sda2.jpg

June 17, 2006

The Lactating Taxpayer

During my stint at the CBC Election Roundtable earlier this year, I critiqued Jack Layton's plan for "focused, targeted steps to support creative people and to make sure Canadians see themselves in our culture."

I can't continue. My eyes are bleeding.

And before you, dear reader, object - be advised that I am an artist. In fact, the most common type of artist, a living, breathing, working one of the unheralded "commercial" variety. Unlike our cousins in "the Arts," we manage to make a living at our craft without seeking comfort from the nanny state wet nurse.


I forgot to add - "or offering it.";
The Lactation Station Breast Milk Bar is partly funded by a grant from the Canada Council for the Arts.

That moaning you just heard was the sound of John Williamson curling up in a fetal position on the floor.


Posted by Kate at June 17, 2006 12:01 AM
TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4084

Comments

I would like to MOON Miss Dobkin and thereby "re-contextualizes something often regarded as indecent or repellent, offering a celebratory view".

Posted by: Me No Dhimmi at June 16, 2006 11:40 PM

Breast Milk Bar only in Canada? Pity.

Has this breast milk, which the public will sample, been tested for HIV?

Posted by: Howard Roark at June 16, 2006 11:51 PM

For starters, I'd like proof that the breast milk samples at this Lactation Station Breast Milk Bar are "pasteurized." Breast milk is a bodily fluid which can be healthy, but it can also carry communicable diseases which I'm pretty sure the customers mosying up to this Bar would like to avoid.

Why doesn't it surprise me that the nutbar who came up with this idea is a lesbian? She's already a few feet wide of the maternal plumbline (I maintain that a child for its optimum mental health and development thrives with a mother AND a father, rather than a single mother, or a mother and ANOTHER mother) and with this idiocy is widening her circle of off-kilter experimentation another few notches.

And she's being funded by the Canada Council for the Arts? 'Talk about milking the public.

Posted by: new kid on the block at June 16, 2006 11:53 PM

How many babies will go hungry for the sake of art.

Posted by: rebarbarian at June 16, 2006 11:53 PM

Blood Fortified Artist gets G.G. Award? Next Iron Fortified - Milk Maiden to sell samples with proceeds to go to Haitan Orphans?

Shouldn't Health Canada be stepping in here? And I don't mean with cookies.

Posted by: Cheri at June 17, 2006 12:02 AM

Er, ah, got milk?

Posted by: Sean at June 17, 2006 12:19 AM

How many more of these bs projects are Canadians going to fund until someone gets the cajones to start shitcanning these elitist bureaucrats that hand out this funding.

It boggles the mind to think how much lower our taxes could be if we got rid of all the waste in Ottawa, not to mention how much our GDP would increase if these parasites actually had to get jobs that contributed to the economy instead of suckling at the Federal teat.

Posted by: johnboy at June 17, 2006 12:23 AM

I think this just asks for a made for TV movie from CBCpravda. Starring Margot Kidder as the spaced out lesbian donor.

Posted by: cal2 at June 17, 2006 12:28 AM

Then they wonder why the average Canadian, or "right-winger" as the socialists call us, don't vote for the NDP. What a colossal waste of money. Of course, any criticism will be considered evidence of homophobia by the socialists or some other garbage label.

Posted by: Trent at June 17, 2006 12:29 AM

Why can't they do it like the rest of us? Ask the wife after junior is finished ;-)

Sorry, but as I fully support breast feeding (two kids and never bought a litre of formula), and sincerely love the packaging, I can't understand how: a) merely tasting could be considered art, and b) how the government could fund this "art". But then again I remember The Life and Times of Bubbles Galore and some photographer (?) put polaroids in road kill hanging in trees and both got got funded. I also remember how a proposal from an Alberta artist to write a book on the disappearing grain elevators of the prairies got rejected.

My hat goes off to all the real artists that can actually put food on their table without government assistance. As a serious photographer who has exhibited and sold my work, I am always disgusted at the hoity toity artsy fartsy community who think they know art and their sh*t doesn't smell. They are always first in line for govt handouts. Art can honestly pay, ask Kate.

Posted by: Texas Canuck at June 17, 2006 1:21 AM

During my stint at the CBC Election Roundtable earlier this year

Stint? That wasn't a stint. It was the attempt to expose you for the hate-bag you are. Everyone knows that, KKKate.

By the way, your oeuvre from that period is total crap, Katie. Ten years from now, you'll just be a distant memory of the skank from Delisle, Saskatchewan who, like Coulter and Malkin, every decent person hated.

Tick, tock, tick tock, cunt...you've got 1 minute left.

Posted by: Ti-Guy at June 17, 2006 1:27 AM

The Milk Marketing Board will have something to say about this infringement on their monopoly! Or has she purchased a quota from them?

Posted by: philanthropist at June 17, 2006 1:39 AM

Thanks to Ti-Guy for showing just what Liberals, Progressives, Leftists and the NDP are made of.

I'm speechless.

