Safe and Effective®

Abstract

Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, several countries faced short-term fertility declines in 2020 and 2021, a development which did not materialize in Scandinavian and German-speaking countries. However, more recent birth statistics show a steep fertility decline in the aftermath of the pandemic in 2022. We aim to provide data on the unexpected birth decline in 2022 in Germany and Sweden and relate these data to pandemic-related contextual developments which could have influenced the post-pandemic fertility development. We rely on monthly birth statistics and present seasonally adjusted monthly Total Fertility Rates (TFR) for Germany and Sweden. We relate the nine-months lagged fertility rates to contextual developments regarding COVID-19 mortality and morbidity, unemployment rates, and COVID-19 vaccinations.

The seasonally adjusted monthly TFR of Germany dropped from 1.5-1.6 in 2021 to 1.3-1.4 in 2022, a decline of about 14 %. In Sweden, the corresponding TFR dropped from about 1.7 in 2021 to 1.5-1.6 in 2022, a decline of almost 10 %. There is no association of the fertility trends with changes in unemployment, infection rates, or COVID-19 deaths. However, there is a strong association between the onset of vaccination programmes and the fertility decline nine months after of this onset. The fertility decline in the first months of 2022 in Germany and Sweden is remarkable. Common explanations of fertility change during the pandemic do not apply in its aftermath. The association between the onset of mass vaccinations and subsequent fertility decline indicates that people adjusted their behaviour to get vaccinated before becoming pregnant, as societies were opening up with post-pandemic life conditions. Our study provides novel information on fertility declines in countries previously not affected by any COVID-19 baby bust. We provide a first appraisal of the COVID-19-fertility nexus in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic.

The vaccine that causes menstrual changes also causes behavioral changes. Ok.

Download it here.

50 Replies to “Safe and Effective®”

    1. An excellent book, and more chilling than “1984,” IMHO. “Quietus” sounds so lovely, doesn’t it?

  1. Safe and “effective” Dr.John Campbell
    Summary
    Vaccine not permitted for Britain, but okay for those stupid ignorant peasants in India.
    They’re brown, so it’s okay to inject them with the shite cause they’re peasants and no one worries about poor brown people.
    706000 vaccinations to prevent one hospitalization.
    Seven serious adverse events for every hospitalization prevented.
    https://youtu.be/onNe5VMQAwQ

      1. This on the aftermath of a study citing fertility concerns. If I didn’t know better I would almost suspect an ulterior motive rather than vaccinating for profit. After all, the vaxx is useless as a vaccine, but with the proper amount of fear stirred in, it certainly benefits the bottom line.

  2. This may not be “NEWS”, but as time rolls on, the Substantiation (ie EVIDENCE)…grows by leaps n bounds.

    They tried to Murder us all with a “Faulty” Bio weapon, Now its Food, its production…and the destruction thereof as their latest angle to eliminate population. As Birth rates drop which to me, will continue to do so, what couple will start a family when a domicile is min 500k and interest rates sit at 5.5%..?? Only the UBER Riche… (By Design..??)

    When will we make…? “The STAND”
    How long till the mass of brain addled reality deniers wake up…?

    1. What’s amazing is that the worldwide army of woke foot soldiers doing the bidding of the elites haven’t noticed that Davos is a “whites only” club.

  3. In response to the Chinese Communist Flu, which had nothing to do with the Chinese Communist gain of function research partially funded by the US Govt / Anthony Fauci, the entire planet was locked down, wreaking all sorts of havoc that is still playing out.

    One of the issues slowly working its way thru the media / government embargos is the effectiveness and unintended consequences of the vaccines which are now shown be neither as effective as hyped or as harmless as claimed.

    Cue Ronald Reagan: “I’m from the gov’t, and I’m here to help.”

      1. No way Megan Rapinoe reproduces, having to care about another? I don’t think so, Megan is about Megan, full stop. Can you imagine how many times her parents wished she was a BJ? The boosters will have to do the job on her, still not safe, but in her case I would say effective.

      2. John.

        Please let her be “smart” and go for 8….the world could certainly use Far Less TWATS.

  4. I have personally feared from the beginning this was a depopulation event. If birthrates don’t tick back up this will make the disruptions to society made by China’s one child policy look like a walk in the park.

    1. You’re such an old worry-wart, JB. We have MAID for anyone who can’t get the services they need from society….

    1. A study like you linked which is based on people filling out questionnaires is not science, but are you really so dense you believe this study’s conclusion about male fertility, given the only people it questioned were women?

        1. The scientific literature is also irrecoverably corrupt from dump trucks of big Pharma money, just like the regulatory agencies.

          1. To simply dismiss the massive amount of scientific work done on the pandemic because you don’t like their conclusions is a bit too convenient.

            Whatever the failings of scientific research — and there are certainly some — it’s far better than whatever you are basing your beliefs on.

        2. That’s pretty funny….as usual. The issue is HUMAN fertility….doesn’t make much difference which of the sexes (and yes, there are only two) is infertile, does it?

