The fact that the first couple of paragraphs are complete and utter bollocks undermines the rest of it.
Men compete with each other physically, women compete with each other socially. This isn’t news. Dr. Jordan B. Peterson has said so, Orange Is The New Black said it explicitly in the pilot, and everyone remembers the mean girls from high school.
“…women compete with each other socially.”
That is an artifact of the rule of law imposed on women by men in western society. Go anywhere else on the planet and it doesn’t take much for that “social competition” to morph into some rather brutal physical aggression. 4chan is pretty good at posting the video on that sort of thing if you are really curious – China being especially noteworthy given its lop-sided male to female ratio. With so many men available, why are the beatings so vicious?
The commenters bring up a significant recent change.
Government, Transfer Payments, and Legal Changes like divorce, custody, and child support laws have replaced Men and Man’s Traditional Protection of Women, Children, and Family. This is a major Change in Society and relationships. I do not know if it is good, bad or indifferent, and I am probably the worst one to opine on it. But the changes are happening, and second, third, fourth order, and more effects are now appearing, and will continue to pop up until society reaches a new equilibrium, or maybe even collapses or dissolves.
if wimins slow walked the world!!!!
Thank goodness the collective advancement of humanity has brought us both hairspray and a non-cranium crushing version of making that bank teller back off.
Cat fights are highly entertaining. And might I add … a particular demographic seems to show up in the news most often for killing and/or torturing their rivals. Best not to mess with a sistah’s boyfriend!
And lest we ever forget … “We came, we saw, and we humiliated (all of) Bill’s sexual conquests”
Cat fights among women are very scary for other women. Personally, I have always preferred men as BFFs. I understand them and know how not to annoy them too much, as most normal men do have red lines.
Other women can be very devious, emotional and vicious, without even acknowledging their power. A world run by women would be terrifying, a few rather right-brained leaders excepted, like Margaret Thatcher and Indira Gandhi.
Domestic violence. I suspect, often starts with a verbal interaction, and women tend to be better at using language to hurt males. No one ever talks about that, of course. Wimin are victims.
It is a common thing for women to use men as emotional punching bags. The trope is that “women can’t hurt men and men shouldn’t hurt women…. so women have no anticipation of consequences.
Or that’s one explanation. The increasing body of evidence that women initiate around 60% of domestic violence – even when they are more likely to lose if the man retaliates – may suggest alternative lines of thought.
The biggest reduction in Domestic Violence would be achieved if women simply stopped hitting men.
Yup, my ex tried to wallop me a few times after one too many bottles of wine.
She had a few bruised wrists over the years.
Kipling had it right.
Most of the consumption decisions are made by women in capitalist economies, far, far beyond any genuine contribution they make to it. That is why women are portrayed in advertising as smart, sophisticated and empowered, and men are portrayed as children or imbeciles.
If women ran the world? Oh, but they already do control the western world.
That is why the dragon is eating us alive. Our Chinese friends know better than to give women any real power.
The last time that happened, Jiang Qing used her power over her senile husband, Mao Zedong, to settle scores with all the people in the Shanghai movie business who she thought has stopped her rise to stardom, and turn China into a stage for a melodrama written by a lunatic, starring Jiang Qing herself.
(She was ugly, she couldn’t act, and back in Shanghai was better known as a drunken party girl than for any of her bit roles.)
Nobody at all in China ever wants anybody like Jiang Qing to hold power again—in China. They plan to thoroughly enjoy watching a dark-skinned Jiang Qing destroy the United States, though.
Seems I recall there are quite a few women working in the Wuhan Lab. Where the viruses are “high function” … the scientists however are … low function(aires) of the Communist State.
well ghost as usual, out of your depth and full of SHIT, you obviously know nothing about Chinese women, Chinese culture/and or Chinese domestic dynamics!
Welcome to the 21st century…
Oops, like, I totally dropped lies and ugly rumors about her on social media while she was sleeping. How clumsy of me!
Whenever anyone says women are kinder and more nurturing and blah blah blah, I just assume they never went to high school.
Oddly, Queen Victoria’s reign is remembered as peaceful and prosperous due to her later years, but prior to the age of menopause, Great Britain averaged one new conflict a month.
Western civilizations greatest downfall has been the glorification of womanhood.
It has been one of the earliest forms of virtue signaling and a prime example of masking ideology.
Look at the so called “Real Housewives” of wherever and simultaneously look at women CEOs.
These two situations occur, as a result, at the same time. At first this may seem odd when really it is quite obviously the result of selective objectification. The CEO may be married and have children but rest assured she is not fat and not an object of desire. The “Real Housewives” are, quite apparently, prostitutes.
Fat girls and freaks fail, and they know it. That’s where the man hating element comes in. Women’s liberation embraces man hatred as a cover to occupy the scorned.
Women are wearing less clothing, more make-up, and surgically / chemically enhancing (destroying) themselves. They’re twerking at the Grammy’s and twerking at navel ship launches. Our rivers are flowing with estrogen to the extent of wildlife mutation as women choose to put themselves into full service without consequence mode.
So when I read “The original human intra-species violence was between females competing for resources.” I had to laugh as it is an attempt to factually (not really btw) repudiate the assertions of a masking ideology designed for those women who can’t compete in the objectification game while stratifying those who can. You see, this “primal misogyny” thing happens mostly to hot chicks.
I’d rather see women collectively grow a little respect for themselves, reject objectification statuses, and actually enjoy their kitchens for a change.
Link fubared.
This is probably not the correct one.
https://www.wordplays.com/crossword-solver/how-clumsy-of-me!