Posted by: hey at June 17, 2006 1:46 AM

Does anyone else notice the lack of logical argument flowing forth from the vitriolic left? The best they can come up with is a foaming at the mouth, spit infused diatribe.

"KKKate"??? The implication that Kate is somehow a racist is lost on me. What exactly are you basing this on?

"oeuvre" Wow. I take it you had eggs for breakfast and learned a new french word. Good for you!!

I am a decent person and I like all other decent people do not hate Coulter, Malkin or anyone. I only feel love for all humans. Why are you so full of hatred Ti-Guy??

If you made that final reference in front of me...you would quickly be educated in how to properly speak in public and particularly in front of and to a lady.

Posted by: johnboy at June 17, 2006 1:47 AM

lmao. apparently I am the one who needs to take some french.

Posted by: johnboy at June 17, 2006 1:52 AM

hey is right. I'd take that as a threat if I were a cop or lawyer.

Posted by: Cheri at June 17, 2006 1:54 AM

Best thing to do is ignore Ti-guy. He must be off his meds again.

Posted by: mrtisaduffer at June 17, 2006 1:55 AM

Ti-Guy:

You have already demonstrated on another blog that you are a raving lunatic who needs, desperately, to resume his meds...

As top the "Arts" proposal...give me strength...

Posted by: Bruce at June 17, 2006 2:27 AM

Proof that liberalism is a progressive disease.

Posted by: Bernie at June 17, 2006 2:51 AM

Ti-Guy?

Once again, the 'tolerant, inclusive' Left impeaches itself, with its own words.

Thank you.

I will reproduce your nasty little screed on every forum and blog I frequent.

Appreciate it, turkey.


BTW, do you speak to the women in your family this way? Just curious...

Posted by: backhoe at June 17, 2006 3:36 AM

Is there a 'supply management board' set up for those milk producers? What about the culled (past producing) 'ones', is there any market for 'them?'- How often do they have to be 'refreshed' (my Dad called that calving, what is it called in this particular industry? - he always let his cows dry up befor breeding season so they would have lots of milk for their new calf) Do the human herd use disinfectant on their udders? Questons for those who want to know...like NKOTB and I!!
IMO this is just another attempt by the snots of the left to mock all things wholesome and good for families. They produce trash, like Broke back Mountain to make us question the wonderful, wild , courageous real men of the west - the cowboys - they try to trash that image so any red blooded young boy will be embarassed to play the role of the eternal freeman, the cowboy. Sleaze ball nobodies like Ty-guy sneer at our hostess Kate because she lives in Sask. and earns her own living plus running the best news site in Canada. The pea green envy of these slugs oozes from their vile pens and their rubbry blubbery lips; worthless sneer. Offensive artsy fartsy individuals have been running with the Liberano/Dipper gangs - they all live in the same cess pool. Good people must resist the impulse to listin to anything these losers write or say or produce. They make good people feel sick.

Posted by: Jema54 at June 17, 2006 3:36 AM

I sort of laugh at the comments that have been posted on here tonight. I think everyone is really missing the point that Kate is trying to make.
Kate, as an artist is not looking for us as a taxpayer to support what she does. She is looking after her self.... so why is the Council for Arts funding something like drinking breastmilk???

Posted by: marlin at June 17, 2006 3:51 AM

Ti-Guy,

God knows I disagree with Kate. Often. And how.

But what you've written just isn't right.

This is a woman who spends a good chunk of her day running a forum, completely as a volunteer, where people can get informed and exchange ideas.

We need more people like Kate in today's world, and in modern democracies.

If you dislike her ideas, make a reasoned argument against them. God knows there's an argument to be made ;-)

Kate, please keep up the good work, and don't think for a second that that senseless screed represents the rest of us who don't form your core constituency.

There's quite a number of us out here who disagree with you often, and respect you always.

Greetings
"Tony"

Posted by: tony at June 17, 2006 3:55 AM

Ti-Guy,

God knows I disagree with Kate. Often. And how.

But what you've written just isn't right.

This is a woman who spends a good chunk of her day running a forum, completely as a volunteer, where people can get informed and exchange ideas.

We need more people like Kate in today's world, and in modern democracies.

If you dislike her ideas, make a reasoned argument against them. God knows there's an argument to be made ;-)

Kate, please keep up the good work, and don't think for a second that that senseless screed represents the rest of us who don't form your core constituency.

There's quite a number of us out here who disagree with you often, and respect you always.

Greetings
"Tony"

Posted by: tony at June 17, 2006 3:57 AM

Wow Kate. You didn't steal the limelight from some perversion artist during your last cross-burning at the Fringe did you? Sounds pretty vindictive.

KKKate, Coulter, Malkin, the c-word, and a clock ticking- all in the same post on a thread ridiculing the pseudo-art industry that has wasted billions since Expo 67.
Whaddaya know... it's not everyday you get to see the work of a truly gifted gynophobic socialist surrealist.

Posted by: RodF at June 17, 2006 4:03 AM

I think that the Canada Council grants can go to such absurdities as the above is a result of the left having hijacked the definition of art.

Posted by: rebarbarian at June 17, 2006 6:43 AM

I wouldn't be surprised if the lesbian mother opening her breast milk bar is a Wiccan. This is exactly the upside-down illogic that witchcraft espouses. And speaking of spouses: Wiccans are less married to partners than to their craft.

Collecting mothers' milk for those other than their babies--strangers, in other words--to taste is, frankly, sick. Like Jema54, I'm a great fan of breastfeeding: I breastfed both of my daughters, and never paid for formula or bottles or had to find a heat source when they needed to be fed. 'Just tucked them under my shirt and, VOILA, 20 minutes later, a happy baby, not to mention a happy mom.

Breastfeeding is an intimate relationship between mother and child, designed for the optimum physical health of the baby (it builds up essential antibodies in the baby's immune system, among other things) and is a wonderful "mechanism" for the physical, psychological, and spiritual bonding of mother and child.

To exploit mother's milk--and, by extension the intimate mother/child bond--this way, by offering it to disinterested parties as part of an "art" installation, is a perversion and a desecration of its original intent which, essentially, is what occult witchcraft is all about: turning everything upside down, vandalizing sacred relationships and understandings.

From a post entitled "Liberals and trangression" at: http://kraalspace.blogspot.com/2006/06/liberals-and-transgression.html:

"...in the phantasia of [her] consciousness, [she] is attracted almost sexually to the idea of trangression--to soiling the respectable. [Quote by David Warren]...most of all, what [she] seek[s] is the thrill of transgression; the dark pleasure of pollution and destruction. For people in thrall to such perversion, other people's rules and norms are essential. A vandal cannot be tempted by the prospect of designing and building [her] own structure; the whole point of [her] existence is to soil and deface what belongs to someone else."

This is a classic definition of a parasite. What Jess Dobkin is actually doing with her installation, is not sucking the teat dry; she's actually sucking the life out of a time-honoured and sacred bond between mother and child.

Creepy.

Posted by: new kid on the block at June 17, 2006 7:29 AM

Thanks Kate.

..."focused, targeted steps to support creative people and to make sure Canadians see themselves in our culture."...

I can definitely see the 'support':
http://tinyurl.com/g665w

But I'm having a much more difficult time seeing the 'creative' & 'culture' part:
http://tinyurl.com/fkvcj

Posted by: JM at June 17, 2006 7:59 AM

Imagine this... It's after midnight as the weekend begins, Ti-Guy is trolling around the internet (insert the standard "mother's basement" and "tin-foil hat" references here) he reads about an artist who wants people to...

"quench their curiosity" and taste samples of pasteurized human breast milk at her upcoming show."

"Jess Dobkin has titled her work the Lactation Station Breast Milk Bar." (shouldn't that be "tittled"?)

"Participants will have the opportunity to sample small quantities of breast milk, donated by local lactating new mothers at this free public tasting," said a news release." (Hey, it's FREE! You don't have to pay for your breast milk shooter! That ought to bring in the crowds!)

The artist says "she became interested in taboos surrounding breastfeeding", which is news to us Canadians who knew nothing of any "taboos" other than a normal human sense of discretion regarding intimate bodily functions, although the artist projects on her hoped-for audience her sick perception of "something often regarded as indecent or repellent" that "becomes a curiosity in adulthood."

Anyway, back to Ti-Guy alone at his computer late at night, in a state of excitement after reading about this, he lashes out and makes an unfortunate post, foul and cruel. Anyone interested in reading more of his posts can find them over at that "blithering idiot" Zerb's blog, Ti-Guy's a regular over there (surprise surprise), a good place to copy and paste his post (although, like all internet moonbat septic tanks, comments there are agressively censored).

Posted by: calgarian at June 17, 2006 8:12 AM

WTF makes leftists think that splattering the contents of their hineys onto canvas is art?

Oh, yeah, there are those who actually do that and believe it's art.

Our tax dollars shouldn't go to freaks and geeks with no talent who don't want a real job.

The real artists are those with talent and who don't beg for money.

Now, Kate's a real artist. Just check out her stuff. I mean, hot damn! Definitely worth paying for to put on your wall and show off proudly to company!

O/T: Canadian Sentinel gets award... from the "enemy":

http://thecanadiansentinel.blogspot.com/2006/06/sentinels-first-blogger-award.html

Posted by: Canadian Sentinel at June 17, 2006 8:32 AM

The CP newswire story has a few more details that contain reaction by several bemused tories.
http://tinyurl.com/ncjsf

It pisses me off that once tax dollars are handed to an "arm's length" organization, the government loses control and any say about the appropriateness of the groups spending decisions.

From Godless, Chapter one by Ann Coulter:
"This is a country in which taxpayers are forced to susidize "artistic" exhibits of aborted fetuses, crucifixes in urine, and gay pornography. Menawhile, it's unconstitutional to display a Nativity scene at Christmas or the Ten Commandments on government property if the purpose is to promote monotheistic religion."
........
"Liberals swoon in pagan admiration of Mother earth, mystified and overawed by her power."

