32 Replies to “The Roadkill Diaries?”

  1. 33 counties havent responded

    2 counties responded but will follow up

    That does NOT mean:

    A) 35 counties do not have the chain of custody forms

    B) This is evidence of fraud

    Nothingburger. Governments regularly drag their butts on stuff like this.

    1. AllA, when it comes to voting integrity, responding promptly is essential, I New Hampshire they discovered irregularities , 4 REPUBLICANS were short changed about 300 votes each, because Dominion voting machines, and the stated people responsible for the voting integrity tried to block full audits, which will now happen. In Georgia the Dim senator late filed 1200 registrations, which you appeared to minimize when discussed, you can not break the law a little bit, it’s all or nothing. In AZ, maricopa county, officials are blocking a full independent audit of dominion machines, they “fixed” audits can not be trusted. In Mi, an audit was performed, and the state DA (a dim) threatened Lawyers involved with legal problems if they disclosed the results . How many things need to come to the surface before and IDIOT ,like you gets it?????

      1. Maricopa county has already had two audits. 4 out of 5 county board supervisors are Republican. They did not want to give access because of the way they interpreted Arizona law – access is only through a court order. The judge ruled a subpeona is equivalent to a court order. So now the supervisors are off the hook.

        Another nothingburger. When will it end?

        1. Spoken like someone who has never undergone an audit. A recount is much, much simpler. Maricopa county did a recount and called it an audit. That’s a red flag to real auditors.

          An audit doesn’t ask “what’s the count?”, it goes deeper to ask “How is this counted? Can you show what happens when something isn’t counted right? Where are your cross-checks? Where are the points of sign-off and responsibility?” and many others.

          2. You just said “Maricopa county has already had two audits.”

            And now you say “Except they didnt do the audit. Nice try.”

            What kind of drugs are you on?

    2. No. It means that multiple Counties haven’t yet fabricated fraudulent chain of custody documents … that “appear” believable.

    3. We don’t have absolute proof that Bigfoot exists. The absence of that proof doesn’t prove Bigfoot exists. But if you want to believe, it may help to suppose that someone does have such proof but perhaps they just don’t want to share, so conclude that Bigfoot exists.

      That thirty-five counties have not shown that they have documented chain of custody for their absentee ballots doesn’t mean they do have documented chain of custody for those ballots. If they ever present such documents they may be examined, and they may valid. But maybe the county officials concerned are procrastinating because they are afraid of the media frenzy when they prove Bigfoot exists. It’s not some simple routine thing like showing you did your job in and election just as you were supposed to do.

  3. Is that the insignia of the 9th “Hohenstaufen” or the 30th SS division on the lanyard around her neck?

    1. Even The Star of David is a symbol of ethnic supremacy when it suits our masters, so why not?

      1. You can’t do elementary school math. If you could, you would know that it is utterly impossible, not merely unlikely, that Biden won. Trump’s lead in Michigan at 10 pm was greater than the number of ballots remaining to count. Elementary school math will tell you that 300 thousand is not and can never be greater than 400 thousand. It’s fraud.

        Also note the difference: Trump complied with the whole Russia investigation. Democrats stonewall and censor. Don’t want people to think you cheated? Stop acting like you cheated.

          1. And you think that that’s a comeback to an analysis based question? Your response is on the level of “no, you’re a poopyhead!”

            And that’s what we expect from you. We know that you’re immune to fact and logic, but we continue to answer the less lunatic appearing posts because there are lots of lurkers to whom they might seem reasonable questions (to people who don’t know your history here).

          3. “Show me any evidence of what he said.” His words are right above this one. That, of and by itself, is evidence of what he said.

            If you’re an ESL student struggling with English who meant to say “Show me any evidence that what he said is true” then having been reading here for over two weeks would have provided that evidence, or a quick duckduckgo search would supply more. But you’ve already shown that you automatically dismiss that with which you don’t agree, and don’t post sources for your own allegations.

            How about you show us a court case where what we say is evidence was presented to the court, and the judge ruled it false (not dismissed without seeing or ignored) and the erstwhile liars were found in contempt of court and thrown in jail for lying to the court? We both know you can’t.

            And thanks for making it so plain for lurkers that you really don’t have a clue what you’re defending with your constant repetition that there isn’t (and never has been?) any evidence of fraud. You’re making it much easier to convert the unconvinced. At this point less than half the voting public of the US thinks that there was no fraud at all, and the numbers are falling daily.

      2. “You’re gullible and have been lied to.” You are describing yourself. It was easy to deceive you with lies you wish are true, it will probably be impossible to help you to realize you have been deceived. You will keep coming here to tell us we are wrong because you need to constantly reassure yourself.

  5. To all the readers that have swallowed the big lie that there was no election fraud here is a little rumble happening in Michigan that has the potential to burst the big lie.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/breaking-antrim-county-clerk-material-witness-sheryl-guy-dismisses-election-fraud-casejudge-overrules-decision-reinstates-case/

    This should get national attention before the weekend is over, a county clerk acting like a supreme court judge. This has all the earmarks of election interference that all of the other courts had refused to hear. Judge Elsenheimer now has the box seat for possibly the biggest trial of the century. I wish him well.

    1. Ah yes still quoting the completely debunked “antrim county audit” that was laughed out of court. Go read the complaint in dominion v. Powell for a refresher.

      1. Having a principle who should be testifying in the case instead try to dismiss the case is not laughing it out of court. Neither is putting your fingers in your ears and going “NYAHNYAHNYAH…” until the people you’re dealing with walk away, shaking their heads.

        The case is proceeding. There may yet be a full audit, and review of the findings in a proper court. But I’m not holding my breath.

          1. You do know that election fraud was a problem in the US before 2020, and we need to fix it. It’s why “True the Vote” has existed for 10 years.

  6. I pray Judge Eisenheimer lives to complete his task. Arkancide – you know…….

  8. I marvel at the completely moronic comments that are posted here by the leftist trolls. “The election was the most secure in history.” lie that has been spouted by the left has been swallowed hook line and sinker by all the bottom feeders that can’t allow themselves to look around them. To believe that Biden, who couldn’t turn out an audience that would fill a high school auditorium, won over Trump who had people lining up 24 hours ahead of schedule to get into arenas that held 15,000 to 20,000, won with 7,000,000 more votes beggars the imagination. That in itself would give any thinking person pause to consider. The myriad of other occurrences that happened surrounding the election, the mathematical probabilities in vote turnout and count, the lost chain of custody, the unwillingness for the courts to hear the evidence that has been assembled, I could go on ad nauseum. For the Supreme Court to refuse to hear any evidence, for the FBI to be involved in shredding ballots, for the DOJ to refuse to investigate expulsion of vote checkers and then believe that the election was fair and honest is an indication of how stupidly moronic some people are.

    1. Fully agreed. Just like the funniest part of the Obama terms were the hoops he jumped through to never produce a proper birth certificate. I’m not saying he didn’t have one or couldn’t have been elected because he was ineligible (which I don’t care about, the vote arguably put him in), I’m saying that that single example and failure to produce the proper documentation put a lie to his “most transparent administration ever”.

      Except to the useful idiots, of course.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation