How Wisconsin Streetfighters Disrupted a Democrat Ballot-Gathering System
The raw material of the ballot-gathering strategy is the phantom voter or address. Every ballot needs to tie to someone — even if only a name on a list.
Live, votable ballots accumulate at addresses where the indicated voter does not reside. Those ballots, gathered, are the inventory of electoral victory. He who gathers them can vote them.
The ballot-gathering system was frictionless until 2020. Thousands of phantom addresses inhabited every state’s voter list.
[…]
For the ballot-gathering strategy to work, Democrats need tens of thousands of phantom addresses and voters. A few is not enough. Without thousands of loose ballots tied to phantoms, the edifice comes crashing down.
They also need Republicans to do nothing.
The Wisconsin team proved, in this election, that adding even a small amount of friction – removing thousands of phantom names and identifying several hundred thousand incorrect addresses — has a massive impact on the ballot-gathering system.
Our Wisconsin election heroes applied Fractal Programming technology, funded by Mike Lindell, at scale to find and challenge phantoms. The process is explained at www.Omega4America.com.
They went to scores of county registrars and challenged thousands of phantoms — proof in hand. Quietly, below the radar, they showed registrars, whose job it is to deal with this sort of thing, that Bill Jones was not a real person. They helped clean up addresses that were wrong — either typos or fake.
Any one of those addresses was a landing pad for a loose ballot.
FLASHBACK 2006: “Laurie Hawn, Conservative Candidate in Edmonton Centre, has filed a complaint with the Commissioner of Elections Canada after massive voter list irregularities were uncovered by his campaign.”
But the pillow guy is a looney crank election denier who must be CRUSHED … by the likes of David Hogg
https://outsider.com/news/activist-david-hogg-quits-pillow-company-intended-put-mike-lindells-mypillow-out-business/
Turns out he’s doing the practical work that the RNC hasn’t even officially acknowledged exists. And Lindell likely SAVED a Wisc. Senator seat for the Republicans. Where’s his thanks from Mitch McConnell?
A while back Steve Crowder documented fraud in Arizona by showing recorded votes from fake addresses such as parking lots, vacant properties, etc.
For this, he was suspended from YouTube!
How dare American citizens think that their votes are actually “meaningful”…! 🙂
Accuracy and politics are mutually exclusive domains…aka the Kingdom of LIES.
Cheers
Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
1st St Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”
Those silly Americans. That would never happen in Canada.
Exactly, perish the thought.
Bernie Madoff was impossibly successful which attracted legal scrutiny. Which is not comparable to the Federal Liberal Party of Canada being the most successful at winning elections political party in the history of mankind.
Of course, no actual evidence provided and they always neglect to tell you something: each envelope is tied to ONE person and the signature needs to match that person. Don’t forget, the ballot type has to match too.
In other words, another bogus “victory” by the pillow merchant.
Every word a lie including “and” and “the” in that post Allan
“Of course, no actual evidence provided”
You mean the evidence that your side absolutely refuses to examine? The evidence that your side goes to court and files lawsuits trying to block for ever being see….THAT evidence?
“each envelope is tied to ONE person and the signature needs to match that person.”
Except that they DON’T BOTHER checking them. Nice try.
Still pushing those same myths I see.
Because no unionized public employee would EVER jigger the voting rolls to ensure he/she/it stayed employed, right? And no election official would EVER fiddle with the stored boxes of advance votes before election day, despite being offered huge dollars by candidates, right?
Those things could never ever happen, right Allan S? Unpossible.
This post by the CTH is nothing but hot air. There’s zero substance.
Good thing there is an army of snivel disservants up here in canuckistan with nothing better to do than to try to refute the truth with lies. This happens on other sites that I visit as well.
“This post by the CTH is nothing but hot air. There’s zero substance.”
The irony…
You obviously didn’t read …
https://www.omega4america.com/
To be fair you have to browse through dozen of similar articles at that site to get a bit more understanding than just picking up some new buzzwords. And I didn’t see anything technically specific though I didn’t expect to. Proprietary algorithms, right?
Personally, I’ve been aware of the voter roll data relationships for some years now, and have come up with several approaches on how to cleanse the system. The problem quickly becomes one of scale (aka scope). Even the most efficient algorithms can take nearly infinite amounts of time given tens of millions of records to cross reference against dozens of similarly sized data sets. And you have to hit them all: tax rolls, criminal databases, post office address lists, property tax lists, death records, change of address lists, etc. The fractal approach, which I only slightly understand at this point, may be a recursively parsed solution. Drill into it, break it into tiny chunks, then assign the chunks to individual apps. In normal-speak, that means “many hands make light work, here’s your shovel, dig that patch of dirt over there”. What if a voter roll checking system ran from not one point (taking months or years to complete) but from a million points at the same time? Or “only” 10,000?
