Former South Philly Judge of Elections Charged in Massive 4-Year Voter Fraud Scheme
Prosecutors said Beren and an unidentified “consultant” were involved in the voter fraud conspiracy. The complaint alleges the consultant “exercised influence and control in Philadelphia’s 39th Ward by distributing cash payments and supporting family, friends and allies for elective office in the 39th Ward, and installing Ward Leaders, Judges of Elections, and Democratic State Committee.”
Prosecutors said that around 1984, this consultant “installed” Beren to the committee for the Democratic Party in the 39th Ward of Philadelphia. In 1988, the consultant helped Beren become the judge of elections for the second district in the 39th Ward.
According to Philadelphia, a judge of elections essentially serves as the head of a polling place for both the primary and general elections. Prosecutors said two other divisions also voted at the same polling place, making Beren a “de facto judge of elections” for all three.
After serving in that role for 27 years, Beren stepped down and became a poll watcher in 2015. At that point, prosecutors allege Beren hand-picked a replacement who would allow her to continue running the election process for the three divisions.
This setup allegedly remained the same from 2015-2019. Starting in 2015, the consultant began directing Beren to add fraudulent voters to certain candidates, some of whom were clients of the consultant.
On Election Day, the consultant would drive Beren to the polling place and tell her how to cast fraudulent votes. She then allegedly engaged in multiple illegal activities such as advising in-person voters to support a certain candidate, casting votes herself in other people’s names and encouraging voters to cast additional votes for family members who were not present.
At the end of the day, prosecutors said Beren and other unnamed workers would add names to the voting book of people who never came to the polling place. They allegedly did this to falsely match the number of fake votes cast.
But hey, as the Trump-hating, Biden apologists say, there is no “real” evidence of fraud, so pay no attention to reality. Narrative uber alles
Where is Allan S when you need him? Paging Allan S, clean up on column one!
Coder…the critical point is that it is almost always DemoKKKraps doing this. In texas there were 500 court cases of election fraud, just last month.AllenUndork (AKA unMe) isn’t a critical or deep thinker, just an emotional Whales dick (DORK)
So you missed the 2019 end date on this one? Fraud does happen, but nothing I’ve seen indicates it was higher than noise levels in 2020.
No amount of idiotic “audits” will change that opinion. The Maricopa audit is a complete joke.
You’d know about idiotic jokes. After all, you look at one in the mirror daily.
allanunDork
Maricopa election officials, under oath, admitted to deleting voter info from the voting machines, BEFORE turning them over for the audit. That shows there was/is fraud, to a much larger scale than your pee brain can process. All election material is to be preserved for 22 months after the election. So not only fraudulent, but criminal. You are a prime example of an individual who is so stupid, you can’t think properly.
About time
It’s a token arrest.
Conspiracy , so they need to identify and charge the other conspirator. We’ll wait and see what happens. Those damned REPUBS are always crooks!
It will prove that … “election fraud is rare, and too small to make any difference in any election”. Oh! And it is “always caught and corrected”.
This is how Democracy dies in darkness. The darkness of election fraud.
The U.S. election system is a mess and nobody is addressing it. The majority of the voting public, including 32% of Democrats and 54% of independents thought the election was phony. Moreover, the percentage of sceptics is growing. Here’s a recent Rasmussen poll:
“In April, 51% said Biden’s election was tainted by cheating — so the latest results show a 5% increase.
A whopping 84% of Republican voters believe it is at least somewhat likely that cheating affected the outcome of the November election. Unaffiliated voters (54%) and Democrats (32%) were less inclined to think that.
More whites (59%) than Black voters (47%) or other minorities (55%) think it is at least somewhat likely that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
The latest Rasmussen survey also found that 65% of likely voters believe that wider use of mail-in voting will lead to more cheating in elections, including 51% who say it’s “very likely.”
Like cheese steaks, it is their specialty. Dem thugs been doing it in PHL for centuries.
Nov 12 2012 Philly Inquirer describes the impossible:
In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes
A Consultant eh…?? THAT’S who “installed” Beren..??
I can’t imagine who said consultant may be..??
Obviously some filthy Rich POS with Far Left aspirations seeding electoral swaths of land to slowly but surely fill every Polling Station with someone interested, regardless of methodology, ensuring an outcome for their desired candidate – Always a DEMOCRAT.
Soros..?? or one of his minions…
Gates..or one of his..?
Seems to me this has been happening in pretty much every State on the West Coast and those in and around DC..and on the East Coast as well.
TRUMP won by a Fucking landslide – and its this type of Corruption that STOLE it from him.
I wonder how long the American public will refrain from actively utilizing the 2nd Amendment and retake their Country from the Turnips running it.
Google is on the job. Out of curiosity I used the key words “Marie Beren, Mitt Romney”. I did so, because I seemed to recall a number of wards in Philly that had 100% voting rate and every single vote went to Barrack Obama. I was curious if these were Beren’s three wards.
Google had scant offerings for those key words…and they asked me if I made a mistake and wanted the key words “Mr. Burns, Mitt Romney”.
I’m sure it’s a mistake.
Well, that’s bad and everything but as long as it’s not “widespread” then it’s ok.
-Sarcasm.
Death by a thousand cuts.
What’s the problem? It’s only one small cut…………
Election fortification is good because people can’t be counted on to vote as they should.