sda2.jpg

December 10, 2006

CWB: We're "Not Accountable" To Wheat Producers

Last evening, CTV's Jill Macashon did a segment (web version) on the Canadian Wheat Board debate that had all the depth of a sixth grade book report. Watch it if you like. About all you'll "learn" is that Alberta wants the monopoly gone, while Saskatchewan and Manitoba farmers function as a Borg collective.

But here's a neat tidbit a reader sent along a few days ago, contained in a this 2005 federal court document: Renova Holdings Ltd. et al. v. The Canadian Wheat

The plaintiffs argued "that the Board issued direct export licences for wheat to producers outside of the designated area and that the revenue from the direct export sales by those producers did not become a part of the pooled revenue from sales held for all who farmed in the designated area and provided wheat for the Board to sell. However, and this is the crux of the cause of action, the Board incurred expenses in granted the direct export licences which it then, wrongfully in the view of the Plaintiffs, deducted from the pooled sales proceeds account held for all producers of wheat in the designated area."

In the CWB statement of defence:

[3] The Defendants seek to strike out the Statement of Claim on the basis that the Board is accountable only to Parliament and that neither the Board nor the Crown owe any duty to or are accountable to the Plaintiffs as producers of wheat.

Posted by Kate at December 10, 2006 12:42 PM
Comments

Stephane Dion has announced that if elected, he will "reinstate" the Canadian Wheat Board should the Conservatives dismantle its monopoly as promised.

Posted by: Big Jack Attack at December 10, 2006 1:36 PM

Had a very short discussion with a 65 year old farmer friend just this morning. Imagine that!

He was pro Wheat Board. He figured Cargill was just waiting to go one on one with producers. The ever popular divide and conquer tactic.

He didn't feel the free market would pay as well as some hoped. Somehow large southern Alberta producers would do well, but didn't elaborate as to how. It was not a very in depth discussion mainly cause I have no background knowledge of CWB duties and activities.

Two sides to every issue I guess.

Posted by: eastern paul at December 10, 2006 1:40 PM

I heard the Senators arguing with the Accountability act for making the WB exempt from the Act. The Senator was saying that the WB was NOT accountable to parliament because it was an independent arms length outfit. This statement refutes that statement. Hummm??? Why are all the Liberano$ in both Houses of parliament terrified (hysterical!!) that these secret accounts might be cracked open for all to see? the bouncing bunny Easter is going sideways in QP. Don't they know that everyone sees their panic and wonders why they are so emotional about 'protecting' farmers in the Wild West (which they despise).

'Me thinks that (they) doth protest too much'

Posted by: Jema54 at December 10, 2006 1:48 PM

Canadian Wheat Board - Producer Payment Options
Cargill AgHorizons, as a representative of the Canadian Wheat Board, brings you a variety of Producer Payment Options to help you make the right pricing decision for your Canadian Wheat Board grain. Consider one of the Producer Payment Options to help you manage risk, provide control over cash flow and potentially increase your net return.
Cargill is already a part of the CWB so that farmers argument is a moot point!

http://www.cargillaghorizons.ca/grain/payment_options.shtm
Creating a marketing plan is the first step in the process, and Cargill AgHorizons Farm Marketing Representatives are available to assist you in determining the best combination of Producer Payment Options for your operations. For more information on Producer Payment Options, go to the Canadian Wheat Board website at http://www.cwb.ca/en/contracts/index.jsp.

Posted by: George at December 10, 2006 1:57 PM

Wasn't the head of CWB on Newmans show this week complaing about parliament giving directions to the board?

Great post Kate.Just threw the whole political interference bull out the window for the Lib's.

Posted by: paulsstuff at December 10, 2006 2:04 PM

Not too early to name it...let's see:
Boondoggle...taken
Scam...taken
Cover up ...well used
How about Wheat Board Shaft?

Posted by: vf at December 10, 2006 2:08 PM

"Renova v. CWB", is not about CWB marketing in the west. Its about the separate Part IV national licencing that the CWB does for the federal government as required by the Act. It was put into the Act in 1947, and access to information internal documents describe it as a tariff or export/import tax with the money to go to the government and the costs to be paid by government.

Part IV is the same, but the CWB now claims it mandates and describes the buy-back in the west, and they make prairie farmers pay the Part IV costs.

Farmers in the East are granted licences for free, while the farmers in the west, who can't get the licences, must pay the costs.

