Suzanne Venker sheds much light on the not so hidden hatred that fuels modern day feminists:
To the average person who’s busy living their life, … it doesn’t make sense that feminism, which bills itself as merely promoting sexual equality (a phrase that sounds so utterly innocuous but isn’t), could be so destructive that it rips relationships, families, and society apart.
But that’s exactly what it does. In response to Carlson’s question about why any group would do this, Mac Donald said, “Because [feminists] would rather hate.”
Feminism was created for the sole purpose of driving a wedge between white Western women and white Western man in order to undermine and destroy Western Civilization
Exactly. This destruction of the ‘family unit’ is one of the main tenets of Marxism in order to create the new Soviet or Marxist man and woman.
It’s here, now; witness Bill Gairdner’s “libertarian socialist” where you are free to “do you own (state sanctioned) thing.”
“This was a type that had to be created by the West to resolve the deep contradiction into which it had fallen by embracing two conflicting political philosophies at the same time: classical liberalism, and egalitarianism. You can’t put these two ideologies – the most freedom, and the most public control – together, without eventual doctrinal confusion and collapse.”
The confusion was avoided by fission and fusion: by splitting our former unified body-politic into two new bodies: a private body, and a public body – to produce libertarianism of the private body; and socialism of the public body, then fusing them in what I call “libertarian-socialism.”
This fusion satisfies all parties: our mass publics, because they get the a broad range of once-forbidden sexual and bodily pleasures and acts (free-love, homo-sex; easy divorce; abortion; pornography; easy access to drugs; transgendering; etc); and also our egalitarian-type social-engineers, because once such publics are stupefied by their own pleasures and bodily liberties, political reality can be manipulated with minimal protest, coast-to-coast.”
What can be done about the vastly-increased top-down control now so visible in these regimes?”
Nothing much. This is far too vast, deep, and novel a movement, combining three powerful and natural things: the human desire for sexual and bodily self-indulgence (never before permitted to such a degree); the equally-powerful human desire to be free of all external control of these aspects of private life; and finally, the egalitarian idealism and desire to control others (the libido-dominandi) of the bureaucratic classes of these regimes – all floated thanks to enormous tax harvests unprecedented in human history.”
As long as Western publics continue to accept the Faustian deal: to surrender so many of their former ideals of personal, and family, and political, economic, and property rights and principles of self-reliance, and responsibility to their own governments, in exchange for their new sexual and bodily liberties, libertarian-socialism is here to stay!”
Ain’t reality sobering. Will the onion let itself be peeled perpetually, or will it make a stink, maybe cause some tears?
https://www.williamgairdner.ca/how-libertarian-socialism-works/
Rosie the riveter started the idea of a wife standing alongside her husband, or off to her own career, within the family.
Then the radical Marxists soon took over feminism and turned it into the hate men collectivist nonsense it is today.
But the real thing was a thing to behold and has led directly to a more prosperous and free society.
So of course the Marxists had to kill it.
Heh … Rush called them FemiNazis.
Come to think of it he is not that far off.
Why bitches gotta be so angry?
How can there be any DOUBT that feminists are a HATE group? Where’s the SPLC? What other group can get away with saying THEY should have power uber alles? Well, except for “the gays”.
Ironically, my favorite gayyyyy 80’s musician, Joe Jackson got it exactly right, in the final stanzas of his song “Real Men” …
Time to get scared – time to change plan
Don’t know how to treat a lady
Don’t know how to be a man
Time to admit – what you call defeat
‘Cause there’s women running past you now
And you just drag your feet
Man makes a gun – man goes to war
Man can kill and man can drink
And man can take a whore
Kill all the blacks – kill all the reds
And if there’s war between the sexes
Then there’ll be no people left
And so it goes – go round again
But now and then we wonder who the real men are
From the article: “The dissident feminist Camille Paglia goes so far as to call feminists “literally insane” in a conversation with Jordan Peterson, who then says (which goes back to my point about feminists’ upbringing) that women whose relationship with men “has been seriously pathologized can’t distinguish between male authority and competence and male tyrannical power.” He adds, “They fail to differentiate because all they see is the oppressive male.”
“Stop letting yourselves be bullied. If you don’t, they will get what they want. And trust me, It won’t be pretty.”
Really? No. ‘Twill be glorious.
One of the few intelligent things my ex-wife ever said to me is that women are lunatics, and that nobody in his right mind should go near them, much less marry one. I only wish I had listened to her sooner.
They don’t want to be the equal of men. They want to be free to cut off their husband’s balls, watch him die in agony, take his money and then spend the rest of their days gorging on black pudding till they fatally injure themselves popping out Mulatto Baby no. 13.
The closest women ever (temporarily) get to happiness is when they’re playing the whore. Climax robs them of what few wits they have and blocks out their self-loathing. The junkies regularly found dead with needles full of elephant tranquilizer in their arms have more dignity.
Give them the war between the sexes they think they want. It’ll be about as successful for them as Hitler’s war with the Jews.
They will not just lose. Men will finally get the kick in the pants necessary to find a way to beget sons not requiring the assistance of the sisterhood, and will finally be free to have their ungrateful sisters, daughters, ex-wives and mothers-in-law hauled off to the dogfood factory with their black and Arab bulls.
The sooner the better, I say. The resources wasted on female frivolity are the resources that will take future generations of men to the stars. Not pretty? It’ll be the end of a glorious beginning of human history, followed by the chapter in which we explore the whole of the inheritance God has given us.
I won’t live to see that chapter myself. I merely thank God there will be no women in heaven—just as there will be no Muslims, queers, communists, or newspapers.
“I merely thank God there will be no women in heaven…”
What kind of f-ed up troll is this? You should shut up now, pal.
By the way, your ex is one lucky beeotch to be shut of you. I bet she threw a party.
Yup. It was in her mouth and everyone came.
You would be right at home with the misogynistic clerics who argued whether or not women had souls.
A Canadian…
You are sick.
Get professional help.
It’s the Communist disease that Liberals have:
pride, wrath, envy, greed, gluttony, lust and sloth.
Self hatred and narcissism are a deadly combination.
Possibly linked to the high suicide rates amongst those addicted to social media.
To seek to establish your worth by the people you hate upon is a mighty narrow value system.
Humour requires a fairly broad outlook on life,so evident in those fragile humourless citizens we know.
Could you imagine any one of the humourless scolds of CBC laughing at themselves?
I have been saying this since forever.