Their greatest asset is our short memories: In forecasting the future, experts are generally no better than everybody else. They might be worse.
26 Comments
Leave a comment
Best Canadian Blog
2004,
2005,
2006,
2007
About Kate
Why this blog?
Until this moment
I have been forced
to listen while media
and politicians alike
have told me
"what Canadians think".
In all that time they
never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio - "You don't speak for me."
homepageemail Kate
(goes to a private mailserver in Europe) I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Support SDA
I am not a registered charity. I cannot issue tax receipts.
Economics for the Disinterested
...a fast-paced polar
bear attack thriller!

Want lies?
Hire a regular consultant.
Want truth?
Hire an asshole.
Click to inquire about rates.
Dow Jones
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC. My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." Kathy Shaidle
"Thank you for your link. A wave of your Canadian readers came to my blog! Really impressive." Juan Giner - INNOVATION International Media Consulting Group
I got links from the Weekly Standard, Hot Air and Instapundit yesterday - but SDA was running at least equal to those in visitors clicking through to my blog. Jeff Dobbs
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood."Michael E. Zilkowsky
Intelliweather
Seismic Map
Comments Policy
Best Of SDA
Hide The Decline
The Bottle Genie
(ClimateGate links)
You Might Be A Liberal
Uncrossing The Line
Bob Fife: Knuckledragger
A Modest Proposal (NP)
Settled Science Series
Y2Kyoto Series
SDA: Reader Occupation Survey
Brett Lamb Sheltered Workshop
Flakes On A Plane
All Your Weather Are Belong To Us
Song Of The Sled
The Raise A Flag Debacle
(Now on Youtube!)
(.mwv Video)
Abuse Ruins Life Of Girl
Trudeaupiate
Kleptocrat Jeans
Child Labour
I Concede
Small Dead Feminist
Protein Hoser: THK Interview
The Werewolf Extinction
Dear Laura (VRWC)
We Wait
Blogging The Oscars
Jackson Converts To Islam
Just Shut The HELL Up
Manipulating Condi
Gay Equality Rights
Blogroll
News Aggregators, Resources
Drudge Report
Bourque (Canada)
Memri (Middle East)
Newsmax
Military News Spotlight
Watching America
Int. Free Press Society
Newsbeat1
Rawlco local news
Dates in History
Newseum
Oilprice.com
My Westman
Favorites
Instapundit
NRO The Corner
Weekly Standard
Outside The Beltway
ScrappleFace
Day By Day
James Lileks
Hugh Hewitt
Mark Steyn
Belmont Club
Powerline
Den Beste (archived)
American Thinker
Victor Hanson
Michelle Malkin
Michael Yon (Iraq Imbed)
Tim Blair (Oz)
Protein Wisdom
Captain Capitalism
Kathy Shaidle
David Warren
Damian Penny
Publius
Cjunk
Conservative Grapevine
Newsosaur
Edward Michael George
Long War Journal
Eric Anderson
Charles Adler
Inconvenient Science
Climategate 2.0:
The emails unredacted
Search the database
Climate Audit
Prometheus
Planet Gore
Icecap
Anthony Watts
Climate Debate
HK Climate
Climate Depot
Anthropogenic Global Bias
Yanks, mostly
Professor Bainbridge
Stephen Green
Wizbang
Daniel Drezner
Dean Esmay
Right Wing News
Patterico
Medienkritic (Germany)
I Could Be Wrong
Mystery Pollster
Maggies Farm
Maxed Out Mama
Bill Roggio
Musing Minds
Pajamas Media
Newsbusters
Blackfive
Day By Day
Cox And Forkum (archives)
Brussels Journal (EU)
Argghhh!
Ed Driscoll
Don Surber
Obsidian Wings
Tygrrrr Express
Brutally Honest
Karl Rove
Tom Nelson
Call Me Stormy
The Last Tradition
Canadian, eh?