There are a bit more than 315 million seconds in a decade. Consider that a hypothetical infinity in computational effort. With 10K apps each taking a piece of the data pie, that cuts the 10 year task down to under 9 hours. 525.6 minutes. Try it again to 100K apps, and you’re down to 52 minutes 34 seconds. Compared to 10 years. Smells like winning. Now get the states, counties, and courts to accept the results. The records are, in theory, public ones.
It sure is weird how two states, Ohio and Florida, that took some fairly basic steps to clean up voter rolls suddenly went from “purple” to solid red. The changes in Miami-Dade are particularly staggering.
But “no evidence of fraud”, or something.
“It sure is weird how two states, Ohio and Florida, that took some fairly basic steps to clean up voter rolls suddenly went from “purple” to solid red. The changes in Miami-Dade are particularly staggering.”
I know, right?
Also strange that only the states that allow widespread mail-in voting and ballot harvesting are the same ones where the Republicans, despite being clearly favored in the polls *and* the early election returns, ‘gradually’ find themselves losing. Which is another oddity: some states can count millions of ballots in one day, yet others take A WEEK or more? Hmmm….
The solution is obvious: elections need not only to be clean, but SEEN to be clean. In-person voting and voter ID, one day only. Advance voting for those who can prove a need for it, mail-in ballots only when people are out of the country or other special circumstances.
alla unDork should move to Brazil, then maybe we would get to see him/it/she/ they in the news, hangin from a lite post!
Here’s an interesting little video from Maricopa County. I’m sure all those multiples & handfuls of ballots are merely favours for legitimate family members, right, Allan S?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUoIfDJ8fBg&feature=youtu.be
Further:
IMPOSSIBLE: Despite Only 17% Democrat Turnout on Election Day – Katie Hobbs and Democrats Are Winning Over 50% of Maricopa County Election Day Totals
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/impossible-maricopa-officials-now-report-democrats-independents-voted-katie-hobbs-election-day/
This is a really good example of narratives that are easily debunked
If 17% voted Democrat and 83% voted Republican – I’m making huge assertions here – that is still only 1.7% and 8.3% of the vote. 90% of Arizonans vote early.
This is on par with the “shocking video” on Rumble of people delivering up to 6 mail in ballots to a drop box. Perfectly legal in Arizona as long as they’re family, household members, or part of an adult personal care home. There’s no limit to the amount of ballots or the size of your family (by blood and by marriage).
If the rabbit hadn’t stopped to take a crap he’d have beat the turtle. Your making the assumption that all 90% voted blue. In addition, it still makes no logical sense that people would vote one way for governor & the other for senator.
And, with the average family size in the US being 3.13 persons, not 27, it still don’t explain mittfuls of ballots. Love the qualifier, BTW: “legal…as long as”.
Open. Your. Eyes.
Only a small majority of the 90% is needed to nullify any R gains in that 10%.
You are talking about IMMEDIATE family. The Arizona law says family by blood or marriage. This means, anyone in your family tree.
Oh, I know, Allan. All those illegal aliens are related to each other & that’s why vehicle after vehicle had fistfuls of ballots delivered. For their families. Understood.
Now, explain away the conundrum of voting for two different partys. I can hardly wait for that shitshow.
Ass
“…Republicans (most) want paper ballots cast the day of the election, voter ID, mail-in voting only when absolutely necessary, cleaned up voter rolls, no ballot harvesting, results declared on election day, transparent audits, etc.”””
So tell us Allen, do you support the above..?? As for Mail ins..?? Only US service members abroad and those who can prove without a shadow of doubt that they are truly abroad….If not, state your reasons….conversely, STFU.
“In addition, it still makes no logical sense that people would vote one way for governor & the other for senator.”
Reminds me of the 2020 US election where people supposed voted for Joe Biden for President, but every other vote on their ballot was for the Republicans. We already know from long experience that 95%+ of US voters normally vote for the *entire* ticket…what happened this time?
Republicans (most) want paper ballots cast the day of the election, voter ID, mail-in voting only when absolutely necessary, cleaned up voter rolls, no ballot harvesting, results declared on election day, transparent audits, etc.
Democrats want universal unsolicited mail-in ballots, no voter ID, “dirty” voter rolls, legal ballot harvesting, day of election registration, votes valid received days after election day, no audits, etc.
Who is interested in clean, credible transparent elections? Who is interested in opportunities to cheat?
“Who is interested in clean, credible transparent elections? Who is interested in opportunities to cheat?”
And who will apparently spend millions ensuring that recounts or forensic audits are *NOT* done to prove the election was fair and honestly conducted? If your election is so honest, and you are so 100% CERTAIN of that, then why not allow it to be proven?
(a rhetorical question, obviously…we already know exactly why…)
Elections Canada – a wholly owned subsidiary of the Liberal Party.