Declaration Of War

Amazon Is Booting Parler Off Of Its Web Hosting Service.

In case you haven’t figured it out, the end game is to wall off access to social media tools by conservatives, even those they develop independently, so that the technology can be exploited exclusively by the left for political organizing and message control, in a repeat of their capture of the mainstream press.

So, that’s all that’s happening.

95 Replies to “Declaration Of War”

    1. I am looking forward to the coming civil war in the U.S. If these democrat pansies think people are going to stand for elimination of free speech they are sadly mistaken

      1. What are they going to do? Biden will enact laws to outlaw conservative thought and big tech will enforce it.

        1. So what you are saying is, Big Tech will boot conservative people off their networks and platforms, and continue to preach to the existing (mostly miserable and childless) leftists the same old echo-chamber pablum.

          I think the censorship has just happened in the reverse direction: several million conservatives will now be insulated permamently from Leftist propaganda.

          And the filthy, shitty, scummy kids snitching on their parents and relatives to authorities? Y’all MUST HAVE wondered what kind of lives the same kind of people had in China once everyone was sick and tired of the cultural revolution, or East German kids adter handing their parents over to the Stasi? Mostly dead of suicide, drug overdoses, or killed by vengeful siblings once the authorities were too busy to notice.

          No, things are unfolding beautifully. Keep it up lefties! Every move you make is ensuring your eventual cruel, painful, hideous death. One way or another. In war. Drug addiction. Falling afoul of your new buddies. Or at the hands of your enraged enemies. Keep it up!

        2. Can’t effectively outlaw thought. They’ll enact laws and regulations intended to suppress communication of conservative ideas and opinions, and “big tech” will try to enforce them. But human nature includes a contrariness that sows rebellion and tends to motivate creativity.

    2. Technically President Trump has more than enough evidence of China’s involvement in the Election hacking and signals sent to China in vote changes from the Chinese voting machines.
      So, yes, President Trump can show the Chinese involvement which is an Act of War against the United States.

  1. Don’t anti-trust laws apply against these bad actors? They’re clearing blocking competition.

      1. Doesn’t even matter in the us who’s in power. The whole apparatus is under democrat control. Anyone who opposes them will be investigated, in peached, and jailed.

    1. The biggest companies in the world are conspiring to maintain their monopolies. Some $50 billion fines are in order and jail time for the people at the top. Zuckerberg needs to spend 20 years in an orange jumpsuit.

  2. THANK YOU KATE FOR ALL THE YEARS WE HAVE BEEN USING SDA!

    I mean that in capitals as well.

    This day, I have been regretting since I think I posted it back in early 2000 (or was it before), that we will not have a free internet.

    So I want to get my thank you in before this site is blocked.

    Thanks
    Kate & supporters

    1. Maybe our friends on the left can point out the government statute or initiative that created SDA and similar endeavors. Friedman had it right government is a hitchhiker on the road of success. Hayek said human behavior dictated using state power only in areas of wide agreement. Now consensus is manufactured. Conservative Ideas of state intervention only if necessary but not necessary and proper notions of liberalism like temporary problems requiring temporary only measures stand soundly defeated in the US federal state, and Canada, with our pronouncement Proud Boys given they had nothing to do with the Capitol riots must be shut down. Yup all eight of them. Why work hard when political connections provide a cushy collegial life that others pay for.

  3. **DEVELOPING: Trump legal team preparing lawsuit vs Twitter, Facebook, et. al., based on the novel argument that these social media giants denied his free-speech rights in COORDINATION with Democrat GOVERNMENT officials to whom they donate and with whom they privately communicate**

    Also this…

    **DEVELOPING: A furious Speaker Pelosi is convinced Trump had her laptop stolen (contains PP slides) & is on warpath to get it back & has hatched blackmail scheme vs Trump w Schumer & McConnell to have him impeached & convicted under Insurrection Act so he can’t run again in 2024**

    https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1348082222700646401

    1. A furious Speaker Pelosi is convinced Trump had her laptop stolen

      Any bets that it might have been a false flag operation just to give that old broom pilot an excuse to go after Trump?

    2. That first item is interesting as heck.

      People have been saying “Twitter can do what it wants. The 1st amendment doesn’t apply because Twitter is not the government.” But if Twitter took action with the strong encouragment of — or even with threats from — federal politicians, then you can argue that they are censoring at the government’s behest.

