32 Replies to “When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal”

  1. Like with Barry’s shared dreams of his father I doubt the fig Strzok the ground far from this extremist tree.

    1. Watsername, the first woman president f the US, Vallery Jarret, had a similar background. Hmm…

    1. Hey strapon, do you second for Rizwan, by inserting useless drivel at every turn. You have about zero credibility

      1. Yes, I too long ago tired of his Evolution Derangement Syndrome, his Atheist Derangement Syndrome, and maybe most of all, his newest mental disorder, Trump Derangement Syndrome. The difference being that I no longer even read his posts, as with the other regular agendized trolls who visit here.

        Since we are on the topic, I think if many of my fellow SDA’ers educated themselves as to what internet trolls are actually seeking, they would be less gullible in playing the ‘straight man’ for them. Too many potentially good threads here have been hijacked and ruined by trolls AND THEIR WILLFUL ENABLERS.

        I mean, really, don’t you guys realize how embarrassing it is to see fellow SDA’ers manipulated to jump through hoops and dance at the behest of baiting, low-info leftards?

        Sigh… I can’t be the only commenter here that feels this way.

        1. CO, it’s called entertainment. If I want to “educate” myself, I would be doing it in here, full stop!!!

          ET once dragged out a nice topic, intellectually above most in here, and all there was was whining and moaning.

        2. Nothing deranged about it, other than the hero worship. Trump fills the prophecy of a childlike leader as a penalty for trusting in a man.

          Jer 17:5  Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD. 

          Once again proving scripture…

          Isa 3:4  And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them. 
          Isa 3:5  And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable. 

  2. So a small-time mainstream paper asked an area man who had recently been in Iran what he made of the revolution. Naturally, Peter Strzok Sr. gave them nearly nothing they didn’t already have from wire reports—beyond a naive hope that Khomeini needed US engineers like himself too badly to turn on Uncle Sam, a hope soon dashed, as we now know.

    We’ll need more than this to figure out what the son was playing at.

    Strzok Jr. is probably not an asset of the Iranian revolutionaries as such. He and they are mere catspaws of the same globalist conspiracy to destroy Christian and Jewish civilization. The Islamic Revolution, of course, removed Israel’s most important ally in the Middle East, and an important obstacle to the globalist plan to finally destroy the Jewish people along with it.

    1. Do read the thread if you have time. That is a very tangled web. Most people are very naive about the Deep State and the depth of its corruption.

    2. It does seem odd how many fabrications and missing parts the Strzok official bio contains. Conspiracy stuff like this should be tailor-made for Stradivarious.
      Oh right Trump.

      o

  3. Und zen vee vill all be speaking german…

    Cheers
    Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group ‘True North’

  4. If you beleived all the Malarkey from the New Yorker’NYT’s,Washington Post and CNN you would think the earth was flat like those wackos for the Flat Earth Society do

    1. Probably because actblue was a dnc domain, so it would make sense that this would be the domain name they chose for the phishing attempt.

  5. All that article shows me is that P. Strzok senior was like a lot of lefites at the time who wanted the Shaw gone and Iran to become an islamic republic. However I am not quite sure how this reflects on the son. The son is wrong on his own account not on account of the sins of his father. My biggest fear is that the US is successful in nailing Strzok for doing bad things and letting his puppet masters off the hook. Strzok, I think, is the symptom and not the disease. Bigger question is how all of this seems to focus on the UK and Australia. Who was pulling the strings of those two independent ‘friendly’ nations that they would let themselves become entangled in trying to manipulate a US election.

    1. I was initially inclined to dismiss the article as only peripherally related, until I started following some of the Twitter posts and also links. Looks like there was a longstanding connection between Obama and the Strzok family. When you add to that the other Iranian and Muslim Brotherhood connections around Obama, this one also become meaningful. The speculation is that Peter Strzok Jr. was a spy for Iran and central to a lot of the questionable moves done by the Obama government.

      1. The concern I have with your analysis and I don’t disagree with it at all is that Strzok didn’t get to where he is now by himself. Having watched him being grilled it is quite obvious that he did not get to where he is through his own competence. He is in way over his head. So who in the Deep State wanted him there and beyond using him as a fall guy if their plans fell apart what was his purpose? Spying for Iran doesn’t really cut it. Hillary was feeding her emails to a foreign entity (not Russia) so likely Pakistan(?) which of course would be a conduit into the islamic world which includes Iran. We know he was used to cover for the second Obama (Hillary) but did he have other purposes? We don’t know yet. All that aside the point I continue to make is we need to be very careful that we don’t take our eyes off the ball and focus on bit players like Strzok and miss the people handling him and putting him into positions he is eminently not qualified for. After all who would leave a trail so easily traced except someone who is extremely incompetent.

        1. Good post Joe. But the trail could be a set up, for just the reason you point to, to take eyes off the real culprits. Think Harvey Lee Oswald, he was a set up to divert from the real culprits, big business, CIA, FBI (Hoover), and the anti Castro cadre, Mafia, and a few others. The swamp is big deep, and bi-partisan!

  6. “My biggest fear is that the US is successful in nailing Strzok for doing bad things and letting his puppet masters off the hook. Strzok, I think, is the symptom and not the disease.”

    Exactly, as was LindaL’s comment, “Most people are very naive about the Deep State and the depth of its corruption.”

    This whole sordid business is much bigger and deeper than the two low level flunkies Strzok and Page. There was a reason why Obama talked about ‘fundamental change’. The Democrats under Obama were working toward remaking the United States into a facsimile of what Saul Alynski advocated, and Hillary was to further cement the transition. Trump upset that agenda.

  7. As Sara Carter has pointed out, junior is probably roast turkey already, unable to recall when or if he changed Hillary’s email conduct from grossly negligent to extremely careless.

    His metadata shows he made a change on the date in question.

    IOW he doesn’t want to lie under oath by stating he didn’t make that change, Congress and law enforcement may infer that he did make that change, and can then explain why, on what exculpatory basis, he made that change.

    I’m not an American so don’t know their criminal equivalent to breach of trust, but it appears the dam Strzok is busting, especially with his g/f cooperating very nicely I’m told. Strzok, otoh has acted exactly like the perp he probably is, with DeMarxist henchmen acting as his lawyer. But they can’t save each other, as is their plan.

    Mueller’s latest Russian indictments, based on information known months ago, is his waving of the white flag, and he will wrap up to leave the DeMarxist to their own destruction, precisely for the reason others think it won’t wind down – it’s political from the start and its poisonous roots are seeing the light of day. Time to finish up and be done by the end of summer.

    Rioting against the public will seems to be losing its appeal with the public too so an unpalatable scene on display, goonery by Strzok et al from the top and goonery from the bottom up via Antifa fascists.

    Didn’t Hitler send out squads of people to intimidate the public? Anyway, I digress.

  8. I find it interesting that Strzok started his FBI career in the middle of the Clinton presidency. He, presumably, shot right up the ladder. The same year he started there, Hillary Clinton was under investigation for “Filegate” (the acquisition of FBI background files on myriad individuals). The conventional wisdom was that she was doing opposition research. Or, maybe she wasn’t. ;D

    It sure would be helpful to know the names of the files she pulled. Also, helpful would be where Strzok’s employment recommendations came from.

  9. What I find symptomatic in the Strzok Family isn’t HATE for the Shah or the Savak, nor was it a Jimmy Carteresque affinity for Radical Islam … no, I believe at the core of the Strzok Family is Judeo-Christian HATE. That HATE caused them to choose the #1 Judeo-Christian antagonist -Islam as their chosen people. They don’t simply HATE America and her Allies … they HATE the foundation of our country … a respect for the God of the Old Testament. I’m going out on a limb here and wagering that Peter Strzok has a social media footprint expressing anti-Zionist resentment. I’ll bet he absolutely HATES Israel. And I’ll bet he wishes Pence dead. Yes, as a matter of fact, all those satanic looking photos of Strzok are windows into his soul. His eyes are dead. He is clearly Satan’s little helper. Just like daddy.

    1. Kenji, the Judeo-Christian shtick doesn’t cut it, unless you are blind. The west was build on Christian principles, who’s boots were/are standing on 6.7 million dead Jews

  10. I no longer bend to this ‘acorn not falling far from the tree’ crap as any kind of accurate predictor.

    In my lifetime, I have seen more than a few quality men raise bad apples, while at the same time, I’ve seen some good young men miraculously sprout from fathers who I considered weak or even dishonorable men. And maybe most importantly, this little saying completely ignores the contributions of the other parent…. dear old mom.

    In my business career, I dealt with a lot of family owned, multi-generational businesses and there are few better environments in which to observe this ‘phenomenon’. To be clear, I am not saying that integrity of the father is not an important factor in the raising of a quality son, just not the only one. A quality father is a strong contributor to any offspring’s success, but not a guarantor of that success.

    In my own family, for example, I would say the ‘acorn rule’ is about 50% accurate…. but you must factor in a plus or minus 50% for personal bias. 😀

    In the end, it is increasingly apparent that Peter Strzok is a despicably dishonest man and ultimately a traitor to the America he took an oath to….. and, to me, these facts will not change one iota if tomorrow we next learned that he was spawned by either Mother Theresa or Hilary Clinton, herself.

  11. We do not need to worry about Peter Strzok… The Congressional Hearing revealed that he is a liar , to both Dems and Republicans
    If you have ever hear the Story (fable) of King Solomon’s wisdom you would recognize how they caught him…..Who do you believe McCabe or Strzok..YEP

Navigation