The Abject Failures of Los Angeles Public Health

Barbara Ferrer is the head of Los Angeles County Public Health. She is a complete failure, yet has kept her job. Like Theresa Tam, Bonnie Henry, Deena Hinshaw, Kieran Moore, Anthony Fauci, Deborah Birx, Leanna Wen, and so many other public health “experts”, history has proven that their policies were never based on “data and science” but simply pulled from their posteriors with one purpose in mind: Scare the hell out of the public so as to control them.

13 Replies to “The Abject Failures of Los Angeles Public Health”

  1. Just read this article by Pierre Kory, linked below. He is sharing insider information he has received from medical personnel still working in the trenches, so keep in mind it would be dismissed as anecdotal. I had no idea, Dr Kory had gone from a moderate supporter of vaccines to full Steve Kirsch. It is very hard to accept that the public health apparatchiks and hospital chains were so successful in suppressing any dissent, given what is descried in the article. The vax sceptics have to talk in code.

    https://pierrekory.substack.com/p/nursing-reports-from-the-front-lines

    1. Australian Medical Professionals Society

      “One of the chief concerns of our membership is that of medical free speech. Contingent to a joint statement received from AHPRA and the National Boards on 9 March 2021, Australian Health Professionals numbering over 825,000 were essentially forbidden from publicly questioning the science underlying the emerging COVID-19 injectables, let alone questioning any government messaging urging Australians to be vaccinated because these products were deemed ‘safe and effective’. The effect of this unilateral action was to undermine professional independence and, in so doing, strip away years of training, academic achievements, qualifications, awards and expertise. However well intentioned, this gagging by bureaucratic decree inserted AHPRA and the National Boards between the Clinician and their Patient, in addition to counteracting normal robust interprofessional dialogue, as more data emerged.”

      Read the whole thing

      https://npaq-8630368.hs-sites.com/covid-19-an-update-of-evidence-based-information?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

    2. On a podcast in the past year, Kory said that only 5-10% of doctors he’s met are open to learning something new. The rest believe they learned all there is to know in medical school and they simply have to do what they’re told and trained to do. The tell tale response in a conversation for someone open to learning is:

      “That’s interesting. I’ll have to look into that.”

      1. “they simply have to do what they’re told and trained to do”
        This is the mindset of a tech, not a professional. Ie a bookkeeper compared to a CPA; or a para legal compared to a lawyer.

    3. Ex
      Many are bought and paid for, t’is why the Shermans were killed. They were too rich to bribe.

      1. I would like to know more sbout that. It does seem likely that their deaths connect to their pharma business.

  2. FYI
    Dr Drew is hosting Dr Malone today. I couldn’t verify the time, but I believe it is at 3pm, Pacific.
    Supposedly, it has already been banned by Youtube.

  3. There is the potential for a major natural experiment right now, that would go long way in bolstering the case that mRNA or other gene based “vaccines” are too problematic for further development.
    It is time for comparative studies of the many covid vaccines that have emerged over the last two years. There are over 30 covid vaccines, classified into 4-6 subtypes, a few are “gene based” and a couple are “mRNA/lipid nanoparticle” based, but many are based on older traditional vaccine technologies.
    Some of these older style vaccines have been dispensed to millions of people providing a golden opportunity for a huge natural experiment, a data analysis of vaccine safety by type. If mRNA vaccines are inherently riskier than say, an inactivated virus, it should become apparent. And yes, it will be difficult and limited in reliability due to the reality that the data collection has been sloppy, even in the industrialized west.
    Also, note that the issue with the gene based “vaccines”, my not be the mRNA concept itself but that it was an error to select the spike protein as the antigen. Possibly if they had chosen an alternate protein, on which to base the vaccine, the mRNA story would have had a different, even better, outcome.
    Note that I am focused on the safety issues and I am considering the lipid nanoparticles and the difficulty in any vaccine to contain a coronavirus as separate issues.

Navigation