CPC Youtube Channel
The Shotgun
Bow. James Bow
Ghost Of A Flea
The Black Rod
Blog Quebecois
Catprint
Calgary Grit
Proud To Be Canadian
Fighting for Taxpayers
Quotulatiousness
Arcologist
Uncle Meat
Editorial Times
Halls of Macadamia
Full Comment (NP)
Andrew Keyes
Brad Farquhar
Steynian
Blazing Cat Fur
myWestman
Inspiringyoutothink
Prince Arthur Herald
Freelance Conservative
November 2016
Recent Comments
- Phillip G Shaw: The problem was created by LBJ (The real reason may read more
- Lev: “The Met Office, badly burned by the failure of its read more
- ural: Absolutely correct. However, the innate human being is much older read more
- johnmac: Selling predictions of the future is the oldest, best selling read more
- NME666: great babble Josey, but do you have a point, or read more
- Phillip G Shaw: "That truism, however, appears to have been forgotten over the read more
- B Deplorable: That brings to mind a saying about computing that was read more
- Joe: Oh Dear NME 666 is off his meds again. On read more
- Gord Tulk: But they sold lots of product that lost money in read more
- ural: "Drawing flak means you are over the target." OK. So read more










I work in the insurance industry.
Shakespeare's Dick the butcher said "... Kill all the lawyers".
He was wrong. We should kill all the actuaries.
look back through the last century and actuaries stand alone in the level of damage they have wrought compared to the other white collars.
Based on their 'wisdom', multi-trillion dollar entitlement debt have been created around the globe:
1. They fixed social security retirement age at 65 back in the 1930s hen it should have been adjusted for life expectancy - it would be closer to eighty today.
2. Their cost estimates for Medicare in 1965 for 2005 missed by 10,000 percent.
And on and on.
They base their predictions for the future based on past experience. That's like driving a car looking out the back window.
You may be right. Your commentary and analysis have often been very good in the past.
I do not know if you are giving good info this time. More information, please.
Monday; I am drinking 1.4 cups of coffee, because I read a study promising it would help my liver.
Tuesday; I will NOT drink any coffee, because I read it causes pancreatic cancer
Wednesday; I will resume drinking 10 cups of coffee per day, because it was found to protect against heart disease.
Thursday; I will throw-out all my coffee, because I saw a program linking coffee to kidney stones
Friday; I will buy a Venti-sized coffee at Starbucks (I threw all of mine out yesterday), because I read that coffee helps flush "toxins" out of the human body,
Saturday; I have scheduled my first ever coffee enema ... symbolic of all the coffee studies that have been shoved into my various orafices
Do the private insurance companies actuaries actually change their tables? ... or use the 1930's data?
Just who do you think pointed out the retirement age should be changed to Harper? What happened when Harper changed it?
Don't you see in difference in the motivations of the management of private companies and politicians?
They update their tables periodically. But IMO they are just window dressing. The companies set their prices where they think the market will buy.
For example: in the mid eighties a life annuity on a 55 year old paid well over 15% annually. Today you would get barely your deposit back if you lived to a normal expectancy. The rate is not based on what is reasonable to expect for the next thirty or so years rather it is based on current interest rates and what a lay person is prepared to pay at the time of sale.
The social security age was pegged at 65 when fdr signed it into law. That only changed recently up to age 67. In the thirties the average life expectancy was lower than 65. Today it is over 80. (I read somewhere that 65 was the age used by the first employee pension ever - set up by the Krupp family in the late 1800s and that the us ss creators adopted it directly)
The Medicare underestimate is pretty well documented: the house ways and means committee cost estimates are discussed here:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703746604574461610985243066
A key snip: "The rate of increase in Medicare spending has outpaced overall inflation in nearly every year (up 9.8% in 2009), so a program that began at $4 billion now costs $428 billion."
"The companies set their prices where they think the market will buy."
Of course. The one thing that they will not do is sell at a loss (this is were the actuaries come in) . The government has no such concerns.
My prediction is an easy one. The trumpster cultists will all be embarrassed, and none of them will admit it. No way to tell who would have been the best pick, but it was easy to tell who was most feared; Walker, Perry, Cruz, Carson all drew serious flak. Drawing flak means you are over the target.
As for how Trump would actually perform as a president, only 2 things you can say at this point. He is no Reagan, and too soon to tell on anything else. Trump was around during both Carter and Reagan, so safe to say he has seen the effects of policy. Also safe to say, he sat on the sidelines till very late in the game. Apart from political donations to the Clintons.
If Trump is no Reagan, that's good enough in my expert opinion. Harper was no Reagan; he was much better in a number of ways. Already Trump has made a better VP pick.
https://mises.org/library/sad-legacy-ronald-reagan-0
Enoch Powell was correct.
Computer models are the crystal balls of the 21st century.
Just like a crystal ball, the information provided is based on the agenda of the charlatan controlling it.
the insurance industry is like going to the slots, 'cept slots are honest
Anyone who does not contemplate outcomes of societies and what direction that takes are fools. As a business owner I always did this through necessity not idle curiosity. The various 'influencers' change but that simply reinforces the need for regular review. It is an inexact exercise but that does not discount the need.
