"Fuck off, Fascist"

| 23 Comments


Alex Epstein responds to Massachussettes attorney general's subpoena for private or confidential correspondence.


23 Comments

I like a message to government that has lots of effs.

Compared to what the American Revolution was fought over, there are way more serious grievances this time around,

Forget the terms like progressive and socialism. The real term is creeping communism. This story is about one of the many creeps

You know, if there was such a thing as guts and decency, the entire US press corps would be screaming for her resignation. If there were guts and decency...

Cowering, quaking bastards.

No, jimmy, they are not quaking, they are believers, and that makes them a whole different threat than cowards would front. They are like kristians, who will not entertain opposing opinion . Because "belief" has shut down that portion of brain that processes logic.

Guys...the problem is that the MEDIA agree completely with the AG in this matter....most of whom have been brainwashed by Academia over the past 50 yrs.

The Media with their Social Engineering BS along with Marxist Academia are the real threats to our Western Civlization....one look to Sweden and the asinine legislation they've passed in the past 16 months is a good indicator as to which way the wind Is blowing....same goes for our country - Left wing Marxist (_i_)holes in every Jurisdiction at every level of government...from Coast to Coast with the exception of Mr Brad Wall.

Epstein's response is certainly appealing and has PR value. It also drives the progressives control freaks crazy which usually makes me smile.

I suspect that this other front might be quite effective:

"From the Washington Times and the department of “Mutally Assured Destruction” (MAD) comes this blowback.

If Democratic attorneys general can pursue climate change skeptics for fraud, then also at risk of prosecution are climate alarmists whose predictions of global doom have failed to materialize.

The “cuts both ways” argument was among those raised by 13 Republican attorneys general in a letter urging their Democratic counterparts to stop using their law enforcement power against fossil fuel companies and others that challenge the climate change catastrophe narrative."

I doubt those cheering on government harassment of libertarian and conservative skeptics and Lukewarmers would be keen on the same methods applying to catastrophic anthropogenic climate change alarmists, activists, philanthropists, think tanks and business class environmentalists. CAGWeras fight tooth and nail to hide data and emails that are clearly FOIA items from bureaucrats and taxpayer funded research.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/06/17/ags-striking-back-at-exxonknew-and-rico20-say-we-can-come-after-climate-alarmists-for-fraud-too/

If we're going for humorous responses to CAGW alarmists then this reply by Premier Brad Wall to Leapers claiming that's they'd won a Twitter war should be included:

Leaper : "ICYMI @NaomiAKlein & @mzjacobson just destroyed @PremierBradWall and it's the best thing ever"

"Brad Wall: "Yes...I was blinded by the pixie dust and gored by the unicorn."

Except in the case of climate alarmism, it actually is fraud. The so-called "science" behind it is woefully bad. In the 1970's, the big climate threat was "global cooling leading to a new Ice Age", and the "solution" was "use less fossil fuel." Today's climate threat is runaway global warming, and the "solution" is, wait for it, "use less fossil fuel."

Two diametrically opposed "imminent threats", same "solution"? Sounds like a "solution" in search of a problem to me.

The reply was perfect.

Odd,but a few days ago,I responded with the same epithet to the Mayor of Montreal for trying to rename a park after a traitor,and my comment was "held" then disappeared.

Sometimes we have to recognize the value of what has been euphemistically called the "F" word by the media,as it often conveys the exact emotion required toward the recipient of said profanity.

The government of Massachusetts is simply taking on the role as the test case for this agenda, much like B.C. was the test case for a carbon tax. If Mass. succeeds, every other State and Province will shortly follow suit.

As someone at Watts Up With That pointed out, the actual subpoena calls for the past 40 years of correspondence from Epstein and his organization. This might be difficult to provide since Epstein is only 37 years old, and his organization was only founded in 2011. Modern liberalism: unworkable solutions for imaginary problems.

I posted this comment on their site,( It is past time to get nasty with these nasty people). I got the censorship clock. free speech is not so free anymore, yet they would publish the f word because it suited them?

NASA continues to ignore the FOIA request for their internal communications ... which will prove their conspiracy to commit temp data fraud. The left is simply trying to counter and preempt the eventual smoking gun of Global Warming FRAUD. The absolute correct answer if F-off !

The crime isn't fraud, it is blasphemy against the AGW church.

Like kristians, or even more so, atheists.

Maybe it should be a crime to call climate change our existential threat, when it clearly is not, and to deny Islamist terrorism isn't at least approaching an existential problem, which it clearly is.

To the talking head Dems, it's all about their false narratives, where CO2 is the enemy, not Islamist killers, none of whom are "lone wolves."

I think as the electorate becomes somewhat focused (how focused can an electorate be when only about half show up to vote) on the issues of terrorism, security and trust will shift to Trump, but it won't happen by itself, and he can't do it by himself.

Think it through Trump haters, if one does not support Trump, for any reason, they are de-facto backing an irredeemably corrupt tyrant with abysmal judgment (Benghazi, putting America's most sensitive secrets up for grabs) who will fail time and time again to face the truth of the Islamist threat and the countries and leaders that support it. The connection is now irrefutable.

She won't because she is beholden to those very people. One of her closest advisors is of Islamist background and Clinton campaign is sustained by tens of $millions from Islamist states; so she sees Trump through her eyes.

Imagine that, foreign interests are helping shape American policy. Why is America for instance, importing crude from Saudi Arabia when the US has vast reserves that cannot be exploited or transported, because of:

Climate change.

No economic basis for the argument. No security basis for the argument. No concern for double dealing SA leaders known to provide protection money to mujihadeen madrassas in the ME and mosques in the USA, all spewing nothing but hatred to every single value enjoyed by civilized peoples.

While Obama and Clinton try to disconnect the dots with their gun control canard, the voters hopefully will.

Meanwhile the wicked witch of the West, Fauxcohantas Warren, jumps on her broom.

What may undermine Clinton is she and Obama spewing the slime, instead of leaving the dirty work to their useful violent idiots as all spit on liberty.

Good for Alex Epstein. Perfect response. More people need to do this to, yes, Tony W, creeping communists, as that is exactly what is going on.

The decades of Stalinist induced 5th columnists in the educational system have produced progressives (communists) like this AG. There are lots of them everywhere in almost every discipline.

Like Communist, Islamist, and Socialist, maybe it's time to apply the word Progressivist since that's really what's been going on for the last several decades: a radical Progressive ideology being forced onto society?

More on the article from Forbes:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2016/06/16/first-the-government-went-after-exxonmobil-now-theyre-going-after-me/1/#9f06b667db68

Disgusting, yet, as stated, gives the public opportunity to smash the fraud of the AGs and their narrow, extreme political agenda.

Seems the goal of the left is to remove the amendments to the Constitution, then destroy the Constitution itself.

FASCISTS is an apt term

Friedrich Hayek called them all statists, inflicted with their fatal conceit & self-serving delusions of the efficacy of big government, aka central planning .

That's the most descriptive term to describe these corrupt incompetents I think.

Big government is bad government. Does anyone argue government is virtuous or even good. Only statists think big government is good government. Our Constitution guarantees good government, not big, bad government that erodes freedom and prosperity.

Statists seek to separate individuals from their families, communities and civil society as a whole. In fact civil society is dangerous to big government because it denies them direct access to the citizen and taxpayer, and puts the lie to the idea that we are a part of government, that we didn't build that, that government is part of civil society not the other way around.

My pastor today opined the fall of the father within society, as he is devalued by not just his actions, but by the active sanction of statists, where they become the breadwinners, not the parents, where children are raised only knowing the love of a woman, but not the strong complement of fatherhood.

The statists gleefully promote that idea, then blame societal decline on greedy capitalism, offering more of their fatal conceit as the solution.

"Although Epstein normally does not use such profanity, and although TOS normally wouldn’t reprint such language, both are entirely warranted in this case."

Anything less than this, or in Charlie's post regarding this, would be "nuanced" and not with the gravitas that suits this, and the other 100k recent examples of government overreach.

Thank you Charlie, for posting this without nuance.

"We cannot expect the Americans to jump from capitalism to communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans small doses of socialism, until they suddenly awake to find they have communism."
Nikita Khruschev, 1959
Seems to be working...

Hayek had it right. The active attempt to destroy the family has been a staple of the cultural Marxists (communists) since October 1917, and they have succeeded remarkably well. It is not total yet, but getting close.

Leave a comment

Archives

November 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Recent Comments

  • Ken (Kulak): Hayek had it right. The active attempt to destroy the read more
  • canuck66: "We cannot expect the Americans to jump from capitalism to read more
  • marc in calgary: "Although Epstein normally does not use such profanity, and although read more
  • Shamrock: Friedrich Hayek called them all statists, inflicted with their fatal read more
  • DanBC: More on the article from Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2016/06/16/first-the-government-went-after-exxonmobil-now-theyre-going-after-me/1/#9f06b667db68 Disgusting, yet, as read more
  • Jan Scheit: Like Communist, Islamist, and Socialist, maybe it's time to apply read more
  • Ken (Kulak): Good for Alex Epstein. Perfect response. More people need to read more
  • Shamrock: Maybe it should be a crime to call climate change read more
  • Markon: Like kristians, or even more so, atheists. read more
  • Stan: The crime isn't fraud, it is blasphemy against the AGW read more