      1. If Twitter STOPS using Common Carrier protections, THEN it can do what it wants. Otherwise there are laws that it too must follow, private company or no.

  4. When do the lawsuits start – about discrimination, violation of the First Amendment, etc.
    After all – if a private bakery is not allowed to refuse to bake a cake for a gay marriage, then, an Internet server can’t refuse to allow someone to use their services.

    They can block ‘hate speech’ which exhorts violence [and even that is arguable] but- can they, legally, refuse to allow someone to use their service?

  5. I was an ‘Amazon Associate’ for a week shy of two years. I learned there are a few keys to success at amazon.
    Appearance is everything. Be special.
    Make the numbers look good. Show enthusiasm for the amazon way. Lie, cheat, steal to reach your goal. Piss money away like there’s no tomorrow.
    If you show up and put in an honest day’s work, you’re doing it wrong.
    There are many, many others.

    When the amazon bubble bursts it will be epic.

    1. Not hard when China provides you with abundant and cheap labour, coming soon to America with her undefended borders.

      “Workers were required to work more than 100 hours of monthly overtime in violation of Chinese labour law that limits overtime to 36 hours a month The factory uses more “dispatch workers,” similar to temporary staff in the U.S., than are allowed by Chinese law. Employees did not receive adequate safety training. Workers are required to arrive at work stations 10 minutes before their shift begins and they are not compensated for this time. Staff dormitories lack adequate fire-safety precautions such as fire extinguishers.”

      “All workers are subject to long hours and low wages,” the report stated. “As wages are low, workers must rely on overtime hours to earn enough to maintain a decent standard of living.”

      When caught, Amazon promised to “look into it.” They’re from the Chinese government, there to help, another old lie.

      Nothing further heard, currently shut down for coronavirus, ready to be ruled to work again, China’s “labour movement.”

      https://financialpost.com/technology/amazon-blasted-by-labor-group-over-china-factory-conditions-1

  6. There seems to be a lot of colluding going on here between left, big corporations and big tech, feels as though they have all been on the same team for some time.

    The big techs are digital marketers and they sure seemed to have provided a lot of free marketing services to smiling Joe and team during the campaign.

    But then again, Smiling Joe from Scranton seems up for anything, as long as there is 10% for the big guy.

    1. Ya think? Look at donations to Democrats. It’s all from big tech and wall street. They’re the party of rich oligarchs.

  7. Criminals and never do wells fear the light above all.
    Only people of evil intent fear free speech.
    History repeats.

    Nice to see the tech lords committing suicide,it looks good on them.
    Remember all those empty promises made by these “platforms” to entice the public to come play?
    I wonder what the scumbags fear?
    What has prompted the evil stupid progressives to expose their connivance,conspiracy and arrogance now?
    Is it because they believe they have won?

    Or have they realized they are trapped?

    1. Oh, they are trapped all right. They chose sides long ago and now are about to reap what they have sown so are
      panicking and are trying to stop people communicating with each other.

      1. Exactly- some information being released and declassified that might be difficult for them to hear or made public?

      1. Nobody should say things like that or we’ll all be banned. I’d be content for him to lose an argument with Hillary.

  8. This ain’t over. What we are seeing unfold is an attempt at a Globalist coup d’etat of the USA. I pray that president Trump has the balls do do the right thing, no matter how bad things look.

  9. That Buzzfeed report is the most biased, libelous account I’ve ever seen in print. I am sure law suites will follow, but Bezos, being on of the richest men in the world, probably doesn’t care. By the time the law suite resolves itself, the plaintiffs will be dead.

    Time for some people to step up.

    This is
    a) the start of the left dictatorship in the US and Western world
    b) a slick use of political opportunism for some corporations to enforce their monopoly

  10. I wonder what Amazon will say to their customers and shareholders.

    If someone owned any Amazon shares could they no sue for deliberately damaging their stock.

    I’m kidding. Its just the CCP. They won’t care.

    1. They are afraid there is overwhelming evidence of China involvement in the voter fraud which President Trump can show is an act of war against its citizens.

    2. If that is true, she is basically fucked. Trump can invoke the insurrection act, and remove her and the Dems from Congress.

      Why the fuck isn’t advocating for a coup an arrestable and impeachable offence? Did Pelosi just commit a documented act of high treason?

      1. You forgetting that SCOTUS decided that no one had standing to bring an election case before SCOTUS? Who is left to prosecute crimes of insurrection, if no one has “standing” to enforce election integrity.

    1. Those have been around for decades. The source(s) of the early ones was (were) never officially identified, but the speculation was that the transmissions came from Cuba, particularly since many of them were in Spanish. From a radio standpoint, it’s a plausible explanation as Radio Havana often had a strong signal into western Canada.

      Then there’s the predecessor to the Internet, at least for those outside of the government or military, which was packet radio. All one needed was a way of transmitting digital data packets, a receiver, and software by which to decode them.

      Some of the systems back in the 1980s were quite sophisticated, with bulletin boards, sort of in the same way as the old CompuServe.

      1. People forget there are many, many ways to communicate that don’t involve Farcebook or some other browser based platform. On the internet, IRC comes to mind. (Internet relay chat) If one wanted to go completely rogue, a hybrid dialup/internet BBS systems could be implemented. Somewhere in a closet I have a US Robotics 56K modem that I believe still works. 🙂

        There’s also HF radio, largely forgotten and unknown to the current generation of leftist radicals who can’t think past the end of their nose. Sitting here on my desk is a modern HF transceiver. It can be easily interfaced with computer software capable of generating a number of obscure digital mode protocols which can be used for sending over-the-air messages. Depending on the frequency and time of day, I can easily cover CONUS & most of Canada with a signal. A proper antenna is also required. (For the technically curious, search for “NVIS”) The government spooks are so focused listening to cellular calls and monitoring internet traffic, the “old ways” have been largely ignored.

        Someone mentioned Numbers Stations – they still exist. The Cuban government appears to have a few running. Signals are quite strong in the US.

    2. Being just a kid somewhat less that 10 years old, I remember the five digit codes being broadcast on public radio station run by communists for about an hour every morning. Being a kid, it was just a curiosity not anything that was unusual.
      In later years being a soldier for 26 months, got into training on what they called teletype. In the program was hours and hours of typing 5 character codes from printed sheets, some numeric only some alphanumeric. Heh, got pretty good at it typing some 400 characters per minute, that’s how they counted it over there rather than words.

      The way it communicates is, the recipient gets the key first and the rest is garbled nothingness of 5 number blurbs.

  11. This is a digital Kristallnacht. In fact, when you think about it, the Dems have pretty well followed the Nazi rise to power playbook almost to the letter. Brownshirts, Kristallnacht and next, the Volksgerichtshof.

  12. The global elite wannabes say “it’s a private company, it can do what it wants” and then “if you don’t like it make your own”. They say that with a smirk cause they know and secretly support that you will just be hunted down even if you DO make your own, as we are seeing. So just see through the BS and just treat them like the enemy that they are.

  13. So I’ve opened up a Parler account. If you are using an Apple computer or iPhone, you’d have to open it first on iPhone but do so quickly as Apple may be moving to censor it. Then you should get an email and from there you can link to and bookmark Parler. Best do so quickly because it’s unlikely you’ll be able to find it through a search engine since Google has moved to censor it.

  14. Apple says to Parler “We want to be clear that Parler is in fact responsible for all the user generated content present on your service and for ensuring that this content meets App Store requirements for the safety and protection of our users, We won’t distribute apps that present dangerous and harmful content.

    Oh the platform IS responsible for the users content then? And it would take 5 minutes to find tons of “dangerous and harmful content” directed at people on twitter and facebook. So they’ll be banned too? Just more authoritarian enemies picking and choosing in their war that they have started. Precisely what US patriots need to dismantle.

  15. MeWe.

    Far better set up than Parlay or Parler….And is user supported financially.

    10 days…Trump’s in Abilene…most interesting place to hang methinks.
    This show ain’t even close to ending…..

    1. Indeed, at a protected MIL facility.

      If Pence or NanZi disappears in the next day or two (CLAS movement), then the SHTF very shortly.

      For a POTUS in “big trouble” he sure has appeared calm cool and collected, all this week. The Demarxists and CINOs are in disarray and panic mode. The next 10 days will be epic.

      NCSWIC 17

  16. I don’t see the problem? Companies have no obligation to host a site that gives them terrible PR and pisses off their advertisers. This is a profit motivated decision above all. If you don’t like it, then you don’t believe in the free market.

    1. So slavery should be allowed if it’s good for the shareholders (and who cares about the slaves)?

      Are you really that limited?

        1. Retard, that isn’t what he said. He said “clearly there are areas deemed important enough to society to warrant suspending the profit motive above all else”

          You are ducking fumb. Get a refund from your school. You got taken.

          1. “clearly there are areas deemed important enough to society to warrant suspending the profit motive above all else”

            So it’s socialism then.

        2. Hahaha, nice. You’re running circles around these folks, Andrew. I guess it helps that they don’t actually stand firmly for anything other than self-identifying as “conservative” and needing to feel constantly aggrieved.

          1. Getting aggrieved is the entire point of liberalism.
            BTW, have you noticed you can run your mouth on this platform about conservatives and nobody bans you?

        3. The left decided that businesses could be shut down and destroyed if they didn’t play by the lefts rules. Now it’s time for the right to play by the same rules. You will always lose if you let your enemy set the rules, change the rules any time they want and feel compelled to play by them because you believe in rules.

          1. I hope kathy above reads your post. Might be educational for her, but that’s a tall order.

      1. Rusty.

        Right. And any objection is socialism. More logical fallacies than peanuts in a Snickers.

    2. Their decision and collusion hinged on politics, not profit. Therefore they overstepped their bounds. Proof of this is Twitters blind eye to worse and more prolific left wing calls for violence on its platform.

  17. I almost joined Parler, but they asked me for definitive identification, so I digressed…….

    1. It’s a choice. If you want to use it, prove who you are to get in. If you’re not a bot, then you can use the services. If you’re not willing to prove you’re not a bot, then you can’t use the services.

      Agreed, it’s not ideal, but I think it’s better than being flooded by bots.

  18. Yeah, Parler is already dead. I went over there, saw the words, “enforced by a Community jury”.

    Wikipedia. Try and edit the Hillary Clinton page, and you know where Parler is already headed.

    1. No, it’s not dead. DLd the app Friday, and still working right now, updates flowing in, including @Bongino 10 minutes ago.
      Parler appears to be ready for the service disruption, moving to different servers.

      But Apple has its ways. Another user has said that Apple is sending Malware notifications out for removal. Another pointed out, to go to your settings and disallow auto-downloads, and, another setting to disallow auto-removal of software. BT will use all means to try and erase competition.

      If 17 is right, we could see a comms blackout, of some sort, within 10 days. What that means, will reveal itself.

      The apps can be located at alternative sites for DL. Workarounds are the order of the day.

      This is the start of the great awakening, where Big Tech cuts its own throats, aiding the creation of competitors, by their actions. There is no more dangerous an enemy than a motivated group of freedom loving, industrious conservatives

      1. Just to add, all PARLER has to do is post their app, from either platform on their website. It can be installed, bypassing BT stores. Lots of “How To’s” out there.

        Every time a roadblock is thrown up, there is a new way engineered to get around the temporary roadblock. BT will not shut down conservative thought, they cannot control us. Actions they do take, are minor and beatable.

  19. The first thing you do when you declare war on your enemy is to take out their communications.

  20. Insurrection against mainstream media and big tech, total storming of the Bastille and their local affiliates, that would flip Congress from weasels to not weasels.

  21. Not actually a free speech issue. Nobody is saying you can’t still publicly call for the assassination of all of your liberal political enemies — https://twitter.com/RMac18/status/1348119358044688384 — you just have to do it the old fashioned way, like muttering it at strangers while pushing a shopping cart through a park, or while orating from the back of a truck to a crowd of pitchfork- and torch-wielding fellow “patriots.”

    Seriously, though: Parler’s appeals to “free speech” may be unsophisticated and disingenuous, but all the same, I’m with you on this one — AWS shouldn’t boot them or any other site permanently off its services (they have an absolute right to, I just don’t think they should exercise it). Bad precedent. Should be temporary, pending further efforts by Parler to grow up.

    Parler, for its part, needs to put in place a much stronger content moderation system that demonstrates a firm commitment to prohibiting users from posting material clearly intended to incite violence. Unless their argument is that unfettered conservative online discourse is indistinguishable from speech that encourages or incites violence, it shouldn’t be that hard to Parler to find a way to better police itself.

    1. You are about to let the side that claims “silence is violence” determine what speech “incites violence”. Bravo.

    2. You are aware that the left is constantly advocates violence against conservatives and Trump supporters, aren’t you? When you’ve been threatened with cancellation and genocide often enough, getting violent back is really the only recourse, and telling your enemies what they have to look forward to if they don’t change their ways is the civilized thing to do.

      1. Leftist, therefore obviously no. This after all is the entire foundation of leftism: obedience. Submission. Homogeneity of thought, word, and deed. That’s why young people are being charged small fortunes to be indoctrinated at the “institutions of higher learning” across the western world. They get f*cked financially before they even walk in the doors, then f*cked again in the brain, day after day for years, if they aren’t inspired to drop out and join Antifa first.

        Lance is pitiful, but he’s just one of millions like him. Say the right things, think the right thoughts, and all will go well for you, just like the dog in the cartoon.

    1. They’ve been a great convenience in the past, but more and more I find their stuff is either plastic Chinese crap, all obviously the same crap from the same factory with different (generally really stupid) “brand names,” or else used from third-party sellers. Ordered a book recently and thought I was buying a new copy – it arrived yesterday and it was heavily used, every page stained and some missing. Reordered it from Canadian company Chapters, which is what I ought to have done in the first place.

      The honeymoon is over.

    2. I “window shop” on Amazon, but I don’t buy there. I’ll discover products and get price information. If the seller has a website I may approach them directly through that to buy. If I really want something I’ll pay more for it to cut out Amazon. It’s stupid to become dependent on a single source.

  22. Lets analyze this.

    There were riots and endless mayhem in the cities organized by the fascists of antifa and black lives matters. The actions were organized with the purpose to terrorize the population, fully intended on destruction of buildings, businesses and normal course of life.
    They were organized, it can be said highly organized.
    How were they organized?
    If one said that it was organized on twitter and Facebook one would be right.
    Not being participant at any of those, can’t look into it. Those that are, perhaps could find the organizing communications.

    The difference between the antifa and blm actions and those at the congress buildings is that the first was organized for the purpose of destruction. The second, with a view from afar, looked that the eventual end was not at all planned, it did get out of hand. This will happen when you have masses of people with their backs against the wall and nowhere to go.

    It was unfortunate that it happened.

    The part that is pertinent here is that the fascist mayhem organized on those platforms was cool. The unfortunate end of the demonstration at congress buildings was a public call of conservatives and republicans to demonstrate, not to destroy. It remains to be seen who was it that initiated the violence

    That apparently is something that the extremely rich fascist oligarchs can’t handle.

  23. I think it’s an issue of both free speech and discrimination.

    That is, if a company – and of course these companies are private companies – is set up to offer services which refer to enabling the communication of speech, then, it is discriminatory to refuse these services to anyone.

    The only time a private company can refuse services would be if these services were used to incite violence. Not hatred – which is a subjective emotion that can’t be regulated. But actual actions of violence.

    The Elites are desperate to prevent the People from another take-over of government as happened in 2016. They are at the moment focusing on Trump as the assumed leader of the People but it’s hardly just about him. And it’s not left-vs-right; and nothing about ‘conservatives’. The People are made up of ALL viewpoints, not just ‘conservatives’. So- the People have to fight back. Lawsuits against these companies and new communication methods.

  24. So, by the reasons claimed by Amazon to de-platform Parler ( hate speech, organizing a riot with screenshots) shouldn’t Twitter be de-platformed?

    Andy Ngo Has screen shots of Antifa organizing and encouraging riots, doxxing police, calling for the murder of named individuals, organizing to attack media so they won’t record their actions. They call for removal of government by violent means. They also post videos on bomb making, how to make Napalm, how to blind people with high powered lasers.

    Twitter must be removed!

  25. Won’t be long until a few pissed off folks start mixing diesel fuel and fertilizer and renting vans and shit. I’ll be over here making popcorn.

  26. From the article linked to:

    // Amazon said it was unconvinced that the service’s plan to use volunteers to moderate calls for violence and hate speech would be effective.

    “Recently, we’ve seen a steady increase in this violent content on your website, all of which violates our terms,” the email reads. “It’s clear that Parler does not have an effective process to comply with the AWS terms of service.” //

    If anyone doubts that, fossick about at this site:
    e.g. https://www.reddit.com/r/ParlerWatch/comments/kugcv5/glad_he_cleared_it_up_for_us/

    Amazon & Trump have form:
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Amazon.com Inc on Monday accused U.S. President Donald Trump of exerting
    “improper pressure” and bias that led the Department of Defense
    to award a lucrative $10 billion cloud contract to rival Microsoft Corp.
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-jedi-lawsuit-idUSKBN1YD1XI

Navigation