sda2.jpg

December 9, 2005

Banned Blog Words: 2006

Forget those extra 10 pounds. They aren't going anywhere. So much easier to swear off a few flabby words.

Let's start the new year off fresh and dump the comfy cliches once and for all. Some of the ones below always sucked; others have worn out their welcome like an incontinent grandma.

I say we pinky-swear not to use the following words when we blog, as of midnight, New Year's Eve:

* asshat
* moonbat
* sweet
* MSM
* idiotarian
* heh

Add your own in the comments.

Posted by at December 9, 2005 6:08 AM
TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3053

Kathy Shaidle is Trying to Oppress Me from The Meatriarchy
Kathy is guest blogging over at Small Dead Animals and she wants to eliminate half the words I use in every blog post: Let’s start the new year off fresh and dump the comfy clichĂ©s once and for all. Some of the ones below always sucked; other... [Read More]

Tracked on December 9, 2005 7:36 AM

Comments

heh...

Posted by: Deity at December 9, 2005 6:19 AM

Awwwwe. I liked all of them. Need to think up some new ones though, you know, just to keep things fresh.

Posted by: Schwarze Tulpe at December 9, 2005 6:48 AM

"Chilling," unless it refers to what you're doing with champaigne.

Posted by: Andrea Harris at December 9, 2005 7:14 AM

heh, what kind of moonbat idiotarian MSM loving asshat would come with a list this sweet?

heh! Sweet!

Posted by: pale at December 9, 2005 7:25 AM

pale:

You win!!!

Posted by: Jim Pook at December 9, 2005 8:24 AM

Are you a law abiding citizen...?
Do you own a handgun............?

Well it's YOUR fault that blacks are shooting blacks in toronto..!!

You the legal hand gun owner are the real criminals..!!

You Will be punished..!!

Paul Martin says so.....!!!!!!!!!!
Have a nice day ...vote liberal....!!!!!!!!

Posted by: B Wylie Ajax, Ont. at December 9, 2005 8:49 AM

I love the word moonbat,

Posted by: DrWright at December 9, 2005 9:30 AM

Excuse the dumb question... but what does 'moonbat' mean? I haven't used it cause I don't know its meaning...

Posted by: Jose at December 9, 2005 9:34 AM

"[something], indeed," as in "Cliches, indeed."

I support the war on cliches!

Jose: supposedly it means someone who won't change their position when presented with facts that show they are wrong. I think a lot of rightists think it's fair to assume that leftists are, by default, wrong, and that their positions are necessarily based on false premises. It's continued use as a catch-all for all leftists does nothing for genuine debate and discourse (not saying that those are goals of anyone in the blogosphere, just saying).

OH! I got another cliche to ban:

"Just saying."

Posted by: RP. at December 9, 2005 9:48 AM

I'm keeping "moonbat", "moonbassity" and "moonbattery".

Posted by: Richard Evans at December 9, 2005 10:04 AM

Until the blogosphere becomes MSM, I'll keep using MSM. I type slow...

Posted by: Mad Mike at December 9, 2005 10:08 AM

But I love "asshat" and "idiotarian"! What are the equivilants you intend to use??

Posted by: MCPO Airdale at December 9, 2005 10:19 AM

As a chiroptologist Moonie, thanks for sticking up for us.

What should MSM be replaced with?

Fricken Propagandising SOBs is a bit long to type.

Posted by: Cal at December 9, 2005 10:24 AM

What do you call the Micheal Moores of the world if not asshat moonbat? If the foo shits ya wear it.

Posted by: kelly at December 9, 2005 10:34 AM

Clearly.
Clearly.
Clearly.
Clearly.
Clearly.

Prime Minister announces plans to ban all tired adverbial phrases that introduce Prime Ministerial Platitudes.

Yearly.

Posted by: PlatoStepChild at December 9, 2005 10:39 AM

"Liberal Government"

Posted by: rhebner at December 9, 2005 10:46 AM

Not a chance pal .. there are already too many people in this country trying to take away what's left of my culture.

Culture is language .. ask any frenchman in Quebec.

Those words are English speaking peoples slang and when you get negroes to stop saying mo-fo dawg and bitch, I will take another look .. deal?

Have a laugh at Dukes Place .. http://dukemcgoo.blogspot.com

Posted by: Duke at December 9, 2005 10:49 AM

Looking forward to never seeing this again
"PMPM is an asshat"

and seeing a lot of this

"XPMPM is an asshat"

Posted by: richfisher at December 9, 2005 10:54 AM

I'll stop using any of those terms if and only if the Liberals lose the election.

Deal?

Posted by: Warwick at December 9, 2005 11:00 AM

Can we use SIW (Senators in Waiting) for MSM?

Posted by: Gary at December 9, 2005 11:04 AM

Moonbat is a political epithet coined in 2002 by Perry de Havilland of "The Libertarian Samizdata," a libertarian weblog. It was originally a play on the last name of George Monbiot, a columnist for The Guardian.

moonbat

Posted by: steve not in ontario at December 9, 2005 11:16 AM

Nyet, comrade. Asshat was a mainstay in my vocabulary long before most people knew what a blog was and I have no plans to retire it.

Posted by: Sean at December 9, 2005 11:38 AM

I hate to lose MSM because my chubby fingers have difficulty typing mainstream media without making a typo.
I agree with all the rest Kahty. Sort of.
Therefore, I will stop using MSM if we acknowledge that the current mainstream media are nothing more than Liberal "Lickspittle".
G'day eh?

Posted by: Joe Molnar at December 9, 2005 11:40 AM

See what I mean about chubby fingers, Kathy?
Sorry!!

Posted by: Joe at December 9, 2005 11:42 AM

For the best definition of the word "moonbat", do a search on Wikipedia. You'll get the "whole enchilada" there. Say, isn't whole enchilada a cliche?

Posted by: DoubtingThomas at December 9, 2005 11:49 AM

How about adding Bwhahahahaha to the list...that is so lame.

I agree with nixing
- moonbat
- boondoggle

But MSM is still a good way to indicate main stream media or pravada newspaper.

Posted by: tomax7 at December 9, 2005 11:54 AM

Oh no,we are not going to be politically correct on Kate's site nor is it going to be hijacked by a commenter.Heh, at the end of one of her posts speaks volumes and if you dont like what she posts then I would direct you to archives on sda.com June14,2005- Complaint Procedure.

Posted by: spike at December 9, 2005 11:54 AM

Please oh please do not take away Dipper, Librano, Lieberal, and my favorite doodleheads. On second though doodleheads can go.

Posted by: wade at December 9, 2005 12:28 PM

On a similar note one term I hope politicians and the media would lose.
"moral authority"

Posted by: wade at December 9, 2005 12:30 PM

Can we add "Canadians feel..." ?

Posted by: Garry at December 9, 2005 12:52 PM

Kathy, don't cave in to the asshats. The Moonbats have a sweet deal with the MSM from which they will never let go. They have the upper hand, every last idiotarian.

Heh.

Posted by: Doug at December 9, 2005 1:13 PM

I don't suppose we could do away with "blog" by any chance?

Posted by: Occam's Carbuncle at December 9, 2005 1:36 PM

Hey, yah, Occam- "blog" is indeed a crappy word. When I first encountered the word I assumed it meant a silly walk or something gay guys do to each other.

I always get the same reaction to the word "blog" when asking folks if they know about them. They frown in disgust and ask, "What's that?"

I fear we may be stuck with the word "blog" and will always be known as "bloggers". I swear, they sound like dirty words, curses or epithets.

I wish there could be a new word for this thing we do here. Really.

Posted by: Canadian Sentinel at December 9, 2005 2:29 PM

Are you all crazy?

You are talking like these adjectives are actually going to be taken away and there's nothing you can do about it.

No wonder the Liberals are so successful.

Christ, get some balls and some individuality and use whatever god damned words you want to express yourself wherever you want .. and the rest of you can damned well tolerate it.

Isn't that what you people are on here whining about all the time .. freedom of expression the stupidity of political correctness etc etc sheeesh use the brain people! Watch you don't fall off the that cliff to the left of you.

Meanwhile ... have a good laugh at Duke's place
http://dukemcgoo.blogspot.com

Posted by: Duke at December 9, 2005 2:33 PM

What Duke said. Death to the liberano scumbag moonbats!!!!!!

Posted by: FREE at December 9, 2005 2:57 PM

"Moonbat" is a perfect word to describe the touchy-feely ecofascist left.

NFW will I abandon the appropriate tools at our disposal

Posted by: Jack Linard at December 9, 2005 3:12 PM

Wow, I've... never used one of those.

Posted by: BruceR at December 9, 2005 3:14 PM

What the hell are we supposed to say in the meantime???

Posted by: Dante at December 9, 2005 3:17 PM

Quiz: You are faced with a rabid violent home invader. Your choices are ..
(a) An armed policeman who isn't there.
(b) You, with a gun who is there.
(c) You, no gun.

Posted by: Duke at December 9, 2005 3:20 PM

If the words are banned and we get a Liberal Government......will we have to register our vocabulary???

You can have my words of choice when you pry them from my cold dead hands!

Down with the word registry!

Posted by: PGP at December 9, 2005 3:34 PM

I made a list of the 7 words you can't say during this election:

idiot
criminal
extremist
private
reform
majority
Gomery

Posted by: Phil at December 9, 2005 4:27 PM

Phil,

Also add the following words (and variations thereof) that MSM have voluntarily banned for use in describing the federal Liberals and their policies: "nazi", "dictator", "thief", "liar", "thug", "whore", "incompetent" among many others.

Other words unofficially banned from MSM daily use include: "freedom", "democracy", "efficient", "effective", "intelligent", "individual rights", "normal winter weather" and "christmas".

Addendum note to the above: the MSM will substitute "two hundred forty dollars" in place of "christmas". For example: Mr. Prime Minister, is that your "$240 wreath"? To which he would answer: "Why yes it is. Season's greetings Mary Lou and Barbara.

Posted by: Martin B. at December 9, 2005 5:37 PM

Volcano Cam

Posted by: ferrethouse at December 9, 2005 6:21 PM

After January 23rd, I promise not to say Liberal Government.....

Posted by: DazzlinDino at December 9, 2005 6:43 PM


The Definition of "Useful Idiots"

Oh brother. U.S. Activists Trek Toward Guantanamo.

HAVANA - American activists reached the halfway point in a long trek toward the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay to protest treatment of terror suspects, but it appeared unlikely the communist government would let them enter a Cuban military zone to reach the U.S. outpost.

Marchers from the largely Christian group, Witness Against Torture, said by cellular telephone on Thursday that they had completed about half of the 50-mile trek from the eastern city of Santiago.

The 25 marchers, who set out Wednesday, hope to arrive at — or at least near to — the naval base by Saturday, which is International Human Rights Day. The march was organized by the Catholic Worker movement, an anti-war and social justice alliance. [Orwellian inversion of language, anyone? —ed.]

“We don’t know how far we can get, so every step forward is an amazing thing,” said Shelia Stumph, a 28-year-old marcher from Raleigh, N.C.>>>>

Question for these hopelessly stupid, narcissistic moonbat “activists:” how does it feel to be willing propaganda tools of a totalitarian government that uses torture as a routine method of suppressing dissent? via LGF

Posted by: maz2 at December 9, 2005 10:34 PM

Um, how the hey did those Americans get into Cuba? It's not like you can just fly there from, er, Miami. Could go via Canada, I suppose, the problem these days isn't so much Cuba letting you in but the U.S. letting you back in when Immigration sees the Cuban visa stamp in your passport.

I nominate "whatever". 'Cause, you know, whatever.

Posted by: Meg Q at December 9, 2005 10:59 PM

How about dropping the phrase "extreme right-wing" when referring to the left-of-John-Kerry Conservative party? Any chances that will get traction among the idiotarian moonbats in the MSM? It would be sweet to see those asshats (Liberano senators in waiting / future governors general) admit that the Conservatives are actually left of center. Or to clearly make it, really really, the very very number one top priority. Foo. Heh. Indeed. Read the whole thing.

Posted by: Ed Minchau at December 9, 2005 11:27 PM

I don't want to hear some asshole lieberal continuosly telling me what it is that "Real Canadians" want,

Posted by: Robert at December 10, 2005 12:29 AM

How about this deal: I'll stop saying "conservatard" to refer to a Bush supporter, as soon as they stop using Bush as their President.

Actually I've never used the word before, but I've seen it used lots on other sites I look at. I've not used any of those nominated words, although I do spell out "Main stream media" from time to time, because MSM means nothing to 99% of english speaking people. Acronymns are supposed to save people time, not send them scurrying to Wikipedia to join the "in crowd" on the web.

Posted by: saskboy at December 10, 2005 12:34 AM

Yeah, what's with the volcanoe cam? Isn't there a Canadian cam, like one in Saskatchewan to once and for all solve the mystery of how long you can see your dog run away for in Saskabush???

Posted by: tomax7 at December 10, 2005 8:52 AM

Listen to this. I on regular occasion visit the Rabble forum called babble. It is a moonbat forum for sure. When this blog entry (Charles Adler On Fire - http://www.conservativegroundswell.com/audiovideo/ProudToBeCanadian.ca_Adler_on_Line_12_07_05.wmv) was posted on ' www.proudtobecanadian.com ', I posted the link on several other blogs and forums, including babble. I thought it was a great example of good radio programming and they would enjoy listening to it as much as I did. There were 3 quick replies to my kind and considerate post and link. The first called Adler a loudmouth hack. The second reply called Adler an embarassment to loudmouth hacks. The third reply made no sense at all. When I tried to add another reply, I notice the thread was locked! Of course, since nobody was allowed to post a reply, the thread would very quickly drop out of sight, so it would never be heard. That’s not even the best part. I logged on to babble tonight, and it says I’ve been banned. BANNED! Banned from the ‘pulse of Canada’! I must admit, I’m a little shocked, but maybe I shouldn’t be. Here’s a copy of my e-mail to babble:

I have tried several times to access the babble forums and it keeps saying that I am not yet activated or I have been banned. I know that my account was activated, so it would appear I have been banned. I cannot think of anything I might have done to cause me to be banned, so would you be so kind as to check my account status at your end? Thank you. I look forward to participating on this blog again soon and engaging in what our national television network call’s “the pulse of Canada”. Thanks again. BTW, my screen name is Chazz. Any other information you may need from me, don’t hesitate to ask.

Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks. Chazz

Posted by: Chazz at December 10, 2005 10:59 AM

Adler is a bit of a loudmouth, but at least he's sincere and I don't think he's anyone's puppet. I guess the people at Babble just don't know how to debate anything constructively, so they decided to just ban you. Welcome to the Interweb, where the weak get big heads when they are given Bannanation powers.

Posted by: saskboy at December 10, 2005 6:12 PM

Definitely need to add "blogosphere" to that list.

Posted by: The Powers That Be at December 10, 2005 9:31 PM
Site
Meter