Original item here
https://catallaxyfiles.com/2021/04/17/muddy-primal/
The fact that the first couple of paragraphs are complete and utter bollocks undermines the rest of it.
Men compete with each other physically, women compete with each other socially. This isn’t news. Dr. Jordan B. Peterson has said so, Orange Is The New Black said it explicitly in the pilot, and everyone remembers the mean girls from high school.
“…women compete with each other socially.”
That is an artifact of the rule of law imposed on women by men in western society. Go anywhere else on the planet and it doesn’t take much for that “social competition” to morph into some rather brutal physical aggression. 4chan is pretty good at posting the video on that sort of thing if you are really curious – China being especially noteworthy given its lop-sided male to female ratio. With so many men available, why are the beatings so vicious?
Also this for European women:
https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2013/06/just-for-show_1.html
See the last paragraph.
The commenters bring up a significant recent change.
Government, Transfer Payments, and Legal Changes like divorce, custody, and child support laws have replaced Men and Man’s Traditional Protection of Women, Children, and Family. This is a major Change in Society and relationships. I do not know if it is good, bad or indifferent, and I am probably the worst one to opine on it. But the changes are happening, and second, third, fourth order, and more effects are now appearing, and will continue to pop up until society reaches a new equilibrium, or maybe even collapses or dissolves.
if wimins slow walked the world!!!!
Thank goodness the collective advancement of humanity has brought us both hairspray and a non-cranium crushing version of making that bank teller back off.
https://youtu.be/L0eeSoU35wM
Cat fights are highly entertaining. And might I add … a particular demographic seems to show up in the news most often for killing and/or torturing their rivals. Best not to mess with a sistah’s boyfriend!
And lest we ever forget … “We came, we saw, and we humiliated (all of) Bill’s sexual conquests”
Cat fights among women are very scary for other women. Personally, I have always preferred men as BFFs. I understand them and know how not to annoy them too much, as most normal men do have red lines.
Other women can be very devious, emotional and vicious, without even acknowledging their power. A world run by women would be terrifying, a few rather right-brained leaders excepted, like Margaret Thatcher and Indira Gandhi.
Domestic violence. I suspect, often starts with a verbal interaction, and women tend to be better at using language to hurt males. No one ever talks about that, of course. Wimin are victims.
It is a common thing for women to use men as emotional punching bags. The trope is that “women can’t hurt men and men shouldn’t hurt women…. so women have no anticipation of consequences.
Or that’s one explanation. The increasing body of evidence that women initiate around 60% of domestic violence – even when they are more likely to lose if the man retaliates – may suggest alternative lines of thought.
The biggest reduction in Domestic Violence would be achieved if women simply stopped hitting men.
Yup, my ex tried to wallop me a few times after one too many bottles of wine.
She had a few bruised wrists over the years.
Kipling had it right.
Most of the consumption decisions are made by women in capitalist economies, far, far beyond any genuine contribution they make to it. That is why women are portrayed in advertising as smart, sophisticated and empowered, and men are portrayed as children or imbeciles.
If women ran the world? Oh, but they already do control the western world.
That is why the dragon is eating us alive. Our Chinese friends know better than to give women any real power.
The last time that happened, Jiang Qing used her power over her senile husband, Mao Zedong, to settle scores with all the people in the Shanghai movie business who she thought has stopped her rise to stardom, and turn China into a stage for a melodrama written by a lunatic, starring Jiang Qing herself.
(She was ugly, she couldn’t act, and back in Shanghai was better known as a drunken party girl than for any of her bit roles.)
Nobody at all in China ever wants anybody like Jiang Qing to hold power again—in China. They plan to thoroughly enjoy watching a dark-skinned Jiang Qing destroy the United States, though.
Seems I recall there are quite a few women working in the Wuhan Lab. Where the viruses are “high function” … the scientists however are … low function(aires) of the Communist State.
well ghost as usual, out of your depth and full of SHIT, you obviously know nothing about Chinese women, Chinese culture/and or Chinese domestic dynamics!
Welcome to the 21st century…
Oops, like, I totally dropped lies and ugly rumors about her on social media while she was sleeping. How clumsy of me!
Whenever anyone says women are kinder and more nurturing and blah blah blah, I just assume they never went to high school.
Oddly, Queen Victoria’s reign is remembered as peaceful and prosperous due to her later years, but prior to the age of menopause, Great Britain averaged one new conflict a month.
Western civilizations greatest downfall has been the glorification of womanhood.
It has been one of the earliest forms of virtue signaling and a prime example of masking ideology.
Look at the so called “Real Housewives” of wherever and simultaneously look at women CEOs.
These two situations occur, as a result, at the same time. At first this may seem odd when really it is quite obviously the result of selective objectification. The CEO may be married and have children but rest assured she is not fat and not an object of desire. The “Real Housewives” are, quite apparently, prostitutes.
Fat girls and freaks fail, and they know it. That’s where the man hating element comes in. Women’s liberation embraces man hatred as a cover to occupy the scorned.
Women are wearing less clothing, more make-up, and surgically / chemically enhancing (destroying) themselves. They’re twerking at the Grammy’s and twerking at navel ship launches. Our rivers are flowing with estrogen to the extent of wildlife mutation as women choose to put themselves into full service without consequence mode.
So when I read “The original human intra-species violence was between females competing for resources.” I had to laugh as it is an attempt to factually (not really btw) repudiate the assertions of a masking ideology designed for those women who can’t compete in the objectification game while stratifying those who can. You see, this “primal misogyny” thing happens mostly to hot chicks.
I’d rather see women collectively grow a little respect for themselves, reject objectification statuses, and actually enjoy their kitchens for a change.