We Get Mail

From a reader, slightly edited for length;

Just in case you haven’t seen this yet, the Judge who raked Tamara Lich over the coals for “mischief,” denied her bail, predicted a long prison sentence (etc), is Justice Julie Bourgeois.

Her bio is here: https://news.ontario.ca/en/bulletin/32728/new-judge-appointed-to-the-ontario-court-of-justice

It appears that Justice Bourgeois ran for office in 2011. As a Liberal. Favours, anyone? Possibly, or she could just be a lawless leftie. It’s a common affliction.

It seems she got trounced in the race, dropping >6% over the previous result. Riding results here.

She was appointed in 2015 by the Harper govt. As you know however, the Law Society is the outfit that selects judges, the PM signs the appointments. There are consequences to electing milquetoast leaders. Oops, I mean “incrementalist” leaders.

Yes there are.

Update, from another source: According to Elections Canada, this fair and impartial dispenser of justice donated almost $10,000 to the Liberal Party of Canada between 2009 – 2015.

70 Replies to “We Get Mail”

  1. Libs
    Cons

    Globalist Controlled Traitors against the best interests of Canadians since confederation.

    Tamara will be made an example of.

    Political Prisoner…

    Where’s Traitor BJ ?

    Sucking off the media and a CPC globalist plant

    1. How is someone fleeing political persecution in a totalitarian state a traitor?

      Ugh never mind, it is you.

      Speaking off you, are you Antifa trying to discredit the freedom movement with your stupidity (you know like your UN plane theory), or are you just another reincarnation of Angle/ray/Achmed?

      1. Fear and Loathing in Ottawa

        We are currently living through a hi-tech witch hunt.

        John Buchan

        “Terrorist!”. “Witch!”. “The Far-Right!”. “The Occult!”.

        One of the few things we share in common with each and every past society is that we confidently stand on the frontline of time. We are the cutting edge. We don’t have the luxury of hindsight, we are the moment. In these moments societies are often tasked with making quick judgments pertaining to war, the economy, disease, religion, crisis, inventions, art, etc. Canadians are currently in a time of crisis. I will submit to you that the crisis is not a virus, but indeed a crisis of the mind. In respect of due diligence, we must seriously and rigorously discuss the possibility of a mass psychosis event stemming from the emergence of Covid, specifically in Canada where I believe a political witch hunt has broken out.

        https://johnbuchan.substack.com/p/fear-and-loathing-in-ottawa?utm_source=url

  2. That is a flat-out lie. The Law Society does not choose judges.
    What a fantasyland of misinformation you retards live in.

  3. Yeah, “incrementalism” is a waste of time. That’s why, whenever the Liberals get into power Federally, they don’t waste time, but instead start pushing their agenda(s) immediately and forcefully. They’ve been dragging the Overton window to the left since the 60s, whereas the Cons don’t drag it right when they take the reins.

    Harper wasted a huge, indeed generational, opportunity. And now we’re all paying for it.

    In the end, it won’t matter. Countries that take the route we’re taking always end up on the ash heap of history due to internal contradictions that tear them apart. It’s like going bankrupt — first slowly, then all at once.

    1. Harper was holding the bag for the Libs but he did sign us up on a great UN Democracy killing Agenda and gave Dicktator Trudeau the opportunity to control of the Senate

      Yes thank god for the cons…

    2. Actually the left got to power exactly through incrementalism and not through revolution. That does not exonerate Harper for his monumental mistakes, biggest of all was leaving all those empty senate seats for Potato to fill out. Worked out great didn’t it?

      1. I don’t think it’s a binary choice between incrementalism and revolution; the Libs and the Cons both used the apparatus of government, but the Cons couldn’t hold their noses to drag the Overton window back towards the right. T’was beneath them.

        If you aren’t gonna use the power of the Federal machine to advance your agenda, you might as well not run for office. The Libs get that, for good or ill.

        I guess we’ll see what the Senate’s gonna do soon enough.

        1. I agree that Harper was too timid, CBC, empty senate seats, not enough pushback on gun control etc. Great decorum is no substitute for going for the jugular. We all know the arguments and we agree on them. What I oppose is the rejection of incrementalism.

          Firstly (less important), once you reject incrementalism in five minutes later you have Maxipads calling for all or nothing and for righteous to martyr or Rejtan themselves. Just like some idiots here were calling for truckers to fight cops.

          Second, politically we are in the shit we are, because the left kept pushing the center of the political spectrum to the left. While the right was mainly busy fighting for the purity of the right tail of the distribution. Many years ago Mark Steyn accurately pointed out that successful conservatives do not move to the center, they move the center to the right.

