When The Democrats Do It, That Means That It's Not Illegal

| 18 Comments

More on Comey's testimony here.

Related:

The conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch released almost 900 new emails from a Huma Abedin email account on Tuesday, which the group said offer more proof that Hillary Clinton sent and received classified information through her unsecured home server when she was secretary of state. Abedin was a long-time top aide to Clinton.

Judicial Watch obtained the emails with a Freedom of Information Act request that also required a follow-up lawsuit in 2015 after the State Department failed to produce any records.


18 Comments

... eh, what difference does it make?

Karma is a bitch.

This is one promise Trump can still keep.

".........the FBI ultimately dropped the matter without seeking charges because they could not show either of them intended to violate the law,....."

Like drunk drivers who unintentionally kill someone, you let them go because they "didn't mean too".


CAPTCHA = STOP CANADA

There is a private naval guy in jail because he took 6 pictures in a sub which he didn't share and what Hillary did is OK?

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-08-19/sailor-denied-clinton-deal-gets-1-year-in-prison-for-6-photos-of-sub

The Litigious Society of the United States of America is the greatest impediment to "Stupid is as Stupid does" aspects of the American Open Society.

The difficulty is the Complicity of the entrenched Bureaucracy in moving forward the corruption established with Weak/Ignorant/Corrupt members of Congress such as former Congressman Barney Frank.

Barney Frank "got out of town" after his strident effort to reduce accountability for "Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac".

Was this dangerous acceptance, during the Bill Clinton Administration, due to overt compliance to not offend the openly gay Congressman; OR did Barney Frank receive more money from Fannie Mae associates than the reported $ 8,000.00 in Campaign Donations?

So Hillary let Huma (daughter of high ranking Muslim Brotherhood official) have access to classified information, and Huma sent same to her husband (too stupid to understand how twitter works and lacking in self control) but no laws were broken?

As gratifying as these news reports are, I just can't excited about them any more. I have no faith anything will ever be done about this. That corruption of this level exists in a Presidential administration isn't actually that surprising, but the fact that some 25-30% of the electorate will outright ignore or excuse it is the end of the republic.

Also breaking news from this testimony. Turns at Fusion, the company that produced the phony Trump dossier was paid to do so by .... The Russian government. So the Russians did actively interfere in the election, against Trump at the behest of the democrats who Fusion also works for.

I'm enjoying Democrats, still being in denial of why and how ol' Hill lost. Until they understand and eventually accept that it was Hillary herself, which caused the Democrats to loose control of the Whitehouse, they will continue to be in disarray.
They need to accept that Hillary didn't protect classified info.
They also need to admit and accept that Hillary and the DNC Chairwoman(BlabbermouthSchultz), the CEO and the CCO as well as others in the DNC, conspired against Dem primary voters, in rigging the Primary in favor of ol' Hill.
Admit that the Clinton foundation had other functions than helping the disadvantaged in the world,,,,it lined the pockets of the Clintons.
Lastly, accept that Obama didn't do anything to expose Hillary and her corruption, Why,,,because he'd planned to do the same kind of thing with his own foundation after he left office, and with her President, nobody would have been the wiser.

Now I understand the import of Hillary's pre-emptive speech yesterday, which seemed to go over the same tired ground.

By corollary, Hillary is admitting her hidden emails cost her the election, given all the consequences it generated for her, from State Inspector General reports to FBI investigations to indictment near misses. She is so typical of the Demobrats, who stubbornly refuse to accept either defeat or accountability.

It's all a false flag op to hide the true plan - to destroy Trump or paralyze him for the Demobrats return to power, staring in '18 then POTUS in '20.

It's all noise, subterfuge and misinformation with the only purpose but to keep the Trump administration off balance, with their media sycophants in tow.

As long as Trump remains unpopular there's hope, but if approval rises, the media will suffer what Pat Buchanan calls "Nixon's Revenge:"

"With the media establishment of that day cheering on the anti-war protests designed to break his presidency, President Nixon sought to rally the nation behind him with his “Silent Majority” speech."

