Ann has such a way with words! The other night on TV she called the Left "anti-human" because, if allowed, their extreme stance on global warming will eventually kill more of humanity than Stalin or the Nazi's. She was referring to those of us in colder Northern climates who are the most dependent on energy for survival.

I think Coulter is an abomination to any form of civic discourse.

There was no 'objective' reason to use the faggot expression. None whatsoever. Edwards is admittedly a contemptable demagogue, but call him that and be done with it. She is simply a not very intelligent provocateur. Which would be fine if she actually managed to hit her targets. But 9 times out of 10 she misses and then the rest of us have to suffer the collateral damage of her stupidity.

Ann ---- THINK TWICE before speaking ONCE. Or alternatively ---just STFU.

Some of us are not suffering at all; we are enjoying the synchronised wails of anguish from the humour impaired, and the sobbed moans of shame from those who wish they could agree with Miss Coulter but are too afraid to smile.

Cheers

Ann's just stupid, plain and simple. Any respect I may have had for her disappeared when I got to witness the spectacle of her trying to disprove evolution. This latest outburst doesn't surprise me at all.

I won't be afraid to smile; I've already joined the Ann Coulter Support team...

Kirsten Powers demonstrates what an ignorant cow Ann Coulter really is:

3w.youtube.com/watch?v=iKZw7lCIp4M

Some more of Ann Coulter's "intelligence":

3w.youtube.com/watch?v=Vg7IhR0ccgo&NR

Iberia: So it's OK for you to call Coulter an "ignorant cow" but she cannot call Kerry a "faggot" ? In your world only you left wingers are allowed to call people names and label them. That's what you substitute for logical and rational disscussion of issues.

Obviously, it is NOT okay to call a homosexual a faggot, just like it is NOT okay to call a dark-skinned person a nigger.

Obviously, it IS okay to call a westerner a redneck and a conservative a knuckle-walker.

No, I don't see any problems with those statements at all. /sarc

Repeat after me..."Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me".

Personally, I do my very best to never use ANY slang name against ANY recognizable group of individuals (except the loony left, that is) as I think it is rude...if others use slang names against me, I think it is rude, but I don't cry or moan about it either. I'm a big boy...I can take it.

If Ann or anyone else uses the "F" word or "N" word, then I think they are rude. Period. Full stop. If anyone uses the "R" word or "K-W" word, then I think they are rude, too. But that's about it...I won't "throw the baby out with the bathwater", as it were.

Get over it, folks, your hypocracy is showing. I will NEVER believe ANYONE if they say they have NEVER used perjorative names similar to the "F" word or "N" word themselves.

Via the OED:
"... Amer.Eng. slang ..., probably from earlier contemptuous term for "woman" (1591), especially an old and unpleasant one ..."
But he does have great hair.

Cheers

Hey hey hey....let's get in line with PC protocal here...only a faggot can call a faggot a faggot. ;-)

I've enjoyed the reaction of Coulter's critics more often than I've enjoyed Coulter herself. She usually uses a bludgeon (with Gatling gun) when a simple thrust with a well positioned knife would do. Not a subtle lady, or a very good writer. But her critics are priceless: sanctimonious, self righteous, hysterical, and dull, the lot of them. No wonder Coulter continues. Keep it up, I say.

"...Coulter is an abomination to any form of civic discourse"

No, she isn't. Admittedly, she may not be civil, but she performs a useful function. Think of politics as a compost pile - it needs turning on a regular basis. Just like muckracking journalists, Coulter's purpose is to "let the light in" and watch the rats scurry about.

As for her left-handed "faux pas" in transgressing society's repressive sexual mores - I think I'll listen to some Dire Straits while I install a microwave oven...

"Faggot"
Two
Three
"abomination"
"Stupid plain and simple"
"Fat cow"

Right on time.

Was Ms Coulter wrong to call Edwards a faggot?? Undoubtably. But to hear the wails of protest from those who routinely call Bush a murderer, a terrorist, and who lionize a murderous perverted sadist like Che Guevera as some sort of hero ....

