It's Probably Nothing

| 15 Comments

h/t Bettie


15 Comments

"Iran has the highest incidence of lifetime infertility of any country in the world, estimated at between 22% and 25% in separate Iranian government surveys. Roughly a quarter of Iranian couples, that is, are unable to bear children.

By comparison, lifetime infertility ranges from 11% in Europe and 15% in India. The Iranian data are more extensive than in most other countries because Iran’s government has devoted enormous resources to finding explanations and remedies for its uniquely high infertility rate."

http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/01/irans-demographic-death-grip-std-epidemic-and-plummeting-birthrate/

Perhaps they see an attack on Israel as, "now or never" ... It's clear to me that syphilis ate the mullah's brains.

Hard to beat children when you are humping goats

Hmmm... what happened in 2009 that probably led to this...

It'll come to me, I know it.

Somebody tell Joe Wilson.

No, this has been going on for a long time, at least since the late 1980s when Iran started installing its enrichment and reprocessing facilities.

Why are Western leaders capitulating? Don't they know what Iran will do when it becomes a nuclear power?

"If one day, the Islamic world is also equipped with weapons like those that Israel possesses now, then the imperialists' strategy will reach a standstill because the use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything. However, it will only harm the Islamic world. It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality. Hashemi Rafsanjani, president of Iran from 1989 to 1997

Iran continues to make it clear that it is more than willing to wipe out the 7 million Jews living in Israel even if it means the death of 21 million Iranians in a nuclear exchange. The Iranian leadership considers that a winning strategy. After all they will have wiped out 100% of the Jews in Israel but only 60% of the Iranian population will have died in the exchange. Iran wins.

So why isnt Jimmy Carter going over there to negotate a peace treaty and uring iran cease its nucular build up after all this little pinhead receive the peace prize before

"Why are Western leaders capitulating? Don't they know what Iran will do when it becomes a nuclear power? "

Why did Chamberlain let Hitler do whatever he wanted?

Same answer. They think they're SO much cleverer than the rest of us, they can "manage" the Iranian mullah goat humpers without resorting to "senseless violence". Because Chamberlain had the right idea, but they're -smaaaaaarter- than him so they will succeed where he failed.

Besides, the people making the decisions are the type who think of cities as strategic assets. Losing one is a "setback", not an unforgivable failure punishable by hanging.

Can you imagine Barry O being the least bit upset if Orlando Florida got blotted out by the goat humper mullahs? Me neither. He'd finish his friggin' golf game if they gave him the news in the middle of it.

I don't see why this is described as "It's probably nothing," even facetiously.It is American policy that Iran shall be armed with nuclear weapons and, of course, delivery systems. It shows that the Iranian government is making steady progress to meet the goals which it has decided on and which the American government has approved.

So this shows that the Iranians are not totally incompetent.

The only thing which would be news is if it is demonstrated that the American government is transferring technology (or even enriched uranium) to Iran. I suspect that they are, but that is on the basis of the people involved, not direct evidence.

Iran has aligned herself with Putin & China. We in the US are pretenders of a silly fantasy policy. The Obama administration lost ME influence when the Department of State interfered in the Ukraine. They lost the help of Russia!

The EU/UN is controlled by the rotting turds of back room war mongers. One missile sent to Brussels would solve all the drama & the ME would behave, or be exterminated.

The current regime thinks Iran should have a nuke because fairness....

I figure that if Iran wants a bomb.....give them one.....

....Or two.....

Exactly. It would prevent a lot of future problems. There are many Persians that do not go along with the aims of the Mullahs, but like the anti-Hitler Germans, can not do much at the moment to oppose them. When they did try with the "Green" revolution they got shot up and imprisoned as the golfer-in-chief let them hang out to dry.

Ken, I said that when USA started meddling in Afigan, they should just deliver a few tactical nukes. That would have saved a lot of grief, as Iraq would not have been necessary.

As to Iran getting the bomb, it's not necessary, as the elites and rich will slowly start to leave Israel because of the threat that would exist even if they have a 2-3 month "breakout" time frame. This exodus might take 10 - 20 years, but it would achieve the arab/Persian goal without resorting to an actual fighting war.

In related news:

--The Obama administration on Wednesday paid $490 million in cash assets to Iran and will have released a total of $11.9 billion to the Islamic Republic by the time nuclear talks are scheduled to end in June, according to figures provided by the State Department.

Today’s $490 million release, the third such payment of this amount since Dec. 10, was agreed to by the Obama administration under the parameters of another extension in negotiations over Tehran’s contested nuclear program that was inked in November.

Iran will receive a total of $4.9 billion in unfrozen cash assets via 10 separate payments by the United States through June 22, when talks with Iran are scheduled to end with a final agreement aimed at curbing the country’s nuclear work, according to a State Department official…

Iran will have received a total of $11.9 billion in cash assets by the end of June if current releases continue on pace as scheduled.--

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2015/01/23/why-is-obama-funneling-money-to-iran/

Some of you boys seem kind of excited by the idea of nukes flying around.

Go look up what happened at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Lots of lovely pictures on Google for your edification and education.

If the camel jumpers nuke someone, or someone nukes them, it'll be a hellish nightmare. That's what's so distressing about the Americans behavior, and its why Pierre Elliot Trudeau was the greatest traitor to this country Canada who ever held office. Before PET we had a military that could go places and do things -without- the Americans.

Canada should be able to go frag the Iranian bomb factories unilaterally if nobody else will, and WE CAN'T. Thanks Pierre. Guess its all up to the Israelis now.

Leave a comment

Archives

November 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Recent Comments

  • The Phantom: Some of you boys seem kind of excited by the read more
  • Mkelley: In related news: --The Obama administration on Wednesday paid $490 read more
  • NME666: Ken, I said that when USA started meddling in Afigan, read more
  • Ken (Kulak): Exactly. It would prevent a lot of future problems. There read more
  • sasquatch: The current regime thinks Iran should have a nuke because read more
  • Slap Shot: Iran has aligned herself with Putin & China. We in read more
  • John Lewis: I don't see why this is described as "It's probably read more
  • The Phantom: "Why are Western leaders capitulating? Don't they know what Iran read more
  • Spurwing Plover: So why isnt Jimmy Carter going over there to negotate read more
  • Jim: Why are Western leaders capitulating? Don't they know what Iran read more