29 Replies to “This is What Freedom Sounds Like”

  1. Canada has gone too far for this to resonate, unfortunately. You only have to listen to the Covid Broadcasting Corporation cheerleading lockdowns and throwing out governments’ trial balloons, on governments’ behalf, for ever more stringency, or look at opinion polls.

    On a side note, this is the (perhaps) unintended consequence of socialized medicine: our governments do have a stake in our personal behaviour.

    1. Ask them who is going to be responsible for any adverse effects from the hurry up vaccine that has been killing people all around the globe? Governments have been given complete freedom from any liability arising from adverse effects up to and including death. I have drawn up a form that anyone preparing to give me a shot will have to sign, as will the head of the board of health and the premier. The form states that any adverse effects suffered as a result of the vaccine, would put the future liability for all my living costs, medical costs, and anything else related to an adverse reaction squarely on them.

    2. Rick Bonsteel,
      On a side note, this is the (perhaps) unintended consequence of socialized medicine

      YES. That is it. I would say that maybe unintended consequences in earlier iterations, but not nowadays.

      The power junkies invariably put two things at the top of their bucket lists: single payor socialized medicine and gun confiscation.

      Socialized medicine ennervates the spirit and degrades the character of the people.

    1. Why do you think the Communist cesspool party (CCP) AKA the commiecrats want universal medical (can’t say health) care?

  2. Whittle lost me when the ATF did it’s bump-stock ban. He was waxing poetic about how nobody really needs a bump-stock. The man lacks principles.

    1. He lost me months ago when he supported police taking a knee with the Burn Loot Murder crowd in order to better relations with them.

      Still, what he read is at the essence of what a free society is about: individual citizens making their own decisions and taking responsibility of the results.

    2. It is ok to agree with a person on one point and disagree on another. Purity tests are for the leftists (and PPC supporters).

  3. Holy Cow, what a profound letter. Too bad we will never see any politician live up to that.
    Over the last month or so Danielle Smith has basically said similar statements as to how our leaders should conduct themselves. She has spoken on how it’s the AHS’s job to care for the citizens that get sick. It’s the governments job to ensure the AHS has the capacity and tools to care for the citizens. Not the governments job to quarantine us, shut us down, frighten us, all to protect the system they have let stagnate and become this behemoth lumbering, rationing machine.

  4. Since we are not getting the science (actual numbers) from MSM do SDAers have suggestions for best links that have not been filtered by the propaganda machine?
    How many actual deaths in each province by the month from Wuhab flu? Compared to deaths last year?
    How many actually sick in hospital? I am aware of positive cases that experienced headache…that is all!!
    Daily #s on MSM are skewed for dramatic fear mongering.
    Any police with backbones that will take this kind of stand?
    We have been beome an echo chamber of commenters here…I want more facts.

    1. Geeez Bluetech,next you will want truth in advertising.
      As an aside ,my local paper is running a quit smoking add,stating that 45 000 Canadians die each year due to smoking related illnesses..
      Think about that,if true, then the Dread Covid is a joke.

      Problem with finding accurate numbers,is the statement by Health Canada that they lie.
      Turns out we cannot use the “Annual Deaths by Influenza” to compare the potency of the Wuhan Flu.Cause These numbers are entirely fiction,made up from estimates.
      According to Public Health..Talk about “Good enough for government”.

      And now the number of deaths has tapered off,the propaganda has turned to “CASES”,an utterly meaningless metric as case numbers depend on testing,which Canada refused the asymptomatic for 9 months.

      This is not a pandemic as history describes one,more of a plandemic to cover the asses of a group of serial incompetents who panicked and refuse to accept the responsibilities we paid them to carry.
      They are insane with panic,not fear of the Chinese Virus,but fear they will now be held accountable for the destruction they have inflicted.

      This is the silver lining for those taxpayers who survive this power grab by the Mediocracy,we suspected they were useless. Now we know they are clueless,useless and extremely dangerous.

      This will only end,when we fire them all,as they are exposed as willing to bother us beyond all reason,to save their pensions and positions.