It just makes it hard to regard any of them as better than spoiled children. Whatever happened to quid pro quo?

Judge not lest ye be judged. For you shall be judged by the standard with which you judge others.

The 'problem' with the 'right' is that it, so very often, is the exact mirror image of the 'left'. The juvenile ass***** of the left are a waste of space. Why do we need malicious simpletons like Coulter to drag us down to their level ? Frankly we DON'T.

There appears to be a belief among some here that simply because I believe Coulter to be in the immortal words of Dan Ackroyd an ignorant slut , that I am 'of the left',and attack her for that reason alone.

Nothing could be further from reality. I have nothing but contempt for the 'progressive' end of the spectrum, and I was against the MSM before it became popular.

I just can't abide Coulter. She is almost in equal parts ,clueless, malicious, and mean-spirited. For every 'almost' defensible comment she makes("My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building"), she makes at least 2 absolutely STUPID outbursts.

The Edwards fiasco is firmly in the later classification scheme.

" Bottom line: Coulter's remark was indefensible. She had the right to say it, but that doesn't make her right for saying it, and she deserves every bit of criticism she's getting."--- Capt'n Ed--- Captain's Quarters.

Yeah--- what he said. And he is an actual US Conservative who should know the terrain there.

It's amazing what a one way street the leftards have. They can call names to anyone who doesn't agree with them and its glossed over. One person on the right says anything and they are cussed out and thats OK.
Asshats all.
I look forward to Ann's column every week, if not for anything else but the apoplexy from the left is entertainment in itself.

"Ann ---- THINK TWICE before speaking ONCE. Or alternatively ---just STFU."

The language of the left-liberals, socialists, communists, fascists, et al.; Crush dissent.

Known purveyors included: Stalin and lberia, aka Lavrenty Beria, and dougf.

Socialism's faggots are dead embers-ashes on the slag heap of history.

This was probably an intentional ploy by Ann.

This is not the first time that she has said something intentionally to create an uproar among the leftist political class.

Then what follows is billions of dollars of free publicity for Ann, her books, and her political position as she and others make the rounds of talk shows.

By the time it's over, there's been so much ink and so much discussion that Edwards and the word faggot have been used together to the point of memorialization.

So in the end Edwards and faggot become almost interchangable terms. (I preferred "the Breck Girl," myself) And Ann Coulter receives more publicity for her books, editorials, and opinions than George Soros could pay for on his best day.

Gee at one time a faggot meant a bundle of sticks.

I am old enough to remember using the term
"can I bum a fag off you?". Meaning of course could I get a cigarette off yeah. We all know how distorted the term Gay became from this group of inverts took it, twisted it, than changed the meaning to one less onerous. Indeed its sounds like a party word. Just watch an old movie called the "Gay Divorce" With Fred Astaire for proof.

That certain minorities claim certain words in order to taint them or change their meanings for political advantage has become endemic. To cover up the ugly side of there Dogma laced about in inoffensive words, changed by various groups promoting there meme, is perverse. That we are called bigots because we do not conform to their usage by these distorters is absurd.

I am tired of being put on the defensive by these jugglers of jaundiced views by their slight of hand with the language. In order to refute not by logic , only emotion the stands they take by twisting the tongue of the land into an inclusive nightmare of buzz words. Invent a new word for a perversion that sounds quaint than holler bigotry when people will not play along in this mind game.

Suck lemons libs. You seeded this bed of contaminate. Live with it. I for one don’t go along with your little games anymore. I will speak as I feel with the words intent & meaning, not the liars made up language of the left. You changed the meaning of these terms, deal with it!!! Why should we use your usage? Really why?

Greg in Dallas:
"By the time it's over, there's been so much ink and so much discussion that Edwards and the word faggot have been used together to the point of memorialization."

You are right Greg,it is having that effect.

That's exactly how Bob Rae got stuck with the "crypto-communist' label by Barbara Amiel when she wrote her Toronto Sun column during premier Rae's days in Ontario.

Hi Joe,
yeah, this modern publicity machine is so huge and unwieldy it's not surprising that some sharp people have learned how to use it.

This is the same Anne Coulter who insisted Canada had troops in Vietnam - actual troops not those in the army who happened to be Canadian
From Wiki:
Coulter received some criticism for a statement she made on CBC television's the fifth estate, an investigative journalism program. During an interview by host Bob McKeown, Coulter said, "Canada used to be...one of our most...most loyal friends, and vice versa. I mean, Canada sent troops to Vietnam. Was Vietnam less containable and more of a threat than Saddam Hussein?" McKeown contradicted her with, "No, actually Canada did not send troops to Vietnam." After both had insisted repeatedly, the exchange ended with Coulter's saying, "Well, I’ll get back to you on that."[64] This was afterward characterised by Keith Olbermann on Countdown as an instance of "...Coulter humiliating herself on national TV...[but]...this time...on Canadian national TV."[65] On the February 18, 2005 edition of Washington Journal, Coulter sought to justify her statement by referring to the roughly 10,000 Canadians who volunteered for the American armed forces, and thus fought in Vietnam, stating:[64]

"Yes, 10,000 Canadian troops, at least. There is a War Memorial to them, at least for most of that. The Canadian Government didn't send troops [...] but [...] they came and fought with the Americans. So I was wrong. It turns out there were 10,000 Americans who happened to be born in Canada. .... I didn't believe [McKeown] because I had read about Canadian troops in Vietnam. I was right. People keep saying: "Well, he didn't tell you that they — 10,000 troops ran across to sign up with the American forces." I don't think he knew! He's a bubblehead, Ted Baxter.[65][66]

, and who has made previous outrageous statements and then said she was trying to be funny when voices of opposition were raised. I would be more comfortable if she was not used as the "voice of the right"as she tend to hurt, more than help the cause.
By the way if she wants to be shrill about something try Building 18 at Walter Reed Hospital where the generals are blaming the injured soldiers for the rats and cochroaches - a story which has been strangely avoided by many in the blogosphere.

I am no fan of extremes on either side and the likes of Miss Coulter to not help.

Bazoo and mazbot:

Both of you must have reading comprehension problems, since I never claimed Coulter "couldn't" call people names; that "dissent" should be stifled. Let her keep on yapping...it will just add to the video proof I provided that she IS an idiot. It also speaks volumes about the supporters of such an ignoramus.

Really, you're just seeing the beginnings of the Democratic field being narrowed down.

Edwards is not in it seriously anyway. He wants publicity that national candidacy can bring. (Think of the character Bobby in Hollywood North -- not quite big enough to play in the big leagues, but sometimes you can fake it.)

And the Clintons have now leaked that Obama's family had slaves.

So by the time this thing shakes out, we'll only be left with the real candidates.

Watch this one from a sexually challenged individual. 3w.youtube.com/watch?v=hxR8f_OOhwQ

Greg in Dallas:

So by the time this thing shakes out, we'll only be left with the real candidates.

I agree but as an aside. Who chooses the choices for the electorate. Seems too me in North America its the press for the most part with back room deals by old politico's. Harper is an actual political aberration.

One of the few real populists with principles like Ronald Reagan who ever got in. Not that they will never have had or did have their failures as I am sure Harper will. These guys are human after all.

I don't know Greg but it seems to me the best candidates are never heard of, while the big names are shunted forward.

In other words whoever spreads their metaphoric legs apart for anyone's agenda with money or power, gets the most support. Than its up to the people to pick what left of the leavings for a Leader. Incumbents like the insane Martha ,seem to just keep riding the same old phony pony to power.

I pray I am wrong completely. Just can't shake the thought though. Perhaps you can illuminate this conjecture more aptly than I.

Anyone.....ANYONE who reacts to Coulters comment about Edwards is....A FAGGOTT.

How many of you really want to be associated with the views of Ann Coulter, her flamboyant and offensive style notwithstanding?

I think theres a very good reason behind why she was kicked off the most respected conservative journal, the National Review. She lacks class, she lacks tact, and she certainly lacks anything that might amount to decency. I read the Review and it most certainly is better than the rest in its class, and I daresy it is far better off without her. NR did the right thing by drawing a line and kicking her out for crossing it. She contributes precious little in terms of value - most of her stuff is bluster that doesnt help with anything.

She called him a "faggot". What exactly did she achieve? And how is it helpful in any way to public and political discourse?

No Iberia. You have the reading proplem. I did not say you could not call her an "ignorant cow". I asked why you could call names against the people you dislike and those you dissagree with should not. Do Liberals have the franchise on name calling and slander? What was the point of your post? Are you just yapping?

Bazoo:

"So it's OK for you to call Coulter an "ignorant cow" but she cannot call Kerry a "faggot" ?"

"I asked why you could call names against the people you dislike and those you dissagree with should not."

Show me where I wrote that Coulter shouldn't be allowed to call anyone names. Show me where I called myself a Liberal.

This thread was about the fallout of Ms. Coulter calling Mr. Edwards a "Faggot". You must have thought she was wrong to do this, and you implied as much in your post. Yet in doing so, you called her an "ignorant cow" and in a later post an "ignoramus" If am wrong in this assumption your post has no point. Once again I ask why can you call names and yet you chastize others like, Ms. Coulter, that do the same. Your Liberal bend is obvious.

...and to think i used the word faggot on THIS website and got nuked by cjunk?

What in tarnation does Obama or Gore have to do with Coulter being a bigot? None, that's what.

Actually, Time (and presumably other outlets as well) reported the claim that Obama descended from Jefferson Davis (which has since been determined to be probably untrue) three years ago. This particular version of the story first appeared in the mainstream Baltimore Sun and has a fair number of hits on Google News, so I don't see any MSM coverup.

I do like the name of Obama's ancestor: George Washington Overall.

Revnant Dream, I know what you mean. It's very hard not to be cynical.

Well, down here in the US, you probably understand, our parties' candidates are selected by the primary process.

I won't try to describe it, as it would be easier to look it up on the internet.

The only thing that I can say that might not be obvious in Canada is that the Clintons control the primary process for the Democratic Party.

Anything the candidates say now about the opposite party is really designed to affect primary voters in their own party. Because right now, the candidates are trying to get the nomination in their own party, and what's going on in the other party is not their main focus.

Since the Clintons control the Democratic primaries, all the other Democratic candidates has better watch their backs.

She Barks and She Bites!

ALEX - "Ann's just stupid, plain and simple. Any respect I may have had for her disappeared when I got to witness the spectacle of her trying to disprove evolution. This latest outburst doesn't surprise me at all."

Not stupid just narrowly focussed! Her blind adherence to social conservative ideology is as offensive as the leftoid liberalism demonstrated by hordes of moonbat snipes we hear from daily!

However I get her place in the scheme of current political discourse (such as it is) guess there must be a need for a sort of Doberman Bitch to act as a media attack dog! Counterbalance to liberal moonbat shriekers!

Bazoo:

You definitely have a comprehension problem. I question your deductive abilities also. The "point" of my post is to imply that Coulter is an ignorant, loud mouthed idiot. I also provided video proof of this. I did not chastize her for name calling. In fact, I have no problem with it whatsoever. She is free to make an idiot of herself as much as she wants. As I am free to point her idiocy out to people like you.

Greg in Dallas :

Thanks for your insight. (O:}

This is what Ann actually said:

“I’d say something about John Edwards, but if you say ‘faggot’ you have to go to rehab.”

She is talking about word rehab....a form of counselling leftie psychologists demanded Michael Richards (Kramer) enter when he called blacks "niggers" in a comedy routine.

