Operation Empty Chair

You Sir/Madam have impugned the integrity of all inept Cow Pies everywhere.
In future please call a spade a spade he is just a plain ordinary POS.
Regards

re 'Brown Clown'....you need to trademark that and acquire the domain name now. LOL!!

Yeah, the folks a Stormfront would love it.
It's a racist slur and should be beneath the sort of commenters who assemble here.

That's your opinion pal.

Yes it is. In case you didn't know Wretchard, Richard Fernandez, is one of the internet's most brilliant writers and being a Pilipino, has Brown skin too.

Excuse me for intruding, but Richard Fernandez isn't the one being called a "clown". The part of Obama's "legacy" (if you want to call it that) I find most offensive is the tendency for any progressive or leftist to label anything and everything that doesn't worship at their kool-aid fountain as "RACIST!"

"he can sure sell a speech."

Here are some Chicagoans who didn't buy his SOTU speech:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVRXiVDOFqo&x-yt-ts=1421828030&x-yt-cl=84411374

"I find most offensive is the tendency for any progressive or leftist to label anything..."

Me too. But the mention of melanin content in a moniker is gratuitously racist.
Surely Obama's character and policies, even his abilities or lack thereof, are worthy of comment, but his skin color as a label(which that was above) just plays into the hands of Leftists and tells them they were correct.

Maybe Kate can comment on this?

bullshit....Ooz, quit trying to prove you're an idiot, we are already well aware of it

I have more flip friends than most Philippinos, and they sure as hell wouldn't be offended, and they are all lefties to boot.

as to the zero being blind sided, yup, as he is the smartest man in the room all the time he takes no advice nor considers no opinion other than his own, ever. You need to know one to actually appreciate how closed minded they really are.

Exactly, although he is not a half-wit nor a clown of any colour, as he and his friends, Bill Ayers and Saul Alinsky know exactly what they are trying to accomplish.

I agree with Oz, comments like "brown clown" should have no place here.

Richard Fernandez is right.

1. Brown is a racist reference when referring to a person's skin color as an adjective while insulting them.
2. Pilipino with a 'P' is Tagalog, the Austronesian first language used by a quarter of the population of the Philippines and as a second language by the majority in which they refer to themselves a Pilipino males and Pilipina females. (the term Filipino is an exonym used by foreigners) Ever wonder why it's not called the Filipines? Now you know.
3. Wretchard is a generous soul, he suffers fools like you.
4. You call Obama a Clown, he's a funny guy, no? The Brown part was gratuitous racism.
5. Sure, feel free to exhibit your racism. I'll exercise my speech to call you out.

So when The Brown Clown's acolytes called him Black Jesus, they were racist, right?

When The Brown Clown said "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon," that was racist, right?

Not sure who deputized you as the Sense of Humour Police, but The Brown Clown just sounds funny and captures the man exactly. Deal with it.

"So when The Brown Clown's acolytes called him Black Jesus, they were racist, right?"

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."
~Martin Luther King jr.

Right, his acolytes were racist. And they voted for him because of the color of his skin, which was racist, because they knew virtually nothing about him as a person and candidate after he had his official history sealed from public view. They couldn't judge him on his character, the voted for his skin color.

Go ahead, double-down triple-down on your original mistake, whatever.
Like Obama, you refuse to learn.
I'll be calling you on your racism. Deal with it.

I don't presume to tell others what to post, and I don't let others presume to tell me what to post. What you post reflects your views, not mine, and vice versa. If you don't like it, scroll past it. To each his own.

Hey, Rogue Male ...... EBD is right.

Actually, you are also right inviting folks to just scroll past those who write idiotic stuff which is precisely why I just scroll past anything written by you, Spurwing Plover, NNME666 and others cut from the same cloth. There's too much good stuff on this website to waste time with the garbage that shows up occasionally.

Concern troll* off the port bow!

* Concern troll

A person who posts on a blog thread, in the guise of "concern," to disrupt dialogue or undermine morale by pointing out that posters and/or the site may be getting themselves in trouble, usually with an authority or power. They point out problems that don't really exist. The intent is to derail, stifle, control, the dialogue. It is viewed as insincere and condescending.

Except it doesn't really apply, does it?

1. BCer didn't express anything even remotely resembling "concern" about comments he dislikes; he just said he scrolls past them. So what?
2. He didn't suggest, hint, or imply that anyone's comments might get them into "trouble" with anyone, let alone an authority or power.
3. Your opinion that what other people see as a problem/annoyance "(doesn't) really exist" is belied by the fact that other people are annoyed by certain types of comments. Who cares? They, like you, have a right to be annoyed, or not be annoyed, and to say so, or not say so.
4. When someone proffers up a POV or opinion that differs from your own, they're not stifling, derailing, or controlling the dialogue, they're expanding it.

I've had a couple of proverbial Tong Wars here with BCer. He isn't a concern troll.

He said more than he would just scroll past (re-read), and he was aligning with the thread's concern troll community. Cheers.

I've been blogging her for six or seven years, and commenting for longer than that, and I've seen at times how slightly over-the-top racialist comments can drive reasonable and intelligent and valued commenters away from the thread because they don't want to be associated with that kinda thing.

I'm not necessarily putting your comment (which is a one-off, as far as I can recall) in that category. You make some reasonable points vis a vis monikers vs. slurs, and I didn't jump in specifically to attack you or criticize you; I just felt compelled to put in my two cents worth after seeing Oz being criticized for expressing a reasonable sentiment that's shared by a lot of people.

The bottom line is that it's nothing personal, it's just a sharing of opinions.

I get that, EBD, and I appreciate that you're trying to be constructive, but the thing you and others are missing is that I'm getting the Charlie Hebdo experience by self-appointed Sense of Humour Police, and I won't concede any ground to that on principle. We have our respective perspectives, and they don't align, so let's leave it at that.