Posted by: anselm at June 17, 2006 8:35 AM

It's like Robert Bateman said in 1988 during the Free Trade debate.
"If I can't sell my paintings...maybe I shouldn't be a painter."

These so-called artists would literally starve to death if it wasn't for the public teat.

Message to Mr. Harper, "Stop funding these imbeciles."

Posted by: Proud K-W Conservative at June 17, 2006 8:35 AM

Perhaps Ti-guy was not breastfed as an infant. Maybe there is still a chance for him if he gets to this Lactation Station quickly.

Posted by: ms at June 17, 2006 8:44 AM

Kate
Thanks for the lift in life
Your site is both informing and thoughtful.
Your professional humility is tasteful
And of course your style is impeccable
There's a saying that goes something like
Living well is the best of lifestyles and you seem to do this well;so go Kate go!
You certainly don't need susidizing.

Posted by: Simon at June 17, 2006 8:45 AM

You have to wonder what type of hallucinagen Ti-guy has been using. Maybe it's too much Ti-weed!!! This guy is not only foul mouthed but has totally lost touch with reality.

The bread and butter of Canada are us ordinary working people who think art is something that adds to life . Beautiful painting from the Group of seven, wonderfull music from people like Natalie McMaster from Cape Breton Island ,Nickleback from Hannah , fabulous comedy from our home town boy Brent Butt. I even love those talking beaver commercials that are currently running on TV. All this art happens without Canada Council grant.

Many of the projects that are (I dislike the word funded with a passion) given taxpayer's money to waste seem to be designed to disgust, revolt and anger us ordinary folk. The most extreme example that I can recall are the dead rotting bunnies.

Most taboos developed for very good reason usual to do with transmission of disease either directly or indirectly.

It would appear that the abilty of the left to overcome these taboos make them superior in their own minds.

To quote my 81 year old other " Today everything that is right is wrong and everything that is wrong is right." This kind of bizarre display being rammed down Canadian's throat with their own money is another example of how out of touch the people running Heritage Canada have become. Maybe they are using the same drug as Ti-guy.

Hopefully under the new and improved Canadian administration we will see a little common sense, decency and respect used in handing out taxpayer's money. Better yet get rid of the grant system altogether.

I agree with Kate that art should be treated like any business. If a business can only survive with govenment handout then it shouldn't be there.

The likes of Ti-guy brings the term troll to a whole new level. Defending the indefensible because it is just part of the leftist mantra.

Ti-guy try inserting some logic in your diatribes or at least a little humour.

I'm sure Kate just laughs when she reads comments from the likes of Ti-guy .They just expose themselves for what they are " Small people with small lives". With a very limited vocabulary I might add.

Posted by: ruralroots at June 17, 2006 8:47 AM

Doe anyone know how much of our tax dollars were given to this "artist" ??

Posted by: Fred at June 17, 2006 9:16 AM

Wow thai-guy, it's nice to see that you're staying true to yourself. The more centrists that see your screed, the more converts we'll have moving to the right. Please, keep up your good work!

Posted by: Richard Evans at June 17, 2006 9:19 AM

Tax dollars going to small or large business? Never heard of it. Why would we subsidize business? They choose to be 'risk takers' then tax payers have to subsidize their "risk" through a myriad of write-offs, write-downs, and deferrals on borrowed money. Meanwhile, they lobby(also a tax supported business expense) to get their taxes to zero,asap.
No, it is too absurd to even imagine.

Posted by: steve d. at June 17, 2006 9:24 AM

This anti-artist is not only full of milk, she's full of sh**.

There is nothing "celebratory" about her Breast Milk Bar; in fact, offering mother's milk to every Tom, Dick, and Harriet is obscene vandalism of an intimate and, some would say, sacred bond between mother and child.

There is a definite whiff of sulphur as Dobkin more than affirms what ruralroot's 81 year old mother says: "Today everything that is right is wrong and everything that is wrong is right." Adherents of the occult delight in turning the world upside down, so that what most of us revere and hold in high esteem, they degrade and desecrate.

At its most basic, Dobkin's Milk Bar is a parasitic concept, feeding off society's conventions and rules; in fact, more than feeding off them, it actually sucks dry the authentic physical, psychological, and spiritual bond between mother and breastfeeding child. This is not a lively concept but a deadly one.

BTW, Toronto Public Health had better be on hand to monitor the bodily fluids/mothers’ milk being sampled by the unsuspecting public on July 13. As to Dobkin’s statement that “many drink [mother’s milk] exclusively for the first months of life,” and that her installation is to correct her assertion that “the memory of that taste and the sensation of drawing milk from the breast are forgotten,” I’d say “Amen. Get used to it.”

“And grow up.”

Posted by: new kid on the block at June 17, 2006 9:31 AM

Titless wonder talks about lactating.

Get off the stage, skank.

Posted by: Ti-Guy at June 17, 2006 9:37 AM

Go away, Ti-Guy. Your posts stink.

Posted by: new kid on the block at June 17, 2006 9:54 AM

PS--I'm planning on writing to the Ontario College of Art and Design (general@ocad.on.ca) to ask them if they're planning on having some public health inspectors at the installation to check the bodily fluids for communicable diseases and to see if they are going to post some warning signs: "Danger. Ingesting bodily fluids from unknown sources could be a danger to your health!"

Posted by: new kid on the block at June 17, 2006 9:59 AM

Check out goof #2, steve d., another contender for the Stupidest Troll trophy... "They choose to be 'risk takers'". Oooh, and the other choices are...? As opposed to the coming Trudopia where there will be no risk taking, where all will serve the state. Barbara Tuchman wrote that economic man and sensual man will not be repressed (sorry, but when she wrote in 1978 "man" had not been replaced by "person") but in steve d.'s dreams economic man will be eliminated. Hey stevie, maybe if you were smart enough to learn about economics rather than just parrot simplistic Marxist economics drivel you'd learn that tax breaks to businesses create jobs and stimulate economic growth, eventually generating more revenue to the government. You're an amusing fool steve d., please keep posting for our entertainment.

Posted by: anon at June 17, 2006 10:22 AM

How many recipients of Canada Council grants have donated to the Lie-beral Party of Canada since 1993?

Posted by: Bruce Randall at June 17, 2006 10:25 AM

Wondering what the container will be for the samples. Original packaging by any chance.

Posted by: maryT at June 17, 2006 10:28 AM

"Does anyone know how much of our tax dollars were given to this "artist" ??"

$9,000 for 'free' milk

Posted by: JM at June 17, 2006 10:47 AM

More on economics... while I would think there must be better recipients for grants than this bizarre and deranged artistic event, bear in mind that, for its $9000 investment, the government will see returns. Hopefully several hundred citizens will turn out to this event rather than sitting at home in their sweatsuits watching TV, which means they'll drop money in stores for their outfits - some will be wearing over a thousand dollars in fashions - and most will no doubt go out to restaurants, bars and cafes, before and after, in groups, again spending money. Cabs, public transit, personal vehicles, all generating economic activity which in turn will generate revenue to all three levels of government. One could argue these people would find an excuse to dress up, go out, and socialize anyway but, in the big picture, any kind of urban recreational event, such as this breast milk tasting, that gets people out of their homes, generates lots of consumer activity. There is method to the government madness, getting that downtown crowd out in the streets strengthening and supporting their cash churning culture.

Posted by: anon at June 17, 2006 11:03 AM

LESBIAN ... SINGLE PARENT.
This is probably frightfully obvious, but why did these two pieces of personal data have to be included in the "art" story. Should they be relevant at all? Is is evident that these labels are now avant-garde badges of honour? Are these the new "mum and apple pie".

Posted by: Me No Dhimmi at June 17, 2006 11:12 AM

Anon: your phrase : out in the streets strengthening and supporting their cash churning culture.

A heads-up on how conservatives and other grown-ups are likely to read that: 'poor anon, sounds like he hasn't done very well financially ...'

Posted by: Me No Dhimmi at June 17, 2006 11:27 AM

I used to work at the Confederation Centre of the Arts here in Charlottetown. There is currently a mini-uproar because the Cons have cut a lot of the Centre's federal funding (in the millions). What most Canadians don't realize though is that the Centre receives funding from nearly every provincal treasury as well, because it is a "national institution" (ask your province whether they send a cheque).

Anyways, my first day on the job, I had to tour the art gallery. Nearly the entire top floor of the gallery was devoted to the work of one artist (I don't recall his name). It featured many things made of human hair (such as wreaths) and two displays that contained pig fetuses called "pig fetus number 1 and number 2".

Harper majority, anyone?

Posted by: Angela at June 17, 2006 11:47 AM

If you think Lactation Stations are something to get excited about.
OCAD holds an open house every year that you would'nt believe.
A couple of years ago we visited to find 6 or seven plaster casts of vaginas mounted on a wall.
Also a video that some student apparently shot of herself and set up in a 5 minute loop.
The video was a 20 something year old girl walking around a house foundation excavation site in a white dress.
This was apparently her thesis.

OCAD does have the coolest building in Toronto however.

Posted by: richfisher at June 17, 2006 11:50 AM

Stanley Kubrick just rolled over in his grave. So what do ya figure Ti? After the Coroba are ya up for a little of the ultraviolence?

A little of the fifth perhaps?

Sick socialist fucks like you will find your own hell....just remember to hum along.

Syncro

Posted by: Syncrodox at June 17, 2006 12:20 PM

Who could disagree with the proposition that if they can't support themselves through legitimate private sales, they should find another occupation.
Or find a second one.
And just stop demanding a chunk of my livelihood.

Now if all those Conservative-voting farmers got on this bandwagon we'd really be getting somewhere.

