sda2.jpg

December 30, 2005

In The Presence Of God

"I, Flipper, take thee, Cindy"

Posted by Kate at December 30, 2005 12:19 PM
TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3189

Comments

Gazing intensly into each others eyes...
"Honey ,... Your blowhole stinks of fish"
Foreplay ;)

Posted by: richfisher at December 30, 2005 12:33 PM

You know, I used to laugh at nutjobs like that until we legalized gay marriage. Now it's just rather sad. Hey! Maybe those 2 gay penguins in the New York Zoo (or was it Boston's zoo?) can legally get married now! Why not?

Posted by: Morris Abercrombie at December 30, 2005 12:36 PM

As The Kingfish would say, "[Un]holy mackerel dere, Andy!"

Posted by: Bob at December 30, 2005 12:42 PM

I think Morris sums it up.

Posted by: Jeff Cosford at December 30, 2005 1:08 PM

I am utterly speechless.

Posted by: Mississauga Matt at December 30, 2005 1:17 PM

This of course gives an entirely new meaning to the concept of "fishwife".

Will wonders never cease, soon we'll have people marrying their pets.

Of course these folk have taken the Oscar Wilde dictum of, "Other people are hell", far too seriously.

Posted by: Hans Rupprecht at December 30, 2005 1:17 PM

Gives new meaning to my favorite song: "Oh I wish I was an Oscar Myer wiener, then everyone would be in love with meeeeee..."

Yes, I have a life and love Newfie tube steaks.

;-)

Wonder if the real "Flipper" was invited to the wedding. I heard Lassie and Mr. Ed had something going.

Wonder if Nemo likes his new mother-in-law fish. Then there's always the problem with Bruce...he likes little fish...


Posted by: tomax7 at December 30, 2005 1:26 PM

I am both speechless, and not surprised. but my second thought is...
I remember watching the Simpsons one evening, and seeing a "talent show" put on by the school teachers, when Bart could only sum it all up by saying, "I didn't think it was possible, but this both sucks, and blows"
really, it could be entertainment?

Posted by: marc braun at December 30, 2005 1:36 PM

Is this a case of life imitating art? Or, vice versa? Or, something else altogether?

The undeniable fact is that male dolphins have been known to make, shall we say, "overt" (well, the word ends in a "T") approaches to human females. "Is that a pistol in your pocket? Or, are you just glad to see me?"

Posted by: Hungry Valley at December 30, 2005 1:38 PM

Oh great, now I have this mental picture of them consummating the wedding that I just cannot get out of my mind! Yuchhhh. No more stories like this, please!

Posted by: morison at December 30, 2005 1:39 PM

She should look into how dolphins mate.
No monogomous romance there.
She'll change her mind or .... (flip flop).

Oh come on that's just inexcusable!!!

Posted by: richfisher at December 30, 2005 1:59 PM

That great champion of progressive bioethics, Peter Singer, claims that some animals can consent to bestial relations.

If dolphins are not significantly less intelligent than humans, as many biologists claim, then surely dolphins could be capable of understanding the rights and responsibilities of civil marriage, and presumably, could offer informed consent.

Once the difficulties in communicating informed consent between the species are overcome, the legal argument for interspecies marriage will be irresistible to the courts and progressive opinion.

Posted by: Loyalist at December 30, 2005 2:03 PM

What a coincidence .. Late last night I did a parody post on the new gay movie hinting this very possibility. This may well be the next issue to be dealt with by the loons in our courts and supported by our dicky-whipped politicians.
Check it out and laugh, then cry because we are on the way down as a moral society.

Duke's place
Click Duke below

Posted by: Duke at December 30, 2005 2:13 PM

I'm angling to marry my '95 Safari so I can claim 'da bish as a dependant.

Posted by: bernie at December 30, 2005 2:14 PM

It appears Duke's Place has been censored.
Can anyone tell me what is so bad about a political parody site?
Kate did you ban my site?
Who complained?
What specifically was the offending post?
Censorship on this site .. it hard to believe, perhaps it some other problem.
Please explain.