Posted by: John at December 10, 2006 2:13 PM

Not being a wheat farmer or a farmer of any kind, this whole wheat board smacks of nothing but political interference designed to give a monopoly to eastern wheat growers. Perhaps it is more complicated than that, but to this outside observer......give breaks to farmers from eastern Canada at the expense of farmers from western Canada. Sounds so very Liberal.

Posted by: odie441 at December 10, 2006 2:20 PM

It's obviously a big deal for the Eastern farmers. Why else would the likes of Wayne Easter be up in the House yelling his guts out on the subject?
Steffawn Deeyawn doesn't know his ass from page four on the subject either.
The Liberals don't consult, they cater to their Eastern base and to hell with the West.

Posted by: Liz J at December 10, 2006 2:36 PM

".........that neither the Board nor the Crown owe any duty to or are accountable to the Plaintiffs as producers of wheat."

And that's exactly what's wrong with the whole system. Consider, if you will, if there are any producers under any circumstances, who would agree to trust the marketing of their products to an organization which is wholly unaccountable to them. If anyone were to propose this type of arrangement in private business, they would be laughed out of the place. It's entirely ludicrous.

And if the CWB does consider themselves not accountable to producers, what type of internal behaviour might this have given rise to? We can only know that if we could have the CWB audited.

Posted by: WildRose at December 10, 2006 2:37 PM

Love it...CWB..commie Canada..the sheeple shall reign.

Posted by: Justthinkin at December 10, 2006 2:41 PM

What Dion has done is send a message to Quebec as well Ontario.

By disparaging the West & coming on like a bull in rut. He has essentially said. The West is of no matter anymore. Its back to Quebec being the big cheese. Ontario feels safe knowing its politics as usual without wild eyed Albertans. With presents looted from the only real producing Province to ease the pressure on the East by theft of Western money & resources. Including this indentured servitude known as the CWB. Which of course they would never allow happen to real Canadians out East.

Very shrewd plan of conquest. Give hope to Ontario there Empire is whole. While bringing back those issues they understand. Like appeasing Quebec with Albertan money. With there “Natural born governing party” of loons& crooks.

This was a call for yesterday’s Canada. It may work.

With "Nice guy Ed now in power in Alberta. Dion believes there will be no fears of an Albertan defection. With the win of the Democrats down South, they feel this will boost there chances in the East. Hence the DEAN scream at the convention.

This was what was implied with cheers. The Libs believe they will be back in power soon. Who can say they will not, with these new factors? Its why all the old guard where there like sharks in the front row with him. The MSM was beside themselves with joy. Particularly at Honest Ed’s Election. The Star was dizzy with elation of this.

Alberta just may have voted its own demise. If the left is that happy, I would worry.

Dion signaled his intention to loot Alberta with the rest of the West by his tough talk. This make hearts glow in Ontario & Quebec. Qubecer’s being cagey voters will see there meal ticket secure under Dion.

This is just speculation, which I hope is wrong. I fear not. To my fellow Albertans, you where played bubba.

Just my opinion

Posted by: Revnant Dream at December 10, 2006 2:42 PM

Dion has no idea about anything to do with the west, he thinks he will get rural votes in Ontario, and has basically written Alberta off. He obviously thinks we will just bow down and continue to take it. Well we are different, he will find this out. The east may have a bigger voter base, but the west has the power. Manufacturing is tanking in Ont. and Que., it's the west keeping this country alive for now.

Posted by: Hunter at December 10, 2006 3:46 PM

30% of Albertans voted for Morton. That support will increase if the liberals try another NEP brainchild like a carbon tax, etc. Alberta farmers want the CWB gone as a monopoly. Drive around the fields this summer and see how many that used to grow wheat and barley and now into non WB crops. What if Alberta farmers decided not to seed any wheat this year. Could happen. All I predict is if Dion ever becomes PM, and tries to take what is Albertas, he will find out that when we talk separation, we mean it. We will not blackmail canada like quebec has for years, taking our money and resourses. It is Ont and Que that better wake up. Dion and liberals are not their saviour. We need an audit of the CWB books, the sooner the better. Liberals are afraid of that as it will be worse than adscam ever was. Maybe farmers should go after the full pymt of wheat that was sold to Britain to finance the war, which they turned around and sold at world prices. If natives,can go after treaty money etc for things signed over 100 years ago, head tax can be paid back, Arar can blackmail us for millions, why not pay the farmers for all that wheat sold 60 years ago. I still think the next federal election will be the last in the Canada we now have. Vote que out of canada.