Posted by: maryjane at June 17, 2006 12:20 PM

i'll be the first to admit being a bilingual failure, but isn't the English translation of Ti-guy
"tiny penis" ???


Might explain the hate on for Kate's successes.

Posted by: Fred at June 17, 2006 12:28 PM

Posted by Me No Dhimmi:

"out in the streets strengthening and supporting their cash churning culture.

A heads-up on how conservatives and other grown-ups are likely to read that: 'poor anon, sounds like he hasn't done very well financially ...'

Sorry to disappoint you Dim, but I've got an $800K+ RRSP, $200K+ cash on hand, a house and car paid for, no debts, and business interests worth over half a million and growing fast, I'm filthy, rolling in it. Just because I don't dress up and go to tittie bars, and cafe society in general, doesn't mean I haven't "done very well financially" but I like to remind the left-wing whackos that they are hardcore participants and beneficiaries of cash-churning capitalism.

Posted by: anon at June 17, 2006 12:30 PM

Posted by: Fred at June 17, 2006 12:28 PM
"i'll be the first to admit being a bilingual failure, but isn't the English translation of Ti-guy
"tiny penis" ???"

You beat me to it, Fred, although it might also match what's between his/her/its ears.

Posted by: Anonyme at June 17, 2006 12:44 PM

Some worship a god; some a goddess; some are godless.

Gaia is the newest goddess; she of the Maurice Strong pantheon at the Palace of Kyoto.

Gaia is brimming with milk/honey, here, even though she appears lachrymose/pregnant. Venus, Gaia is not.

http://www.paulding.net/bin/url.cgi/13316.4

Posted by: maz2 at June 17, 2006 12:44 PM

anon: Totally misread you as one of said left-wing whackos! I read you as being in favour of the "art installation" for the spin-off effects -- you are obviously keenly familiar with the myriad and spurious "spin-off" fallacies.

Good on you! You've indeed done well, but George Soros would probably not concur that you're "filthy". Smile.

My net worth (up to the time of this post -- just did a Excel re-cacl) is $17.35 million. But, er, I'd prefer to maintain my privacy and you'll simply have to accept that on good faith. And it even rises despite the time I waste here. Smile.


Posted by: Me No Dhimmi at June 17, 2006 12:52 PM

typical leftie thought's swirling around again, as Angela put it Harper Majority Anyone. I believe the Canadian taxpayers are starting to wake-up, listen & VOICE THERE OPINION's after years of seeing there hard earned tax money go to endless wastebaskets. This is also why Wacky Jacky will never form the government(although he came close last year when he jumped in bed with his leftie cousin's) ya the bleeding heart's will be around but the number's are getting fewer. Small business people such as kate & others who are trying to survive & are not asking for handouts for there talent's are the ones that i would always support. Why because Iam a small businessman & i understand after years of seeing my business tax continually rise I see some hope at the end of the tunnel. Oh and Jack BTW i really so hope your kissing cousin Bob Rae succeeds in his bid because we REALLY DO REMEMBER HIM here in Ontario & WOULD LIKE TO THANK HIM AGAIN!.
Yes Angela We Can Say Harper Majority
Have a Great Weekend all

Posted by: bryanr at June 17, 2006 12:52 PM

Working around and with artists these past months has been quite an eye opener. Their attitude is one of aboriginal entitlement, child like innocence combined with arrogance and a condescending view of most others not in their world. Making a subsistence living is most acceptable in their world, making a good living, is, for the most part, not. Most of them seem to be looking for their “Patron Saint” that will see them through the tough times. Unfortunately artistic culture and peer pressure, if they wish to remain in the artsy community, dictate that tough times will last forever. Being financially successful is just not the in thing or acceptable. Robert Bateman is looked down upon by “true” artists because of his success. The individual I work with has finally had enough of the art world, he is approaching 60, and wants a better life for his wife and young daughter. Have you ever tried to change the thinking of a 60 year old anyone? After months of telling him it’s my way or you can bloody well continue to starve, break through. His biggest problem after my tug a war with him is coming to terms with almost a life time wasted living in third world conditions and realizing that now he can concentrate on his art. He has lost a number of his artist “friends” because of his newfound lifestyle but in his words he has found a life strategy instead of living a life tragedy.

A couple of comments about the artsy crowd, they are very pleasant to be around and genuinely care about others, it’s just to bad their attitude towards success is so warped. As far as the Ottawa/CBC art crowd is concerned does anyone know if there is a way you could retroactively drown them all at birth.

Posted by: Western Canadian at June 17, 2006 12:55 PM

"Best thing to do is ignore Ti-guy. He must be off his meds again."

Nah, he was traumatized by being weaned too early. Maybe he should visit the lactation bar?

Posted by: Sean at June 17, 2006 12:58 PM

maryjane: Got a chuckle from your ON-TOPIC remark re:agricultural subsidies, with which I completely concur. A true libertarian will argue against all subsidies on the simple premise that some people are helped at the expense of others. The "benefits" are concentrated and point-at-able (viz. vote-generating) while the costs are dispersed and unseen (risk free vote-wise). A wildly optimistic view would be zero sum; but in reality because government is a high-overhead operation, the result is negative-sum. We are ALL impoverished somewhat, though we don't quite know why!.