Posted by: Duke at December 30, 2005 2:16 PM

If this had happened in Canada, the Liberals would've made it a human (mammal) rights issue and the Supreme Court would have agreed. Anyone who said otherwise would be labelled a racist and sentenced to internal exile. The new couple would have both been garanteed full rights under the law, provided the husband spends at least 6 months of the year in Canadian waters.

Posted by: Peter at December 30, 2005 2:17 PM

"You can't cherry-pick from the Charter of Rights."

Can I marry my gun?

Posted by: Doug at December 30, 2005 2:23 PM

Nobody censoring you.

Something seems to be weird with MT right now. Hopefully I can figure it out.

Posted by: Kate at December 30, 2005 2:27 PM

Somethings fishy ?

Posted by: richfisher at December 30, 2005 2:30 PM

Thanks Kate. I will look further into this.
I cannot post with my url containing my name.

Posted by: Duke at December 30, 2005 2:32 PM

I think the medicare system will have something to say about the results of introducing our pets and pet spouses into the legal sex swap clubs.

I am talking about the results of oral sex .. specifically, animal on human. Have you seen the teeth on some of these criters?

This is so insane! I can actually see this as serious issue in this pretend country.

Posted by: Duke at December 30, 2005 2:40 PM

Duke: That's probably because the link with your name is an email address not a url.

Posted by: Hungry Valley at December 30, 2005 2:57 PM

Keep voting LIBERAL and this is the kinda crap Canada is going to be full.

Posted by: Mike at December 30, 2005 3:26 PM

flipper ... this is nuts

Posted by: Jack Dog at December 30, 2005 3:28 PM

Hungry,

I had to use a friend's Email and user to post this.
I can't post anything with the name DukeMcgoo in it.
I must be banned from this specific site as I can still post elsewhere with no problem
thanks,
Duke

Posted by: Jack Dog at December 30, 2005 3:35 PM

Duke,

The jig is up! Lassie told Kate all about it. You know, the kennel club in Montreal. Not only that but she said that the puppies aren't yours either.

The bitch...

Posted by: Texas Canuck at December 30, 2005 3:40 PM

I suppose that up to this point the woman's life had no porpoise....

Posted by: Dr.Dawg at December 30, 2005 3:43 PM

Puppies?
You are mistaken .. it's a heifer and a colt

Posted by: Duke at December 30, 2005 3:50 PM

Glory be .. it looks like I can post again.
but not if my URL is listed

Posted by: Duke at December 30, 2005 3:51 PM

Will she jump through hoops for him ?

Posted by: bernie at December 30, 2005 3:52 PM

lets see if this goes through
tinyurl.com/bd69s

Posted by: Duke at December 30, 2005 3:53 PM

Yes y'all
but I wonder if this has something to do with blogspot flagging me somehow.
Christ, if this can happen, free speech will be gonzo.
I wonder if this is happening to anyone else?

Posted by: Duke at December 30, 2005 3:55 PM

"Geek Love" by Catherine Dunn anyone?

Posted by: Deity at December 30, 2005 4:03 PM

Hey Duke, maybe you just used up your link-whoring allowance for 2005. Better luck next year, eh...

Posted by: rws at December 30, 2005 4:12 PM

Why would anyone be upset, or even care, if some idiot wants to marry a dolphin? Maybe, after the inevitable divorce, we'll get lucky and the dear woman will hitch up with a great white shark. I have to laugh at the irony of this article appearing on a Saskatchewan based blog. Those tales of Prairie boys having their first sexual experience with whatever farm animal would stand still do have a basis in fact. Who cares?!

Posted by: dmorris at December 30, 2005 4:33 PM

Hey, what did the Liberal dolphin say to his new wife?

Blow hole me!!!

Posted by: westword at December 30, 2005 4:56 PM

rws,

Whoring if you wish. I offer brief moments of laughter and entertainment to a lot of tense people who take it all far too seriously at times.

