29 Replies to “Pfizers New Anti-Viral vs Ivermectin”

  1. My background in the sales of enzymes in the animal nutrition field didn’t hurt my ability to grasp the info presented, but I agree that Dr. John did a great job in presenting the information. Note that late in the video that he referred to Paxlovid as Pfizermectin….you just know that he is trying to stay neutral, but a “little” bit of cynicism leaks out in a number of his videos from time to time.

  2. Yet UnMe persists in spewing forth a “Reason” mag. article which correctly indicates that Ivermectin has, and is, showing all manner of startlingly positive effects in managing COVID C-19 infection … and then concludes … but … the NIH, FDA, and CDC haven’t run any substantial studies on it … therefore it’s worthless. Utter bureaucratic NONSENSE!!

    Good GOD! What are we allowing our so-called “Health” Bureaucrats to do!? They have been INTENTIONALLY withholding lifesaving treatment … in favor of saving $Trillions for Big Pharma. Literally … heads should be bouncing off the gallows onto the floor for what they have done using the Power of Government to enrich $Big Donors at the expense of millions of lives.

    And now they come along and clone Ivermectin in a Patentable format … and voila! There, suddenly, is the “Health” bureaucrat approval.

    Government is NOT our friend. Government … and esp. Deep State Bureaucrats need a good beheading … at the ballot box, of course.

      1. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS

        Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

        Kory, Pierre MD1,*; Meduri, Gianfranco Umberto MD2; Varon, Joseph MD3; Iglesias, Jose DO4; Marik, Paul E. MD5

        “The Panel FOUND THE CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE FOR IVERMECTIN’S EFFECTS ON SURVIVAL TO BE STRONG AND THEY RECOMMENDED UNCONDITIONAL ADOPTION FOR USE IN THE PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT OF COVID-19.

        In summary, based on the totality of the trials and epidemiologic evidence presented in this review along with the preliminary findings of the Unitaid/WHO meta-analysis of treatment RCTs and the guideline recommendation from the international BIRD conference, IVERMECTIN SHOULD BE GLOBALLY AND SYSTEMATICALLY DEPLOYED IN THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF COVID-19.”

        https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/06000/review_of_the_emerging_evidence_demonstrating_the.4.aspx

      2. Yes … the overwhelming clinical evidence didn’t fit the format of medical studies. It simply … worked. Like 87% worked. Like the NEW $$$$ version of the Ivermectin molecule.

        Comprehension is fully intact. Ivermectin was dismissed without a legit effort by the government or any Big Pharma conglomerate … why? Simple. There’s no profit in doing the study. $$$$ > human health if you are Big Pharma.

  3. Excuse me!?
    At the very start at about 0:25 he says, “No one is saying that information about Ivermectin has been suppressed ….”.
    Really? REALLY?!

    Admittedly I have probably not given him a fair hearing but I can’t shake the feeling that he’s some kind of shill. Recently he left the impression that the only problem with the gene therapy injection was that people didn’t know how to deliver the jab properly. That rang bells.

    1. Yeah, I’m not sold on this fella. He is the ultimate fence sitter. The new Brit.

      I have my IVM sitting and waiting, full confidence in using it. All the right people hate it, so it’s good to use I case of emergency

        1. I have cravings for hay. Don’t want to mention the shop publicly, but there are tack shops in the country selling it online without any concerns

      1. Mine’s on the way (from India), if I need it, but I’ve got very good Vit. D, zinc and quercitin levels.

        1. That should work well JSB, according to Dr Zelenko. He was using IVM and HCQ until the government NAZIs declared it was ‘unavailable’ in NY. Zelenko has been very successful using that protocol, along with budesonide and a few other items, to save thousands of lives, “No Deaths” according to the good doctor.

          He’s a practicing doctor, unlike the bureaucrats who haven’t seen a patient, EVER, in their professions, but make decisions contrary to what works

          Vit C, D, Zinc and Quercetin. We added NAC as well. I’m impressed.

          The Vid went thru the house 3 weeks ago, we are on the Zelenko meds, I was asymptomatic, my wife was ill for 2+ days but recovered quickly. Late 50s. An easy, simple nutrition combination, that avoids any toxic jabs that harms the heart, circulatory, immune and nervous systems.

          1. I support Dan’s statement. I have been teaching classes In post-secondary education through the fearporndemic. Not wearing a freaking mask anymore. i “engage” maskless with my 20-year-old students. Heck, I hand-shaked a former student today! NO PROTECTION!…

    2. 1) No it has not been suppressed. The evidence is clear that Ivermectin doesn’t work on COVID.

      2) There is no gene therapy injection.

  4. His last line…
    ” Message to world leaders ‘You’re not a horse, you’re not a cow. Use your human intellect’ ”

    i.e. Ivermectin works for a very scientific reason

  5. how about a chemical and molecular analysis?

    might find they are similar except for some inert ingredients

  6. you mean filler do you not? like when china was discovered using arsenic as a filler in its home made
    drug copies.

    1. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/tables/table-2e/

      AND
      AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS

      Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
      Kory, Pierre MD1,*; Meduri, Gianfranco Umberto MD2; Varon, Joseph MD3; Iglesias, Jose DO4; Marik, Paul E. MD5

      “The Panel FOUND THE CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE FOR IVERMECTIN’S EFFECTS ON SURVIVAL TO BE STRONG AND THEY RECOMMENDED UNCONDITIONAL ADOPTION FOR USE IN THE PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT OF COVID-19.

      In summary, based on the totality of the trials and epidemiologic evidence presented in this review along with the preliminary findings of the Unitaid/WHO meta-analysis of treatment RCTs and the guideline recommendation from the international BIRD conference, IVERMECTIN SHOULD BE GLOBALLY AND SYSTEMATICALLY DEPLOYED IN THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF COVID-19.”

      https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/06000/review_of_the_emerging_evidence_demonstrating_the.4.aspx

  7. Was wondering if the Pfizer concoction was not related to Ivermectin.
    If it turns out to be a derivative, what are the medical fascists going to do with that?

  8. Results: Ivermectin was found as a blocker of viral replicase, protease and human TMPRSS2, which could be the biophysical basis behind its antiviral efficiency. The antiviral action and ADMET profile of ivermectin was on par with the currently used anticorona drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir. Conclusion: Our study enlightens the candidature of ivermectin as an effective drug for treating COVID-19.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996102/

Navigation