In a "Nutshell"

| 45 Comments

45 Comments

Yeah... but because I smoke I'm a burden to the health care system. Right.

So how does an unvaccinated child cause a vaccinated child to get ill?
Just cant work it out .

All the comments in media about the anti vaxer movement of a while ago ignores the fact that the recent spread of these disease is related to the millions of undocumented and un-vaccinated illegals that the democrats flooded North America with.

Ahh, the state forcing folk to get injections.
What could go wrong?

But Harry, it's all intended for the greater good of the Democrat party.

"So how does an unvaccinated child cause a vaccinated child to get ill?"

It doesn't. That's the point.qx7

The cartoon ironically illustrates the "science" on the mandated vaccination side. The pandemic "peanut" allergy problem has been theorized to be an unintended consequence of having peanut oil proteins in the suspension fluid of the vaccines....nothing to see here citizen.

You can't work it out? Ok. Not sure if you're being intentionally obtuse or whether it's a legit question but the answer is pretty simple.

No vaccine confers 100% protection. You get the vaccine because it is likely to be effective. For example, if a measles outbreak occurs in a school, you could expect somewhere between 2-3% of the vaccinated students to get sick whereas you can expect close to 100% of the unvaccinated students to get sick.

@Harry, that's part of the explanation but the other big issue is unvaccinated people travelling to countries where these diseases are still prevalent and bringing them back.

Vaccines are absolutely a wonderful thing to give a child and I have made sure my kids have every vaccine they need. Still, government making vaccinations mandatory is a large step towards totalitarianism. You can make vaccinations mandatory in order to attend public school and I'm OK with that, but the idea of the government forcing any medical procedure on us, no matter how good it is for us, is wrong. We cannot protect everyone from the consequences of their own stupidity.

Pro-choice argument in abortion: a woman's body is hers to control. Everyone else, butt out.

Pro-choice argument in vaccination: ______________

No double standards here. Move along.

I was afraid of this.

You can thank Global Warming for the idiocy of the anti-immunization crowd. When scientists threw their credibility out to appease the socialists of the global warming crowd, people began to (rightfully) regard them and their work with suspicion and contempt. The problem is that not only was 'climate science' regarded with skepticism...everything else they did was called into question too. People are doing the exact same thing with science that they did with religion - they're throwing the baby out with the bath water!

Back in the 70's and 80's people got fed up with the hucksters and shysters of Christianity. The holy rollers, the televangelists - all of them were given the boot they rightfully deserved - but people threw out their morals and ethics too. They placed all their trust in science - and that is where the hucksters and shysters have come to dwell as a result. Give David Suzuki and Fat Al Gore all your money, you zombie mutts! They'll do your thinking for you, they'll tell you what to say and all will be well!!!

And of course - when that little scam became public knowledge, people threw out the charlatans again - and along with it, the Scientific Method that established the basics of microbiology and immunology.

Stupid people that can't think for themselves are now in a quandary: they can't trust the clergy, they can't trust the scientists...and they aren't smart enough to trust themselves. Whom is to think and speak for them and lead them?

I'd like to add that not every child can be vaccinated - either because they're too young or because they have a compromised immune system from diseases such as cancer.

Yeah, Mike, POLIO is such a neato disease!

Ever wonder why it was eradictaed? or do you look forward to your kids getting it?

"if you do not vaccinate your children then you should have to sign a waiver saying you are opting out of healthcare entirely." This was part of the twitty thing, if it was that easy to get out of mandatory "healthcare" everyone would be doing it.

As wonderful as the idea of a vaccine is to prevent disease, I can't dismiss the concerns of anti-Vaccination crowd especially when the World Health Organization has been caught using Vaccines for sterilization. I also don't buy the effectiveness of flu vaccines, I've known to many people who have gotten sick directly after getting them.

I don't trust the government and I don't trust the UN

No, it relates to unvaccinated kids who are able to get the measles from "undocumented democratic voters".

Vaccination only works to irradicate a disease if two thirds of the population are vaccinated.

