Seattle based Amazon.com is in an interesting battle with the Obama regime over the subject of aerial drones. It's interesting that Obama supporters constantly drone on (pun deliberate) about how "progressive" they are. Not always, it seems.
21 Comments
Leave a comment
Best Canadian Blog
2004,
2005,
2006,
2007
About Kate
Why this blog?
Until this moment
I have been forced
to listen while media
and politicians alike
have told me
"what Canadians think".
In all that time they
never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio - "You don't speak for me."
homepageemail Kate
(goes to a private mailserver in Europe) I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Support SDA
I am not a registered charity. I cannot issue tax receipts.
Economics for the Disinterested
...a fast-paced polar
bear attack thriller!

Want lies?
Hire a regular consultant.
Want truth?
Hire an asshole.
Click to inquire about rates.
Dow Jones
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC. My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." Kathy Shaidle
"Thank you for your link. A wave of your Canadian readers came to my blog! Really impressive." Juan Giner - INNOVATION International Media Consulting Group
I got links from the Weekly Standard, Hot Air and Instapundit yesterday - but SDA was running at least equal to those in visitors clicking through to my blog. Jeff Dobbs
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood."Michael E. Zilkowsky
Intelliweather
Seismic Map
Comments Policy
Best Of SDA
Hide The Decline
The Bottle Genie
(ClimateGate links)
You Might Be A Liberal
Uncrossing The Line
Bob Fife: Knuckledragger
A Modest Proposal (NP)
Settled Science Series
Y2Kyoto Series
SDA: Reader Occupation Survey
Brett Lamb Sheltered Workshop
Flakes On A Plane
All Your Weather Are Belong To Us
Song Of The Sled
The Raise A Flag Debacle
(Now on Youtube!)
(.mwv Video)
Abuse Ruins Life Of Girl
Trudeaupiate
Kleptocrat Jeans
Child Labour
I Concede
Small Dead Feminist
Protein Hoser: THK Interview
The Werewolf Extinction
Dear Laura (VRWC)
We Wait
Blogging The Oscars
Jackson Converts To Islam
Just Shut The HELL Up
Manipulating Condi
Gay Equality Rights
Blogroll
News Aggregators, Resources
Drudge Report
Bourque (Canada)
Memri (Middle East)
Newsmax
Military News Spotlight
Watching America
Int. Free Press Society
Newsbeat1
Rawlco local news
Dates in History
Newseum
Oilprice.com
My Westman
Favorites
Instapundit
NRO The Corner
Weekly Standard
Outside The Beltway
ScrappleFace
Day By Day
James Lileks
Hugh Hewitt
Mark Steyn
Belmont Club
Powerline
Den Beste (archived)
American Thinker
Victor Hanson
Michelle Malkin
Michael Yon (Iraq Imbed)
Tim Blair (Oz)
Protein Wisdom
Captain Capitalism
Kathy Shaidle
David Warren
Damian Penny
Publius
Cjunk
Conservative Grapevine
Newsosaur
Edward Michael George
Long War Journal
Eric Anderson
Charles Adler
Inconvenient Science
Climategate 2.0:
The emails unredacted
Search the database
Climate Audit
Prometheus
Planet Gore
Icecap
Anthony Watts
Climate Debate
HK Climate
Climate Depot
Anthropogenic Global Bias
Yanks, mostly
Professor Bainbridge
Stephen Green
Wizbang
Daniel Drezner
Dean Esmay
Right Wing News
Patterico
Medienkritic (Germany)
I Could Be Wrong
Mystery Pollster
Maggies Farm
Maxed Out Mama
Bill Roggio
Musing Minds
Pajamas Media
Newsbusters
Blackfive
Day By Day
Cox And Forkum (archives)
Brussels Journal (EU)
Argghhh!
Ed Driscoll
Don Surber
Obsidian Wings
Tygrrrr Express
Brutally Honest
Karl Rove
Tom Nelson
Call Me Stormy
The Last Tradition
Canadian, eh?
CPC Youtube Channel
The Shotgun
Bow. James Bow
Ghost Of A Flea
The Black Rod
Blog Quebecois
Catprint
Calgary Grit
Proud To Be Canadian
Fighting for Taxpayers
Quotulatiousness
Arcologist
Uncle Meat
Editorial Times
Halls of Macadamia
Full Comment (NP)
Andrew Keyes
Brad Farquhar
Steynian
Blazing Cat Fur
myWestman
Inspiringyoutothink
Prince Arthur Herald
Freelance Conservative
November 2016
Recent Comments
- Mike: If drone delivery is a bad idea, then it will read more
- gordinkneehill: Using drones for delivery is just dumb. Not only do read more
- Mike: Drones are already used to check power cables autonomously, outside read more
- Altadore: Justthinkin -- ad hominems aside, I don't believe we disagree. read more
- Oz: "I also have a bit of a problem with these read more
- Glenfilthie: I'm scratch building one for recreational purposes. I have a read more
- Justthinkin: Well. When drones ("flown" by idjits on the ground) can read more
- ural: The opportunity for abuse is to great. I don't want read more
- Jay Currie: At a guess autonomous vehicles will be doing most of read more
- Altadore: Robert, I don't understand your point. How is this story read more










The first time a drone chews up a toddler, there will be hell to pay. Does Amazon really want that kind of liability? I'm guessing no.
All aircraft operate under VFR (visual flight rules) or IFR (instrument flight rules)
IFR means they are under the control of air traffic control through radar, transponders, communication, ect.
VFR means the pilot must, at the least, maintain a visual watch for other aircraft, ect.
If drones are to safely fly in shared airspace (from the ground up to thousands of feet high) they have to operate under the above flight rules. I doubt if a camera would suffice as a 'visual watch'.
I would think it would be very easy for terrorists to target aircraft of all sizes and do major damage to them. Fifty pounds of the right king of material into a jet engine or pilots windshield would be catastrophic. It wouldn't even be suicidal.
The popular slogan ITS HARD TO FLY LIKEA EAGLE WHEN YOU WORK FOR TURKEYS and the biggist turkey lives in the Whitehouse
The "progressives" enact regulations and hearings to stop measures they disagree with. They stop regulations and hearings to enact measures they agree with. Whether it's a drone, pipeline or wind turbines being considered, "due diligence" depends entirely on their opinion on the matter.
Thus pipelines are subject to paralysis by analysis and lawfare, while their pet wind turbine projects are exempted from the nuisance of having to demonstrate their safety &/or efficacy.
It's not that complicated - really. Remember, common sense is a superpower, though once a troll asked me to define it's meaning - of course that proved they didn't have any ..... well you know what I mean.
Why can't the people who work for Amazon or Microsoft in Seattle, or the people who work for Google or Facebook in California, understand that the president they so eagerly supported is a staunch advocate of central planning?
I can understand if they want such issues as gay rights or legalized pot or abortions. But they should be able to get that without voting for a glib marxist with a messiah complex.
The mind boggles.
I'm interested in the possibility of these things in hu*****.
You could stand by your truck,while the camera-carrying drone checks out the valley over the hill in front of you.
Provincial governments across Canada are probably scrambling to prevent this by legislation as we type.
Amazon is just the beginning. If drone delivery becomes normal (and if allowed it will become normal) then shortly the sky is going to be cluttered with drones. Really.
Also, there will be a lot of unionized federal U.S. Postal Service workers out of a job and mail delivery is one of the few services the U.S. government is actually authorized to provide to the nation in the Constitution.
I certainly wouldn't want a 5lb package + dead drone falling on me or my truck from 200 feet. This is a bad idea period.
2 things, one a gust of wind
two, if they become normal it will be hard to separate the good from the bad. Terrorists would just need to fly one so a passenger jet engine ingest one of them on take off.
In commemoration of George Washington's 283rd birthday we bring you "The Crossing" an excellent rendition of Washington's crossing of the Delaware River on Christmas 1776.
http://commoncts.blogspot.com/2015/02/happy-birthday-george-washington.html
I also have a bit of a problem with these drones, and not just because posties would lose their jobs.
I can't see it as being economically feasible.
In a downtown core (Calgary,e.g.)the logistics to get a package to an office would be insurmountable. I don't think it could be done.
Apartment buildings, same problem.
In residential areas, there would have to be satellite offices all over to make it feasible, and those would have to be staffed by humans. One main depot out near the airport would mean that the drones would take one package, drop it off, and then return empty.
How many drones would be needed on a Monday morning in Calgary?
How would the drones do in inclement weather?
Would they be accurate during a chinook, a rainstorm, a blizzard ?
How about at night?
Would they be trusted if other groups were also using drones, perhaps for nefarious purposes?
As much as I like the futuristic appeal, I don't think that drones will ever replace the courier companies. Sometimes man is better than machine.
Robert, I don't understand your point. How is this story about hypocrisy or contradiction among "progressives"? Are aerial drones supposed to be a progressive cause? Is Amazon? Or are you just instinctly against anything that the Obama administration does?
