28 Replies to “Margin Of Fraud”

      1. It is absolutely despicable how Ashli Babbitt’s family is being disrespected by the left and it’s propaganda machine. All because her tragic death defies their bullshit narratives.

        Too bad for her that she wasn’t a violent, meth’d-up, thieving, impaired driving, resisting arrest, black saint like Floyd.

        1. ++++++++++/\ CO…!!

          “…Too bad for her that she wasn’t a violent, meth’d-up, thieving, impaired driving, resisting arrest, black saint like Floyd…”

          Yea, the left just loves their designated sainted POS….Not DEAD Enough.

          1. Why don’t you stick to words you understand? Insurrection obviously isn’t on that list. I’m guessing “peaceful protest” isn’t, either.

        2. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. I can only imagine how different your comment would be if it was BLM rioting inside the house.

          1. You mean like the last 2 times that Democrat activists have occupied buildings in Washington over political disagreements? (The Kavanaugh hearings come to mind and are one of those examples.)

          2. You stupid leftarded assholes just don’t get it, do you?

            YOU are the racist, partisan pricks that boil EVERYTHING down to how it fits your fucked-up, divisive narratives, not us. YOU are the ones with ideological leaders that are such tyrants that 1/2 your supporters are only supporters because they are scared shitless to step out of line.

            Most of us out here in the real world couldn’t give a shit if Floyd was white or Babbitt was black. These cases are about morality, not whose fucking ‘team’ they were on.

            And speaking of morality, shove your fake BLM bullshit right back up your ass, if you lowlifes truly cared about black lives, you would demand action for the thousands being slaughtered by criminals, not the handful taken by police. You don’t give a fuck about black lives, so don’t come here and claim otherwise, you lying little pukes.

            BTW, what you think is “over the target” is just all us SDA’ers slapping our foreheads and saying “these race-baiting trolls are getting batshit crazier by the minute.”

    1. Meh. Maricopa Co. has given all the template necessary to make this all go-away … stonewall. Refuse to obey a “political subpoena”. Simply DARE the Legislature to do anything about their non-compliance.

      And PS … our courts are too busy with Jan. 6 prosecutions to take up the case

  1. Michigan’s Supreme Court already acknowledged that the illegal rules its bureaucrats illegally, unconstitutionally, implemented to fraudulently carry out its illegal vote were illegal.

    The same illegal procedures were employed in PA.

    But you know, Trump, so no standing, or something.

    1. Gonna go on a limb and say that you wildly misinterpreted the ruling. That you people are still crying hot bitch tears over this is hilarious.

      You lost.

    2. PA was legal. Read the SCOPA ruling.

      Michigan was a violation of the Administrative Procedures Act when Benson gave guidance on how to verify signatures. She’s allowed to do so, but didn’t execute correctly. Theres no smoking gun here.

      Nothingburgers.

      1. You’re mispronouncing “Nyah nyah nyah nyah nayh”

        And if there’s no problem and a fully independent and transparent audit will prove that, then the cost of the audit is money well spent to prove that the system works to those who currently say it’s broken.

          1. Thank you for asking. Allan S still does not acknowledge that there is a difference between an audit and a recount.

            There are many types of fraud. One way an audit detects fraud is by following the process at each step along the way, and testing that the system is working as planned. For example, if 11,000 votes come in at a riding and only 10,000 have signatures (which can be checked) and are on the correct paper type for state printed ballots (which can be checked) and have the correct chain-of-custody documentation (which can be checked) and are still under seal (which can be checked) then the audit should find 11,000 ballots, of which 10,000 are legal and should be counted.

