I Amuse Myself

Dope is poison

*
kenji says... “crime and non-punishment”

it starts here...

he's not a batsh!t serial killer... just a
"a very challenged young man."

*

hay fwanker, most addicts start with booze, most smokers stay smokers, try keeping up, or you may mistaken for Unme!!

*
rob83 says "Waiting for UnMe to Respond."

funny you should ask, rob... he already did...

"The only outrage here is the continued persecution of people for
committing non-crime such as drug dealing and owning guns."

*

"Betcha each one of these 3 people who died, originally started with pot."

I'll take that bet and say they started with wine or beer instead.

*
"oz says... they started with wine or beer"

you're missing the point, guys. anyone willing to buy
non-prescription drugs from a dirty, unwashed biker in
their local sleazy booze can - deserves whatever happens
to them.

you consume mystery meds, fraggle-rock, it's on you!

*

"Dope is poison"

Honestly Kenji, that simple statement is so mired in ignorance that I was more surprised at my own reaction to it than your supposed point. It truly bothers me to see someone who's opinions I otherwise give some weight to blabber such outrageously dishonest rhetoric.

Dope is not poisonous, I don't believe they have even found a level considered toxic, yet. Now, alcohol in comparison, that IS a poisonous drug with countless amounts of deaths and societal destruction left in it's wake. This stark difference is NOT even debatable. I invite anyone wanting to challenge these simple facts to supply proof. I mean PROOF, not emotional wringing of hands. Please do the research, actually, I DARE you to! At the very least you will strip away some of your ignorance and have a more evenly balanced viewpoint.

BTW, where is your outrage and holy crusade to ban that evil child-killing DRUG, called alcohol, from society? Since I'm guessing many here enjoy the odd drink, do you not see the brutal hypocrisy in play here?

Here'a a news flash for many... OUR KIDS ALREADY HAVE RELATIVELY EASY ACCESS TO MARIJUANA AND HAVE FOR DECADES!!!

Despite your hardest prayers and wishes, weed is NOT going away anytime soon. Legalizing it is the only way to control quality, and thus safety. Ironically, it is ONLY anti-pot crusaders who wish to keep billions of profits in the hands of 'criminals' instead of government(ya, I know, what's the difference)and YOU ARE THE ONES who also put a healthy portion of our young population in direct danger of death by evil scum like Kabani.

*
"frances asks... Could the three accused be
from the Sikh community?"

what are you saying, frances? I mean, "diversity
is our streng..." sweet baby jebus!

*

*
"canadian observer bleats... the only way to control
quality, and thus safety"

"Health Canada says it will begin random testing
of medical marijuana products to check for the
presence of banned pesticides after product
recalls affecting nearly 25,000 customers led to
reports of illnesses and the possibility of a class
action lawsuit."

From the folks who brought you the Phoenix
payroll system.

*

Ya, I think our kids deserve to die for making bad choices, too.

and your ignorance is hangin out. Most drug dealers have very little ot zero to do with bikers. Many are every day citizens who frequent the same places you do in every day life. And this makes it harder to break the cycle of drug dealing. Tho I agree with buying garbage and ingesting/injecting as being utterly stupid, and have NO sympathy with those who "accidently" OD and kick off!

Yeah, screw those Thalidomide and Tylenol users. They shoulda bought government approved safe drugs.

Holy sh*t, do you even conceive the stupidity of the point you are bleating?

Following your logic, we are safer dealing with bootleggers than Labatts. Did everyone here get that clearly? NEO believes that all of us would be safer drinking backwoods moonshine than Crown Royal. At least that is the hypocritical bullsh*t that he just finished trying to sell us on how the weed industry should work.

If I were your lawyer, I would advise you to stop talking before you really expose the real depth of your ignorance. But, I'm not, so please tell us more about this evil weed and your apparent belief that people deserve to die for ingesting it.

The meme that backwoods moonshine is dangerous is a myth created by the U.S. government during the alcohol prohibition era.

I certainly didn't call moonshine dangerous(Ha, maybe Screech). It was a simple reference to the general safety or trust inherent in regulated and unregulated drug marketplaces.

And the FACT that the US government pushed the 'dangerous moonshine myth' does not eliminate the FACT that people really did die from ingesting bad moonshine, too.

*
"I think our kids deserve to die for
making bad choices, too."

sorry, oprah... becoming a junkie isn't a
sub-optimal "life choice"... it's actually
assisting in your own suicide... and
picking up a little hiv or hep c along the
way.

see... there's this thing called "parenting"...
oh... never mind.

*

"the FACT that the US government pushed the 'dangerous moonshine myth' does not eliminate the FACT that people really did die from ingesting bad moonshine, too."

Did they? Do tell. Really, where do you get that from?

Uhhmmm, we were talking about weed.... not heroin or meth. You do understand that there is a MASSIVE difference, don't you? Please tell me you understand this, because, if you don't, you are completely lost.