  5. Everything is based on the RT-PCR test. It will produce many false positives if the Ct value is set too high. In SK the laboratory uses a ridiculous Ct value of 45. All designed to instill fear.

    PCR tests cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. The false appearance of a lethal pandemic has been manufactured using cycle thresholds (CTs) that are too high
    The higher the CT — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — the greater the chance of a false positive. Research shows that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically
    The SARS-CoV-2 PCR test was developed based on a genetic sequence published by Chinese scientists, not the viral isolate. Missing genetic code was simply made up
    November 30, 2020, 22 international scientists published a review challenging the scientific paper on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 that was adopted as the standard across the world. The scientists are calling for the so-called Corman-Drosten paper to be retracted due to its numerous errors
    The flaws of PCR testing have been capitalized upon to incite fear in order to benefit the Great Reset agenda developed by a technocratic elite

    1. You have explained it very clearly.
      This is the same explanation that I received from a Lab Technologist. She compared it to stretching the sample like a rubber band causing distortion.
      The politicians cannot be trusted. They do not have science backing their over reaching virtue signalling policies.
      All the while failing to look after the most vulnerable.

        1. A good article but it FAILS to mention the very important Ct value used in their RT-PCR test example.

  6. Violent hate cannot ever be appeased, any more than mollifying a spoiled child having a tantrum makes them a better adult.

    We know what to do and don’t need government to tell us how to live our lives. If we had real leaders the scandal of long term care facilities, its residents now representing nearly 3/4 of Canadian covid deaths, presaging a “second wave,” would have been prevented.

    They would rather rule, taking the easy out for themselves, but harder for us, than take the hard route to make it easier for us.

    “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.” Winston S. Churchill

    “When you worry about what others think of you and then bend to appease them, know that your life is not really yours. It belongs to the people who sway your choices because you let them.” Richelle E. Goodrich

    “The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it. Power is what all messiahs really seek: not the chance to serve. This is true even of the pious brethren who carry the gospel to foreign parts.” H.L. Mencken

    Trust the people has nothing to do with it, collectivists first impulse is to rule from on high, from the top down, with ridiculous blanket policies like lockdowns. If they accepted citizens know how to take care of themselves, then we wouldn’t need 90% of these doofuses who only take and couldn’t survive in the real world. It would be bad for their business.

  7. “Norris is not the first law enforcement authority in North Idaho who has announced they will not enforce COVID-19 mandates.

    Bonner County Sheriff Daryl Wheeler said in November that he would not enforce Panhandle Health’s mask mandate. He said the sheriff’s office is working “at maximum capacity on real crime and it cannot enforce the unenforceable mask rules.”

    https://www.krem.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/new-kootenai-county-sheriff-wont-enforce-covid19-mandates/

  8. Gavin Newsom has an answer for these types of ‘deplorable’ Police Dept’s. and Counties … withhold $$B’s

    https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article248131860.html

    Sayyyyy … didn’t the left claim that was unconstitutional when PDJT threatened to do the same to scofflaw States?

    BTW … note how the Marxist-media (Sacramento Pravda Bee) is egging Newsom on. Demanding that Newsom PUNISH all Counties who refuse to bow before unelected, non-practicing, Health bureaucrats. The Press is disgustingly anti-American

  9. Robert, I listened to every single word (something I rarely do now) and it is superb.

    Dear Whittle nay sayers above.
    What the fcuk is wrong with you? Who gives a shit about his naive error in taking a knee for Burn Loot and Murder. Do perceived previous error negate the content of this video. My gawd, and you pine for strong conservative leader and toss him/her at the first instance of ideological impurity!?

    1. If he is in favour of one concession to the left, what else might he be willing to give up and compromise on? Do you believe that the left would ever do anything like that? Of course not. Such concessions are seen as weaknesses and the left will do everything it can to exploit them.

      1. I have been following Bill since his blogging on EjectEjectEjecthe He is authentic in his convictions and the love of the Republic. Sometimes I agree with him and sometimes I don’t (ex his support of cops). But he is authentic.

        Why is the discussion about him not about the contents of the letter he presented anyway?

Navigation