Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Pilgrim's Progress
How Not To Become A Millenial
Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
I’ll accept it, Jordan. No questions asked.
I thought that beggars couldn’t be choosers.
Well the rejection certainly beggars belief
Any ‘charity’ that rejects donations is not a charity.
Couldn’t read it all. Got tired of reading the same thing over and over again. Never did find out what the “charity” actually was.
Yeah, I can see what you’re saying.
20 sentences. I mean, damn, T-W-E-N-T-Y.
In the Post Melinial. Five or six maybe, but twenty!? Obviously too much.
Good grief.
Here’s the thing. Why on God’s green Earth would you choose to not name them??? Certainly there can’t be liability issues and if it’s because your thinking is that ultimately it will only hurt the recipients that this charity provides aid too I kind of understand to some extent.
If charities feel they have the luxury of yaying or naying funds based on political ideology let them grow some balls and say so.
I’m not interested in donating to anyone who resents me.
I was also annoyed by that. Why would Peterson protect them. He should have shouted the scumbags’ name from the rooftops.
Guess whoever they are is your basic group of Commie scumbags. Screw ‘em.
George Hull Charity
Full-time staff: 91
Avg. compensation: $93,125
That seems like a pretty lucrative career choice.
L – A “charity” run by virtue signaling Social Justice Warriors, morally bankrupt, with no chance for a loan.
“Hoist by their own petard.” the Bard would say.
I think you mean “hoisted by their own retard”
I checked the George Hull Charity website. Almost all of the funding from government! Almost none of the money
spent on programs. Sounds like the old Make a Wish scam.
The only “charity” I donate to, and respect is the Salvation Army, they run things with volunteers, so very low over head.
Agreed – Salvation Army is my domestic charity and Operation Smile is my international one.
Anything associated with the United Nations is an automatic “The Computer Says NO!” (reference Little Britain)
Ditto — Salvation Army. Good outfit.
Yup. The good old Sally Ann.
Jordan should give to them.
War Amps is another with low overhead.
Even more so since the other leftist non-charity organisations constantly berate them.
Yet the government which hates my guts and wants me dead, continues to accept my tax dollars.
What this tells me is that this “charity” takes orders from those whose “donations” it does accept.
If this is the ‘charity’.
From their latest annual report:
THE GEORGE HULL CENTRE ANNUAL REPORT 2018–19
Total Revenue 10,357,000
Salaries and Benefits 7,805,000
Professional Services 679,000
Program and Client Expenses 229,000
Putting aside if it is or not, those that run the ‘charity’ are very generous to themselves first and foremost, what ever is left over, they will see to it that it is spent on the ‘professional’ help, and what’s left over after that is for the actual purpose of the ‘charity’
https://georgehullcentre.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Annual_Report_2018-19.pdf
$20 bucks says they’re ALL card carrying Liberals, another $20 says this is the new “Adscam”.
Ps… the very first thing the Trudeau Liberals did after defeating Harper was to rescind his “Charity” reform laws.