Industry regulations and corporate pride in their product quality/reputation will be the best available insurance against tainted weed. Unless you have a better...

oh... never mind.

Ha, how about this?

You stop wasting my time and then YOU prove to the rest of US that no one has ever died from drinking bad illegal hooch.

Good luck with that mission.

*
"can-knob whines... we were talking about weed....
not heroin or meth."

hey, '8-mile'... maybe you should read slower...

"judge grants bail to man charged with trafficking
fentanyl, weapons charges. 3 dead."

*

"can-knob.... 8-mile" Well, aren't you just a class act with lots of great insight to share on the topic.

If you want to impress people with your wit and intelligence, try an intelligent response to ANY point I have made. I tell you what. You refute ANY point I have made on weed in a clear and respectful manner and I will show you the same in kind.

BTW, let's be clear here, YOU challenged MY reply to Kenji that was strictly about his DOPE comment. Don't try some chicken-sh*t game now in an effort to deflect your inability to offer ANY proper comment on the topic. YOU invited yourself into this, I sure never asked to be dragged into the hell-hole that is trying to communicate with you.

Also, BTW, I am becoming more and more convinced that the vast majority of Conservative 'weed pro-prohibitionists' don't give a damn about weed itself. No, I think this is about refusing to see legalization as anything but ...'A LOSS TO THE LIBERALS'.

I suspect you may be a PRIMO example of this theory.

"Could the three accused be from the Sikh community?"

Seems to be a lot of that going around.

Two suspects identified in beating of man with autism at Square One bus terminal

Ronjot Singh Dhami, 25, and Parmvir Singh Chahil, 21, are wanted by Peel police on a Canada-wide warrant for aggravated assault.

Mr. Dhami has a history that is interesting to say the least.

B.C. suspect in autistic man’s beating once hid 23 fentanyl bags in an uncomfortable place

Dhami was convicted for assault with a weapon in 2011. He also has traffic violations dating to between 2012 and 2014.

They included driving without reasonable consideration, failing to produce a driver’s licence or insurance, violating a restriction on a driver’s licence, having unauthorized tinted windows and failing to obviously display a relevant new driver sign.

Then, in 2016, he was the subject of a voir dire that was associated with a three-count indictment for possession for the purpose of trafficking fentanyl, heroin and cocaine.

Whatever you do, CO, don't read this.
"You stop wasting my time and then YOU prove to the rest of US that no one has ever died from drinking bad illegal hooch."

Demanding a negative be proved is a logical fallacy. The burden of proof would be on you for making an assertion.
That said, I never stated that no one every died from bad booze. People have died from good booze. I can prove ethanol poisoning.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/alcohol-poisoning/symptoms-causes/syc-20354386

The current generation likes to soak tampons in vodka and stick those tampons up their butts or vaginas.
Some could die from that practice.Ethanol OD.

Another weed apologist, another addict doing the rationalization dance, Jesus wept. I know a guy who spent a month in a locked psych ward because of weed, and everyone not living in a cave knows it stunts brain development in young people by now, so how about you shut your ignorant cakehole. Alternatively, go work for Justin.

"Demanding a negative be proved is a logical fallacy."

Yeah, I agree completely. But, it sure made my intended point well.

*
"can knob cries... I sure never asked to be dragged into
the hell-hole that is trying to communicate with you."

so you, just like the cathy newman - jordan peterson interview,
claim the right to not be offended by free and open discourse.

look, maybe you should just pull out your colouring book and
get a little "snowflake" respite while the adults get on with
the debate.

*

*
"soak tampons in vodka and stick those tampons
up their butts or vaginas"

boy... you sure know how to have a good time.

*

Ha, I tried to give you 'lawyerly' advice earlier, now you pay the price for not listening.

I submit to everyone who reads our interactions, they are now on record for all to see, who exactly was trying to inform and create comments on topic and who exactly was incapable of rising above one childish comment after another.

Michael, you seem rather emotional about this. Thank you for not threatening to kill me, too.

I assume you show yourself the same 'outrage' when you enjoy the drug called alcohol? Unless you are a teetotaler of course, or are you just another hypocrite drunk that wants his fix kept legal? Which is it? Ha, anyways, your Justin comment helps bolster my earlier mentioned theory, so thanks for that.

Yes, it stunts the brains of young people, thanks for raising such a vital point. All the more reason to keep it off the streets.

BTW, if Jesus is weeping, it is because he just read your irrationally hateful post.

ITT, drug warriors and their apocryphal tales.

If not for the lacing of the drugs, the only outrage here would be the incarceration of some fine young armed entrepreneurs by the Canadian state. Lacing drugs with worse drugs might actually be a real crime though. Still beats psyco Trump's idea of executing them.

This nonsense ends when prohibition ends.