I've mentioned this elsewhere, but Frederick Hayek in "Why I am not a conservative" stated that while conservatives will argue against industrial subsidies they will often favour agricultural subsidies. You are in exalted company with this topic anyway.

He called himself an "old whig" (classical liberal) instead.

Posted by: Me No Dhimmi at June 17, 2006 1:12 PM

Canadian Observer: Good post. My daughter is a professional musician in New York. I know intimately whereof you speak (but it's getting better!)

"Robert Bateman is looked down upon".
For his near photographic representation, eh?
For the obvious super-high non-fakeable skill, eh?

Posted by: Me No Dhimmi at June 17, 2006 1:17 PM

JUST IN CTVnewsnet: Scott Brison say's he would cancel the planned GST cuts if he became PM. Good going there Scott just what consumer's want no GST cut, that should give your leadership bid a boost.
Hey here's a thought you should become the finance critic?

Posted by: bryar at June 17, 2006 1:26 PM

bryar: Well that's usually good politics unfortunately being that the NET tax consumers greatly outnumber the tax payers.

And I mean, a cut does COST the government money, right?

Posted by: Me No Dhimmi at June 17, 2006 1:38 PM

That is true MND no disagreeing on that point, however when governments are showing record surplus's on the backs of the taxpayer, Tax cuts are alway's a welcome relief no matter what form they take.
And we must remember his statement is coming from the party that had a redbook plan to eliminate it entirely.
Sure it was the hated tax of the time but we must remember that it did do exactly what it was mean't to do, unforntantly a previous gov't. just did not apply it properly, it became there endless little piggy bank for there useless wastefull programs.

Posted by: bryar at June 17, 2006 1:53 PM

Looks like this is just one of a long line of taxpayer-funded trash And before YOU TOO jump to conlcusions, I'm a real artist--a classically trained musician. Our support comes mainly from patrons, NOT taxpayers.

Get a load of this steaming pile of shit:

Dobkin's original titty bar

Posted by: Doug at June 17, 2006 2:04 PM

bryar : oh, be assured, we agree! I was attempting irony, not very successfully.

Milton Friedman on taxes:
I am in favor of cutting taxes under any circumstances and for any excuse, for any reason, whenever it's possible.

Posted by: Me No Dhimmi at June 17, 2006 2:06 PM

Me No Dhimmi asks: "LESBIAN ... SINGLE PARENT....Are these the new 'mum and apple pie'?"

Uh-huh, MND, you've got it.

No more moms in their kitchens, wearing aprons, pulling cookies out of the oven. No cache. Not cool. Do such moms even exist? (Well, yeah, we do. But we've been rammed into the closet, so we can't nail our kids' feet to the floor to make sure they don't get socialized: Hats off to "Patrick," the CBC producer who asked about my stay-at-home kids, "How do they get socialized?")

If I tried to mount an installation called "Mom's Homemade Cookies and Milk Bar," with me in dirndl skirt and apron, I'd have to fund it myself: No government arts grants for good, old fashioned, healthy fare, no matter how genuinely counter-culural it would be.

To get a grant, I'd either have to go topless, embed glass shards into the cookies along with the chocolate chips, or maybe include breast milk in the recipe.


Posted by: new kid on the block at June 17, 2006 2:41 PM

Oh yeah, and I'd have to be a LESBIAN...SINGLE MOM...

Posted by: new kid on the block at June 17, 2006 2:43 PM

new kid, just think of the possibilities if you were a single mom, lesbian farmer.

Posted by: maryjane at June 17, 2006 2:48 PM

Single mum lesbian farmer of colour?
Ka-ching, ka-ching!

Posted by: Me No Dhimmi at June 17, 2006 3:04 PM

The possibilities are endless...

Posted by: new kid on the block at June 17, 2006 3:28 PM

Ti-Guy,

What a typical socialist. Insults a woman because he disagrees with her opinion, nope, nothing fascist about that. How do you feel about Jews and visible minorites Ti-Guy?

Posted by: Trent at June 17, 2006 3:56 PM

More breast envy by the socialist left. I mean shoot, who can't see how much the NDP, Liberals & other freeloaders look for a free lunch.

That is, if there not suckling at the government teat already.

I would agree with one poster here who observed .


That perhaps being bottle fed , by there progressive parents. Has unhinged them to the point where they now desire that warm fuzzy period in there life, where all was free.

Kind of like the Canada they created. Only the milk is polluted.

This type of Art only makes boobs out of them.
Bring out the ripe tomatoes.

As for Ti-Guy. What a cad. If this is how you respect the ladies your in for a long lonely life. Sounds to me you suffer from little man syndrome. Only in your case, its in a distinctively personnel, private, place.

Posted by: Revnant Dream at June 17, 2006 7:32 PM

ti-guy is lucky he didnt say the things he said in front of me.

