of smart retort, she turned herself into a victim. She was in politics where others will say things she may not like, victims are popular in a segment of the population, though majority has not time for that kind of foolishness.
MacDonald just did not have it. She is a decent character, though would have been better off as a liberal.
Campbell insulted intelligence of most of the voters telling them they just don’t have the capacity to decide for themselves, in much the same vein as that knucklehead Reid. You probably would not vote for somebody that implies that you are just too bloody dumb to know.
Stronach is a rich airhead that gives blonds bad name. She wanted to be the first woman prime minister so she tried to buy her way to leadership of conservatives. That did not work out. So what do you do? Well another party seems to be in turmoil maybe that will work. OK she changes parties, though you have to admit that Stronach sounded more like a liberal than a conservative when she ran for conservative leadership. What happens? Well it did not look like she would make it so she quit trying, after that there was really nothing left for her ambitions. As it is now, maybe, possibly she could make it as CEO of Chrysler if thing work that way, that’s up in the air somewhere and some of the air got into her head.

Posted by: Bolshevik at April 17, 2007 10:58 PM

Don Imus - wrong! Belinda is not a nappy head

Posted by: jlc at April 17, 2007 11:51 PM

Belinda wanted to be top dog without first going through training school.

It was all about OPPORTUNITY and it presented itself when the Conservatives were in a leadership battle.
If it had been the Liberals she probably would have arranged to run for leadership there.

Who in their right mind would think her foray into politics was for anything other than top job or nothing?
She gave the Conservatives and Liberals her services, made little contribution in the grand scheme of things. The real top-off is saying she's going back to the family business where Daddy really needs her and her children need her, blah,blah.
Translated, 'I didn't get what I wanted so I'm going home'!

Posted by: Liz J at April 18, 2007 7:29 AM

I remember in a past column by David Warren how he commented that the reign of Paul Martin made him able to appreciate "the few and miserable virtues of Jean Chretien".

Belinda has accomplished the same thing for Sheila Copps.

Posted by: felis corpulentis at April 18, 2007 10:26 AM

Which is sadder?:

That nobody bothered to scan it and put it on the Internet.
That I did a Google image search to find out.
That I admit to doing the image search.

Posted by: Saul at April 18, 2007 10:39 PM

I found it !!!!.
I googled images "chain saw accidents" .

Posted by: cal2 at April 21, 2007 3:24 PM
Site
Meter