Ann was playing on this to show how utterly inane the Left is. I saw a Psychologist on O'Relly, in absolute sincerity, talking about word rehab for people who do not speak politically correct. This Psychologist also recommended Bush needed word rehab for saying Obama was "articulate"!

I personally think politics needs a few more Ann Coulters to counteract Moonbat idiocy.

Revnant Dream's post of 2:19PM
Couldn't agree with you more. You have captured the essence of this whole debate.

Weekly Standard Scrapbook: Lefty site has 60x more profanity than FR [Free Republic]

This may or may not come as a surprise, but there's more profanity on "The Internets" than in traditional media. Lots more. The enterprising blogger Patrick Ishmael (newsbuckit.blogspot.com) did an, excuse the pun, quick and dirty analysis of the ideological divide in online trash-talking. Make that, ideological chasm. He did a Google search for comedian George Carlin's famous "seven dirty words" on popular lefty and righty blogs.

Lefty Daily Kos took top honors with 146,000 pages containing one or more of the words in question.

Its lefty competitor, The Huffington Post, was close behind with 109,000. No right-wing site reached even 10,000 on the Carlin scale.

A commenter at the site refined the methodology to account for overall site size, finding a "'7 words' to pages" ratio of "1 profanity every 2 pages" for Daily Kos and "1 every 121 pages" for the Free Republic ("the foulest" of the righty sites). The study "isn't scien tific," Ishmael warns, "but hey, it's pretty @*%#$&! close." ...-
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1794510/posts

And Hillary is a Dyke.

Iberia: So it's OK for you to call Coulter an "ignorant cow" but she cannot call Kerry a "faggot" ? In your world only you left wingers are allowed to call people names and label them. That's what you substitute for logical and rational disscussion of issues.

The fruit fly sized brain of those on the left severly limits any capacity for reason and the digestion of facts, so what do they have left other than feelings and name-calling?

Those on the right have reason, facts and name-calling too. And it seems the name calling is particularly effective against leftoid feelings.

I can not speak to John Edward's choice of sexual partners but I'm some pissed that the anti-Catholic rant that his henchmen, sorry henchwomen,went on got almost zero coverage. Move along, no bias here, move along.

She could have just said that he was "Light in his loafers" if they don`t light the term faggot!

If Ann Coulter's comments were on a comedy channel, that might be funny. But I personally am not amused with gutter politics as it does nothing to come up with answers to the challenges government and all of us face.

Damn, I wish that Ann Coulter had said something anti-Semitic to a cop. She'd be out of our hair by now.

Language, eh. The "Green Police", eh? Such much language; the power of language.

Green Police! The ultimate end of those who dissent: Step One: Arrest by the Green Police, read Political Correctness-Language Police. Step Two: The Final Solution, Death.

Today, the Green Global Warming Police, are stalking the lands. The next step?

The Green Police: a product of the left-liberals and socialism. ...-

"The Franks, the Van Daans and dentist Albert Dussell live above a shop in Amsterdam and hide from the Green Police, who are combing the city for Jews."

The Diary of Anne Frank ( 1959 ) ...-
http://www.tvo.org/TVOsites/WebObjects/TvoMicrosite.woa?snam

She's lucky she said it in the US. here in canada she could get nailed for a hate crime, a guy in Quebec got a $3000 fine for calling a faggot, a fi fee.

"
I personally think politics needs a few more Ann Coulters to counteract Moonbat idiocy.
Posted by: Gypsy "

Yeah we all know that old saying:
Fight fire with fire, and moonbats with idiot bigots?

It would seem that many of the minority groups that have evolved in tha last decade are converging into a single large coalition which we could give the PC name of "PEOPLE OF THIN SKIN". "Get over it" , find something more important to fight about kids.

I see THE USUAL hysterical over-reaction by the media and politically correct types to someone who is deliberately pushing their buttons.

Fudge, even the homosexuals are calling each other faggot, as the blacks are saying nigger.

What is it with politically correct language definers that only non-white straights can use certain words?

irwin daisy:

Nice to see that you're back to demonstrate your lack of comprehension skills.

"So it's OK for you to call Coulter an "ignorant cow" but she cannot call Kerry a "faggot" ?"

Here is my comment from 5:13pm: "I did not chastize her for name calling. In fact, I have no problem with it whatsoever."

Then you go on: "Those on the right have reason, facts and name-calling too."

Well, at least you got the name-calling part right.

"Obviously, it is NOT okay to call a homosexual a faggot"

Why not? I grew up with this word and it was a descriptive noun, not an insult. Hey, I could even be a faggot myself, although I am not. I don't think faggots themselves are upset by the label, rather like the modern nigger.

We are talking of PC talk here. And these conflabs merely demonstrate how rediculous the PC talk is.

"I don't think faggots themselves are upset by the label, rather like the modern nigger.

So the next time you see some black guys, go up to them and say "How's it going, niggers," or try something similar with gay guys, then come back and write about the response you got.

Insults and harrassment are defined as such by the person on the receiving end.

Revnant Dreams, Je suis d'accord la.

"Kirsten Powers demonstrates what an ignorant cow Ann Coulter really is:"

Your original post with no pretext or explanation, leaving only one conclusion - which you later attempted to change, when challenged on your own obvious hypocrisy.

And then,

"Well, at least you got the name-calling part right."

Which only further proves your hypocrisy, which is the only thing to 'comprehend' from your retarded comments.

Iberia, Ann is being deliberately outragous to get the attention of the idiot liberals, who also run the MSM.

And she got it.

A woman with balls when so many left head-tilting men do not have same.

Political Correctness

"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." ...-

lberia said:

"By psychopolitics our chief goals are effectively carried forward. To produce a maximum of chaos in the culture of the enemy is our first most important step. Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust, economic depression and scientific turmoil. ... With it you can erase our enemies as insects... Use the courts, use the judges, use the Constitution of the country, use its medical societies and its laws to further our ends. ... And bring to Earth, through Communism, the greatest peace Man has ever known." Lavrenti Beria, Lenin University, in a 1933 address to a group of American/Marxist Psychology Students....-

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1794741/posts

Iberia

you said:

"So the next time you see some black guys, go up to them and say "How's it going, niggers," "

Well, you go up to some black guys and listen to how they talk to each other, at present. I know of what I am taking. Hey, I may even be a nigger myself.

You sick lefties want to persecute people for mere words.

irwin:

I think I figured you out...you're a friggin' drunk. Nothing else explains your lack of comprehension skills, your illogic and your inability to make a coherent point.

Let me make it simple for you: I think Coulter is an idiot; I provided video examples; and, I wrote that I have no problem with her insults, because they just highlight her idiocy.

Now, go back to your bottle.

wimpy:

Cry about it all you want, harrassment and insults are judged as such by the person on the receiving end. If blacks want to call themselves niggers and gays want to call themselves queers, and they're ok with it, then that's their business. You are too cowardly to try and do what I suggested, so now you're trying to hide behind bluster about the left. Blah, blah, blah.

Hey mazbot:

That's a pretty good quote. Since communism doesn't exist anymore, it very neatly sums up what right-wingers are trying to do to society..."Use the courts, use the judges, use the Constitution of the country, use its medical societies and its laws to further our ends..."

I think I figured you out...you're a friggin' drunk.

You've crossed a line, my friend. A big one.

Cut the name calling; and settle down. One warning is all you get.

Who is more vile?

Republican Ann Coulter said this:

"I’d say something about John Edwards, but if you say ‘faggot’ you have to go to rehab.”

Democrat Bill Maher said this:

http://newsbusters.org/stories/maher_sorry_cheney_assasination_attempt_failed.html

Ann sounds pretty tame!

If Ann Coulter ever got a hold of the Liberal Party of Canada they would be shrieking for an apology for the next hundred years!