His prime-time address was a smashing success — 70 percent of the country backed Nixon. But the post-speech TV analysis trashed him."

Sound familiar? Nixon went after the media and went to 68% approval and later a 49 state landslide. Then Watergate came.

The Demobrats pine for another one. They may have backed off the Russian file, imho due to their skeletons, like Susan Rice & her serial culpability.

As in Harper's Canada, the scandal du jour types are in full dudgeon for sexist hand gestures, MLK racist bust moving, and suspicious wafer pocketing.

http://buchanan.org/blog/nixons-revenge-fall-adversary-press-126896

Could not agree more Daniel Ream.

It's Kabuki Theatre ... All the Way Down.
Of course nothing will happen.
The Clinton Crime Family has all the ammo it needs to neutralize every potential threat.

From Huma to her mom, from mom to the Saudi King, now Sunni Islam knows everything.

Well said. And, the media will make darn sure nothing comes of any of this.

However, your statement, "...the fact that some 25-30% of the electorate will outright ignore or excuse it...", is a little low in the percentage in my opinion. That figure should be double.

It is the same in Canada. Three quarters of the people could care less about how they are losing their freedoms and being treated by the Liberals, NDP, and progressive conservatives.

Wronger
Together

Around 50% of the US electorate actually voted, and half of them voted for Clinton. So it's an ass-pull, but I think when you have at least that many voting citizens utterly unfazed by what amounts to treason by a Secretary of State...I just don't know where you go from there.

Am I the only one who thinks the captcha makes an awesome band namer?

Alright, I did not realize that the voting numbers were that low. That is pathetic.


captcha: south diesel

"...the FBI ultimately dropped the matter without seeking charges because they could not show either of them intended to violate the law..."

The FBI ultimately dropped the ball on purpose because the law does not require intent, the act alone is sufficient, as the Sailor cooling his heels in the slammer can attest, and if The Twice Failed Candidate's deliberately destroying data devices isn't evidence of either intent, or attempt to conceal, nothing is.

Comey's decision apparently danced on the head of the pin of the difference between extreme carelessness and gross negligence, IOW intent.

If Comey really wanted to ensure the integrity of the American justice system and prevent political interference, he would have recommended indictment of Hillary Clinton. By not doing so, especially after the Bubba Clinton meeting with AG Lynch, he ensured the American justice system would be sullied.

Which it was.

IOW, his "argument" to go public makes no logical sense whatsoever. If Comey didn't think Clinton should have been indicted, that should have been it - standard operating procedures. If he felt she should have been indicted, he should have done so.

That's how you deal with political interference. He did neither, and in doing so put Hillary Clinton in a kind of legal limbo, neither charged nor exonerated.

In the end he did expose the Justice Dept to (deserved) disrepute, and imho his decision to not charge Hillary reeked of political interference.

IOW he screwed this up, causing what he said he was trying to prevent - perception of legal double standards from the Justice Dept, Lynch & Obama.

Leave a comment

Archives

May 2017

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Recent Comments

  • Shamrock: Comey's decision apparently danced on the head of the pin read more
  • Diego Whitworth: "...the FBI ultimately dropped the matter without seeking charges because read more
  • Ken (Kulak): Alright, I did not realize that the voting numbers were read more
  • Daniel Ream: Around 50% of the US electorate actually voted, and half read more
  • Maikeru: Wronger Together read more
  • Ken (Kulak): Well said. And, the media will make darn sure nothing read more
  • Bl@kbird: From Huma to her mom, from mom to the Saudi read more
  • Me No Dhimmi: Could not agree more Daniel Ream. It's Kabuki Theatre ... read more
  • Shamrock: Now I understand the import of Hillary's pre-emptive speech yesterday, read more
  • Carl: I'm enjoying Democrats, still being in denial of why and read more