Cardiometabolic outcomes up to 12 months after COVID-19 infection.

Published July 19, 2022: Findings from a cohort study from 2020 to 2021 in the UK.

➢ Acute COVID-19 is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disorders, but risk generally returns to background levels soon after the infection.
➢ The risk of new DM [diabetes mellitus] remains increased for at least 12 weeks following COVID-19 before declining.
➢ Patients recovering from COVID-19 should be advised to consider measures to reduce diabetes risk including healthy diet and taking exercise.
➢ People without preexisting CVD or DM who suffer from COVID-19 do not appear to have a long-term increase in incidence of these conditions.

28 Replies to “Cardiometabolic outcomes up to 12 months after COVID-19 infection.”

  1. That is all bullsh*t….

    Gates pays and gets all the scientific papers he needs to deflect from his depopulation agenda…

    It’s the vaxxes that are harming and killing people….

    All this did not come about until the vax rollout…

    Think

    Remember

    For God’s sake….

      1. People without preexisting CVD or DM who suffer from COVID-19 do not appear to have a long-term increase in incidence of these conditions.

        Thanks

    1. What it is actually saying is that the bad effects of catching the actual VIRUS are gone within weeks and can be mitigated by diet changes etc.

      As you probably know, the bad effect from receiving the injected stuff will be attacking our immune systems for how long ????
      It is thought that boosting our immune systems with Vit D etc will mitigate this somewhat.

      1. And they love the scam term “Long Covid”. Anyone ever heard of “Long Influenza”?These people are demonic.

      2. Maggie

        “It is thought that boosting our immune systems with Vit D etc will mitigate this somewhat.”

        The above is what Dr Robert Malone has urged folks to do – heal thyself.

        And I’d go as far saying that if one kept up a steady diet of Vit D, say 5000+ IU daily, it would not even appear…

        Worked for me n my wife.
        Non vaxxed – zero issues – no masking since Apr 2021 – Went where we wanted to go – refused to comply with De-Facto NAZI’s

  2. FM, this information is from incurring COVID-19, NOT the “vax”.
    I concur with the findings. It reinforces my belief that natural immunity and no long-lasting side effects from COVID 19 supersede any advantages of the nonvax “vax”!

    1. Exactly Johnny.
      Covid causes absolutely NADDA…A Flu or tough Cold and it’s done, conferring excellent natural immunity upon the survivor…hmm, that being bout at least 97.5% of the entire population.

      The Vax on the other hand, is in my estimation, ZYKLON B in syringe. Same desired outcome. You can Thank Billy, Teflon Tony & Peter Daszak for that.

      Needless to say those of us that are Un-Vaxxed are 100% Immune to any Vax type severe adverse reactions.

      Vitamin D in sufficient daily quantities was all that was required…and the powers that be, Damned Well knew that.

  3. The experts have been saying all along that the vaccine protects you against any real or implied cardio metabolic outcomes. Swear to God I seem to remember maybe hearing that. It was in all the papers.

  4. Once again, it’s people with existing problems that are most affected by covid infection and only for a few weeks. Covid risks, including the poorly defined long Covid, are very low in healthy people. It looks like the spike protein is the main culprit.

    Last Spring, shortly after the mRNA and viral vector vaccines were approved, the Salk Institute showed that the spike protein alone causes vascular disease and cell damage. I’m sure everyone knows that the vaccines not only force your cells to manufacture the spike protein but also produce more spike protein over a longer period than a natural infection. The lipid nanoparticle casing ensures it can go into any almost any organ, even through the blood-brain-barrier. Between this report and other research I read previously about mRNA vaccines, it seemed quite likely that the cure might he worse than the disease.

    “Exposure to this pseudovirus resulted in damage to the lungs and arteries of an animal model—proving that the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease. Tissue samples showed inflammation in endothelial cells lining the pulmonary artery walls….

    Previous studies have shown a similar effect when cells were exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but this is the first study to show that the damage occurs when cells are exposed to the spike protein on its own.

    “If you remove the replicating capabilities of the virus, it still has a major damaging effect on the vascular cells, simply by virtue of its ability to bind to this ACE2 receptor, the S protein receptor, now famous thanks to COVID,” Manor explains.
    https://www.salk.edu/news-release/the-novel-coronavirus-spike-protein-plays-additional-key-role-in-illness/

  5. Ok. So how does this compare with people that get colds and flus?

    I bet any infection leaves you more susceptible to other issues post recovery.

    Without a proper control-comparative, this finding has little value and is open to misinterpretation and more stupid guidelines that have little foundation in science.

  6. A difference-in-difference analysis estimated the net effect of COVID-19 allowing for baseline differences, age, ethnicity, smoking, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, Charlson score, index month, and matched set

    I don’t see injection status. I’ll go with FM.

  7. L – And the award for culprit pathogen for nearly 3 years running the Spike Protein, starring in
    two blockbusters : 1. SARS 2.0 Covid-19 and followed closely by The Clot Shot. The second performance surpassed the first.

    In accepting the award, the Spike Protein, expressed gratitude to “Tony” and friends”; as without the genetic engineering enhancement and world wide distribution(vascular), felt by billions, this Academy of Evil award would never have been achieved.
    ————————————————————————————————————————————

    rwmalonemd@rwmalonemd
    “Are Amyloid Fibrin Microclots Central to Long COVID?”

    To the extent that these clots are driven by Spike protein, it is highly likely that the same mechanism is involved in much of the post-vaccination adverse events.

    https://www.hematologyadvisor.com/home/topics/thr… Posted on 7:56 AM · Jul 22nd, 2022
    https://gettr.com/post/p1jaw206585

  8. “Patients recovering from covid-19 should … consider measures to reduce diabetes risk including healthy diet and taking exercise.”

    No. Obesity leads to diabetes, which is a symptom [diabetes] of a problem [obesity]. People with diabetes (Type 1 or 2) can’t convert their blood sugar due to a lack of insulin or insulin resistance. Exercise doesn’t change this and diet (less carbs, no sugar) only minimizes the amount of blood sugar in your system. It doesn’t improve the insulin situation.

    Fat people need to lose weight because they are at risk of diabetes and will suffer more severely the effects of covid-19. They should lose weight and exercise more. Diabetics will be fine.

    It was interesting that, when vaccines were first introduced, the listed risk factors making your eligible for early injections did not include diabetes or obesity.

    So try the study over again and remove the people who are obese, just like smokers are removed from cancer studies. My opinion is diabetes will drop off the map.

    Ok, now I’ll go read the link 🙂

    1. I read the link. They accounted for obese people in a control group. It appears that covid results in rapid onset diabetes in some people. This is not as important as they may think as it is now well known that any stress on the body can trigger diabetes in those pre-disposed so having a control group that did not trigger diabetes even though they are obese doesn’t really represent a control group. You would need a control group that also received a non-covid stress.

      From their Figure 1, there is a “slight” increase in DMI (diabetes incidence) and then it falls to background. Also, the control group had a significantly lower rate of DMI before and after covid (20% lower) and the paper describes this rate as “slightly higher” for those who got covid. 20% is not slightly higher. It’s much higher and higher than the error bars in the data. In fact the variation along the graph is the same (or higher) than the increase. So I call BS on that conclusion.

      But the increase in cardiovascular disease is very significant.

      I think this is all moot anyway as covid has morphed from a serious bronchial disease (lungs) into a much less serious upper respiratory disease (nose and throat).

  9. They have managed to stigmatize a cough, runny nose and common cold symptoms, while normalizing heart disease, strokes, and sudden death.

    1. HiHo. As one who has severe allergies and has been hospitalized for same, I will say you are correct. My allergy cough turns into asthma, most unpleasant and I worry that the medical profession might kill this otherwise healthy old man in their ignorance about a fake virus and fake pandemic. Yes they are all ignorant. All who support the narrative are ignorant. I have watched this unfold and all I see is ignorance with a touch of evil thrown in.

      1. I would say ignorance on the part of those who support and follow policy, and evil on the part of those who make it.

  10. Everything is great until you take the shots. Then all bets are off, as has been said.

    1. Yep.
      In my admittedly small circle of friends, 2 suffer from what they think is “long covid”.
      Both double-jabbed. One of them is smart enough to attribute it to the vax, the other is not.

Navigation