Posted by: maryT at December 10, 2006 3:48 PM

Opponents of the Canadian Wheat Board Meet to Strategize With Chuck Strahl
http://www.danheller.com/images/UnitedStates/Nevada/LasVegas/Misc/ferengi-big.jpg

Posted by: leftdog at December 10, 2006 3:50 PM

In any commodity business, excepting grain growers in the West, you can sell your product to an aggregator of your choice. Or you can sell it on your own. The CWB situation is plainly inconsistent with democracy.

Beaker has picked a really bad hill to die on. My guess right now is that he isn't planning some sort of Machivellian "bash the west" strategy. He really is that clueless.

Beaker's got a big shock coming.

Posted by: Bart F. at December 10, 2006 3:59 PM

The 65 year old farmer in the above post is typical of many of that age. They grew up in an era of big government socialism and loath anything that would reform some of the institutions of that era like the CWB. Being from a rural area, I know many people like this; they are basically closet socialists.

Like people his age, they often don't farm very much land, and are often renters as opposed to full-time farmers. Nonetheless, they get a vote in the CWB that is completely out of proportion to what they contribute to the market. Western Canadian agriculture cannot continue to be held hostage to these leftist, parochial interests if it expects to grow and prosper.

The CWB election results were announced today. Unfortunately, pro-choice candidate Dwayne Anderson lost. However, a candidate who appears to be pro-choice (it's somewhat unclear from his biography) unseated single-desk dinosaur Art Macklin. So the balance of power essentially remains unchanged.

Farmers will continue to be threatened with jail if they dare to cross the border with a harmless load of wheat. The years of shame continue unabated.

Posted by: Dennis at December 10, 2006 4:08 PM

"CTV's Jill Macashon did a segment (web version) on the Canadian Wheat Board debate that had all the depth of a sixth grade book report."

Kate:

You never know with journalists whether they do things that way because they're just not that bright or because they think we're not that bright.

Many years ago, while on a military course, a Canadian Forces public affairs officer with a lot of media experience gave me some great advice about reporters:

Remember you're just another news assignment; the guy who's interviewing you for the local paper this morning probably has to cover a dog show this afternoon.

Posted by: JJM at December 10, 2006 4:13 PM

P.S. "maryT's" tirades are becoming increasingly wearifying in my view.

She carps away about "dual citizens" like M. Dion but then goes off on a full-scale Albertan separatist rant.

Having (presumably) only Canadian citizenship, doesn't seem to have made "maryT" any more patriotic or loyal about our country.

Posted by: JJM at December 10, 2006 4:30 PM

They screw up dog show reporting, too.

Posted by: Kate at December 10, 2006 4:39 PM

I wish you prairie farmers would get a handle on that CWB. You keep selling your grain so cheap to Rogers Flour that we can't compete with you and we only live a mile from the mill.

Posted by: Stewart at December 10, 2006 4:49 PM

Dear JJM 4:30

I am not a separtist Albertan nor is the ill-advised dual citizenship hole Dion has dug himself into my problem.

However I will assert that Dion displays an ignorance of western Canada that exceeds any federal leader I have seen in my lifetime. Including Trudeau, Layton, and Duceppe. I hope it's just "early returns".

If Dion, as he has pledged to, comes riding out of the east on his horse next year planning to impose wellhead carbon taxes and assert CWB monopolies there will be big trouble. And it won't matter whether the motivation is ignorance or something worse.

And I suspect we would agree that the last thing we need in Canada is a second national unity problem.

Posted by: Bart F. at December 10, 2006 4:59 PM

[3] The Defendants seek to strike out the Statement of Claim on the basis that the Board is accountable only to Parliament and that neither the Board nor the Crown owe any duty to or are accountable to the Plaintiffs as producers of wheat.


Shut the f**K up and get back on the combine.

Nice.


Syncro

Posted by: Syncrodox at December 10, 2006 5:09 PM

JJM: I am crying crocadile tears, you don't like me. FYI, I am eligible for citizenship in 2 other countries should I wish to apply. That wonderful USA is one of them, and my parents, grandparents and greatgrandparents, on both sides, were US citizens. They come to Canada in 1908, and for some reason never took out cdn citizenship. That is the reason their guns were confiscated during WW1, not cdns. Oh, didn't you know that there has been a law on the books for years re confiscation of guns. That is why Rock said he would never impose it, cause its already there and been used. But, I do have a cdn passport, does that count.

Posted by: maryT at December 10, 2006 5:47 PM

JJM and another thing, I am ALBERTAN first and cdn second. Most Albertans are like me. Didn't use to be that way, but after Trudeau and sucking up to Quebec that changed. Dion needs to gain at least 51 seats, plus hold all he has. He will need the west and Alberta to get them. If he forms a government with just Ont and Que, there will be no Canada other than a land mass on a map.

Posted by: maryT at December 10, 2006 5:54 PM

Dealing with the CWB should be optional, no matter how many farmers support the current monopoly over western producers.

It's like people voting over whether to allow me the right to speak. Sorry, but my freedoms are not subject to a vote.

Posted by: rabbit at December 10, 2006 6:11 PM

The CWB claiming they are not accountable to farmers is nothing new. They have successfully used it several times in court in the past. But in this case it didn't work, and the CWB lost. The difference is that when the CWB sells grain, it is their grain and the Act says they can sell it for whatever they want, and that's how the CWB beat farmers in court in the past.

But once money has been put in the pooling accounts, the Act is very specific about how it is handled and paying national licencing costs from the western pool accounts is not allowed.

There's millions at stake here and it is shameful that our ideological directors have put the interests of self-seving Winnipeg bureaucrats over the interests of prairie farmers. The CWB has appealed and this case is presently under Judicial Review in the Federal Court.

Posted by: John at December 10, 2006 6:32 PM

Steffawn Deeyawn will have to make himself clear, and in English, that's next to impossible.
It's too bad, after all these years in politics he hasn't a better grasp of the English language. It also begs the question, how much does he know about the Country beyond Quebec and Ontario?
Of course we have learned it only matters if English speakers can't master the French.

Posted by: Liz J at December 10, 2006 7:44 PM

Any governemnt that has the power to jail its farmers (which it did a few years ago) in the west for selling their own produce but allow eastern farmers free choice to sell their product, is not fit to govern.
We already have the communist system of health care and the CWB wheat and barley market monopoly in the west is just another example of the communist mentality of the BLOC - heads, ND's and Libs.

Why is the CWB exempt from access to information?

Posted by: Joe Molnar at December 10, 2006 7:52 PM

The amount of dirty laundry hidden in the CWF will make adscam look like chump change.

End the liberano/communist control of our country!!!!

Posted by: FREE at December 10, 2006 8:23 PM

JM, the Lie-beral's exempted the CWB from Access to Information requests, as well as barring the Auditor General from going over the books. What have they been hiding?

Posted by: Bruce Randall at December 10, 2006 8:37 PM

''Dealing with the CWB should be optional, ''
Subsidizing agriculture should be optional, too.

''With presents looted from the only real producing Province.... Revnant Dream .

What do Albertans do, other than occupying real estate overflowing with petro-billions, that other Canadians do not? What do YOU do, Revnant idiot, that other Canadians do not? This contemptuous, asinine, self-righteous sentiment, so pervasive on this site is absolutely disgusting. The sooner Steve and his Alberta yahoos are turfed from power, the better.

Posted by: maryjane at December 10, 2006 9:14 PM

Maryjane, that won't be happening anytime soon. Just you wait until the Auditor General gets to go over the books of Canada Post, the CWB, Via Rail, etc.

Posted by: Bruce Randall at December 10, 2006 9:25 PM

Forgot the foundations BR.

Posted by: Bill D. Cat at December 10, 2006 9:36 PM

maryjane, don't talk too loudly, your in for the unearthing of another big fiasco, compliments of your beloved Liberals.
Listening to the likes of Wayne Easter yelling his guts out on the issue tells us there's something he hopes to cover up.

Posted by: Liz J at December 10, 2006 9:36 PM

maryjane,
Other than lower taxes, get out of the way of the people and let them run their own affairs?

How come the Sask economy is in such great state if it has nothing to do with oil? Sask has huge amounts but their government interferes and stops development.

Lefties with no grasp on reality.
enough

Posted by: enough at December 10, 2006 9:42 PM

So, if I understand this properly, the CWB is utterly unaccountable to those who must sell them their produce. How truly GOD-like, this CWB! I love Socialism! Keeps the peons in their place! The unwashed, the uneducated, the mean-spirited, uppity workers. Yep! Socialism is such a positive thing. Unless you actually work for your daily bread!

Posted by: benning at December 10, 2006 9:42 PM

The people bad mouthing Alberta reminds me of the spoiled brats that have no respect for their parents that supply them with all the money they want with no gratitude.Alberta keeps Canada together with transfer payments.Maybe its time to stop the money and let the rest of Canada grow up.