Iberia Go back a bit and read the last post from maz2(7:54). It is exactlly what all the "special"
interest leftey groups are doing to this country. Kick started by Peier Trudeaue and his socialist bullshit.Wake up man.

lberia: "Since communism doesn't exist anymore ..."

Are you saying that it is dead?

Rob C:

Let's see...in the US, since 1970, the so-called left-wing had veto power for 12 out of 37 years. In Britain, Conservatives held power from 1970-1974 and 1979-1997. Canada only had 8 or so years of Conservative leadership. But you're kidding yourself if you think Chretien or Martin could even remotely be considered left-wing. So, in general, the English speaking west has had right-wing, business friendly governments for most of the last four decades.

Yet, somehow everything that has gone wrong is the fault of the left. Who the hell is running things? Special interest lefty groups? Yeah, sure! Give your head a shake.

ural:

The Red, is dead...for now. What exists is "communist" in name only.

Ann Coulter,

Not the smartest woman in the world, but still pretty smart ...

She knows that 75% of people will see this comment as being pretty tame; the other 25% will respond in a much worse fashion.

You see this kind of action all the time in sports ... A player will play a little dirty against a player they know has a temper; eventually the player with the temper retaliates and gets a penalty.

Ann's just stupid, plain and simple.
Kirsten Powers demonstrate what an ignorant cow Ann Coulter really is
Coulter is an abomination to any form of civic discourse
The "point" of my post is to imply that Coulter is an ignorant, loud mouthed idiot.
Comments like this soar in intellect, superior clarity and power.
Now everybody rest, there is no more to say.
Gypsy, your observation is exactly right on, notwithstanding the comment by the person from the socialist paradise, who really doesn’t know what he is saying, merely following the Diktat of his Dear Leaders.

Ann did not say Edwards is a faggot. What she said was, I wanted to say something about Edwards. You have to go to rehab if you use the word faggot. The implication is there, but it was two distinct sentences. Wonder what the msm think when Gov Rommey got the most support in the staw vote the gathering, and McCain was #5. Guess all that talk about his religion is backfireing. Lots of LDS members in the USA to support him. As for Ann getting booted from the Nat Review, it was something she said on her new TV show which may or may not become a series with Fox. Watch the sunday talk shows in the US as I am sure this will be played over and over again.

"Cut the name calling; and settle down. One warning is all you get.
Posted by: Paul at March 3, 2007 9:35 PM "

Priceless... in a thread praising Ann Coulter.

"Cut the name calling; and settle down. One warning is all you get.
Posted by: Paul at March 3, 2007 9:35 PM "

Isnt that the same word nazi that nuked my comments?

Kate you should do something about this totalitarian before he destroys your rep.

"I think I figured you out...you're a friggin' drunk."

Iberia, you didn't respond to my charge, obviously because you couldn't. Therefore the charge remains.

Calumny and ad hominem are not a defence. All you have done is proven your own ineptitude and intellectual rot. You are attempting to punch above your weight class and have been bloodied beyond repair. But like a fool, you keep coming back to be bloodied more. It seems your preferred colour isn't so much red as it is black and blue.

But I will continue to enjoy indulging you.

*Iberia: So it's OK for you to call Coulter an "ignorant cow" but she cannot call Kerry a "faggot" ?

Posted by: irwin daisy at March 3, 2007 6:07 PM

*Here is my comment from 5:13pm: "I did not chastize her for name calling. In fact, I have no problem with it whatsoever."

Posted by: lberia at March 3, 2007 7:22 PM

*Let me make it simple for you: I think Coulter is an idiot; I provided video examples; and, I wrote that I have no problem with her insults, because they just highlight her idiocy.

Posted by: lberia at March 3, 2007 8:58 PM

Seriously irwin, WTF is wrong with you? There is a written record of comments, why are you making things up?

It appears that you have the same problem that Coulter has...and just because you say you're right doesn't make it so.

The Truthiness in this thread is enough to make a liar do a doubletake.

"*Iberia: So it's OK for you to call Coulter an "ignorant cow" but she cannot call Kerry a "faggot" ?"

This I quoted from another commentor. However, his assumption was right. You did not qualify your statement, leaving only one conclusion.

In response, you backpeddled in an attempt to change what you meant. I called you on it and you responded with ad hominem. None of this was "made up" other than your ungrounded and inflammatory attacks on myself.

And you continue - "It appears that you have the same problem that Coulter has..." Whatever that means.

As I said, I will continue to enjoy adding to your new colours.

I don't get this fixation on Ann Coulter's intelligence.

I have to say that down here in the States all this petulant screaming and denunciation of her intelligence is relegated to the immature.

We would regard this desperate attempt at demeaning her intelligence as being at the level of some 8th grade girl who thinks she should have won the spelling bee.

You know, down here someone can open a string of gas stations and become a socially prominent patron of the arts.

I regard myself as a semi-literate non-academic who has probably been hit in the head too many times.

Coulter was smart enough to get through law school, to work for a Supreme Court justice, to promote herself into the rank of prominent spokeswoman and best-selling authoress.

This might not mean that she's as bright as Einstein or Hayek or Stephen Hawkings, but you gotta figure she's a pretty bright woman.

With cjunk at the helm of this website it more and more resembles myblahg. GO FIGURE.

A conservative bigot. Where's the news?

Iberia you are yourself a faggot and with any luck someone will do to you what you have coming. God is watching, you sick deviant.

"I think I figured you out...you're a friggin' drunk."

You've crossed a line, my friend. A big one.

This from penny, who goes on to say:

Iberia you are yourself a faggot and with any luck someone will do to you what you have coming. God is watching, you sick deviant.

Her line is bigger than Iberia's line.

Well, Dr. Dawg, I guess you never know what sets some people off. No point discussing this topic any more...too many people are starting to lose it.

"I guess you never know what sets some people off. No point discussing this topic any more...too many people are starting to lose it."

You can't help destroying yourself can you iberia? If there's anything your comments on this thread prove, it's that you are thoroughly a hypocrite - as previously charged.

And what's this dawg? "Her line is bigger than iberia's line." A schoolyard case of na-nana-na-na? What a stunted and pathetic comment.

Both of you do not rationally argue an issue. Rather you both irrationally come here to pick fights and then lose as usual. Winning no friends, respect or consideration. Casting insults on your way out the door.

Both poster moonbats for the ignorant left. And tremendous examples for political fence sitters to flee from in the opposite direction.

Keep up the good work.

Gypsy, the incident to which Coulter is refering is not Richards but Isaiah Washington who refered to a fellow cast member as a "little faggot." ABC forced him to go to rehab. So now we go to rehab for unpleasant ideas. Sounds like the old Soviet "psikhushka" misuse of mental health facilities.

There's a particular twist in that we have a black guy blatantly homophobic -- which used to be ok, like blacks were permitted to be antisemitic -- but I guess being a TV star removes some priveleges.

As for Coulter, a careful examination of the video shows she didn't actually call Edwards, whom I despised for his past legal work which includes channeling a fetus's thoughts in court, a "faggot." She HAD to have known, though, that what she did would cause contraversy, there being no such thing as bad publicity for an author.

Actually Bear, she fell back on her usual defense - it was only a joke. She has used this defense many times before, and like with the boy that cried wolf it is growing old.
She is smart, this is all about selling books, and Ann!

Actually Bear, she fell back on her usual defense - it was only a joke. She has used this defense many times before, and like with the boy that cried wolf it is growing old.
She is smart, this is all about selling books, and Ann!

Charles Darwin said that if evolution were true the evidence for it would be in the fossil record; there should be thousands of intermediary species. Can anybody name some?

Horses, Harry -- one of the best documented fossilized evidence of evolution from collie-sized toed animals to big modern hoofed horses.