TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1653
Jesus Through the Wrong Lens from Kobayashi Maru
Forgive me a short rant here, but... Why is it that between The DaVinci Code (soon to be turned into a film, directed by Ron Howard), and now this flap, there seems to be this desperate rush on to view Jesus through the lens of our sex-obsessed cultu... [Read More]
Tracked on April 14, 2005 6:00 AM
Anything to build circulation eh? Now its Blasphamy.
Was Jesus Gay?
NO!
"Homosexual" and "Christian" are mutually exclusive.
The scriptural condemnation of the practice of homosexuality is unequivocal.
As long as He isn't that Clown Jesus from Godspell. Because then I'm so outta here...
Posted by: Kathy Shaidle at April 13, 2005 11:52 AMMutually exclusive? Really? Making sweeping statements like that would lead me to believe that humans and Christianity are mutually exlusive, because we've all broken a "rule" or two.
Posted by: Marc Vandersluys at April 13, 2005 12:17 PMFirst politically incorrect, now religously incorrect. What comes next in the hierarchy?
Posted by: BrightLeaf at April 13, 2005 12:38 PMActually, isn't that politically correct religious progressiveness?
Had you speculated that he was gay and married, I might have seen it that way.
Posted by: BrightLeaf at April 13, 2005 1:11 PMAnd in another setback:
President Bush has "no gay artists" on his iPod.
Posted by: Cal at April 13, 2005 3:08 PMIf Jesus was an Essene, he spent most of his life being celibate (regardless whether he was married, as some speculate).
Posted by: lrC at April 13, 2005 3:11 PMThey're not "mutually exclusive". Christian or not, we've all sinned. However, Jesus, the Son of God did not sin. It is more correct to say "Christ" and "homosexual" are mutually exclusive.
Kate, you should have added an "!" after the "?" in the thread title.
Oh sure. Like I've got nothing better to do than look after comments threads that run into the triple digits.
Posted by: Kate at April 13, 2005 6:15 PMTouchy?!
Posted by: Jack at April 13, 2005 6:18 PMMoses looks a lot like a pumped blue Peter.
Posted by: richfisher at April 13, 2005 6:55 PMJesus was gay. Allah's a woman. And Buddah was just short for his weight.
Posted by: Brian M. at April 13, 2005 10:41 PMwas jesus gay? thats past tense.i believe the tomb was empty=ressurection so is jesus gay?personally i dont believe so but i do know he was a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief.
Posted by: doug at April 14, 2005 12:05 AMWell, even a hardcore Papist like myself finds watching the s-l-o-w b-u-t s-t-e-a-d-y implosion of the Anglican church just a bit too creepy and "voyeuristic" sometimes...
Posted by: JJM at April 14, 2005 6:33 AMChristmas in Bethlehem. The three wisemen dismount from their camels in front of the stable, arms laden with gifts, and the first one through the doorway, smashes his head on the top of the doorframe. He reels back, claps his hand to his forehead, and shouts "Jesus Christ!" Mary jumps out of a stable stall, and cries: "That's a great name- I was gonna call him Fred."
Posted by: dave at April 18, 2005 1:04 AMcheap levitra online Clearly, then, the city is not a concrete jungle, it is a human zoo.
Posted by: cheap levitra online at April 22, 2005 3:43 PM