Posted by: spike 1 at December 10, 2006 10:02 PM

For the uninformed,the CWB does NOT buy our grain.They only sell it for us,and charge a fee for doing it.We dont know,and cant find out what the fee is.What we do know is that they sold wheat to Britain at under world price,the Soviets and when they bought,it was called the Great Grain Robbery,and Iraq at the same time as the AWB. A few years ago the Libs passed legislation to exempt any employee of the CWB from prosecution for any dealings that they may have done on behalf of the CWB.

Posted by: spike 1 at December 10, 2006 10:21 PM

''The people bad mouthing Alberta....."
spike 1

Ya got it backwards, spike. It's Alberta yahoos and their ideological soulmates who are badmouthing everyone else. What do YOU do, BTW?

Posted by: maryjane at December 10, 2006 10:25 PM

Maryjane Where are you, and what DO YOU DO?? other than contribute to global warming with your hot air and the methane from the BS that flows so lieberaly from you head.

Posted by: Rob C at December 10, 2006 10:40 PM

Just to put the economic aspect of the grain trade versus other Canadian trade with the US, the oil company Encana recently announced that they would be shipping 400,000 bbls/day of oil for refining in the US. At $50/bbl, that is $20 million per day crossing the border and nobody in Canada is getting excited. And Ontario essentially had free trade, worth billions of dollars, with the US since the 1965 Autopact.

Contrast that to the jailing of farmers for taking $20 worth of grain across the border. The pathetic CWB, who is no friend of the grain farmer, has been used to make a massive transfer of wealth from Western Canada's grain farmers to their Liberal friends and supporters in central Canada over the last 50 years. That is why the Easter bunny and friends are screaming blue murder.
If free trade is good enough for eastern Canada, then a continental barley and wheat market is good enough for the West, one way or another.
Western Canada, a nation withOUT Ontario and Quebec.
What a couple of boat anchors they have been to Western Canada.

Posted by: rockyt at December 10, 2006 10:42 PM

Bill D. Cat, glad to see you've been attention, that NINE BILLION DOLLARS is just being begged to be audited.

Posted by: Bruce Randall at December 10, 2006 10:53 PM

Spike, You say "the CWB does NOT buy our grain. They only sell it for us...." Seems like you have been listening to the CWB. Its important for those of us opposed to the monopoly to know when they are telling the truth and when they are not. This one is absolute propaganda garbage, it is a legal sale to the CWB.

Section 32. (1) of the CWB Act states: "The Corporation shall undertake the marketing of wheat produced in the designated area in interprovincial and export trade and for that purpose shall
(a) buy all wheat produced in the designated area and offered by a producer for sale and delivery to the Corporation...."

This is also supported by court cases.

Posted by: John at December 10, 2006 11:01 PM

''Maryjane Where are you, and what DO YOU DO??
Rob C''

I am in SK and I work hard for what I have, like the vast majority of my fellow citizens from sea to sea to shining bloody sea. I'm not the one here saying my efforts and my region are the be all and end all of what is productive and worthwhile in this world. YOU and your incessantly whining right-wing fellow travelers are. What do YOU do???

Posted by: maryjane at December 10, 2006 11:36 PM

"I wish you prairie farmers would get a handle on that CWB. You keep selling your grain so cheap to Rogers Flour that we can't compete with you and we only live a mile from the mill."

Nothin' like a little salt...

CWB is accountable to no one, farmer, AG or Parliment. This is one thing the Conservatives MUST fix before calling an election. Could it become a vote of confidence?

Posted by: Cheri at December 10, 2006 11:43 PM

maryjane;I grow wheat in the CWB designated area.I was also a seed grower in that same area so that I could sell my wheat to other farmers as seed and not have to let the CWB sell it for me.John;if thats what has been in court,then you have had a very poor lawyer.The CWB never takes possession of our wheat because if they did then the demurage charges from strikes or labor stoppages would be leveled against the CWB and not taken out of the pool account.When we sell canola to elevator companies and there is a work stoppage,the elevator companies have to absorb the costs and not the farmer as the farmer has sold his canola.

Posted by: spike 1 at December 10, 2006 11:47 PM

I work in that dirty old oil buseness. You know the one that allowes "ABERTA" to support the rest of Canada with equalization money. Oh by the way, which sea is the bloody one ?? Now you run along i am done talking to you now.

Posted by: Rob C at December 10, 2006 11:51 PM

Maryjane never did say what she does but, from her blather, my diagnosis is that she's an urban NDP snivel servant who knows absolutely nothing about either farming or the oil industry.