Most people want predictable outcomes but the essence of life is dealing with the variables. Human progress has now evolved to a high tech innovative state where disruption is fast and can be devastating. No one knows where it will all end.
as I'v said for years, get religion out of politics. Cuz, Carson, Bachman, Huckabee, Bush2 and Jeb, all perfect examples as to why. You want religion, go to church, not government. Why the fact that many of us are turned off by religious bull$hit is so hard for the bible bangers to grasp is to their own detriment. I know a few who will not vote for bible bangers, and John Tory was a prime example of that.
Yep, the word expert is meaningless when it comes to speculative science. It is not even close to the precision and accuracy of real experts in science, trades and technology. The speculative science experts, usually humanities and social science areas but not exclusively, are professional guessers. Their work is based on WAGs and SWAGs : wild ass guesses and scientific wild ass guesses. In a rational world they'd be as harmless as astrologers and tarot card readers but they've convinced the political class that their WAGs and SWAGs are essential. For some reason (professional courtesy?) real experts don't challenge them.
Personally, I think that despite education and secularism people still default to a pre-Renaissance mindset. Superstition, religious behaviour, belief in the power of clerics, the need to be ruled, guilt and redemption, etc. You can physically take humans out of the dark ages but you cannot take ancient evolutionary instincts out of the human mind.
"Drawing flak means you are over the target."
OK. So who, from both inside the party and the media, drew the most flak?
Interesting concept - you try to prove a point by disproving your it.
But they sold lots of product that lost money in the high interest rate era 25 years ago. And the actuaries signed off on it.
Oh Dear NME 666 is off his meds again. On a more serious note, because really who cares what NME 666 ingests or spews, the fact is that the "experts" are like the false prophets written about in the Old Testament. The king would call for his experts (he called them prophets) and the prophets would feed the king the information he wanted to hear, whether it was long life or success in war or whatever. We have the same today when our 'prophets' (we call them experts) tell the king and the masses what the king wants them to hear. The world is burning up (AGW) the nation will go bankrupt (Brexit) Everything will shut down (Y2K) etc etc etc. As has been pointed out innumerable times: Those who don't learn from history - repeat it.
That brings to mind a saying about computing that was old by the time I wrote my first FORTRAN programs over 40 years ago: garbage in, garbage out.
That truism, however, appears to have been forgotten over the years. How else can one explain social media?
"That truism, however, appears to have been forgotten over the years."
The MSM is about to learn that lesson..They think they KNOW what people "should" think...When they don't understand the crap they are pushing is crap...Happy trails
great babble Josey, but do you have a point, or more specifically, will address my point. And don't forget to use the toilet paper and wipe clean.
Selling predictions of the future is the oldest, best selling scam ever. Appreciating that there even is a future sets us apart from the animals. Abusing the desire of people to have somebody, ANYBODY, confidently tell them the future is a disgusting, exploitative part of human nature
Astrologers read historical patterns, correlate star and planet alignments to earthbound events. Astrologers then take these historical patterns and extrapolate future events from past correlations.
Replace astrologers with climatologists/Karl Marx/shaman
Replace "star and planet alignments" with tree and ice rings/available information from the library of London/vein patterns on a correctly slaughtered lambs' liver.
Oracles, Prophets, John Edward...wrap your predictions in enough mumbojumbo, some (sometimes enough) people will believe anything
Absolutely correct. However, the innate human being is much older than the dark ages.
People like Pol Pot, Stalin, Marx, Hitler, Mao Tse-tung, etc. wanted to change human nature ... and killed hundreds of million people attempting to do that.
“The Met Office, badly burned by the failure of its long-range forecasts a few years ago……….
………..Half way through May it said this about the coming summer: “the outlook suggests the chances of above – or below – average rainfall are approximately similar.”…………
……….Even then, it added a disclaimer: “this is not a normal weather forecast. It’s an experimental and complex outlook based on probabilities”.
If that’s not a sophisticated “expert” bullshit?..........What is?
The problem was created by LBJ (The real reason may not be obvious) by passing a law that prevented preaching politics from the Pulpit. (The loss of IRS Tax free Status). The religious right could only get a voice in the Republican Party & has become a cumbersome millstone
Donald Trump promised to wipe out that law and put religion back into the Pulpit..The religious Right welcomed that decision... He then embraced Gay's & issues important to the Republican women... No religious test in Trumps Republican Tent...