          1. Art:

            You realize that the paper is NOT blaming a drop in fertility directly on the vaccine, right?

        3. KM apparently just ignored the graph, and is implying that the precipitous drop in fertility at the end of 2021 is from…wait for it…covid infections.

          1. And you, HiHo, just ignored 8 papers showing the COVID infection causes a drop in male infertility.

        4. You have no ability to distinguish between a good study and a bad study, nor a meta-analysis/literature review and a real study.

          1. Given that I have written numerous scientific articles (not in medicine) and am an editor for a scientific journal, I do actually have some ability in discerning bad studies.

            But it’s apparent that you’re definition of a bad study is one that reaches conclusions you don’t like.

          2. KM, given the BS that has come from “scientific journals” of late, it comes as no surprise that you write for them.

          3. HiHo: Okay, so you reject modern science.

            You must have something more reliable to replace it with. What is that, precisely?

        5. A whole 41 or so men with no pre-Covid baseline for comparison, and the caveat “severe” Covid infection without defining what that is. Colour me unimpressed. Especially vs. countrywide data.

          1. Trying reading what I read. That paper lists 8 other papers that discusses COVID infection and male fertility. That’s why I gave a link to it.

          2. The first paper referenced was garbage, doesn’t lead me to want to read more if the first one referenced was that pathetic.

    1. Hmmm, reminds me of…..HIV/AIDS.
      Whose paws were all over that debacle, why one Dr. Fraudchi AKA Mini MEngele.

      1. Yes, indeed.
        A very large portion at the opening of RFK’s magnum opus, The Real Anthony Fauci, dealt with AIDs. It was the mother of all eye-openers to read this and see the frightening parallel to the contemporary PSYOP 19.
        I got glimpes of it in an earlier reading of “the disgraced” Judy Mikovits’ book Plague of Corruption.

        1. I’ve had that book for a few months now. Trying to finish another before I get into it.

      1. Either way it’s a killer STD.
        One now has to look at a potential unvaxxed partner’s previous sex history from the inception of the Goo shots going forward, since its not known if the Juice has an off switch or it just keeps making ‘ killer stuff ‘.
        That means any partners that may have been vexed and that they were not aware of.
        Abstinence/celibacy will be in vogue, so will pure untainted blood, sperm, eggs, body parts, etc.
        How much will a human that is strictly pure be worth and would that person need to protect themselves from being harvested by some unscrupulous ghouls ?
        Is there a simple test, like the HIV one to detect that, if not someone will make a killing.

        Perhaps it may be in a purebloods best interest to not signal that information and remain secretive about that lest one gets drained, sliced and diced.
        That is one of my worries going forward.

    2. I don’t think the vax is transmissible. The spike protein, on the other hand, quite probably is.
      A certain number of lipid nanoparticles containing mRNA is injected. These particles do not reproduce, they get into cells and get the cells to start churning out the spike protein, in an uncontrolled fashion.

      The “off switch” for protein translation is very poorly understood, and has to do with so-called “junk DNA” (DNA that does not code for proteins), causing the transcribed RNA to fold about in certain, very poorly understood ways, preventing the ribosome from moving ahead on the mRNA strand, protein folding, positive and negative feedback loops of incredible complexity…things like temperature, Ph levels, sugar levels, other proteins being translated from mRNA in the vicinity, other strands of mRNA in the vicinity…
      There is literally millions of man-years of research needed just to scratch the surface, but if and when we do have a full understanding, well, we’ll be able to grow products like cars and radios from a nutrient-rich soup.

      1. Protein folding RNA prions leads to Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease better known as Mad Cow .
        There has been some study on vexxed people who exhibited all the traits of this disorder and dying within 3 to 4 months of the mRNA shots.
        Not a good way to go either.

  5. On the six-o’clock news this morning on AM 770, here in Calgary, a leading researcher at U of C was interviewed regarding the tripling of the incidence of liver disease in young people ‘everywhere’. No age-range was stated. Various possible scenarios were touched upon including sedentary, social and dietary habits during the pandemic but over-indulgence in alcohol was clearly favoured. We are all well aware of what happens when young people ‘come of age’! Happily, I am now advised to limit myself to 3-4 drinks per week rather than the previously advised 2-3! Yay!
    Now, my scant understanding of diseases in the major organs is that they generally develop over an extensive time-frame suggesting that the current situation may be the result of over-indulgence during times somewhat previous to the onset of Covid 19. However, in the light of the growing volume of concern over the “Safe and Effective ” status of the covid ‘vaxxes’ one could be forgiven for embarking upon, at least, a tentative exploration of the possibility of any association. Not a whisper!
    The silence is deafening!

    1. What was the over indulgence straight whisky from morning till the wee hours of the morning? Hell I’ve seen alcoholics make it into their 70s and 80s, and they consumed alcohol.

  6. You are aware that this paper is NOT claiming that vaccines cause a drop in fertility, right?

Navigation