          1. Professor David Haskell says it best.

            A key strategy of the SJWs running education, media, & most of Gov’t is

            1) pathologize any dissenting view

            2) use bullying to push competing views to the fringes so the majority accept the uncontested dogma

            3) pass laws to punish heretics

            4) open season on heretics

            I’m a heretic

            It’s pinned in his Twitter page here

            https://mobile.twitter.com/dmillardhaskell?ref_url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.davidmhaskell.com%2f

            Again professor David Haskell

            61% of Canadians already think the mainstream news media is deliberately lying to them.

            Now for 2 yrs they’ve omitted & manipulated info to malign the vaccine hesitant.

            In this podcast interview, I spend an hour providing evidence that the 61% are correct.

            Lies, damned lies, and the media? With Dr. David Haskell

            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kgE4KWFshJ4&feature=emb_title

    1. Yep.

      Yanky @Yanky_Pollak; 4h
      Former Liberal Party candidate and current Ontario judge Justice Julie Bourgeois, who denied convoy organizer Tamara Lich bail, previously spoke about the “desperate measures” citizens take during “desperate times” during her failed election bid.

      Roberto Wakerell-Cruz @Robertopedia; 4h
      FLASHBACK: Justin Trudeau expresses support for Julie Bourgeois, failed Liberal candidate, in 2011.

      Bourgeois, a judge, just denied Freedom Convoy organizer Tamara Lich bail.

      https://nitter.net/Yanky_Pollak/status/1496196946968600586#m

  4. I was told a long time ago. Libranos lawyers who run for office in hopeless races and take one for the team get in line for Judicial and Senate appointments.

  5. I think she’s a provincial appointee. So on this case it’s mcguinty or wynne . But who cares … the federal appointments were no better.

    1. She’s not. She was a Harper appointee. Not a Law Society appointment or McGuinty appointment. Cat Man gave her the job. Good law and order judge. Gets the scum off the streets.

  6. The government, the media, and the courts are all-in for the leftist totalitarian situation we live in. The bulk of Canadians are a-okay with it, too. Our hope has to be in God. Pray for relief from this tyranny, and strenght to hold firm to the truth in the meantime. Pray for mercy for the normies and the Karens in society, for “they know not what they do”, having been brainwashed by decades of government run schooling to see the government as the Saviour.

  7. These are very dark times. And just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse, it does.
    Makes one appreciate what we once had.

  8. I hope it gets much worse.
    Your big heroes were going to take down the government. Now Pat King is bawling in protect custody and Tamara Lich is going to spend months in jail.
    Looks good on them.
    Jail more of these scum!

    1. Have you ever heard this little bit of John Fitzgerald Kennedy’s wisdom?

      “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.”

      Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it. And you won’t enjoy it one bit, little leftist troll. Not one bit.

    2. It will get much worse, next will be the fiery, but mostly peaceful protests and then it will escalate from there. Works for Antifa, works for BLM, so it would be wise to follow their tactics.

      1. I think we are very very close to some of those tactics happening from our side. There have been two sets of applications regarding our laws depending on your political background. Injustice will be rectified one way or another.

        1. Yes. If mischief is enough for life in jail, why not shoot a “peace officer” with the same penalty. No, I’m not suggesting anything, I’m noting how stupid the current rules are.

    1. Yes. Molotov cocktails are the same as blocking the street. If we, the public, had known that before the truckers convoy then doesn’t the government think that the initial round of protest would have been different?

      When did bouncy castles become the equivalent of WMDs?

  9. You can appeal a bail decision. The odds of winning are poor, but it would be worthwhile in this case, as it would be a form of protest.

    And who knows? Lich might win, which would mean she would be out of jail (possibly forever) and Bourgeois would appear partisan.

    1. We could also picket around the jail and not let anyone in or out until she’s released.

  10. The term used is quite disturbing to me: “possibility to re-offend”. So wait, isn’t rule of law, isn’t “innocent until proven guilty”? I mean what it’s established that she “offended” already? Wasn’t this just a charge pushed by gov, a charge which has to go on trial? And the charge is not murder, it’s mischief. What “re-offend”?

    1. When has the likelihood, never mind “possibility” of reoffending ever stopped our great “justice” system from releasing even the worst violent scum back into the streets?

      Lich is a political prisoner, end of story.

    2. “So wait, isn’t rule of law, isn’t “innocent until proven guilty”?”

      Week or so back we were treated to an alleged cop outright admitting that he arrested first & made the suspect prove their innocence in order to get released.

      Nobody should be surprised at said candor, especially after the last couple weeks.

  11. No tears? No begging for mercy? No apologies or denunciation of the truckers movement? Then no bail for you! You are insufficiently sorry for your heinous crimes.

    Unfortunately, poor Tamara will eventually be forced to do all that to avoid a life ruining sentence just like the people who did no more than wander around the US Capitol were forced to do.

    1. There is no shame in begging in this case. We’re dealing with totalitarian tyrants here. Prisoners were often tortured and coerced to sign confessions by tyrants. None of these confessions had any value other than a proof that the state was run by tyrants.

  12. As per records from Elections Canada, Julie Bourgeois of Casselman, ON donated almost $10,000 to the Liberal Party of Canada between 2009 and the election of Justin Trudeau in 2015.

    Even if one accepts that political partisanship does not necessarily disqualify someone from becoming a Judge, Justice Bourgeois definitely should have recused herself from this case given her very obvious political bias and conflict of interest. We are now fully into banana republic territory.

    Details available at https://www.elections.ca/wpapps/WPF/EN/CCS/Index?returntype=1
    (select “Additional Search Criteria” near the bottom of page to search by Contributor Name)

    1. Being a liberal means being unable to recognize conflict of interest, let alone political corruption. Corrupt judge? Check. Par for the course in Canada. I’m so looking forward to moving south, to Latin America, where official corruption isn’t wrapped in leftist sanctimony and everyone knows whose palm to grease. Here in Kanada? You need to fellate the idol of Trudeau worship instead.

  13. You have to admit that a large percentage of women in position of power are quite evil.

    I looked at statistics on percentage of judges who are female, percentage of police chiefs, percentage or governors or minister etc etc

    females are on average only 25 % of those who are in positions of power .

    but when you look at who are the people in power that are mean, tyrannical, cruel, unfair…you would think you would find only about 25 % of them are female but nope! it seems like most of the evil ones are female.

    I could easily find many dozens of names of females in position of power who are tyrannical.

    The judge who is giving insanely harsh sentences to january 6 people ; a female ( Beryl Howell )

    the prison warden that treats january 6 prisoners worse than muslim terrorists ; a female ( Kathleen Landerkin )

    the judge that is insanely harsh on Tamara Linch ; a female ( Julie Bourgeois )

    That governor in the USA who made it illegal to buy flower seeds when the covid panic began ; a female ( Whitmer )

    That judge in Georgia that is opposed to investigation of voting machines ;a female

    That judge who spoke to Bill Clinton and then soon after Hillary was magically off the hook ; female

    Neustar CEO, an Obama apointee who was involved in spying for Hillary ; a female ( Lisa Hook )

    the attorney general who threw in jail a record number of black men ; a female ( Kamala harris )

    The two BLM leaders who stole millions from BLM ; two females ( Pamela Moses and Paulissse something )

    The German chancelor that imported over one million illiterate muslims who then attacked thousands of women ; a female ( Angela Merkel )

    Colorado secretary of state who illegally destroyed voting data ; a female ( Jena Griswold )

    The ” squad” ; four democrats who are so anti USA one wonders why they are not deported ; all 4 are female ( Ilan Omar, AOC and 2 other females )

    Chicago mayor who will not give interviews to white journalists ; a female ( Lori Lightfoot )

    signed bill to allow more mail in ballot thus more cheating ; a female ( Hochul )

    Violated stock disclosure law nine times in one year ; a female ( Democrat Jenifer Granholm )

    Fulton county DA who instead of investigating voting fraud wants to investigate Trump ; a female ( Fani WIllis )

    The MIchigan democrats who told parents they should not be involved in what is taught in school ; most are female

    and how about these females ; Chrysta Freeland, Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, Liz Cheney,

    I could go on all night with such examples because there are so many evil females in position of power that you don t even have to look for them, they pop up everywhere everyday !

    PS #1 ; most of those females are leftist…not a coincidence.

    PS #2: NO I am not saying that all women are bad.

    1. Aslan said war is ugly when women fight in them.

      The rest of Lewis’s work confirms this is because women are especially cruel, it’s not some chivilristic sentimentality.

    2. C F
      Women are more emotional than men, liberals are more emotional than real men (conservatives)
      When emotional area of brain is active, it shuts down logical area (frontal lobe) of brain.
      Determined by fMRI studies, using the emotion of religious belief .

      1. So in other words you can afford all the emotions you want as nothing will get shutdown anyway.

    3. A similar case can be made for putting all men in jail because of the overwhelming preponderance of violent male offenders.

      Those who are bought, are bought. Those who are corrupt, are corrupt. Should I look into the bestiality rates of those who share an eye colour with you?