            If those 10,000 legal ballots are further divided into groups of 200 which are individually totaled and sealed then that too can be checked (whether the listed number and breakdown of ballots on the summary is correct). If the ballot counting machines are required to have an accuracy of 99.98% (meaning error rates must be lower than 2 votes in 10,000) and the 10,000 proper votes are fed into the counting machine and it reports that 60% of the ballots require human intervention (because of bleed-through or misalignment of the reference marks on the ballot with where the vote tabulation portion is) then that is another thing which can be checked. If images of those 60% are sent out-of-country for verification/decision, then there will be a record of that on the routers.
            If there is an illegal copy of database editing software on the computer, even if it is erased before the computer is handed over to the audit, then it will leave its own digital trail that can be found by a skilled auditor with that particular skillset. There are a number of other individual checks that can be done, but I think you get the point.

            Any one of the many means of fraud can slip through a partial recount. If it’s important that it be done properly then it must be done for everything. And that it be done under the public eye, because evil flourishes in the dark.

            Did I answer your question well enough that you understand why we are supporting audits now?

      2. As usual , neither you nor UnMe have any idea what the fuck you’re talking about, since all you do is parrot fake news you’ve heard on Twitter.

        Michigan Supreme Court ruled the changes to the voting laws were unconstitutional, since changes to voting laws most be passed by legislation, not decreed by government fiat.

        Keep beclowning yourselves, halfwits.

        1. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mlive.com/public-interest/2021/03/court-invalidates-michigan-rule-on-how-to-verify-absentee-ballot-application-signatures.html%3foutputType=amp

          Wrong again. First it wasn’t the Supreme Court. Second MI election law doesn’t specify what Benson addressed. So she didn’t violate any election law. What she did violate was the APA in issuing the guidance..

          You really shouldn’t embarrass yourself like this.

          PA = nothingburger

          MI = didn’t follow APA

          1. Let me use small words, so even your pinhead retard brain can process it.

            An act is a law.

            If you violate an act, you’re breaking the law.

            Michigan’s corrupt SOS instituted voting procedures which violated the act. The election results are illegal.

            Spin it any way you want, but you pretending that breaking election law is a “nothingburger” is a pretty dumb hot take, even for a goose-stepping fascist numbskull like you. Go back to Twitter, maybe the echo chamber there has some more hand-waving for you to regurgitate here.

          2. Issuing guidance incorrectly doesn’t nullify election results. This is the kind of logic leaps that have been laughed out of court for months.

            No election law was broken. The guidance was to CLARIFY election law. Click the link.

          3. Keep spinning. The court clearly ruled Michigan’s election was illegal. So was PA’s.

            Interestingly, US states like Florida and Ohio which have implemented rational election reform (bringing them closer to what might be acceptable in, say, Canada) have gone from being swing states to solidly red.

            Weird, that. All so very strange.

          4. Go ahead and quote from their decision where they said MIs election was illegal. There is a link to it above.

          5. PAs extension of the mail in ballots deadline was ruled legal by the SCOPA. Go ahead and read their decision too.

            The plaintiffs appealed, but didn’t give a good argument to overturn.

  2. After this much time has gone by, I have to wonder if they’re calling for it knowing the evidence has been buried.

      1. Sure thing, bud. Your claim sure fits with all the illegal last minute “emergency actions” and the fact that the American Left is all in for ID-free voting. In case you’re actually as stupid as those who actually think those actions don’t add up to unverifiable votes – fraud – let me remind you of one immutable truth: There is no reason for a political party to campaign against voter ID except to insure their ability to cheat in the future. Just as they did last time.

        BTW, for the record I do not think you’re stupid. I think you’re one of the leftists who are terrified that the truth of how you defeated the Bad Orange Man and his smelly, stupid supporters will get out, so you come on sites like this to promote your BIG LIE – but perhaps you’re one of the legions of people who’d rather believe a pleasant story that shows all is well rather than face the stark, nasty, frightening truth.

    1. There was plenty of evidence – if you want to call it that – filed with lawsuits in the form of affidavits.

      The problem was the lawyers filing the lawsuits lack of vetting. The affidavits were incredibly low quality. O’rourke v. Dominion for example the affidavits was nothing but people being upset. No relevant facts to the case whatsoever.

      Or how about “spyder”. The story changed depending on what state it was filed.

Navigation