75 Replies to “A Global Conspiracy”

  3. Prison? Hell no, they get elected as POTUS and PM.

    Crime PAYS! State sanctioned murder of its own citizens, it saves money, dontcha know?

      1. These people always land on their feet. it doesn’t matter that they should be in prison and that any common sense person would see the obvious without difficulty.

        They’re so well connected and protected that they’ll never be touched.

        The rest of us? Why that clinking sound you hear is the sound of the jailhouse door key hitting the bottom of the garbage can.

        They’ll all get promotions and a new car.

  5. Campbell is overstretching.

    He’s jumping to the conclusion that the Corona virus originated in a lab, and it might well have. But it’s not certain, and different scientists can draw different conclusion. No need to invoke global conspiracies.

    1. KM you’ve always been full of crap. Do you ever back up your accusation with anything like FACTS or a believable alternative hypothesis? Dr. Campbell’s had quite a few other videos loaded with such FACTS that do support his words – overwhelmingly so. Not that you’ve ever watched a single one. Go infect a wet market pangolin with your make-believe cross species naturally mutated virus ya lazy dishonest twit.

      1. Actually, I cite scientific papers all the time on this subject, far more than those who disagree with me do.

        Did you not notice how casually and quickly Campbell went from “There are credible scientists who believe that the virus originated in a lab” to “It’s a given.”? Did you not see that sleight of hand?

        But you didn’t want to see it. You badly want to believe want to believe in a giant conspiracy theory, so you shut your skeptical faculties down.

        I don’t have a dog in this fight. The lab hypothesis seems highly plausible. But Campbell is being sloppy here.

        1. “Actually, I cite scientific papers all the time on this subject” Too funny. Would these be those ” peer review” papers like Lancet and Nature publish?

          1. LindaT:

            Sometimes the papers come from those sources, but mostly from other sources.

            Do you have better sources? What are they, precisely?

          1. MB:

            I don’t need to cite an external source here because I’m pointing out the logical sleight of hand Campbell just pulled.

            At any rate, you have cited nothing yourself.

            And no, I won’t shut up.

          2. You NEVER cite a darn thing KM. I DID say that Dr Campbell ALREADY proved his point that original SARS-COV-2 was lab sourced in his PAST videos. You still haven’t learned to read. Find the one about the TOTAL lack of an intermediate animal reservoir between the bat species in question and humans that would have been critical to facilitate natural trans-species infection. If that doesn’t exist then the wet market theory crashes because the HOW is missing (never mind that bats or pangolins don’t even appear to have been sold there). Play devil’s advocate all you want but you always come off as a Gov’t/Big Pharma Lackey. Must pay well to have no shame. But hey, cite something even if it’s a Fauci Feb/20 email telling everyone involved with the Wuhan lab to get their origin story matching the official narrative. Smh.

        4. Funny thing is…..real world data trumps “scientific papers”…..especially those that are pushed by the same fraud artists trying to cover their asses. For example, anybody who takes a look at the New Zealand new case and death data and pretends that the “vaccines” are “safe and effective” have rocks in their head. There is no question the virus came from the lab. Lots of bullshit trying to kick dirt over it since this gong show began.

    2. Campbell is overstretching?
      It isn’t Campbell.
      Did you even listen to Dr Redfield?

      1. This Dr. Redfield?

        https://youtu.be/-EvvQ03BCZc

        To quote: “COVID-19 more likely was the result of an accidental lab leak..” More likely. In other words, probably but not absolutely certain. In short, there’s a case to be made for the other side.

        Which means that yes, there is room for legitimate disagreement that even Redfield seems to recognize. If you wanted to cite someone who says there’s absolutely no way the virus developed naturally then you picked the wrong guy.

        1. Now who is grasping at straws? Why, it’s KillerM. Sonething does not have to be 100% provable to be highly likely. In fact, if you refuse to accept any less than 100%, you will undoubtedly end up forever arguing academic points, and never moving forward in the real world.

          1. I have no idea what point you’re trying to make, but you certainly missed mine.

            Which is this: there’s no reason to believe that scientists who strongly believed that the virus originated naturally were part of a conspiracy theory. There’s are legitimate arguments to be made on either side, as Dr. Redfield seems to acknowledge.

          2. Hey KM you Big Gov’t/Big Pharma patsy. Explain this: https://hotair.com/allahpundit/2021/06/18/fauci-yes-there-was-a-secret-meeting-among-scientists-last-february-to-discuss-the-origins-of-the-coronavirus-n397583

            Looks like unethical conduct by so called “respected” scientists to me (secret meetings tend to go that way for some reason – that’s why they keep gang members arrested for a crime separate until trial). But hey, I’ve got an open mind for reasonable facts, so go ahead and CITE something. If not, then SHUT-IT.

        3. Yes Smarmot, that Dr. Redfield. Nice cherry picking of his quote, followed with your twisted twisting of his stance. Just to straight away disabuse you of resting on your clay feet any longer, Redfield later in his testimony says that the virus “most likely” came from the lab, among other gems like “not scientifically plausible” and “antithetical to science” and “they squashed any debate” and “wait a second, this isn’t natural” (see below).

          To quote YOUR interpretation of his statements: “In short, there’s a case to be made for the other side.” You then go on to try to convince us that while Redfield thinks the lab leak is probably correct, he also thinks the natural origin theory is a legitimate argument held by honorable scientists with strong, well-founded beliefs (vs. crooked cowards engaged in an obvious conspiratorial CYA operation while excluding the sitting CDC Director from subsequent discussions and statements about COVID’s origin — SCIENCY!).

          Redfield’s testimony obliterates your disingenuous spin, and I suspect you know that or else you wouldn’t keep trying to nonchalantly shop your awful “nothing to see here” take. So yes, this Dr. Redfield (this first quote is from the same opening statement you cherry picked from):

          “Gain of function research has long been controversial within the scientific community and, my own opinion, the COVID-19 pandemic presents a case study on the potential dangers of such research. While many believe that gain of function research is critical to get ahead of viruses by developing vaccines, in this case I believe it was the exact opposite, unleashing a new virus on the world without any means of stopping it and resulting in the deaths of millions of people.”

          Not exactly on the fence, is he Smarm? I offer some more quotes from his testimony below. If you bother to read them and still feel the need to peddle your sorry-ass wares, you need to take a nice long look in the mirror and ask yourself, “Why am I doing this?” Only you can answer that, but even if you do quietly slink away, tail firmly tucked, you still ought to take a moment for some genuine self-reflection. Pretty pathetic. Enjoy.

          “I think just to emphasize in early- to mid-January I did have multiple calls with Fauci, Farrar, and Tedros about how important I thought it was that science get engaged in aggressively pursuing both hypotheses. I also expressed as a clinical virologist that I felt it was not scientifically plausible that this virus went from a bat to humans and became one of the most infectious viruses we have for humans.”

          “I think it’s unfortunate, again I said this before, that this whole approach that was taken on February 1st and subsequently in the month of February, if you really want to be truthful it’s antithetical to science. Science has debate and they squashed any debate.”

          “I think it’s an inaccurate paper that basically was part of a narrative that they were creating…This was a narrative that was decided that they were going to say that this came from the wet market and they were going to do everything they could to support it to negate any discussion about the possibility that this came from a laboratory.”

          “I think there is no doubt that NIH was funding gain-of-function research.”

          “I let them know as a virologist that I didn’t see that this was anything like SARS or MERS because they never learned how to transmit human to human. That I felt this virus was too infectious for humans. There was a lot of evidence that lab actually published in 2014 that they put the ACE2 receptor into humanized mice so it could infect human tissue. I think, you know, we had to really seriously go after the fact it came from the lab.”

