We Don't Need No Stinking Giant Mirrors

| 11 Comments

IF IT'S ONLY VIABLE WHEN SUBSIDIZED, YOUR TECHNOLOGY ISN'T REALLY VIABLE.


11 Comments

Shut Up. I know if I keep rubbing this Sh*t on my head, my hair will grow back.

Thats all they need some big old mirror for Obama narcsisi to admire himself in until in shatters

"IF IT'S ONLY VIABLE WHEN SUBSIDIZED, YOUR TECHNOLOGY ISN'T REALLY VIABLE."

A corollary of this is that if an expenditure (“investment” to fans of big government) can be justified, it will be undertaken by the private sector voluntarily with no need for taxpayer involvement. Are you listening public transit fanatics?

If they're only sustained with subsidization, ALL environmental initiatives are unsustainable.

U.S., Scotland, England, Germany, Denmark, Holland, France, and New Zealand – the list of failed green energy tech is mounting daily. The lessons of other nations who have made the commitment to wind and solar grid dependancy is as clear as any lesson can get – Green energy tech. IS NOT SUSTAINABLE! At least from an economic perspective and a supply side dynamic.

This is a very very clear deterrent example which socialist/left/prog polis who have not fully committed to green energy economic disaster refuse to accept. It displays 2 very genetic traits of Progs and Lib-left governing juntas –

A) the Prog-left utopian disconnect from reality and narrative-confuting truth (which they need to affirm their faith in junk science and junk political theory) will not allow them to admit failure of a Prog political agenda or theoretical dogma – as with their other fallacious theories green energy is a utopian construct that does not stand up to real world test – BUT, “it doesn’t matter how many times it has failed, those experiments were someone else and we will do better, we will not fail , we just need more” _ _ _ _ (fill in blanks with spurious rationale)

B) The basic amorality and cronyism reflex of prog/soc/Lib/left politics will always support their crony or patronage clients who kick back to Prog parties and causes – the Green energy industry is one of the most politically connected industries in operational mode – they make Wall Street look like amateurs. They remain the number one Prog-left lobby and corporate welfare client. Public subsidy for this non sustaining industry is eternal unless the technology changes drastically. Prog-left governments who go down the green energy rabbit hole and needlessly deplete billions of public funds propping up failed energy systems become so entangled with the problem, they cannot admit the truth or reveal the fascistic government-private partnering which is now devastating the economies they manage- out comes the big lie – These failed systems were just ahead of their time is all.

Those of you in Ontario suffering huge unmanageable home and business energy bills and watching energy-dependant industry evacuate your province, can confirm these 2 universal tenets of Prog-left government. Once a giant of industry with abundant cheap energy Ontario is now a province of energy pauperism and post-industrial rust belt culture – wind power was not the sole cause, degenerate leftist government was but green energy is the last nail in the coffin.

"Green energy tech. IS NOT SUSTAINABLE! At least from an economic perspective and a supply side dynamic. "

Well, except in Ontario....right?

Well said.

Crony capitalism is no better than the street walking trade. Did not Lenin say that the capitalist will sell him the rope with which he will hang him?

Occam, as usual, your post is OVER THE TOP, it's not just the lafties, I'v had the go around with quite a few rite-wingers, and worst of the rite wingers is the bible bangers. But for that, your post does point to the heart of the issue Having taken my IE, I get embarrassed by some of your over the top posts, you should know better.

Jamie, Ontario is living proof that there is no cure for stupid.

"..worst of the rite wingers is the bible bangers..."

Don't know where you get that. From the perspective of tax-payers who get twice-screwed by subsidizing the construction and then paying the utility rate increases, the screwing from a greedy and hypocritical bible-thumping rural landowner with 50 acres of solar panels would be indistinguishable from the screwing they get from a greedy and hypocritical eco-parasite who jets around the world at their expense.

" I get embarrassed by some of your over the top posts, you should know better."

You just don't read with any functional level of cognition do you

- re read the points and please explain and itemize all the "over the top" leaps of fact or logic - I await you intuitive critique - but don't ever slag me and then spew some anti-Christian garbage as a pertinent argument.

Personally you sound like some bitter anarchist axe grinder with personal issues and a cognition deficit to me, not that you've no right to pimp that shtick but don't start attacking points of logic or fact just to be contrarian.

Leave a comment

Archives

November 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Recent Comments

  • Occam: " I get embarrassed by some of your over the read more
  • Jamie MacMaster: "..worst of the rite wingers is the bible bangers..." Don't read more
  • oldwhiteguy: Jamie, Ontario is living proof that there is no cure read more
  • NME666: Occam, as usual, your post is OVER THE TOP, it's read more
  • Ken (Kulak): Well said. Crony capitalism is no better than the street read more
  • Jamie MacMaster: "Green energy tech. IS NOT SUSTAINABLE! At least from an read more
  • Occam: U.S., Scotland, England, Germany, Denmark, Holland, France, and New Zealand read more
  • Oz: If they're only sustained with subsidization, ALL environmental initiatives are read more
  • ima victim 2: "IF IT'S ONLY VIABLE WHEN SUBSIDIZED, YOUR TECHNOLOGY ISN'T REALLY read more
  • Spurwing Plover: Thats all they need some big old mirror for Obama read more