When I was a lad, maryjane was what we called cannabis. Any connection?

Posted by: Zog at December 11, 2006 12:35 AM

Maryjane, tell me one instance of an Albertan spitting in the face of a Quebecer visiting or working in Alberta, just because they come from Que. like my granddaughter was in that wonderful province of Quebec, just because she was from small town Alberta. They have turned a 19yr old girl against quebec and liberals for life. Thanks to Monte Solbergs office she in now giving away dozens of Cdn flag pins when she gets insulted. She is being devious, pinning them on restaurant bills and other places where they have to at least touch them if they want their money. One can pin one on an idiot when they are not looking. All tho she says the province is beautiful, most of the people she has met are ignorant. Most of them have never heard of any place but que and are very ignorant of the rest of canada. She was in Montreal during the convention and heard some strange stories from delegates staying at the hostel she and her group were in. Some of them are so stupid they are unaware that Alberta and Ont support them. They actually think Que is self supporting.

Posted by: maryT at December 11, 2006 12:45 AM

Maryjane, i suppose your ok with pouring billions into bombardier, air canada, cbc, welfare? and on & on?

I'm not advocateing handouts to farmers, but have you any idea of the amount of money made off farmers or jobs created by them? fuel delivery, grocery stores, grain co's., cn cp rail, caseih, newholland, john deer, direct seeding manufacturers, shiping companys, container co.'s, trucking companys. I could go on.
And evertime someone goes on strike and ships are held up, where do you think they get the demurage charges? Yes sir ree, right out of the farmers pocket(cwb pool account). Is that fare? How about laying the charges at the feet of the people responsable for the delay's (strike), that would be a novel idea. If You want to see bedlem in sask, man. and probably 1/3 alta. just shut down farming!
btw,how many jobs does your profession create mj?... zilch?

jjm, when one end of the country is treated differently than the other it is difficult to remain patriotic. I suggest somone in the east start paying attention, before none is needed!

Posted by: bygeorge at December 11, 2006 1:17 AM

Bwhahahaah..bend over all you socialist nitwits. Recieve the CWB up your butt and enjoy it. Welcome to Canuckistan, the sorryest excuse for a country going

Posted by: Justthinkin at December 11, 2006 3:19 AM

I am a 68 yr old farmer who gave up hope that the CWB would ever be an asset to me or the industry. I have not grown either wheat or barley for 10 years now, and my only regret in that decision is that it took me so long to figure it out. I now grow only non-board grains, not only because of my philosophical view, but also because I make more money. I don't recall what year it was that oats were removed from the jurisdiction of the CWB, but it was done because oats was considered to be specialty niche crop not grown in enough volume to make any money for anybody. Once out from the clutches of the CWB oats is now my best moneymaker, and the oats related "value added" industry has flourished, not to mention the increase in oats export to the U.S.A.

I am able to make full use of futures and options markets with my grains, not like the restricted "choices" the CWB has offered to producers in the last couple of years in an effort to make it look like they are mellowing.

The CWB was conceived in order to keep grain prices low so as to assist GB to recover from the effects of WW2. They have been very successful in their mandate.

Please Mr. Strahl, bring on a dual market before I retire. I might even grow some wheat.

Posted by: Len Pryor at December 11, 2006 3:30 AM

speaking of who is 'accountable' apparently the present ottawa administration feels itself NOT 'accountable' to the canadaian people with regards to the background events leading up to Maher Arar's being dispatched to syria thanks to rcmp misinformation and bungling:

Holland has been demanding tough answers from Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day about how Maher Arar's case was handled by the RCMP, prompting Day to describe him as a "Perry Mason on steroids."

RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli stepped down from his position this week after contradicting himself on what he knew -- and when he knew it -- about Arar's deportation to Syria by U.S. authorities, who "

gee stock baby, maybe we NEED a perry mason 'on steroids' to root out the truth about YOU.

Posted by: bollocks at December 11, 2006 5:08 AM

bollocks... How about someone to root out the PROOF that all these nasty things actually happened to Arar while he was in syria? I am not prepared to accept HIS word about the "alleged torture" before the government gives him a big bag of money to compensate for something that "supposidly" happened under the lieberal watch. If there is physical proof then by all means he should be compensated for the lieberal incompadence untill then I would tend to do as the US and syria did and tell him to pound sand.Did the RCMP and CSIS just pull this guys name out of a hat and say "Lets jerk this one around just for fun"?