          “The epidemics died so when people thought this was like SARS, it’s going to die. But this virus was immediately the most infectious virus, not the most I think, probably right behind measles virus, that we have ever seen infect man. So I immediately said wait a second, this isn’t natural. And then you go back and look at the literature and you find in 2014 this lab actually published a paper that they put the ACE2 receptor into humanized mice so it can affect human tissue. And then you learned that the new COVID which came from bats now can hardly replicate in bats. So how does that happen? So I said that my view as a virologist, again my hypothesis, and I never discredit them for their hypothesis, the spillover, was that this most likely come from the lab and we need to aggressively investigate both hypotheses.”

          “I was concerned because of the presence of the furin cleavage site that we’ve talked about. And that I think it’s important to understand what that cleavage site does. That cleavage site totally changes the orientation of the binding domain of COVID. So we know it could not see the ACE2 receptor which is the human receptor. It totally changes the orientation now so it has high affinity for human receptors. So that furin cleavage site bothered me. It didn’t seem that it belonged there, and then when you look at the sequences that it used it’s beyond the committee but i know many of you have looked into it, the sequences that they used in those 12 nucleotides for arginine were the arginine sequences nucleotide triplet that were coded for the human arginine. So why did this virus have the arginine sequences for humans there, not bat? It was very disconcerting to me. It looks like this virus was engineered.”

          “As I mentioned earlier unfortunately I was excluded from those conversations which I found retroactively very disappointed since I was obviously a virologist and very engaged, and I actually had asked Jeremy Farrar, Tony Fauci, and Tedros to have these conversations. And then to be excluded I found…unusual. I do think it illustrates one point that’s worth really focusing on. When you have a group of people that decide there can only be one point of view that’s problematic. And I’ll keep on saying it’s antithetical to science, and unfortunately that’s what they did.”

    3. Confirmed PRC shill. It’s beyond obvious it was from a lab. The only question now is whether it was an accident or not.

    4. “But it’s not certain, and different scientists can draw different conclusion. No need to invoke global conspiracies.”

      What is the “need ” here?
      Is the “need” to avoid saying “global conspiracy” on the same scale, close, or larger than the “need” to fully investigate a million dead still warm bodies?

      1. Of course the lab leak theory should be investigated. I never said differently.

        You should rebut what my actual point is, not what you imagine it is.

        1. I din’t say you said it shouldn’t be investigated.

          You brought up “need”.
          I asked “Is the “need” to avoid saying “global conspiracy” on the same scale, close, or larger than the “need” to invistigate?

          “Same scale, close, or larger?

    5. It did originate in a lab. And as George Carlin once said “There is no need for conspiracy when interests converge”.

      1. And how can you be certain?

        And no, George Carlin quote do not constitute proof.

    6. There was a conspiracy to suppress anything that questioned the bat2man theory, correct?

  6. Is anyone else seeing Notley NDP ads at the start of Dr. Campbell’s videos? Speaking of scoundrels…must have a lot of coin to do all the blanket advertising that the NDP’s doing daily in AB. Where’s the money coming from? It sure the heck isn’t from their base.

    2. I usually ad block youtube but every single time I see a youtube advertisement it’s the NDP fearmongering attack ads.

    3. “Is anyone else seeing Notley NDP ads at the start of Dr. Campbell’s videos? “

      Over the course of the last, say, 2 months or so I’ve seen her attack ad on U-tube. It make’s no sense to me. She’s critical of 3 of UCP’s policies, but doesn’t say why they’re bad or what she has to offer as an alternative. I keep hoping for a punch line but it never arrives.

      They’re stupid, so is she and so is anyone who’d vote for the Prog bitch.

  8. This is, of course, important information and a good starting point, but I want to see investigations of the story behind the vaccines, which potentially are killing and damaging more people than the virus.

      1. The story on the Winnipeg lab would fill in a lot of blanks is my guess. That needs to be investigated.

    2. agree Linda – media and politicians who in a uniform and coordinated fashion world wide, engaged in a psyop to advance their agenda.

  9. This was about germ warfare that was 1) done illegally and 2) got out of the lab and 3) killed lots of folks and 4) allowed some to make vast fortunes and seize power.

