Don’t even question the premise of microagression, just use this simple phrase “blow it out you arse”, then don’t talk to them. Of course they might construe that as a macroagression.
The concept of “microagressions” is totally aggressive, not microagressive.
Is identifying an honest to goodness a-hole or genuine pr|ck as a “bully” a micro aggression as well? The article says calling a thug a thug a microagression so is calling a bully a bully a micriaggression because it implies they were raised in a mal-adjusted environment?
So confusing. I’ll just continue to teach my kids to not whine about bullies and while they should not throw the first punch, the first one they do throw should be direct to the nose or gnads. Or is that now a macro aggression?
a good shape punch to the breast bone knocks the wind out of them, then just work them over
By their own logic,does the PC crowd not comprehend that allowing their turd to freefall into the bowl is an act of micro aggression?
They need to reach down and gently cradle it into the water so as not to offend the toilet.
No doubt microaggressions will be all the rage when the Islamists gain more power and influence.
Yawn. Looks like we’ll have to stick to the good ol’ macroaggressions
I say that he should take his message to the south side of Chicago. You know, stand on the street corner and INFORM the people about micro aggression. I do believe that Mr. Sherer, a young gay black man, would soon discover that there are agressions somewhat more serious than the micro kind and that “emotionally crushing terms as “crazy,” “trash” and “thug”” are valid descriptions of some people.
“Hell” is defined as a place where reason and logic do not exist.
Folks, as we descend into an era of civil/social hell, lead by the progressive zombie hordes, get used to unreasoning irrationality becoming law and damaging people.
Because the same irrational logic that can deem innocent or unconscious acts or speech to be “aggression” is the same unreasonable illogic which will make it a crime and then pervert the sanctimonious intent to one of exploiting unreasonable laws to attack dissenting opinion.
An old saying from Canada’s formative era – “Liberal times are dark times” was never more true than it is today. I fully expect a repeat of the Obamanation neo-fascist persecution of philosophical/political dissenters. Political oppression and political prisoners are the legacy of regimes who enforce “political correctness” (AKA political/philosophical uniformity) – and this time I hope Canadians will not stand for it without pushing back.
I find a simple “f- off!” and a Glasgow Kiss usually settles these types of people down rather smartly. Never need to, usually they just look at me and slink away.
I must say it will be interesting to see how Mr. Warren Scherer and his little friends react when the campus Islamic society demands all women must wear the hijab, then starts stoning the ones who won’t.
Not that there’s anything -wrong- with stoning infidels,of course…
Heh,
Those that raise the argument that points to someone engaging in “microaggression”, an original newspeak word, are in fact those that are doing the “microaggression” in an aggressive way to tell the other someone to shut up.
The Liberals showed the Democrats the way, they were never shy about siccing the CRA onto people who opposed their thieving ways, in Pierre the Idiots reign.
Expect a whole bunch more.
Laws? Those are for the little people.
What best way to “include different perspectives” and “engage in authentic and challenging dialogue” than to exclude the perspectives you don’t like and transform dialogue into a monologue held between two people. As Mr. Spock would say: “Fascinating!”
‘Microagression’ is just another lunatic concept dreamed up by the Left to let them exercise control over others.
Don’t even question the premise of microagression, just use this simple phrase “blow it out you arse”, then don’t talk to them. Of course they might construe that as a macroagression.
The concept of “microagressions” is totally aggressive, not microagressive.
Is identifying an honest to goodness a-hole or genuine pr|ck as a “bully” a micro aggression as well? The article says calling a thug a thug a microagression so is calling a bully a bully a micriaggression because it implies they were raised in a mal-adjusted environment?
So confusing. I’ll just continue to teach my kids to not whine about bullies and while they should not throw the first punch, the first one they do throw should be direct to the nose or gnads. Or is that now a macro aggression?
a good shape punch to the breast bone knocks the wind out of them, then just work them over
By their own logic,does the PC crowd not comprehend that allowing their turd to freefall into the bowl is an act of micro aggression?
They need to reach down and gently cradle it into the water so as not to offend the toilet.
No doubt microaggressions will be all the rage when the Islamists gain more power and influence.
Yawn. Looks like we’ll have to stick to the good ol’ macroaggressions
I say that he should take his message to the south side of Chicago. You know, stand on the street corner and INFORM the people about micro aggression. I do believe that Mr. Sherer, a young gay black man, would soon discover that there are agressions somewhat more serious than the micro kind and that “emotionally crushing terms as “crazy,” “trash” and “thug”” are valid descriptions of some people.
“Hell” is defined as a place where reason and logic do not exist.
Folks, as we descend into an era of civil/social hell, lead by the progressive zombie hordes, get used to unreasoning irrationality becoming law and damaging people.
Because the same irrational logic that can deem innocent or unconscious acts or speech to be “aggression” is the same unreasonable illogic which will make it a crime and then pervert the sanctimonious intent to one of exploiting unreasonable laws to attack dissenting opinion.
An old saying from Canada’s formative era – “Liberal times are dark times” was never more true than it is today. I fully expect a repeat of the Obamanation neo-fascist persecution of philosophical/political dissenters. Political oppression and political prisoners are the legacy of regimes who enforce “political correctness” (AKA political/philosophical uniformity) – and this time I hope Canadians will not stand for it without pushing back.
I find a simple “f- off!” and a Glasgow Kiss usually settles these types of people down rather smartly. Never need to, usually they just look at me and slink away.
I must say it will be interesting to see how Mr. Warren Scherer and his little friends react when the campus Islamic society demands all women must wear the hijab, then starts stoning the ones who won’t.
Not that there’s anything -wrong- with stoning infidels,of course…
Heh,
Those that raise the argument that points to someone engaging in “microaggression”, an original newspeak word, are in fact those that are doing the “microaggression” in an aggressive way to tell the other someone to shut up.
The Liberals showed the Democrats the way, they were never shy about siccing the CRA onto people who opposed their thieving ways, in Pierre the Idiots reign.
Expect a whole bunch more.
Laws? Those are for the little people.
What best way to “include different perspectives” and “engage in authentic and challenging dialogue” than to exclude the perspectives you don’t like and transform dialogue into a monologue held between two people. As Mr. Spock would say: “Fascinating!”
‘Microagression’ is just another lunatic concept dreamed up by the Left to let them exercise control over others.