Pennsylvania has settled a federal election integrity lawsuit
.. saying that it has removed more than 178,000 ineligible voter registrations and promising greater transparency in its future housekeeping efforts.
As part of its settlement with conservative legal group Judicial Watch, Pennsylvania and several of its counties will publish information related to voter registration, including the total number of active voters; total number of inactive voters; and total number of voters removed from the voter rolls due to death, failure to respond to an address confirmation notice, and failure to vote in the two most recent federal general elections.
Biden won Pennsylvania by 80,555 votes.
And yet, according to the Guardian …
“There’s no evidence of widespread fraud, and election officials across the US, including Republican leaders, have repeatedly reaffirmed this over the last two years. The Trump campaign’s own efforts to show that thousands of ballots cast under the names of deceased people in Georgia came up empty, with findings that contradicted the former president’s claims, a recent report revealed. There is no evidence in any state of fraud or irregularities that affected any election outcomes.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/10/fact-checking-the-trump-town-hall
Who do believe? Pennsylvania (under threat of law suit) or the Guardian? And thanks to Judicial Watch.
I NEVER believe that ANYTHING the left says is the truth. They are agenda-driven. Any principles that they may have are thrown out the window, as long as it serves the objective. To the left, the ends DO justify the means.
The only “principle” that the left would maintain (if you can call it a moral principle), is to do anything that would lead toward achieving their ultimate utopia, and that includes lying, cheating, and stealing.
The left cannot be trusted to tell the truth. I’ve seen it for myself first hand time and time again over my 60+ years, and I was bamboozled for most of that time until I woke up 20 years ago.
And thanks to Judicial Watch.
Yeppers. A few counties down, hundreds to go.
You might think this would be a more prominent news story in places like the New York Times, WaPo, and CNN. But, surprisingly, it’s not!
[deleted. stop trolling. – ED]
[deleted. stop trolling. – ED]
Elections are Safe and Effective.
The ballot drop boxes are secure … Nevermind the mules
It’s blindingly obvious to any objective observer that the 2020 US presidential election was stolen.
It is also obvious that if the judiciary admits this fact they are inviting civil war.
Given the lack of effort to close the loopholes through which the election was stolen, one must conclude the the Democrats managed their fraud with the blessing of the RINOs.
We have an oligarchy disguised as a republic.
No fraud right, right?
81 million votes? I have a bridge to sell you, if you believe that.
“81 million votes? I have a bridge to sell you, if you believe that.”
And more black votes than Barack Obama got, too.
And at the same time that PDT had the best black GOP turnout since 1960 IIRC [or 1964?] and record black unemployment.
“And at the same time that PDT had the best black GOP turnout since 1960 IIRC [or 1964?] and record black (employment).
Yes, and record low Latino unemployment as well…best in 50 years.
Paging Allan S, Paging Allan S, OFFICIAL election fraud findings on the white courtesy phone…
Did you skip this part:
“In September 2021, the commonwealth told the court that it “identified 27 counties to remove outstanding inactive voters who had failed to return a confirmation notice and ******did not participate in the subsequent two consecutive federal elections.*******”
“With the [Pennsylvania Secretary of State’s] assistance, the counties removed every single inactive voter eligible for removal from the rolls,” it said in a court filing. “The total inactive voters removed was 178,258. There are now 0 inactive voters eligible for removal in each of the identified 27 counties.””
The existence of inactive voters on voting rolls does not prove fraud.
“I don’t understand therefore frauuuuud!”
Hey unDORK
when you are that mathematically challenged, quit proving it.
Inactive voters lists allow for more fraudulent ballots to be presented, that’s why in 2009 acorn was registering non existent voters, as many as 50,000 in one state alone. And that was under O’Butthole’s watch .
How can they be a part of fraud WHEN THEY DO NOT F*CKING VOTE?
Do you have a cranium density issue?
“How can they be a part of fraud WHEN THEY DO NOT F*CKING VOTE?”
How can you not understand the difference between confirmed inactive voters and the ineligible voters who somehow managed to vote anyway? Read it again…SLOWLY, this time.
“Do you have a cranium density issue?”
Do you?
So then find ineligible voters that voted. What does that have to do with an inactive list?
AllanS, I used to be a Union rep on the railway here in the UK. Whenever industrial action was on the horizon I had to check the list of union members of my branch and confirm all the details – are the people listed still at the branch (not retired, changed depots, left service etc) correct names, addresses, dates of birth.
If the details were incorrect the ballot could be null and void if the number involved was enough to affect the result of the ballot. Didn’t matter whether the vote was cast or not.
Obviously in this case, the number of errors is enough to affect the outcome.
Vote early. Vote often
The mantra of the Democrats
and save some ballots to count at the end of the tallying process.
If my math is right, around 54% of those 178K votes give PA to Trump. Hmm. Margin of victory by fraud?
I also understand Kari Lake’s case is going in her favour. I know AS, water under the bridge, baked in the cake, obfuscated away.
Most likely, but still good to know. Add to that Biden’s reverse Trump incompetence, his revolting rookie radical revolutionaries, deer in the headlights mendactic media calling on Trump to save their ratings and divert from the now obvious issue of Biden influence peddling.
Trump, like Harper here, looks like Moses compared to this this mendactic band of malevolent hypocrites. driven by wealth and power.
Btw, the actual PA POTUS count was 50% (exactly, how about that) to 48.8%. Those mail in ballots arriving by truck after poll closing helped?
Only an insurrectionist would question that, or a Trump hater or a power lusting incompetent hypocrite unconcerned with citizen welfare.
But I repeat myself, Allan S. Progressives must have their wars to wash away the blood and toil of their transactions of decline.
There was a 3 day grace period for late ballots as per the Supreme Court of PA due to postal issues. Approximately 10,000 ballots arrived during this time. PA also has a 7 day grace period for military ballots.
Before you start spouting off about Act 77, it was bipartisan legislation. I believe everyone on both sides voted for it in 2019.
Sure, that’s why trucks full of ballots arrived at close polling stations. You doth project too much.
And remember that is only ONE aspect of the fraud operations.
Feel free to list the other 787 million.
Which 787 million? Time to re-evaluate your medications.
“Feel free to list the other 787 million.”
We would love to. Too bad though that your side decided to spend MILLIONS of dollars in lawyers to stop audits, investigations and recounts (real ones) from actually happening….because that’s how innocent people always react when challenged, right Allan?
About the dead guy that was elected by a significant margin in Pennsylvania even though he had been DEAD for weeks! NOT DAYS, GD WEEKS!! Who is serving in his place?
And if he was truly dead, do they have to pay his successor?
Perhaps those voters have a good thing going on there.
Under PA law substitutions cannot happen after the ballots have been printed. So if you want to vote for the dead guys replacement in the same party in a by-election, you have to vote for the dead guy so that he wins.
Yet another case of “I do not understand therefore fraud”
“Yet another case of “I do not understand therefore fraud””
As opposed your own tired old “I do not understand therefore *no* fraud”? Please…
(oh, and he never claimed it was fraud, either. Pay attention.)