Posted by: Rob C at December 11, 2006 6:19 AM

"I am ALBERTAN first and [Canadian] second."

In which case:

1. You confirm that Canada is indeed a "confederation of hyphenated enclaves."

2. Your grumbling at Dion/"Catholic PMs"/Trudeau etc., etc. or indeed anyone who appears to be advancing the interests of Québéc above Canada rings pretty hollow indeed.

Presumably then, it's OK if Alberta comes before Canada but not any other province.

How does that make you any better a Canadian than a Québécois nationalist?

Posted by: JJM at December 11, 2006 7:08 AM

"[W]hen one end of the country is treated differently than the other it is difficult to remain patriotic."

If "patriotism" for you is purely predicated on self-interest, then I would suggest you do not have a firm grip on the concept.

Perhaps you mean "nationalism" instead?

Posted by: JJM at December 11, 2006 7:12 AM

...doncha just love Glasnost?

Posted by: tomax7 at December 11, 2006 7:25 AM

rob c:

time to extricate yourself from the cave.

there are inumerable ways of inflicting torture that dont leave physical evidence. furthermore it was the explicite intent of the americans to send Arar off to syria knowing he would be tortured by the syrians and they, the americans, could claim they didnt do the deed.

theres your proof.

now it your turn to prove the syrians had a policy of allowing any man jack to sashay into their country to check up on political prisoners and prison conditions.

anyone pushing this 'proof' arguement at this point in time when zacardelli admitted the truth did not get out in a timely manner is stuck in their own dark age.

CSIS got their game started by hiring some neo nazi to be an informant whose name escapes me but I certainly dont put a great deal of currency in anything they have to say as far as 'proof' and if 'proof' is the determining factor, where is the 'proof' behind security certificates that by their very nature do not come with any 'proof'.

gawd some people are naive.

Posted by: bollocks at December 11, 2006 8:31 AM

as a farmer i watch the cwb debate with great interest. wheat is a fair price on the world market but we are still getting paid nothing for our product. i was in winnipeg a couple of weeks ago and just thought i would drive to portage and main and see how my money was being spent. the 7 million dollar expansion sure is nice. the wheatboard has nothing to do with delivering a premium to western farmers....it is all about liberal jobs in winnipeg, just drive to portage and main and see the show for yourself. chuck strahl is on the right track, there needs to be a few more firings

Posted by: stubby at December 11, 2006 8:53 AM

No jjm, i mean patriotic. must bother you that the west is becomeing tired of being fleeced. I wonder what you'll call her when she's gone? she wasn't for nationalism? get a grip fella.

Posted by: bygeorge at December 11, 2006 9:15 AM

Spike, First, recognize that there is a difference between OWNERSHIP and POSSESSION. The CWB buys the grain and takes ownership but not possession which usually goes to an elevator company. In the case of buy-backs, there is no change of possession.

As for costs of strikes, etc coming out of the pool accounts, that only affects interim and final payments, and in international court, the CWB claims that interim and final payments are only CWB profits. "In essence, Canada asserts that the latter two payments are in fact and in law a distribution of profits, as opposed to an amount paid for the acquisition of the grain." Case No. CDA-92-1807-01 Canada - United States Free Trade Panel.

Incidently, the panel agreed with Canada on this issue. So the farmer gets only gets "paid" the initial payment, its then the CWB's grain and if the CWB can get a profit selling, the farmer gets a share of the profit. The only incentive for the CWB bureaucrats, who are certain to get paid, is a continuation of the system. This is why they don't want producers to understand what is really going on

Posted by: John at December 11, 2006 9:22 AM

JJM: Thanks for proving Rush Limbaugh right when he states it must be awful to be a liberal and wake up every morning mad. My remarks re the catholic PMs was in response to a question from a reader, who asked who catholic PMs were loyal to. I don't think he knew that we had so many from Que. and their policies were, Que and votes first, then the ROC. It was Trudeau who asked western grain farmers, Why should I sell your wheat, then gave westerners the finger, then the NEP. So, yes, if the question ever came up, Alberta in a Canada with leaders that screw us all the time and kiss ass in Que, I would vote Alberta separation. And if there was ever a national vote re Que, I would vote, kick them out, or at least stop all equalization pymts to that prov from Alberta.

Posted by: maryT at December 11, 2006 9:23 AM

"maryT":

"I would vote Alberta separation."

Well, being born and raised in Canada doesn't seem to have made you any more loyal or committed to our country.