Seriously, what would you do differently? Instantly green-light Amazon's (or any private enterprise's) request to fly commercial drones in any public airspace without any public oversight? I'm honestly asking.
At a guess autonomous vehicles will be doing most of the Amazon deliveries, on the ground, after midnight. At about the speed of a mobility scooter. But there will be a lot of them and they'll be cheap.
The opportunity for abuse is to great. I don't want shit flying over my property. Can these things be outfitted with cameras? ...if so, f**K you.
Well. When drones ("flown" by idjits on the ground) can plop down at my address, which is 4 NMs from the threshold of two runways of an international airport, then come talk me, twit. Full disclosure, former pilot and aeronautical engineer, and FE in the CAF. Back to your hidey hole under the bridge.
I'm scratch building one for recreational purposes. I have a fairly good idea of how these things work and what their limits and capabilities are. Not only can these things fly cameras, it wouldn't be a big deal to hang a couple pounds of C4 on them and fly them up your nose with easily available FPV (First Person View)and currently available telemetry systems. I dunno what the big deal is, the drone flying over your yard will see everything your neighbor does when he looks over the fence.
I am not worried at all about my gov'ts use of this technology - I am worried far more about the Usual Suspects. Killing people with drones is now something anyone could do and it is only a matter of time before our islamic vibrants start doing it on a regular basis.
"I also have a bit of a problem with these drones, and not just because posties would lose their jobs."
Obama and the Democrats have a political problem with federal government union workers losing their jobs. Everything is political with Obama and the Left.
My problem is mostly with the sky being cluttered with drones. What big box chain existing now wouldn't soon start delivering orders made from your home computer directly to homes; merchandise, drug prescriptions, pizzas, coffee, etc. if Amazon is permitted to open this particular Pandora's Box?
p.s. I get a couple of delivers or so every week to my door from Amazon(mostly books) and I like them just fine.
I recently got a new Breville(made in Canada) electric coffee percolator that was more than $20 below the best in-store price.
Justthinkin -- ad hominems aside, I don't believe we disagree. Amazon's plan to fly delivery drones in American cities raises all sorts of safety, privacy, technological, and logistical questions (including, as you note, the wisdom of allowing delivery to places located near airport runways). It's a topic ripe with interesting and debatable issues, yet Robert can chosen the most banal, incoherent and, for SDA, utterly predictable of angles -- turning this into a pointless slag against "progressives".
Rather than calling me schoolyard names, why don't you encourage Robert to clarify his position?
Drones are already used to check power cables autonomously, outside of the operator's line of sight.
I think that Amazon (and others) should be allowed to embrace this technology, as the potential spin-offs are huge.
Also, it will open up a new rural hobby: Skeet shooting for random prizes. Right there, that fixes the private property aspect of the issue, but no doubt Amazon will go whining to the state for protection, (like many who want to ban this kind of thing) instead of simply understanding the cost of doing business.
Using drones for delivery is just dumb. Not only do you have the safety issues, and the privacy issues, and the issues of delivery to multi-unit buildings, but one thing that nobody else here has mentioned is energy. These drones aren't dirigibles. They remain aloft by the constant expenditure of energy to spin their little helicopter rotors. Very expensive power, too, since it's stored in lithium batteries. Their range isn't going to be that great, so packages would have to be trucked to a local drone base, and transferred to the drones. Then the drones fly out loaded, and fly back empty, for their next load (and probably a set of fresh batteries). Those brown trucks go from door, to door, to door all day long on a cheap tank of Diesel fuel.
If you really want to change the delivery paradigm, set up a freight service structured like Uber, essentially privateers who get their loads from a Web site. Call it "Hoober", for sake of argument. I'm going to Calgary this afternoon. I go on the Hoober site, see that Dave in Beiseker has a 20 lb. box that has to go to NW Calgary. I send Dave an e-mail, tell him I'm going right by there, and for five bucks, I'll haul his package. He agrees, done deal. Adds 10 minutes to my trip, negligible extra fuel, and five dollars in my jeans. Needless to say, such a service would have to have provisions to deal with no load, no pay, delivery impossible situations, and some sort of way of ensuring bona fides. Uber seems to handle that OK.
If drone delivery is a bad idea, then it will not be profitable for Amazon.
I say let them spend their money as they see fit, and the market will decide, if you hold voting shares of Amazon, you can vote against it.
That being said, your "Hoober" idea is also an excellent idea.