45 Replies to “Legalize Drugs They Said”

  1. L – The drugs in question are illegal. Otherwise organized crime would not have a black market.
    Not all cultures are equal in moral values. Import the 3rd world without a codicil that they
    adopt Western values or get deported early in their criminal careers, and you become the
    3rd world.

    Secondly, under Marxism, criminals are victims of everything, except their own bad behaviour… so can’t be held responsible for their bad choices and behaviour. Reject Marxism in every institution and regain confidence in the foundational values of Western Civilization. Then you can go back to being a first world country, again.

    Jettison the Schengen Agreement and have national borders. Nation-states that want to
    remain a nation-state, they do that sort of thing.

    1. Good one Larry. If we legalize everything, there is no more crime. Beauty.
      Also, if the government can subsidize the crimes (sell dope below cost; free benefits to prostitutes and coupons to johns), that will further solidify the legal delivery of the crimes.

      1. I know that the only thing keeping me from jumping off cliffs, getting guns and shooting people and filling my body with opiates are the laws against such behavior. We need way more laws. Governments are wonderful and we need more of them.

        1. More laws and more lenient sentences. It’s a fool-proof recipe. Proof of fools.

      2. We choose to have a government so that society can have some basic structure. I’m in favour of a society that disallows citizens from shooting each other and going about the world high as a kite and stealing stuff.

  3. Legalize drugs they said. It will lower crime they said.

    Defund the police they said. It will lower crime they said.

    Open the borders they said. It will lower crime they said.

    Three for three so far.

    And more to come I’m quite certain.

    2. Don’t forget all those “non-violent” criminals in jail on marijuana laws. Yeah … just innocent dope smokers in jail. Because we jail all those “medicinal” marijuana users. Uh huh … keep believing that narrative when you’re robbed or your home is invaded. Keep believing we lock up misdemeanor bong hitters. You MUST believe the narrative.

  4. It is a set up. Those farmer protesters? Obviously part of the problem. They need to be oppressed, because … crime.

  5. It is safer for the police and their families in going after the mostly law abiding farmers than the drug gangs. When your Prime Minister has to go into hiding? What signal does that send to the people that do not have their own 24/7 security guard force?

    1. Criminals are “mostly law abiding” too as they’re not committing crimes 24/7. You should have just left out the word ‘mostly’ when describing the farmers.

  7. This “threat to democracy” moment is brought to you by the Dutch police union mouthpiece while his members beat the piss out of farmers.
    “…a gang left the severed head of a rival on an Amsterdam street”
    With a note attached – “Wooden head…wouldn’t listen”.

    1. Good one Burton…!!

      As a Dutchman, I totally buy that…just ask my Italian wife!!

      Fortunately I’m the son of one who was picked up off the street in 1941, to spend the entire War dodging P-38 Lightning attacks as he rode his messenger bicycle from Krupp Plant to an airfield: Emigrating to Canada in ’57….my dad is no Longer with us, Krupp…..??? Still here and still enjoying the past fruits of slave labour.

      NAZI MOFO’S

      1. That’s why Dutch men wears caps. To keep the woodpeckers off their heads.

      1. Reviving OD’ed addicts ad nauseam instead of letting them finish the job, has created the fentanyl crisis, nobody’s changing my mind.

        2. All one has to do is listen to EMS on a scanner. If it’s not the elderly falling & hitting their heads, it’s drug overdoses. Can’t but wonder how much of the ER overload is due to all the O/D cases being constantly rescued & sent back out to rinse & repeat?

    2. Fentanyl is better classed as a toxin, for the miniscule amounts it takes to kill someone.
      So, cutting pot with fentanyl should be as much a crime as cutting pot with cyanide.

  10. The progressive model of “legalization”, like the Canadian model, is to regulate the bejesus out of something so that the “legal” producers can’t compete with the free market (the only free market today is the underground economy). I suspect that for hard drugs, all they’ve done is decriminalize possession which just incentivises the criminal business. Add the welfare state on top and the dregs that imbibe can feel like it’s consequence free behavior. Legalizing drugs mean I don’t need a prescription for anything from Ivermectin to Morphine.

  12. Just another one of the benefits of multiculturalism. This problem is at least in part imported from Morocco.

    1. Liberal policies are at the root of all of our problems, from immigration to the explosion of drug use and everything in between.

        1. You’re not telling me anything I don’t already know. There are many countries that are almost drug free, none of them have liberal drug policies. We need to implement their policies re. drug possession, not liberal ones.

  13. The core problem is that the state didn’t really legalize drugs. They took over the role of the crime lords, wanting the revenue for themselves. They put large taxes on the “legal” (but only legal if you buy from people who pay the state for their license grow, and people who pay the state for their license to sell, and pay the state their tax on the product) drugs, and it ends up more expensive than it was buying it from the shady guy on the street corner – who is still there, and still making a healthy living.

  14. I just pray to god that these drug dealers have concrete plans to reduce their future carbon-dioxide emissions.

    1. I believe their plan is 30% reduction by 2030. Less N on crop. Moving to electric or hybrid transportation. Source more local. Moving away from single use needles, community sharing.

  15. The ONLY reason America isn’t a Narco-borderless-sex-trafficking-State … is because the US economy is still so much larger than the Mexican Cartel’s economy. For now.

    1. I believe that constitutionally speaking, drug, gambling and prostitution laws are state issues, not among the enumerated powers of the feds.

    1. Ahh yes, all those victims of the poor bartender who does a couple lines of coke at 3am to help him start crunching numbers, or the old lady who smokes a joint before bedtime. Exactly the same as a thief, rapist or murderer, and just as surely deserving of an armed response.

    2. Well Ralph the new bill in the US with 70,000 new IRS agents with massive fire power has done just what you said.

  18. If the laws aren’t going to be enforced, when can we start shooting people?

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation