38 Replies to “When Do We Get To Nuke China?”

  1. Not surprising that the CPC would support dangerous gain of function manipulations of viruses but even more sickening is the involvement of western institutions. True Bondian villains all.

  2. Too many US politicians (99% of the Democrats and at least 50% of the Republicans), companies (almost all the Fortune 500) and organizations (NBA, CDC, NIH & Fauci type scum) are on the Chicom/PLA payroll. We need a 9/11 type thing with China to turn the tide and even then with our Cultural Marxist military I think winning a war with the Turks and Caicos might be a challenge. I mean 9/11 was 20 years ago and we are importing Muslims as if they were Lutherans or Methodists.

    1. That “9/11 type thing” was Wuhan flu. An act of bio-terrorism deliberately carried out by the direct order of Xi Jinping, to demonstrate the capabilities of China’s biological warfare program.

      We now know that the American military top brass have no intention of actually defending the homeland against the People’s Liberation Army, no matter what that civilian in the Oval Office says.

      It helps explain why they never offered President Trump a convincing answer when. he asked, repeatedly, why nukes must never be used.

      1. *
        you don’t get it… as long as the government gets its piece…

        “Unit 731 conducted germ and chemical warfare experiments during World War Two, torturing and murdering thousands of civilians and prisoners of war. The names of the people who committed its grisly crimes have long been concealed, and were hidden by U.S. prosecutors after the war in exchange for the unit’s data and research.”

        *

  6. How can of this type of experimentation have any purpose, other than to wipe out huge swaths of human population?
    More efficient than nuclear weapons. It leaves all the buildings and technology standing.

  7. The purpose of the atomic bomb was not to end the Second World War, already well on its way to its conclusion when it was developed.

    It was to make sure future experiments in collectivism would end at Wall Street’s convenience, not the convenience of any people serious about living in freedom—who could now be exterminated in a matter of hours if they were judged more trouble to the global order than they were worth.

    If the atomic bomb is ever used again, it will be by the Chinese and their globalist American collaborators against states and cities whose citizens attempt to resist the new order.

    A bit like Sherman’s March to the Sea—except for General Sherman, cleansing the South of its freedom-loving white population wasn’t a realistic or desirable goal.

    Never forget that the only war in which American forces achieved victory unassisted was against their own people.

    1. I think China will collapse from internal stresses long before they’re in a position to nuke anyone, but otherwise, yes.

    2. I doubt they would use it.
      However a newly revived Germany leading a new Holy Roman Empire under the banner of a reformed and condensed EU, yes.
      First order of their business will be to glass parking lot the troublesome Muzzies and secure Jerusalem for themselves, Religion and all.

      From there it pretty much goes all downhill, for everyone.

  9. I would say that China is not confident in its military capabilities at this time. Otherwise, Xi would be attacking Taiwan now. Xiden Zhou is weak and if China thought it was any bit ready its military would be on the move.

    1. Very few of the local population in Taiwan would want to be forcibly integrated into the PRC, so perhaps in the long run there never would be an invasion, just lots of talk from Beijing, since the benefits of owning Taiwan are relatively low in comparison to the ongoing problem of dealing with millions of angry people unwilling to co-operate and probably forming large-scale guerrilla fighting forces in the higher terrain. And there’s the risk of waking the sleeping giant of American patriotism, which needs something on that scale to overcome the entrenched forces of accommodation — it’s easier to accommodate a tyrant if he isn’t doing much outside his own borders (Hitler comes to mind here).

  10. The ideological side of me wants to believe the bio-attack was deliberate, but then, why such feeble results? A warning that something more effective could follow? Why not start with that if the intention is to win a biological war? Or did the virus prove less deadly than its handlers had estimated?

    If in fact there was no deliberate release (oops that vial just threw itself out the window, comrades) then we’re just stuck with the fact that China somewhat inadvertently brought on this nuisance pandemic. In that case some economic punishment would seem to be in order.

    Nuking China would have to take the form of nuking their military infrastructure and party appartus. Nuking a bunch of Chinese cities and killing 200 million Chinese citizens would have little benefit for us, as it would probably promote a somewhat similar response (although I would imagine the nuking of Chinese cities would be simultaneous to the other part I mentioned so perhaps there would be nobody to respond). With nuclear first strikes, no matter how effective they may be, you have to calculate the probable response of isolated military units like nuclear subs cut off from their command, would they work out what had happened and respond, or surrender, or try to hide for a while?

    Getting back to the point about nuking cities and civilians (or dams on rivers, etc) presumably if you had a first strike planned then you would have some part two plan of going in to create a provisional government and back it up with force, so you would want to keep the civilian population reasonably friendly, killing one sixth of them doesn’t seem quite consistent with that.

    1. Feeble results? Nuisance? Our economy is now effectively in complete control of the government. Our individual freedoms are, at best, ignored, and once the digital ID system is in place individual autonomy will be a thing of the past.

    2. Peter,

      China did not intentionally start the COVID crisis but they did intentionally take advantage of it to advance their own interests.

      If you want a longer explanation let me know.

      1. Actually I tend to agree with that already, because of the point already noted that the pandemic is not particularly deadly (yet). And I recognize that it has been an ordeal for everyone, but compared to certain alternatives in history it is by far nowhere near that severe (again, yet).

  11. What are the names of those two Canadian guys that President Xi is holding hostage for the Huawei bimbo?

    get those two back, and then you can tell me how badass Canada is.

  12. The Middle Kingdom believes it is the centre of the World. They will push as far as they can until someone pushes back. They don’t want a world war when they can manoeuvre everyone into dependency. Big Business sold out. When we needed medical supplies we found our Elite had sold us out. So now that we know we all participated in the sell-out. The Great Reset will involve us rebuilding our economy to be independent of all foreign countries to the extent that is possible. To do so is worth all the tea in China.

  13. ““When Do We Get To Nuke China?””

    Don’t be a fucking idiot. We don’t. And because of its own policy, Canada never had any nuclear weapons. Blame Pearson or McKenzie King or Diefenbaker.

      1. There’s a joke about the Bomarcs. They’re like government employees: they don’t work and they can’t be fired.

        (I think I read that for the first time here on SDA.)

      2. No, we didn’t. The Bomarc missile weapons remained under the direct control of the United States military, not DND in Canada. The Bomarc was an area effect weapon supposed to be used against Soviet bomber formations. Similarly Canada had no control over the nuclear weapons mounted in its fighter squadron in Germany either.

  15. This coming week the SHA, Sask Health Authority will be forced to gather a working group of health professionals to make decisions on who gets into the ICU and who doesn’t.
    As far as I’m concerned the unvaccinated can go to the back of the line.
    Think about this, drowning in your own spit can’t be a very nice thing to happen to a person.

    1. So DJ – that’s all fine and dandy if you’re stupid enough to believe your turn isn’t coming. 70+ percent are fully vaxed and 76 of eligble at least one Vax. Meanwhile many most at risk have already received their third Vax while it hasn’t even been approved by the FDA and two prominent members resigned. Also don’t forget those who received two doses from different companies are now told they need a third . But they have performed all the “science ” ,right. All the while it’s the unvaxed causing the spread and overwhelming our dysfunctional medical systems and governance. It appears to me this miracle vaccine is having little effect at controlling the virus. How about treatment before you are sick enough to require hospital stays instead of isolate and take an advil? But it’s always easy to find someone to blame rather take responsibility for incompetence, bull headed single minded thinking and expensive non effective desicions. It’s always a hint what you should expect when an organization has “Authority ” in the title. And by the way, I have had their (mostly useless)double dose in case you want to paint me with the “anti Vax ” label. Do I need to show my passport?

    2. So those who had unprotected sex get no AIDS treatment too?
      No cancer care for smokers?
      No care for drunk drivers or drug overdoses?
      Or is it just those that did not submit to the politburo diktat that get care denied?
      Recall how Chicoms in Wuhan built a field hospital in under a week? But somehow ICU space is a hard cap that cannot be adjusted as needed.

    3. Think about this DJ, the “unvaccinated” have a 99.8% survival rate and the “vaccinated” not so much. You are aware that the “vaccines” cannot prevent infection, transmission, illness, or death. That is an undeniable fact!
      The vaxxes have killed over 14,506 Americans. Jump on the bandwagon sport.

    4. ICU’s are always 80 to 90% utilized.
      If people were treated properly with early intervention with ivermecton, HCq and others they would not even be in the hospital let alone an ICU.
      This is criminal behavior.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation