Bombs Away

I just learned there’s a debate on.

#CPCDebate

Now he’s asking their favorite TV show.

21 Replies to “Bombs Away”

  1. Not a debate.
    It’s THE TOM CLARK ROAD SHOW.

    Huge twitter bash fest going on.

  2. CPC members and Canadians want to know what show the leaders are bingewatching before they vote. Tom Clark says so.
    Betcha Max is enjoying this.

    1. That section was just a few moments of comic relief, a very silly waste of time. They went back to some light political questions. Can’t be. Gee, I thought they might play a cartoon!

      Déjà Vu à –100%.
      Yawn.
      Promises, promises, promises.
      Yawn.

      1. Charest “Always a conservative!”

        Angry Jean is just a plant, not there to win, but to try and obstruct PP. Which candidate is he really backing here, BrownClown?
        PP is the only one (sorry Baber) that is trying to attract the strays (PPC).

        LL looks unsure on her feet. Aitcheson is Liberal Lite.

    1. “I like Poilievre but will vote PPC again when the time comes.”

      I’m going to have to do the same…I just found out that Poilievre is in favor of continuing the odious practice of ‘supply management’.

        1. “Could you please list the PPC positions you disagree with?”

          Not even one, as it turns out. I particularly like their firearms policy.

          “Of course why have 80% of what you want when you can have 0%?”

          I have 0% right now, with the Liberals in power. That’s not likely to change, with all the Liberal-loving Toronto voters and PEI with *4* federal seats (all Liberal), never mind Quebec. The best thing I can do is send a clear message to the CPC by voting PPC (and of course letting the CPC leadership know why I no longer support them).

          I suppose if I were a closet Liberal I would be happier compromising my principles the way you do.

    2. Moi aussi. I do not vote for legacy parties. Not even blue-coloured so-called “Conservative” parties.

  3. Just got an email from Andrew Scheer endorsing Pierre. Well, there goes that vote.

  4. I frankly don’t care in a very indifferent way.
    I hold no malice against any of the candidates with one exception.
    I am a one issue voter, and although the chosen leader may or may not follow through on any promise made, which at this point in our history will not stop the inevitable destruction that was initiated by PET, I will hope that the leader chosen is the one that will cause the left particularly the laurentian elite and their paid scribes to lose their minds for having the temerity to warm a seat in the HoC.
    That’s it.
    And from what I’ve seen from the reactions from the likes of prominent liberal politicians like Charest, to the paid scribes, and fart catchers like Kinsella and pollsters like Frank Graves, that person is Poliviere.
    So imagine if you will, a four year period where the whole of the swamp is in a state of torment.
    I can vote for that.

  5. Pollievre will quickly get in line with the mandarins in Ottawa should he become PM. Just like every single other hack has and will.

    I like a lot of what pollievre says, but if you think anything will get eve marginally better under his leadership I’m afraid you haven’t been paying attention to canadian politics.

    I sincerely hope to be proven wrong.

    1. “I like a lot of what pollievre says, but if you think anything will get eve marginally better under his leadership I’m afraid you haven’t been paying attention to canadian politics. ”

      Agreed. I just don’t trust him, despite being in agreement with most of his stated policies.

      Any man who claims to be supportive of the middle class while simultaneously turning a blind eye to large corporations in Quebec gouging that same middle class (and even more so, the poor) by artificially keeping the price Canadians pay for dairy products *3 times* higher than in the US is either a fool or a hypocrite.

Navigation