What's the point of requiring immigrants and "dual citizens" to be that way then?

Some example you are.


Posted by: JJM at December 11, 2006 10:03 AM

Yes bollocks there are naive people . You are confirmation of that fact. You have an obvious hatred for this country (and it's poilice forces). Maybe the Conservative "BAD" lieberal"GOOD" syndrome of the left wing socialists? Don't know don't care.If you are OK with Arar being payed off then I will allow YOU to cover my "tax dollar" share of the bill. Now I want you to run along find maryjane and play nice . I am done talking with you .

Posted by: Rob C at December 11, 2006 11:43 AM

I was a loyal Canadian prior to trudeau and the liberals making this a country of muslims for votes. Read why I would vote to separate. Quit using partial stmts. and spreading them as facts. The Canada I and many other westerners were loyal to no longer exists. Sp interest groups have forced their agendas down our throat, not because it was better, just because they could. The kooks started to use words like bigots, facists, homophobes etc to make their pointless claims. The media followed them. We are supposed to tolerate your views but you in turn don't tolerate ours. The kooks denigrated family, religion (except islam), education, marriage and so many other things. Maybe itis time for a memorial service for Canada.

Posted by: maryT at December 11, 2006 1:02 PM

John; as I said before,you didnt have a very good lawyer.The CWB NEVER buys our grain.They give us an initial price and then sells it on our behalf.For goodness sake, next time you take them to court,get Johnie Cochrane or his equal.You may have to pay a million but you will win.Ask O.J.

Posted by: spike 1 at December 11, 2006 9:32 PM

Spike; I have also read court cases about this, I think maybe it was the Sask Wheat Pool v. CWB in the 80's and if memory serves me it was about SWP taxes. But I am not going to take the time to look it up because you wouldn't believe it anyway. The Act is wrong, and the NAFTA panel is wrong, but you're right, because the CWB has told you so. If that's what you want to believe, go ahead.

Posted by: John at December 11, 2006 10:27 PM

One more quick point, Spike. You are familiar with the 'buyback'? How can I possibly buy my grain back from the Board if I have not sold it to the Board in the first place?

Posted by: John at December 12, 2006 12:07 AM

Monopolies breed complacency

Posted by: scott at December 12, 2006 10:32 AM

Until someone gets the Supreme Court to make the Federal Electoral Boundaries Act unconstitutional because it violates Section 15 (equality) of the charter, no one is going to pay attention to the west and their wants and desires. Consequently they will be stuck with laws made to appease the east becasue that is where the seats are. If Alberta and BC had 80 seats to Quebec's 75 seats and PEI was reduced to 2 seats. How long do you think it would take before the politcal nickel would drop? It should be a no brainer for some smart young western lawyer, because all 10 provinces signed into Confederation for representation by population, not a fixed seat count based on a moment in time in the 1970.

Ian
in Nova Scotia

Posted by: Ian at December 12, 2006 4:34 PM

John;thats the whole point,THEY DONT BUY OUR GRAIN!If they did they would be,as an arm of the Dept of Trade and Commerce,responsible for dumurage charges.Dont get me wrong,I think that the CWB was the worst thing to be introduced to Western Canada ever.It just extended the harsh conditions of the 1930's.

Posted by: spike 1 at December 12, 2006 7:37 PM

Ralph Goodforall and his Liberal "Western Haters" have negotiated the end of the great Canadian Wheat Board as of 2013, through negotiations at the WTO.

Why are the Liberals making such a fuss over the CWB changing 6 years earlier than their negotiated end of the CWB.

Seems to me Wayne Easter is not very well informed by his buddies is the Liberal party. His former leadership in the Farmers Union must be still a fog on the old brain. Remember, the NFU represents less than 1% of the farmers of Western Canada and should be disregarded in this debate.

Posted by: Easter Bunny at December 13, 2006 3:02 PM

Spike, the CWB absolutely is Trade and Commerce, based not only on all court rulings but also based on internal government documents that it was intended as legislation under trade and commerce.

Demurage simply means less money to go into the pool account to be the "profits" shared by the farmers. The CWB bureacrats always get paid, leftovers go to farmers, and as you know, taxpayers pay any deficets.

Posted by: John at December 13, 2006 8:07 PM

Spike, one further point all farmers should be aware of is that producer grain is under AGRICULTURE and NOT TRADE AND COMMERCE. Unless you have contracted or offered your grain to the CWB they have no legal claim to it.

Posted by: John at December 14, 2006 12:07 PM
Site
Meter