      (I have no idea what any comparisons based on your eye colour, which I do not know, would prove but keep in mind that you’re saying that our gracious hostess, by dint of being female, should have no part in public life and that this blog should never have existed. Either grow up, listen better, or join UnMe in the “shush, child, the grown-ups are talking” corner.)

      1. “Should I look into the bestiality rates of those who share an eye colour with you?”

        … or tail length.

      2. C_Miner

        You obviously did not read my entire comment.

        At the end I say this ; PS # 2 ; NO I am not saying that all women are bad.

        I say in my comment that a high percentage of women use their power to do evil things, NOWHERE do I say that ALL women are bad.

        “High percentage” does not mean ” 100%”.

        Of course there are good and even great women out there, nowhere do I say that good women don t exist.

        But women who use their power to do evil things are so numerous that one does not even have to work to find them, such evil women are everywhere.

        and yes a higher percentage of men commit violent crimes, but I don t get upset about it even though I am a man, because I know that a high percentage does not mean we – men – are all bad.

        And of course I don t think Kate is one of the tyrannical women, why would I have been posting comments here since roughly 2004? and why would I agree with Kate 99 % of the time and pay her compliments on her play on words, on her comments, on her observations?

        C_Miner, Are you a woman?

        1. You were trying to sound all rational, but ended with:

          “C_Miner, Are you a woman?”

          Thus invalidating all that pretend rationality.

          1. Colonialista,

            I was honest enough to mention I am a man.

            Becoming hysterical and being offended because I asked someone if they are a woman makes you the irrational one.

            Are you a woman Colonialista?

        2. I arrived here at about the same time as you, but don’t change my handle so that can actually be known. Your “exception” at the end is right up there with a racist talking about his black friend at the end of a rant in that it doesn’t invalidate the main point. My wife agrees.

          1. Yes of course demonstrating that 2+2=4
            and then asking someone if they own 2 dogs or 2 cats does invalidate the fact that 2+2=4
            of course !!!

            so if I ask you if it is raining where you live,
            it invalidates everything I ever said about climate change, right?

            Because asking a question invalidates everything else, right?

            How nice …so you and the other one above don t even have to provide any evidence that there is NOT a lot of women , who once in a position of power, become drunk with power and are tyrannical…
            even though I provided – easily – a nice long list supporting my point…

            all you need to do is attack the messenger ( me ) with some weird illogical rule you pulled out of your rear end.

            You two – and the women who tell you what to reply to me – are truly intellectual giants.

          2. So you’d rather have a Jimmy Carter or Justin Trudeau or Joe Biden as a leader than a Margaret Thatcher.

            You sound like you’re off your meds and can’t stay focused. Saying a whole bunch of bad things about a group, then noting that there (might) be counter-examples, doesn’t mean that you don’t hate that group. Your bouncing around to math or climate change or saying we have to disprove a negative doesn’t change that. Whether you’re a man, woman, or fire-breathing platypus makes no difference if you can’t make sense and stay on a topic. You’re sounding more and more UnMe like in your (lack of) understanding.

    4. Got a real problem with chicks, don’t you?
      Figures this site would be full of incels.

      1. Chelsea,

        You got a real problem with facts and logic.

        My cute and sexy girlfriend laughed out loud at the incel thing!

        1. It’s peculiar they presume folks who are realistic about women would have issues with them. In fact the opposite is true in both ways.

          You’re a heretic against modernity my dear Canadian Freind. You ought to realize that folks like Chelsea are gnostic dualiststs, they think the mind/soul is soem purely aetherial abstraction totally unrelated to their bodies. And they view that abstraction as their ‘real’ selves, and that the body is not their real selves.

          You have stated that the body and mind are interlinked. So you have violated their most fundamental dogma. It matters not either what evidence is apparent nor if your intents are good or ill, you have violated the sacred creed of our era, and they can and will do nothing but scorn you.

  14. Message from our owners; “We must stomp you,cause you might do something”..
    So “mischief” is now a national emergency?
    I wonder what grand “State” they will invoke when we start returning the treatments?
    For if we are to be punished for crimes we are yet to consider,let alone commit,then the sky is the limit.
    And what kind of idiots declare war on those who feed and clothe them?
    Do all our progressive comrades have mommy issues?
    So when does the Senate meet to announce their betrayal ?
    Forward!

  15. L – Did the judge, in her reasoning/ruling, bring the administration of Justice into disrepute?

    That is the only question individual judges or as a group worry about. It’s why judicial proceedings were supposed to be open to the public under Common-Law.

    Publish her statements and reasoning. Place a public opinion poll below it and have at it. Toronto Sun, National Post or any other legacy media still trying to save their credibility.

Navigation