Vaccines for sterilization

Sources? This sounds like the Muslim propaganda in Pakistan and Nigeria,

I don't quite get the idea that vaccines have to be an all or nothing proposition. I base my decisions to vaccinate based on acceptable and unacceptable risk. I would say that jumping out of a high flying aircraft with out a parachute as being an unacceptable risk while going ice skating without a helmet as being an acceptable risk. Polio and smallpox are unacceptable risks. Childhood measles, mumps are acceptable risks. Not that I want kids to get the measles or mumps but rather I know that if you get the diseases while young your overall health risk is very low while if the vaccine wears off as it seams is common in young adults the health risk is much higher. A year ago or so we had a measles outbreak in Edmonton. The medical advise was, "If you are of a certain age you are immune because you had the disease as a kid. If on the other you have only been vaccinated you should stay away because you are at risk of getting the disease."

Travis, you can't get sick from the dead FLU vaccine.

My kids quite commonly had peanut butter on toast at breakfast, sometimes taking a peanut butter sandwich to school, sometimes Ben would have Superstore's President's Choice Spicy Peanut Satay Sauce on rice for breakfast. I recall telling him that none of the girls in his grades 2.. 3.. 4.. classes would be kissing him with that much garlic on his breath.
He said he doesn't care.

So, if you don't want to drop dead from some sort of shock after kissing Ben, simply don't kiss him, and your precious angel will return about 4 pm, same as always.

I don't mind so much if parents decide to not have their kids immunised, I do mind paying for the results though. Just let those folks opt out of government medicine and we'll all get along..

Am I right here, Measles can cause pregnant women to have complications during pregnancy. German Measles (Rubella), can cause birth defects. Anti Vaxers, LOSERS.

I am enjoying watching all the UN-immunized parents and children all falling ill. So they can experience the natural result of their ... resistance of Western medicine. One of my fellow suburbanites just infected a whole BART train ... nice ! IDIOTS.

The older I get, the less I am sure about. A year ago, I was a smug, pro-vaxer that thought anti-vaxers were tin-foil hat wearing morons. After all, having two degrees (BSc and BEd) and being a science teacher didn't leave me much room for doubt. What changed my mind, or at least made me a luke-vaxer? A little objective research (thimerosal, 1976 Swine Flu Debacle, CDC, WHO, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,UN, Autism, Eugenics)and the fact that I just don't trust the track record and culture of death of so many of the people in charge in this world. I know it's just anecdotal, but I have two nephews and two grand-nephews with autism and a 19 year old son with undiagnosed Aspergers. Yes, correlation does not mean causation, but what else could it be that is causing all the autism? Give me an alternative hypothesis. I had a huge argument with my wife when I "forgot" (intentionally) to get my flu vaccine for the first time in 19 years (she works in health care), but I insisted in not getting it this year. It turns out I am the only one in our family of five that did not get the flu vaccine and I am the only one who did not get sick. All the pro-vaccination people who refuse to look at the other side of the argument are starting to remind me of climate change alarmists.

The problem with the Vaxers is that they like to conflate measles and polio vaccines with flu vaccines.
They also trust the government too much.

I never had any measles vaccination for any type of measles until I was an adult who was forced to get these vaccinations by a government agency in order to qualify for admission to a specific program. None of the other people who were admissions but not in my program at the institution had to be screened for these shots(polio too, but I already had that vaccination). I had to get the measles shots even though I had lived my life all over Canada and gone to numerous schools, I had never caught the measles or mumps and I had never been vaccinated.

That said, conflating measles and other vaccinations, which are once-in-a-lifetime, with flu shots, which are annual, totally undermines everything the Vaxers have to say about the issue.
Go ahead Vaxers, line up for that FLU shot that the government is just waiting to give you so that they can put you down. The Elites don't need us anymore, we're just using up their planet with their resources.

Look- childhood vaccines work. If they didn't, one would not be here complaining about it.

One must inject an allergen in order to be badly affected by it.

The anti-science crowd's paranoia would be quite amusing if it wasn't so injurious and annoying.

>"Look- childhood vaccines work. If they didn't, one would not be here complaining about it."

One what? Conflating flu vaccines with childhood vaccines, tsk tsk. Learn the difference. The second panel of the cartoon doesn't specify the type of vaccine.
I'm thinking there is a reason for that.

>"One must inject an allergen in order to be badly affected by it."

Define 'badly'.

>"The anti-science crowd's paranoia would be quite amusing if it wasn't so injurious and annoying."

Sounds like exactly the same thing that I've heard from Warmists many a time.
Scientists lie, and lying politicians care not a wit for you or anyone but themselves after Islamic immigration is considered.

Eric, your family is brimming with Autism and you want an alternate hypothesis?
Hmmm...I don't know....how about....Genetics?

There you go again, calling anti-vaxers anti-science, just like the warmers calling the skeptics anti-science. Stop it. Virtually all anti-vaxers understand the science of immunity acquisition and would take the vaccines if they trusted the people in charge. Remember Ted Turner's comment that the population needs to be reduced to 500 million? They don't even try to hide it any more. They are part of a neo-pagan anti-human death cult. Who are "they"? Do the research yourself.

Being a biology teacher, do you think I might have thought of that? Well, there is no-one over 25 in my family with it. I mean none, and I know you are going to say it was just undiagnosed. Maybe. I'm just looking for answers.

Had the mumps. Had the chicken pox. Had the red measles. Had the german measles. So did most of the kids I went to school with. Don't know what the big deal is.

If vaccinations are supposed to make you immune then get them. Then you don't have to worry about those who don't.

Oh, and there are others that should be banned from the health care system if those who don't get vaccinated are. Fat people, smokers, drinkers, those who speed, those who sky dive, those who ski, those who go to any third world country, those who eat at a fast food restaurant, those that eat at any restaurant, those who pick up hitch hikers, those who don't brush their teeth, those who drink tap water. That's about all. Everyone can have it.

How old are the parents of these kids at conception?

We evolved by procreating at a very young age compared to today's norms; when specifically sperm/egg are in peak form. Eggs, as I understand, are formed by birth of that female baby and whatever is genetically wrong, is wrong from the start as well as the deteriorating with age issue.

However even though sperm is always being newly made - perhaps there's deterioration along with the eggs.

Putting off having children may be the problem. How many family's have you seen where the last baby born to older parents have babies with more serious problems? It's something I've noticed.

"Eric, your family is brimming with Autism and you want an alternate hypothesis? Hmmm...I don't know....how about....Genetics?"

As I like to say, if there's one person in the family with autism, the odd are good that there will be others, too.

Or people who have a few autism-like traits.

[I have reason to believe that autism is a trait in my family - I'm just the only one in it that I know of who is formally diagnosed.]

"Being a biology teacher, do you think I might have thought of that? Well, there is no-one over 25 in my family with it. I mean none, and I know you are going to say it was just undiagnosed. Maybe. I'm just looking for answers."

Why not ask them to look into it? I'm well over 25 myself [going on 40 this year], and was only just recently diagnosed. It's not unheard-of for people over 25 to find out that they're autistic too.

Autism is not a thing only little kids have.

http://articles.latimes.com/2001/jul/23/health/he-25555

This article helps explain the point I was alluding to.

Glitches Are Harder to Detect in Sperm

With men, the biology is quite different because the testes keep producing new sperm cells throughout a man's life. "There are more chances in a male for things to go wrong because there are more cell divisions," Crow says. By age 15, sperm cells have undergone roughly 35 cell divisions. By age 20, it's 150; by 40, it's 610, and by 50, 840--hundreds of opportunities, in other words, for tiny glitches in DNA copying that result in "point mutations," or defects in a single gene.

Idd, they were in the 20-25 range, the normal "safe" range, where there is not an elevated risk for the occurrence of aneuploidy, which has nothing to do with autism.
There are two types of aneuploidy, trisomy and monosomy. When sex cells are formed through meiosis, there is a second reduction division that occurs to reduce the (in humans) chromosome number to 23, so that each egg or sperm contains one copy of each chromsome. After fertilization, the normal, new individual will then have 46 chromosomes - two of each. A normal, complete cycle of meiosis produces four sex cells with 23 chromosome. When one chromosome does not go where it is supposed to, you can end up with two cells with 23, one cell with 22, and one cell with 24. If the cell with 24 gets fertilized (egg) or does the fertilizing (sperm), you get trisomy, three copies of a certain chromosome in every cell of that individual. If the cell with 22 gets fertilized (egg) or does the fertilizing (sperm), you get monosomy, only copy of a certain chromosome in every cell of that individual. There are many disorders, depending on which chromosome you are short one chromosome or have one too many of one chromosome. The one that everyone knows about is down syndrome, trisomy 21, where the individual has 3 copies of chromosome #21 in every cell. Yes, older mothers' eggs are much more susceptible to abnormal meiotic division and their babies have a much higher risk of aneuploidy.
Again, this has nothing to do with autism; autistic individuals have a normal karyotype (2n = 46 chromosomes). Comments about delayed and difficulty in diagnosis are very difficult because autism is a spectrum, ranging from very minor to very severe, and I probably shouldn't have used the term Asberger's last night, because Asberger's is now just called a minor, functional autism.

someone who's child has been vaccinated does not have to worry or care if another child is not vaccinated.

This is such a vitriolic debate on the anti-anti-vaxxer side.
My children are not and will not be vaccinated, because of a large body of evidence provided by medical doctors... Not homeopaths and the like... actual medical doctors who have seen too many young children that display autism signs almost immediately following vaccination.

Eric said: "Yes, correlation does not mean causation, but what else could it be that is causing all the autism?"

Reporting bias. Increase the concern about something, more people get tested, more cases get found.

Are there more cases? No. Are there more cases that were identified? Yes.

Also, they've been jiggering what counts as "autism". Under the new guidelines, -I- am autistic. What I actually am is mildly Asperger's, but that counts as "autism" now when it didn't before.

Most of the "evidence" anti-vaxxers love to spout is of this variety. Its FUD based on a poor understanding of statistical principles, or possibly a deliberate effort to demonize something that has been working beautifully since the 1950's for short term political advantage.

The truth about Autism (and Asperger's) is that its a hereditary condition in the Northern European population, and always has been. It does not occur in other populations, such as African or Asian. At all. This is the same situation as Sickle Cell Anemia in reverse. There are no Europeans/Asians with Sickle Cell. At all. Its hereditary.

Now, if you start finding African/Chinese/Japanese/Korean kids with Asperger's or full blown Autism, kids who have zero Northern European ancestry, THEN I think you can start wondering about what might be making something like that happen. But that is not the case currently, to the best of my considerable knowledge on the subject. There are no autistic Black or Asian kids unless Mummy or Daddy was a Honkey.

So yeah, basically the "autism link" just more bullsh1t, and you guys are falling for it like a bunch of rubes.

Rod said: "My children are not and will not be vaccinated, because of a large body of evidence provided by medical doctors..."

...who are either idiots or liars, Rod. And it isn't a large body of evidence, its ONE STUDY that has since been debunked, harshly.

Do you believe your doctor when he starts going on about gun control Rod? No? Why the hell not, he's a -doctor-!

Meanwhile, the protection from polio, smallpox and other dire diseases that you've been enjoying these last 70 years is rapidly eroding. Currently there is mass immigration into the USA from countries where these diseases were never eradicated as they were here in North America. It doesn't take long to spread something like measles through the un-vaccinated population if you're importing it from Mexico. And Africa, and China, and Madagascar...

That's why there's a measles outbreak in the USA right now. Mass immigration of unvaccinated people, and an increasing unvaccinated population due to suckers like you drinking the autism koolaid.

Wait until the polio starts showing up again, Rod. Your kids are going to really thank you if they catch that sh1t. And they easily could, its endemic in Pakistan and South America. Endemic because of superstitious RETARDS who refuse to get their vaccinations.