Posted by: FREE at June 17, 2006 7:52 PM

Hi, Kate. I too am an artist (but don't support myself at it. Way to go girl!) I'm firmly of the opinion that governmental support (in the US, Canada, or anywhere) tends to degrade art. I also think that a lot of this sh*t is raved over because no one wants to be perceived as uncultured.

Posted by: rabidfox at June 17, 2006 7:56 PM

hey guys & gals don't even respond to trolls like ty guy not worth it don't waste a breath nothing, ignore, they are typical lefties that do not see any other point of view other then there own they will go after kate & others comments to no end, in other words if you can not share with them because they have not worked a day in there life they still feel entitled to receive monies from your hard earned wages simple as that. wacky jacky though is going to have a run when his kissen cousin Bob Rae Days becomes the lib leader.
ya Bob you knob we in Ontario can't wait, we still remember.

Posted by: bryanr at June 18, 2006 12:05 AM

I'm with Simon and FREE. Unbelievable. Go suck your' thumb, Ti-guy. I call Roshambo, and I go first.

Bring on the meritocracy. I'm sick of funding all these effing parasites to the detriment of my kids.

Seems to me that their problem is the fear of being responsible. 'They' have something that 'I' don't, and 'I' want it, but 'I' am unwilling to 'earn' it. How dare 'we' demand that these people be 'responsible' for themselves. They've made a lifestyle choice and I have no right to make a judgement upon it. Because 'they' have 'it', 'it' must have been gotten by nefarious means. Therefore, 'they' being immoral allows 'me' to justify the means to the end.

Art stands on its' own merit. Subsidising art is giving another way to avoid responsibility.

I'm really starting to feel like a sucker. Being a responsible adult means that we have to support all the irresponsible adults? Maybe I should just relax and let others pay my way as I indulge in my juvenile pursuits. I wonder what would happen if we all did that...

Social responsibility is one thing, encouraging deviancy is another.

Steve

Posted by: A Steve at June 18, 2006 12:23 AM

I hearby nominate the CCA (Canada cOUNCIL OF THE aRTS) for the 2006 Booby Prize for taking a natural part of human life and reducing it to a $9,000 con of the Canadian Taxpayer.

To New Kid and the rest of the moms that gave their kids the best that money can't buy, my undying thanks from dads everywhere.

Posted by: Texas Canuck at June 18, 2006 12:47 AM

To Texas Canuck: Thanks, buddy, for the kudos! Breastfeeding my kids has been one of the joys of my life; I'll take it over a double-breasted suit, a briefcase, and a six-figure salary anyday. To H___ with the glass ceiling.

BTW: HAPPY FATHER'S DAY to you and to all the other dads who have dared to grow up and take on the responsibility of a wife and kids: Way to go!! We need more of you!

Posted by: new kid on the block at June 18, 2006 7:42 AM

I had to have Fathers Day yesterday. It was the best day of my life. The queers wouldnt understand anything about it. To all that have earned it, HAPPY FATHERS DAY!!!!

Posted by: FREE at June 18, 2006 11:05 AM

Hey Kate....it could have been worse. Much worse.

Just imagine if some whacko from Toronto or Montreal had decided to have a semen-slurping bar to get rid of "negative stereotypes".....

No pasteurazation required.....it's au natural, you get to drink it right fromt he spigot.
Nothing surprises me anymore when it comes to these lefty-artistic types. Especially those who can't draw, paint, or sculpt...only offend.

Oi Vei!

PS....Ti-Guy, you need to get some help with that chemical imbalance. Maybe a few shots of breast milk would help.


Posted by: James Halifax at June 18, 2006 12:21 PM

new kid on the block:

Queer double-dads (not that there's anything wrong with that ... and they themselves use the term!) was the feature story in the Vanouver Courier, which rag I glanced thru at a cafe waiting for my order. About 5 pages of queer double-dads and double-mums adopting stories. In the same issue, a Geoff Olson was frothing at the mouth about Harper being a Nazi for allowing a free vote on SSM even alluding to the Nazis and their little pink triangles identifying homosexuals. Bloody depressing it was!

My girls are 36 and 33 and happily living in other countries.

So absent the Courier's good wishes, I thank you new kid on the block for those kind words!

Posted by: Me No Dhimmi at June 18, 2006 5:28 PM

You're welcome, with pleasure, Me No Dhimmi: And many more!!

Posted by: new kid on the block at June 18, 2006 5:59 PM

Yeah I saw the stack of that rag on the floor in my lobby. I did a favour to everyone in my building and threw them in the cardboard recycle bin.

Posted by: FREE at June 19, 2006 12:48 AM

Lactation smacktation. A phlegm-filled Fluids Fest -- complete with Boogers 'n' Mash and eye gunk pies -- is a much better ideA

http://www.torontosun.com/News/TorontoAndGTA/2006/06/21/pf-1644704.html

Posted by: JM at June 21, 2006 7:05 AM
Site
Meter