    Who allowed this germ warfare to begin? Who knew about it and allowed it to continue?
    Nevermind, no one will ever ever go to prison.

  10. To km at 4:45

    “I doubt you even know what my point was.”

    But you’re not sure, eh?

    1. JMM

      The troll is no different than a couple other trolls here, that state “I’m a conservative”, but everything they state and argue is the direct opposite, closed minded, shilling for the official narrative from CBC, CNN, CDC, etc. and their favourite Liberal/NDP tyrant.

      Allah and KM are carbon copy trolls/sock puppets, arguing for arguments sake. There are no discussions with them, just smug Liberal Groupthink.

      1. ” … just smug Liberal Groupthink.”

        Nawww, it’s not even that. It’s how they get off. Pudd pullers.

    2. I think KM is Sam Harris, one of the smrt people.
      You know the smrt people that will do anything to be right. They are that smrt.

  11. More to the point.. All our? leaders and professionals come from the same place, University.. It really was a coup to remove Donald Trump.. Or you can believe that it was all for nothing..

    One hand washes the other.. Exactly why the far left has been given everything they ever wanted and more for their participation..
    Or its just a coincidence..

    Now, go eat your bugs and go take your 15 minute walk :)..

  12. In Canada there will be no justice until all the Provincial Premiers along with Trudeau are removed from office , and then some of the lower villains such as the provincial medical boards and senior health officers at the provincial and major city level.

    There is a very long list and so far only Kenney has left the field.

    1. Well, I’d go a lot farther. Ninety-five percent of all politicians and government managers.

      But it isn’t going to happen. So accept it, anticipate the likely consequences, and take care of you and yours.

      1. … Jamie MacMaster

        Yup .. have been doing that from the start , with the understanding there will be no justice. The hope is some of these bastards fell for their own lies , and injected the mRNA VAX.

        1. Multiple times, Brian. They can all take the shares that were supposed to be for myself and the better half, which we proudly ignored.

          Sorry, not sorry to the trolls, alive and well,better than ever despite temporary bouts with the Woohoo flu. A 99.7% chance of survival is an easy, winnable risk, and proven!

          The best thing about being a conspiracy theorist is not having myocarditis, not having strokes, not having Bells Palsy, not having neuropathy, not having uncontrollable seizures, not having sudden heart attacks and not having #DiedSuddenly.

          Life is good

          1. I wish I was as lucky as you, Dan. I was obliged to take the two jabs so I could travel for work, AKA my livelihood, to feed the familly, etc. I wonder whether the mild heart attack I had 6 months after the 2nd jab was due to that. A friend of mine was in similar circumastances and had a similar fate. We are now both “stenters”. Now, as middle aged guys, it may just be par for the course, but the question is forever there with me …

          2. That’s unfortunate Robert, but all too familiar. Its likely the cause, however, no one really knows unless your heart tissue gets biposied, and unless you’re dead, that’s not going to be performed.
            Its those suffering sudden death in their teens, twenties and thirties, that are highly probable from the vax. Young adults do not die from M.I.s Period. Excess deaths are peaking, starting in early 2021……..from historical norms. Gee, what changed?
            See Edward Dowd for detailed analysis on that.
            My wife was given the jab demand as well, but denied it and as a result, the BCGovernment, with the aid of the corrupt BCGEU, fired her, along with a few hundred others. Legal actions still in early stages, despite the ENDP wanting to turn the page under a new commie freespender.
            I was also faced with that choice by my national employer, federally regulated, but since I was working from home, and in an engineering discipline with proprietary skills, they made exceptions and I remain employed, though all new employees must be jibbyjabbed with the mutant gene therapy.
            We’ve both experienced great personal discrimination, hate and intolerance, that has changed our direction in life. We’ve sold from what was going to be a lifelong holiday property, due to the small minded freaks that ran the place, we have displaced relationships, to this day that remain fractured, but, we remain defiant, firm, and if anything, radicalized. Thanks Bonnie, thanks Dix, thanks Trudeau, etc.