"someone who's child has been vaccinated does not have to worry or care if another child is not vaccinated"

The reason why we all need to worry and care about children not being vaccinated is because each unvaccinated person establishes a point of entry for a disease into the broader community, which then provides a platform for the disease to spread more broadly than it would otherwise and infect those people who are highly susceptible (i.e. those who can't be vaccinated for a variety of reasons).

Unvaccinated people are protected by the herd immunity established by those of us who are vaccinted. If enough people choose not to be vaccinated, herd immunity fails and easily preventable, highly contagious diseases re-establish themselves. This means more suffering, disabilities and death - all of which are, again, easily preventable.

@phantom

You can't argue with the anti-vaxxers. Years ago their collective idiocy caused the worst pertussis outbreak in 70 years in the American Northwest, resuluting in otherwise preventable deaths, mostly infants who were too young to be vaccinated. The rate of vaccination in the affected communities moved not one bit afterward. Even when confronted with the horrible results of their actions they don't change. They don't care. They don't learn. They don't listen. Even when their kids start getting polio again they won't admit they were wrong.

If only we forced people to give up their guns, there would be no children dying from accidental shootings or stolen guns.... think of the children, give up your guns or we will take them from you.Every death from guns is totally prevenatble, there ought to be a law............

I think you misunderstand me, Grey Lady. I'm perfectly happy to let Rod's kids die from preventable diseases. They're HIS kids, so HIS problem. Kinda hard on the kids and I feel kinda bad for them, but free country so HIS problem.

The difficulty comes when MY hypothetical kid dies in hospital from that preventable disease because he/she is too young to get the shots, and caught it from Rod's kid in the waiting room. Where we all sat herded together for six hours of waiting, and where they never clean anything.

Rod's concerns regarding vaccines are based on "science" which is pretty much identical to the "science" in the medical literature on gun control, except there's even less of it.

You know how intractably, adamantly, militantly ignorant gun control types are? Rod and friends are being like that right now.

Is we lurrrrning yet, rubes?

sigh.......
100 cases of measles in a population of 330 million. of which 1 to 3 percent of which will have consequences such as complications of Measles such as ear infection, requiring antibiotics, even less ( a fraction of a percent) will require hospitalization or have permanent damage including death ( sorry I can not remember the number i was given by my Doc.) . I am in NO way minimizing those unfortunate children, elderly or those resulting illnesses from non-vaxxers lack of compliance. But if one is going to try to argue from a rational stand point on forcing others to comply in order to ease their fears then one needs to have perspective on the numbers. Infant mortality is threatened by more impressive matters then this. I hazard a guess that more children die from car accidents ( weekly? Daily? ) then measles yearly. BTW I have had allllllll my considerable children vaccinated. That was my choice. I just get tired of people who push for freedom sucking laws to waylay/satisfy their own fears but are unsympathetic to others who happen to do exactly the same but for a different cause.

slaw..... like many people my age, pre vaccine era, I had all the childhood diseases, my friends all had the same diseases. no one died and now we have our shorts in a knot about measles. what the heck wrong? your assumption about a point of entry is not valid if as I said others have been vaccinated.

Leave a comment

Archives

November 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Recent Comments

  • oldwhiteguy: slaw..... like many people my age, pre vaccine era, I read more
  • The Grey Lady: sigh....... 100 cases of measles in a population of 330 read more
  • The Phantom: I think you misunderstand me, Grey Lady. I'm perfectly happy read more
  • The Grey Lady: If only we forced people to give up their guns, read more
  • slaw: "someone who's child has been vaccinated does not have to read more
  • The Phantom: Rod said: "My children are not and will not be read more
  • The Phantom: Eric said: "Yes, correlation does not mean causation, but what read more
  • Rod: This is such a vitriolic debate on the anti-anti-vaxxer side. read more
  • oldwhiteguy: someone who's child has been vaccinated does not have to read more
  • Eric: Idd, they were in the 20-25 range, the normal "safe" read more