I also offer links to places that are important.

What do you do to help spread the word?

Anything? anything?

Posted by: Duke at December 30, 2005 4:58 PM

dmorris,

And exactly how many prairie farm boys have married their sheep?

Didn't think so.

You libs make enormous leaps of logic and feel so smug about it.

Posted by: Doug at December 30, 2005 6:03 PM

I heard Ralphie was a virgin until he was 17. By the time he got the rocks piled up, the cow moved.

Posted by: rebarbarian at December 30, 2005 7:27 PM

As long as the dolphin is circumcized, I see no problem.

Posted by: Mystery Meat at December 30, 2005 7:40 PM

This marriage will flounder.Stop me....

Posted by: bernie at December 30, 2005 8:10 PM

I can't believe that you cretins actually think that because some idiotic rock concert promoter from England "married" a dolphin in Israel that somehow this will translate into a Canadian Liberal government passing a law permitting beastiality is beyond absurd - it's actually insane! You people are THAT desperate to slag the Liberals and gays that you resort to statements like this? What a pathetic bunch of losers.

Posted by: arthurdecco at December 30, 2005 8:15 PM

Doug , I think you can marry your gun but you cant whip your pistol out.

unless its in a paid place in Montreal.


to think of all those old vets voting every year and think that they fought for this place. I could barf.

Posted by: cal2 at December 30, 2005 8:26 PM

artherdecco.

Libs kept the age of consent at 14.
Libs sponsored SSM through.
Libs have not addressed multimarriage in Bountiful BC,
Libs said Jack Layton married a dog.

I dont see a stretch of the imagination for the next step.

Posted by: cal2 at December 30, 2005 8:29 PM

arthurdecco - why is it that anyone that has a conservative bone in thier body is a cretin? That's a pretty close minded point of view you have of the world. Rather, how do say it nicely - so 1950's maybe or how about condensending or maybe even arrogant. Anyway, it's not a very small L liberal thought process you're using. After all if you're small l liberal you're an open minded person that gives people the benefit of the doubt. Your choice of words and attitude towards others demonstrates quite the opposite, but heh I might be willing to give you the benefit of the doubt but likely not.

Posted by: the bear at December 30, 2005 8:32 PM

I have no problem with this as long as he puts tuna on the table and they promise to send the kids to government approved dolphin daycare.

Posted by: Syncrodox at December 30, 2005 8:50 PM

Doug: I'm NOT a Liberal!But if the sheep and the farmer lived together for 6 months doesn't that make them common law spouses, in Canada?
Lighten up.

Posted by: dmorris at December 30, 2005 9:16 PM

All that is good in a decent in prosperous society came from conservative values.

One should not mess with success.

You can't improve on decency and prosperity with so-called progressiveness. That's like over decorating a Christmas tree and thats tacky.

Posted by: Duke at December 30, 2005 9:31 PM

Tacky?? We are talking about inter-species marriage here and the word tacky comes up? This is like getting serious at a clown convention or the funeral of Chuckles the Clown (a classic).

Besides, I hear she had to marry him on porpoise...

Laughter really is the best medicine.

Posted by: Texas Canuck at December 30, 2005 9:50 PM

I heard it was a speargun wedding. Oh the shame!!

Posted by: Syncrodox at December 30, 2005 10:04 PM

Poor flipper, all because his English isn't so good. I guess it's off to the foreign legion for him.

Posted by: Mr. C. Joel Mullan at December 30, 2005 11:45 PM

When do animal rights begin? Before or after the barbeque? Liberal culture, equal to bacteria.

Posted by: X Albertan at December 30, 2005 11:45 PM

I think for tax reasons it makes sense for me to claim common law with the dog, Same sex inter- species (well he was a male, he's a liberal now) -- Eat your heart out Jack!

Posted by: Mr. C. Joel Mullan at December 31, 2005 12:04 AM

"arthurdecco - why is it that anyone that has a conservative bone in thier body is a cretin?"

Where exactly in my post did I claim that "anyone with a conservative bone in their body is a cretin"? I have quite a few conservative bones in my own body and I'm certainly no cretin. It's the slimey winger-types that feel compelled to slag and slur, lie and distort in order to reinforce their empty political posturing that I accuse of being cretins - not conservatives.

Posted by: arthurdecco at December 31, 2005 12:06 AM

arthur - aw I see, just like what you're doing.

Posted by: the bear at December 31, 2005 7:02 AM

"arthur - aw I see, just like what you're doing."

My reply, typed while rolling my eyes and shaking my head no in exasperation: NO, Bear! NOT like I'm doing...How about I paste my post here again for those of you who have trouble with your reading comprehension skills:

re-posted: "It's the slimey winger-types that feel compelled to slag and slur, lie and distort in order to reinforce their empty political posturing that I accuse of being cretins - NOT CONSERVATIVES. (emphasis added)

Did the message get through to you this time, Bear? ...or were you just upset with me because you consider yourself a "slimey winger-type"? LOL

Posted by: arthurdecco at December 31, 2005 12:50 PM

Homophobic...Sexist........Racist......must be a tory!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I feel sorry for you.Let's go back to the good old days.Dat Ole time Religion ................Way back in da good ole days...........when people didn't have rights.........when women wern't our equals...............I like male lesbians...............men who like women...novel idea?

Posted by: ok4ua at January 2, 2006 10:16 PM

Do you lusty young fellows on here have partners?????????????//Female or otherwise? I'm married for years..........you guys don't sound to me to be in touch with the real world.And you talk about repression.........you guys suffer from S.P.S...........small penis syndrom..........it afflicts a lot of sexually repressed males.......

Posted by: ok4ua at January 2, 2006 10:48 PM

You guys need some reeeeeeely good sex. You are so anal retentive..................I love it.You talk like you've really got some insight.Go out and have fun.Get laid. I've had my share. I'm awaitng surgery..............it could be 2 weeks or 2 years..............it's not life threatening...............I'm close to retirement.
You sound like really fungguys..........fungis??You remind me of mushrooms..........you're kept in the dark and are fed horse shit. Go out and get laid.

Posted by: ok4ua at January 2, 2006 11:01 PM

ok4ua:

Think before you post: deep breath, proof read, think, edit, re-proof, and finally post. Suppose it's a good job the left has not taxed the full stop -- could get expensive. Though I suppose in this case one might argue such a tax to be a good thing, it would have a positive effect on grammar. Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I do enjoy a complete sentence.
If I could be serious for a moment I would ask you to re-read your posts. The more insulting you get the less intelligent you sound. Right now I envisage a little guy with a big chip on his shoulder. I do not expect every one to have the same point of view. I joined the military as I have a strong attachment to our pluralistic society and its freedom of speech.
Feel free to rant all you want, however, you may find that a well reasoned and properly constructed argument will make you sound like less of a raving looney.
Come to think of it, I'm not even sure what your point is! Please advise.

Posted by: Mr. C. Joel Mullan at January 3, 2006 12:58 AM

If it sounds homophobic it probably is.If it sounds sexist it probably is.There are alot of sexist homophobics on this blog. Gay people are as old as civilization is or older. That's a reality.It's time we recognized their differences.Read over my comments a few times. You'll get the jest of them.

Posted by: ok4ua at January 3, 2006 2:44 AM

"Gay people are as old as civilization is"

I get your "jest"
I understand ,..let me explain our cronilogically retarded oky.
He is saying all gay people are 3000 years old.

Posted by: richfisher at January 4, 2006 11:57 AM

To the fisherman........civilization is over 8000 years old maybe older(First City Jericho) and modern man is 100,000 years old. And Gay people have been around just as long.Look it up in your Funk and Wagnal.

Posted by: ok4ua at January 5, 2006 12:26 AM
Site
Meter