If Not For Fake Hate There’d Be No Hate At All

On the fifth anniversary of the PULSE nightclub massacre in Orlando, numerous senators, politicians and activist groups commemorated that tragic event by propagating an absolute falsehood: namely, that the shooter, Omar Mateen, was motivated by anti-LGBT animus. The evidence is definitive and conclusive that this is false — Mateen, like so many others who committed similar acts of violence, was motivated by rage over President Obama’s bombing campaigns in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan, and chose PULSE at random without even knowing it was a gay club — yet this media-consecrated lie continues to fester.

9 Replies to “If Not For Fake Hate There’d Be No Hate At All”

  1. The federal government also seems to be passing a law to make the first memorial Night Club out of pulse…

  2. as you see they don’t speak of the fact of the other member of the congregation, who blew himself up in idlib, the sheikh’s ex bodyguard who trained him, the pilgrimage to mecca he went to sponsored by the nypd, the contacts he met there, perhaps the same figure who recruited al shamrani, the pensacola shooter

  3. Meh. There’s probably a down side I’m not seeing. Either the gay media knowingly lied their faces off, further discrediting themselves, or a Muslim deliberately shot up a bunch of gay people because they were gay, driving a wedge between two pet Democrat client factions. Seems like a win-win.

  4. they have used the event to curtail crimethink, about islamists, and push gun control, one of the most ridiculous elements was when they had supposedly the shooter’s lover, with a disguised voice, they gave that up after two weeks, just like with the anti asian panic, that inconveniently involves african americans, who take ibrahim kendi’s advice about the subject group, being ‘white adjacent’ whatever that means,

  5. “and chose PULSE at random without even knowing it was a gay club”

    This part is incorrect, he was apparently a regular at the club. Not really anything odd in that, as jihadi martyrs do not have to answer for any of their “sins” in life and can go straight to paradise and their 72 virgins. Likely he was a gay muslim and self loathing because of it and found his loophole in the bombing of Syria.

  6. There are many stories where young Arabs are subject to homosexual harassments and possibly willingly participate, it is as though going through a phase in their life without actually being homosexuals.
    Those stories were told by the American soldiers while in Afghanistan and the places around, published in newspapers.

    Could not tell you where it was written though I remember reading it. It’s possible that there was a link to it from here.

  7. “….over President Obama’s bombing campaigns in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan…”

    Syria or Libya?

  8. Grits would rather chase phantom terrorists who are just angry murderers, along with anonymous tappers who harm nobody.

    Then they can ignore real hatred and foul acts by Islamist radicals, supported by this moron below, who think hypocritical hatefests of their nation is appropriate for commencement speeches. The real deal folks, not political and convenient omission conclusions.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/virginia-graduation-speaker-racism-white-supremacy-jihad

    My comment: That she eschews individualism, iow liberty, tells you everything you need to know about her totalitarian worldview, which cannot exist without setting people, communities and nations against each other. She represents a vast class of oppressive ideologues who, now that they’ve identified societal flaws, without themselves subject to the same scrutiny, who damage their communities more than anyone, can cash in on ever more victims to be rescued, every solution enhancing their power, wealth and prestige. The Biden regime, already disastrous in its first six months, signals a full and final end to their corrupt, collectivist co-opted reign or error and terror. Why do people who hate their country wish to represent? Not for those they purport to serve. It is cynical power mongering, nothing more, more typical of third world despotism than anything approaching plurality.

    Or is it individualism and its danger of people thinking and speaking for themselves that she fears most?

Navigation