28 Replies to “Those Moderate Muslims!”

  1. I almost threw up in my mouth a bit watching Piers Morgan getting all squishy with his “free speech” and “tolerating” different opinions speech. That’s rich coming from him.
    Maybe it’s time for Maher to bring back Ben Affleck and Sam Harris for a rematch. That’d be fun.
    Hopefully Ben isn’t roided up this time.

  2. Notice already, how the Media describes the stabber and his ilk, as “conservative”, rather than the more applicable, “fundamentalist”
    The Media saying, man who did the stabbing was a “conservative muslim”, rather than saying he was a “fundamentalist muslim”.
    Words matter, and the Media will use anything, to slight “right leaning” people.

      1. I know the question was intended as rhetorical, but I’m going to answer it anyway.
        Everyone here knows why not! That was Carl’s point.

        1. No not everyone. The are radical/fundamentalist mooselimbs that want to kill you. There are non-radical/non-fundamentalist mooselimbs that want the radical/fundamentalist mooselimbs to kill you.

          1. You’re right, but are they HERE… posting comments on THIS FORUM? Because that’s what I was pointing out.

            “Everyone *here* knows why not!”

            Of course, these radical Muslims want to kill me. In their eyes, I’m a heretic, and I should be put down like a rabid dog.
            Unfortunately, there are those around me that think by me just saying that, I’m some sort of a hateful bigot.

    1. Carl, that is something I’ve noticed over years as well.
      It is a very clever deliberate smear of political conservaatives.
      It’s like the reference to Hitler as a right winger which means of course that nearly all SDA commenters are Nazis. Tell a lefty sometime that Hitler was a leftist!

      And Colonialista is correct: why not just say muslim.

      1. From my observation, the “Left” always seems to win, by dividing their target. By lumping all muslims together, you’re uniting them once again.
        If infidels were to start dividing muslims by describing them as say, Modern muslim, Progressive muslim, Non-traditional muslim, Western muslim, Fundamentalist muslim, etc, etc, etc, you get the point.
        There are muslims that are modernized and educated, that respect their daughters like their sons, that don’t want to butcher your head from your shoulders.
        We need to aid those modern muslims, so they can reform islam(or at least they can try), just by re-writing the quran into modern language, would be greatly disturbing, modern v fundamentalist, east v west, educated v uneducated,,, get my point.

  3. Sounds like the “no true Scotsman” falacy. No real muslim will carry out allah’s will.

  4. This is a death cult, and the infidels of the west must either convert or be put to death. From their perspective, it’s really that simple. All those who step up and whine about it being a noble religion, need to go to some of those backward perverted countries, and try living there for a while, and to attempt to practice their own noble religion, it won’t be long before the death part becomes a stark reality. In truth this death cult should be declared a terrorist entity, and be outlawed by every civilized country. Appeasing these fundamentalists is a mistake we’ll all regret.
    Satanic Verses indeed, enough!

    1. I really do feel for the moderate Muslims, who really do believe that this is a bastardization of their faith. The problem is, how many of the moderates are there? Are there enough, and will they EVER speak up against the radical fundamentalists perverting their religion?

      All I hear from them is silence!

      Still, I can feel some degree of empathy (not a lot) for the moderates, because MY Faith has also, and very often been attacked by the very same secularists that have defended theirs. All you have to do is look around at some of the comments posted, even in this forum. Thank God those are only a few.

      1. Don’t say “moderate muslims”.
        Say instead, non-practicing cultural muslims.
        Just as I am a non-practicing Catholic, a lapsed Catholic.
        I am NOT a moderate Catholic.
        All the big ”spiritual” bosses of Islam angrily tell us there is no such thing as moderate islam. Just islam.

        1. Exactly. Simply speaking, the less muslim the muslim is, the better. Zero is preferable over positive numbers.

        2. Whatever you want to call them… I would certainly like to talk to the “non-practicing cultural Muslims” just to know how they feel about their faith getting ripped to shreds by their evil counterparts and waste of human flesh. Not all practicing Muslims are jihadists, at least I would hope, and for those that actually feel rage towards the fundamentalists, I will stand by their side.

          Regardless of faith, this is a spiritual battle between good and evil. There’s evil among every faith, including my own. I don’t stand with them, even if they are so-called “practicing Catholics.” (Nancy Pelosi… Joe Biden… to name just a few. Yes, even the “Pope!”)

      2. Radical muselmen are the ones who cut off your head. The “moderate” muslims are the ones who hold your feet and arms while they do it to you…

        1. I’m sorry you feel that way. I happen to not believe that every single Muslim wants to kill me.

  5. Islam today is a time machine bringing forward the unreformed, unevolved theocracy of the seventh century. Its honest practitioners are bound to support Jihad and bring about shariah law and do so wherever their numbers allow. The retrograde that stabbed Rushdie was honour bound to ignore western culture and law. They see the west as a benefit-ridden fools paradise run by infidels providing opportunities for colonization and demographic conquest. The institutional left (those concerned with, and decrying “Islamophobia”) are the useful idiots of Islam. On this topic, Bill Maher is correct.

  6. Its wishful thinking to imagine a Islamic reformation.. No conservative or liberal distinction exists.. Only silent and vocal..

    1. Islamic reformation is a few centuries behind schedule. Christians stopped killing witches just a few hundred years ago. Perhaps in 200 years, Islam will have advance their behaviour to match that of 19th century Christians. Oh wait, I am delirious with hope, Islam will likely never advance towards civilized behaviour, silly me.

    1. Even Macron posted something on Twitter, at least, and probably elsewhere through the media.

  7. Here is a great essay by Bari Weiss:
    https://www.commonsense.news/p/we-ignored-salman-rushdies-warning

    where she makes the point that, when Iran made the fatwa against Salman Rushdie back in the 1980s, liberal-lefties like Norman Mailer and Susan Sontag defended Mr. Rushdie. But today, Weiss says, the liberal-left would be siding with Iran against Rushdie. If the book The Satanic Verses were published for the first time today in 2022, the book would be declared hate speech and banned most everywhere.

    This is a good essay that attacks the totalitarian idea that “words are violence”.

  8. Mike @Doranimated 1h
    Salman Rushdie’s attacker has been charged with attempted murder — IN THE SECOND DEGREE! Apparently the NY authorities can find no evidence of premeditation. Intentions are so murky. [foxnews.com link here]

    Mike @Doranimated 1h
    Why is Rushdie’s attacker being charged for murder in the 2nd degree? Because murder in the 1st will entail mentioning in court Khomeini’s fatwa. The American liberal establishment is burying the real fatwa even as it celebrates the fake fatwa on the nuclear question.

    https://nitter.net/Doranimated/status/1558519347718590466#m

  9. Avatar
    The Crucible • 10 hours ago

    Muslim scientists have invented a time-travel device that can transport an entire civilization back to the dark ages.

    They’re calling it ‘Islam’.

Navigation