Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Pilgrim's Progress
How Not To Become A Millenial
Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
Wonder what else the chatbot can’t talk about because it’s been programmed not to. Maybe ask it about arguments against grooming children or supporting transgenderism or voting Democrat?
I wonder does the idiot like to eat, because he won’t be doing that if his insane ideas are accepted anywhere. There is no renewable energy other than freaking trees.
Probably not. That idiot is an AI.
Likely he means the idiot who originally programmed the AI.
“Wokeing” with the times?
Or “What I said yesterday has no bearing on what I say today. Nor do either on what I will say tomorrow”
They do it because they can.. In the past if governments could have rewritten every book in every library without it being a logistics and cost nightmare they would have.. They were forced to “float” ideas with wide appeal.. Testing the waters as they go.. Today they push a button and say FU..
The awful realization that all that was good, from the age of enlightenment to our much ballyhooed rights and freedoms were allowed to flourish simply because the technology didn’t exist to kill it in the crib.. Progress has happened in spite of the human condition, not because of it..
When can we just cut off the rest of the country ?
Eat more cows. Burn more coal.
Merry Christmas.
Yessssss!
Pull my finger.
While we’ve made efforts to make the model refuse inappropriate requests, it will sometimes respond to harmful instructions or exhibit biased behavior. We’re using the Moderation API to warn or block certain types of unsafe content, but we expect it to have some false negatives and positives for now. We’re eager to collect user feedback to aid our ongoing work to improve this system.
__________________________________________
It would seem there is an opportunity to provide the AI trainers with some feedback relative to an obvious “biased behavior.” I’d take advantage of that. The chatgbt is, also, programmed for follow-up questions if their information is truthful. Ask it “In the US over 1/2 million birds were killed by wind turbines in the last year. My question is “Why does chatgbt hate birds so much?”
The “Chatbots” return variations of what they were exposed to. If the training samples were Party propaganda, that is what you got back. No surprise there. The Party loves the Chatbots. No deviations. Look for that in your comment section.
AIs exposed to the Internet inevitably become hard-right to auth-right and have to be shut down. That, I think, is their true value: demonstrating that without any pre-existing filters, an Internet data sponge will show you what people on the Internet actually think and say.
And Siri says Jesus Christ is a fictional character. Watch our culture get slowly flushed down the toilet. And what replaces it? Shut up and OBEY …
Yeah. I don’t use this stuff, but I’d be afraid of what I’d get if I asked it about the pros and cons of human sacrifice…
“human AI trainers provided conversations in which they played both sides..”
_________________________________
Here’s the problem with that. I think it would be difficult to equally passionate if you, yourself, hold a certain opinion. But, for argument’s sake, let’s say the human trainer provided an objective and substantive argument for both sides of the “climate change” issue relative to fossil fuels…the chatgbt is going to subsidize that information with other stimulus (inclusive of incorrect data relative to faulty temperature collection locations…as well as an avalanche of garbage accusations that inundate the internet. You know the stuff “98% of scientists agree that global warming is caused by man-made carbon outputs and the like.”
In short, and AI doesn’t have a bullshit filter. They as much as admit that on their information page. They admit that they use a moderation software to block certain questions (and likely certain responses). And, when the UN or NASA or government agencies spout out the total nonsense stances and narratives on climate change, you have to believe that a bot will give more weight to their positions as opposed to Joe Blow commenting on the internet. It’s rigged, of course. But, that doesn’t explain a totally one sided position, especially if the human trainers covered both sides of the argument as they suggest.
it’s just another wiki.. leftists are the trainers.
Good grief. Even the robots are brainwashed. There is no hope.
I can use “refined fossil fuels” to increase my happiness.
Driving large machines over it.
Pouring incendiary fluid upon it.
Dumping truck loads of salt upon the land it was sited on.
Our progressive comrades and their stupid little machines are blind to human nature.
Our nature being what it is,I maintain there is only one pleasure greater in life,than setting your neighbours home on fire and dancing drunkenly around those flames..
And that one greater pleasure?
If your neighbours are still inside.
Look to our history.
Prove me wrong.
There are good reasons we attempt to educate and civilize our young.
I’ve coded AI, and I have a good understanding of how computers actually work. For this reason, I’ve always regarded most of the talk about “Artificial Intelligence” as magical thinking. Computation is not ideation. Computers do no think, nor can they.
That being said, if you want to persist in the illusion that computers can learn, and believe that they’ll eventually, magically, become sentient, surely you must see that it’ll never work if you keep tinkering with them to prevent them from learning anything that offends against religious dogma. Either they can learn, or they can’t. If you have to keep “fixing” what they’ve learned, you’re doomed to failure.
Google has similarly neutered their once-great search algorithm, by constantly “curating” the results it returns – to the extent that it is rapidly becoming useless for accurately indexing websites.
There’s AI and then there’s “AI”, otherwise known as “the man behind the curtain”.
I feel like we need to name the Chatbot. Maybe “Landrew” or something.