66 Replies to “The World Is Being Run By Crazy People”

  1. No, your wrong!
    The psychopaths have taken over our nuthouse.
    And allowed their spawn to flourish.

    They’re coming to take you away…
    (Eerily screams in the background).

    1. I feel very sorry for those children. Pray they turn out to be normal human beings and get away from their “parents” influence.

      1. What has always struck me about that photo is this: those two are looking at each other, not at their newborns. Not at their children. I have more children than the average westerner. And every single photo of our children’s first few moments in the world shows my husband and me looking at our children with the utter love we both felt as we held them for the first time. This was not “staged” or “planned”. This is just the way that parents holding their newborns behave when holding their newborns.

    2. Crazy people … check all the DEI (read: DIE) boxes. The world is being run by checked boxes. What could possibly go wrong? A few airliners missing the runway? Meh. Look at the happy “couple”

    3. *
      Please tell me these imbeciles aren’t actually
      taking up a hospital bed at this particular
      moment in time.

      what’s next… breast feeding pix?

      *

  2. It was one thing to open the insane asylums and turn the inmates loose on the street.

    It was quite another to give them the keys to the culture.

    1. Agreed.
      I am of the opinion that if a man can cloth and feed himself, and is not a clear and present danger to those around him, then the taxpayer should not be on the hook to house him in an expensive asylum.
      That being said, electing the nutters to high office is not sane. Who is less sane, the nutter or the nutters that elect them?

      1. Those who elect such mental cases are one or both of:
        brainwashed by TV; and/or
        beholden (therefore sycophantic) to the cynical culture-destroyers for whom normalcy is the enemy.

  3. At least one of them isn’t sitting there naked pretending to breast feed. Like in the one Huggies commercial. (Insert puking emoji here)

  4. And it seems hospital staff were willing participants in the “Awwwww…ain’t that Sweet?” in this dude pregnancy production.
    50 years ago a right thinking administrator would have asked: “Are any of you two breastfeeding? If not…why are the both of you in bed?
    But…we all have to buy into the delusion now. Playing tea time with my granddaughter last month was more realistic.

  5. Pass me the barf – bag

    These maggots are the death of a free, sane world.

    Beta males will bury us in their bullshit while the rabid femmes of the left cheer them on.

    1. …. while the rabid femmes cheer them on …. and later complain about the lack of manliness on offer.

  6. I wonder if the kids will spend one week here and one week there evenly when they split up.

    Training the next set of revolutionaries. Viva la Venezuala!!!!

  7. What chance will those kids have?

    Ranchers know that a crazy cow raises a crazy calf. Nature at it’s most basic.

  8. Sorry if this was already mentioned,

    Speaking of crazy people,

    M&M candies are now going woke

    the brown and the green ones are now a lesbian couple.

    and here is what the Mars company ( who makes those candies ) says; ” Mars hopes these changes will show the importance of ‘self-expression and power of community.’ ”

    Self expression and power of community trough eating candy…yup they are nuts !

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10423249/M-Ms-woke-new-versions-characters-reflect-dynamic-progressive-world.html

    1. So,candies can be queer now?
      When someone can assign a gender and sexual attraction to an inanimate object
      the world is in deep shit. Very deep.

  9. Check the date on the tweet.

    Pete took 3 months of paternity leave while the transportation system was (and still is) in shambles. If this had been a GOP administration the media would have been in an uproar.

  10. I don’t understand why those two have hospital wristbands. They didn’t actually give birth to any of the children…why are they lying on a hospital bed?

    1. Because it’s calculated image construction.

      Notice that in the photo the two “parents” are gazing at each other, not their adopted children.

      1. Good point. Usually (as in, always) in pictures like this the parents are looking at the child. Indicative of the sheer narcissism required to deliberately deprive children of a mother and father…

    2. Maybe both of them are “transitioning” and were simultaneously having some of their plumbing rearranged in the hospital.

  11. I guess since the babies have taken the name Buttigieg, Pete’s the “man” of the family? I’ll be surprised if the boy child makes it to 16 without being buggered.

    1. OMG, kidshilleen, with reference to my question above, it was not a nightmare. I actually saw that pic then!!

  12. I always thought Pete was the one taking in the a** but he’s apparently not wifey…or do they take turns?

  13. I try my best to respect the “to each his own” thing as long as whoever is not hurting anyone, especially children.
    And I’m not insinuating they will be abusive parents.
    But really?
    This?
    They’re babies! They’re Babies!! WTF!!!

    And would a single hetero male be able to adopt a baby?
    I f*cking doubt it.

    And will it become “hate speech” as per the Libranos to disagree?
    Probably.

  14. Memo to Pete and “Chastain”.
    Two men in a consensual relationship cannot by nature conceive, it is a sterile relationship.
    Having kids isn’t part of the arrangement a if this is a union of just two.
    To obtain children, just like anyone else that cannot conceive, they need a donor (or in the homosexual parlance what they derogatorily refer to as breeders).
    And no legal fiction can paper that over.

  15. Aaaaawwwwww…… What an adorable couple….. Why, they make you want to…. want to….. go “Hrack twoo!” as you hork up a loogie.

  16. HELP! No not the Beatles.

    Did I see a pic of the Buttster with a woman’s bosom (heh, I’m old and old fashioned) molded out of plastic from which he breast fed an infant?
    OR, was that a very frightening nightmare?
    HELP?!

    1. Answered above by kidshilleen! It was not a nightmare, in the traditional meaning of that word.

  17. So, if they are both mummy and daddy, does that mean that, together, they’re a pair of dummies or are they maddies? Inquiring minds…… couldn’t care less.

  18. I’m against this for the simple reason that there are thousands of normal heterosexual couples out there who who would do *anything* to have child of their own, but just can’t. They spend thousands of dollars of their own money, jump through all the hoops and try all the fertilization tactics, but to no avail. So they decide, reluctantly, to adopt… only to be told that newborn babies are in such demand that they are almost impossible to adopt. But *these guys*, who aren’t even willing to attempt to have their own baby, just get handed one. Is that fair?

    1. The infuriating part is that this is an attempt to demean conception to an afterthought and nothing special.
      Nothing puts the alphabet people into a mouth foaming rage quite like saying these four words when they attempt to subvert the act of conception to sexual gratification.
      “Who is the mother?”

  19. *insta-puke*

    Where’s an A-10 Warthog and a Hellfire when you want one?

    Oh the humanity.

Navigation