          3. Dan’s, My daughter in BC also lost her job because she refused the vax. They are recinding this on April 3rd, and we will we if people get their jobs back. I also think compensation is due.

      2. 97% of governments, their constituents and programs, are bad for humanity.

  13. Dr. Campbell has had his eyes opened and he is astonished to find he can see a world-wide conspiracy and his honesty makes him wonder that he has gotten to that position. I figured it out much earlier, by looking at the evidence. But I did not have peers in my profession enforcing conformity.

    1. See Dr Mike Yeadon. Former Pfizer executive, for a deeper rabbit hole description.

      Pfizer Pfaked the trials and unilaterally neglected all typical protocols of development.

      He comes to Campbell’s conclusion, a long time ago from an insider’s angle.

  14. The bug and the vaxxes go hand in hand. Both, c/w 4000 patents, are the creation of the Pandemic Virus Industrial Complex that outsourced some of the research to the ChiComs.

    1. Latest from Dr. Campbell. Per UK government data, in healthy adults age 40-49, the risk of a serious side effect from a booster is 1100 x greater than the risk of severe hospitalization from the bug itself. Not sure if sudden death a year after getting jabbed gets included in the figures.

  15. Was Covid from Lab or Nature? Interesting question because we need to punish bad behavior, and learn how to do better for next time. But this one issue at the start of it all should not be a smoke screen for the many other horrible issues during the run of the pandemic. Mandated jabs, lockdowns, masks, school closures, mixing the sick with the old, and more. Those leading bad decisions should be named, published, fired and their undeserved gains confiscated.

    1. Its manufactured.

      The Furin Cleavage site adds extra genetic code, not found in nature. This is the smoking gun.

      Funded by NIH (Fauci), through Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, to perform the ‘research’ in chiNA! This, after the practice was banned in the US by Hussein.

      To this day, the Deep State continues to obscure and obfuscate, creating illusions as to the origins of the virus. The latest propaganda is The Atlantic (of David Frum infamy) publishing today that its now “Raccoon Dogs” that spread the virus. Their pangolin theory didn’t hold, so why not another misdirection?

      1. Caring about the origin is yet another form of obfuscation.
        The only thing that matters is what our leaders did to us, whether it came from a bat or Dr. Evil himself.
        I’m surprised they haven’t tried to pin it on Putin yet, FFS.

  16. Anyone remember Chris Sky?
    Thrown under the bus by the right for voicing an opinion that the right didn’t like.

  18. So, OJ likes deleting comments critical of himself.
    That man is no friend of freedom of speech, and no friend of a free people.
    The man has come out against gun rights again and again.
    The fact that SDA and BCF seem to love this man is proof positive of their status as controlled opposition.

  20. Dear SDA commenters,
    I would really appreciate factual and thoughtful comments/responses on that second John C video.
    To me, it sound pretty damning, but perhaps I don’t fully understand,
    So please enlighten us!

    Thanks,
    /Johan

    1. True and damning words.
      Which will not be reported in the Government Media.
      However,by making the speech inside the house of commons,he(The MP) provides cover for us to discuss on the censored internet..

      The best meme I have seen in a while,if you google it,is a simple picture,with caption..
      “Thank you for making us a “Vaccine”.
      We have made you a “Play swing””.
      With a very nice picture of a gallows.

      And while the good doctor has honestly laid out his own path to enlightenment,he clings to the belief that public outrage will be enough to defeat our Liar Class.

      Me thinks they can only be rewarded,as they deserve,if we do so ourselves.
      Seems The Terror is the only remedy for a Parasitic Overload.
      For ticks and leeches never let go,for the good of their host…They fall off when they are so fat,that they can no longer hold on.
      Or until the host dies.
      Oh Canada.

      1. “The best meme I have seen in a while,if you google it,is a simple picture,with caption..
        “Thank you for making us a “Vaccine”.
        We have made you a “Play swing””.
        With a very nice picture of a gallows.”

        Posted it here the other day. Yer welcome.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation