Of the outstanding charges Rehn was facing at the time of his death, 13 were for breaches of earlier court orders.
He was 34 years old, with 59 convictions and 38 outstanding charges. The article doesn't say so explicitly, but they include the unexplained disappearance of Christie Blatchford's common sense.











Must agree, Kate. Jail works fine. Its letting them out that doesn't work.
But you have to let them out, because sentences have limits for a very important reason. Limitless sentences are a tool of tyranny.
Some people will behave after you show them the stick. Some won't. The ones that won't are the reason cops have guns and jails have bars on them.
And - this is the reason why we need a death penalty. I've heard the bleeding hearts, I've heard the yammering leftist morons - I have even heard supposedly intellectual conservatives bloviate against the death penalty. Save it.
We need to change the laws and put broken people like these down. This POS WILL kill again if he is able.
13 breaches of court orders? The second should have been proof that he was an unrepentant career criminal and thus deserved a long prison sentence. Yes it costs a lot to incarcerate someone but how much does it cost to leave them out in terms of property loss and injuries to the law-abiding?
Surely there is room in northern Alberta for a nice big penitentiary?
jails work if the criminals are on the inside looking out
Jail works. Rehabilitation doesn't.
Saw the article in today’s Calgary Herald.
After reading the headline, “Shooting proves jail does not work”, had to give up.
Is this some kind of convoluted logic?
The bad guy was not in jail. Would this happen if he was?
The bad guy had over 97 reasons to be in jail and he was not.
Sometimes you have to give up and say to the masturbators to write to their mothers and apologise for talking stupid.
The bad guy had over 97 reasons to be in jail and he was not.
And that happened consistently during the last 15 years of his life.
Christie is good at prose but sucks at math.
I think I have the perfect solution to this problem. Everybody on the parole board (and judges and lawyers in this case) should be mandated to have an extra room in their home ... with spouse and children living there ... to let those (Rehn - for example) who they think he/she is ready to be re-introduced into society have them live with them for a MONTH.
As it is now, I wonder how they (parole board members and Judges and their lawyers) can sleep at night when somebody they just let out commit crimes. Rehn should have been classified as a dangerous offender.
If jail doesn't work, we're doing it wrong. Most instances of people complaining of a thing not working turn out to have user error as the root cause.
Rehabilitation can work, and it does in a minority of cases. It is probably only ever going to work in a minority of cases, but it is a good idea to find better ways of selecting those individuals and investing the effort in them because when it works, it is cheaper than having those people continue their criminal activities.
Unfortunately this somewhat useful objective is being discredited and the resources invested are being wasted in dissipation by the more common result: failure. We accept the widespread failure of the system's rehabilitation efforts because they are paid for by public money which is everybody's money and therefore nobody's money, because as long as we try to do good we are good, because compassion, because non-judgmental, because fairness, because everybody deserves another chance, etc, etc, ad nauseum, ad infinitum.
I had the same reaction to that article. I was trying to understand if it was an attempt at satire, and no matter how I read it I concluded it was not.
someone with 59 convictions in 15 years should be serving life without parole.
The criminal killed himself, I suspect the crime rate will be lower now in his absence.
Glenfilthie said, "And - this is the reason why we need a death penalty."
And Liberal pols sucking up to the Muslims +Muslim immigration to Canada is the reason the death penalty is a bad idea. Do you trust the government that much? Do you think this somewhat stable state of affairs in which we now live is going to exist forever? Is there any power that the government has gotten that has not been abused by the government?
TheTooner said, "Rehabilitation can work, and it does in a minority of cases."
Most career criminals are sociopaths/psychopaths. They cannot be rehabilitated because they have an incurable mental condition.
....................................................................
Do to multiple firearms violations, Shawn Rehn had been prohibited from owning one until the year 2020. Where did he get a gun? I have skimmed a number of articles on this sad scenario and none of them tell us what sort of firearm Rehn used. Does anybody here know?
Sorry. The cops are busy on Jasper Ave picking up jaywalkers. This is and was a massive failure on both the system and the Royal Canuckistan Maryjane pickers.
Prison is all cruel and meaningless until one of the real important people are affected.
You know what did put an end to his criminal life? A bullet. Should have been applied years earlier when it was quite obvious he intended to be a predator in society rather than a member.
By Christie's perverse logic, insulin doesn't work to treat diabetes since it only works as long as you're actually taking it; anti-retrovirals don't work to treat HIV since it recurs as soon as you stop taking them and safe injection sites certainly don't work since the users continue to use. Heck, breathing doesn't even work since despite breathing over a hundred times after waking up one still has to breathe again!
Jails work just fine as long as the criminals are kept inside them. What doesn't always work is rehabilitation. In the same way that we can control diabetes but cannot cure it, there are certain criminals within our society whom we simply cannot rehabilitate. We need a mechanism (three strikes?) to identify them and take them out of the general circulation. Once they're over seventy and the hormones have settled down some of them could be considered for release case by case. Otherwise, since the prison life-style obviously isn't a major disincentive for them, neither is it a major adversity for them. They can be happy in prison, and the law-abiding can be happy with them in prison: win-win.
So where were the armed bystanders in the parking lot that may have helped the police?
Yes of course, they were unarmed by law and cowering inside protective barriers.
That's too bad, I suppose we'll never know if an armed good citizen may have saved the life of this policeman.
Of course long jail sentences work...just ask Robert Latimer, he'll never ease anyones pain ever again
Oz >
“Where did he get a gun?”
That’s probably not the most important question considering he could have picked one up illegally from a variety of sources. Maybe the gun came from Mohawk cigarette smugglers in Ontario or Vietnamese drug gangs in Vancouver. Jihadists in Calgary maybe?
Maybe he got one from the hundreds of guns stolen from Canadian Police armories.
http://www.macleans.ca/general/hundreds-of-police-guns-unaccounted-for/
I’m guessing he just picked one up from some local Somalis in Edmonton; they have plenty of illegal drugs and guns to go around.
Yes. I was implying that gun laws and prohibitions do not work.
It would be interesting to know if it was a handgun(very restricted) or not.
"Most career criminals are sociopaths/psychopaths."
The "high end" types, usually jailed in federal Prisons often are, but the Provincial jail types, whom I worked with,inmates of three different "correctional" facilities, were for the most part, of low normal IQ, many FAS and FAE types.
These people are habitual criminals because they are too lazy,undisciplined, and incapable of absorbing education to ever be truly rehabilitated.
Rehn's long term record makes me wonder if he wasn't one of those types whose dull brain was poisoned further by crystal meth or crack.
Doesn't particularly matter, his self-administered justice did the job all the CSC professionals couldn't do.
Now,I just hope the gun he used was stolen or a black market purchase, or we're going to be treated to volumes of media cries for a return of the LGR.
Don Morris >
“Now, I just hope the gun he used was stolen or a black market purchase”
Rest easy, it was obtained illegally as he was not licence to own one due to his criminal record, and - or - a diagnosed mental illness.
What we can assume with 99.99% certainty is that if it was stolen from a licensed law abiding Canadian citizen, it would have been reported stolen immediately and the police would have been all over Canada to find it.
Not so much if it was purchased through the Edmonton – Fort McMurray Somali drug cartels.
CTV~"Investigators said Rehn brought a handgun into the casino prior to the shooting"
And yes it should be obvious to any reasonable person that gun laws and prohibitions don't protect anybody from the bad guys.
Somewhat related:
Canadian National Firearm Association – Petition
Your chance to be heard in parliament by March 28 2015
https://nfa.ca/news/magazine-capacity-petition
https://nfa.ca/news/ar15-petition
Help keep Canadian communities safe by promoting responsible gun ownership for law abiding citizens.
The fact that Rehn was caught 97 times tells me that he was a very slow learner and would never have benefitted from "rehabilitation". Smart crooks don't get caught and don't get into rehab. In Rehn's case, punishment didn't work either since he seemed to have used jail as a second home. The early releases and failure to lock him away for the duration after parole violations is a cause for concern and warrants scrutiny of the justice system.
Aviator >
“The fact that Rehn was caught 97 times tells me that he was a very slow learner...”
I agree with your sentiments, but disagree that he was a “slow learner” as an absolute. It doesn’t take “the disenfranchised” long to figure out when Liberals have given them a “pass” in life to keep going and going.
In fact he ended his own life, for all we know he might have gotten a few years and then out on good behavior or converted to Islam or something akin – to do it all over again.
There has to be a better way then the death penalty> I could never stomach giving the state the right to kill it's sheep. I don't trust the police nor the justice system period. It's full of individuals who would kill their own mammas for power and a vote. Here in Ontario we had an ME who made stuff up to fit what he wanted. Dr. Randal Smith. He was proven to be "faulty" in his assesment of hundreds of cases. Family was persecuted for stabbing their child repeatedly when in fact the child died from a pit bull attack as per the parents story.
"...Most career criminals ... cannot be rehabilitated because they have an incurable ... condition.
Most. That's why I say it can work in a minority of cases - in the majority, it can't. For any success it's critical to identify the right candidates early and concentrate resources on them, not wasting those resources on the majority who will fail.
Jail is good criminal school. What does work is forced restitution...right down to a life for a life.
The "better way" would mean lifetime incarceration,and we queasy Canadians can't stomach that.
Perhaps we should open a series of Gulags in our far north for these type of criminals,and forget the fiction/fantasy they can or will be rehab'ed. Take a guy like Rehn, stick him in a labour camp in the high Arctic,and let him stay there until he's too old to be a bad boy any more.
If he's a good boy we can promise that he will get to spend his last few years in a warmer climate,if he's troublesome,let him rot up there, out of sight of the delicate latte sippers in our cities.
It's better than the death penalty,for those who oppose it,and we citizens wouldn't have to worry about him any more. A BIG plus is this is the system used by the communists,so how could our communists (by whom I mean "socialists" or "social justice" types) possibly object?
“The fact that Rehn was caught 97 times tells me that he was a very slow learner...”
He was 34 years old, with 59 convictions and 38 outstanding charges.
Someone's a slow learner, but considering he was footloose and fancy free with a record like that, it probably wasn't Rehn.
He may have been caught 97 times, but those 97 catches are likely a mere fraction of the offences committed considering crime was a lifestyle.
Don Morris said, "were for the most part, of low normal IQ, many FAS and FAE types."
I will bow to your superior knowledge and direct expertise here.
As far as I know, there is no cure for FAS or FAE or low IQ. Therefor in those cases, as well as in the case of psychopaths, rehabilitation cannot possibly work as their condition is 'baked-in-the-cake'.
"...That's too bad, I suppose we'll never know if an armed good citizen may have saved the life of this policeman."
I think it is safe to assume not. Since the policeman himself was an armed good citizen and was in a position to know better than anyone else would have been that he was approaching someone who he suspected had committed a crime and therefore might react to police with violence. Obviously in this case that didn't cause him to decide that he should get his gun out beforehand, so the bad guy was able to make the first move. No armed bystander would have done anything before that, and afterwards shooting Rehn couldn't bring Constable Wynn back.
Don't take that to mean I don't see any point shooting Rehn afterwards. That would still have been worthwhile, but it doesn't save the life of his victim.
Sounds like the same story as what'shisphuck in Mayerthorpe.
"The "better way" would mean lifetime incarceration,and we queasy Canadians can't stomach that."
Nor should we. First, it's the murderers that go there. Then it's the rapists. Then it's the thiefs. Then it's the guy who sold wheat illegally to Americans. Then it's the guy who went fishing without a license. Then it's the guy who wrote a pamphlet that offended a protected class. Then it's the guy who votes the wrong way. Then it's you. If we ever come to a day in North American where people are jailed for their political beliefs, you can bet there will be studies and experts telling us there is no other way.
It never ceases to amaze how 'c'onservatives - who oppose the expansion and strengthening of governmental/bureaucratic power in almost every other context - simply lose their minds when it comes to law and order stuff and want to give the government (who they distrust in every other way imaginable) the power to kill or incarcerate people for life. As though the status quo will never change, LEOs are somehow the "good" kind of petty functionaries, and the powerful are always benevolent.
I recall a fellow telling me that back in the old days; before our society got enlightened about crime and punishment, a criminal got the 'paddle' coming into and out of jail. It was a device that rotated and applied a scourging of sorts to the criminal. It usually worked wonders in ensuring most criminals dared not come back for another round. But then what did those barbarian Canadians know? We are much progressed nowadays. We only apply the beating to the innocent.
*
"The fact that Rehn was caught 97 times tells me that he was a very slow learner..."
how so? like most canadian criminals rehn learned that even after being arrested a hundred times, the ineffectual legal sytem will still house, feed, pay for your university degree and even buy you new genitals (if that is your particular kink).
you bide your time, suck up the bennies and hit the weight pile... and return to straight society stronger and more self-involved than when you went in.
he learned that he was an apex predator and people couldn't really do sh!t about it.
somebody tell me... why are we warehousing paul bernardo and russell williams. if we're lucky, maybe they'll piss somebody off and get shanked... before the lunatic left releases them back into the largely defenseless herd.
*
"The "better way" would mean lifetime incarceration,and we queasy Canadians can't stomach that."
To that slaw said, "Nor should we."
Incarceration for life is not a slippery slope, as you have portrayed it. People can always be released if the political pendulum swings that way or if they have been found innocent of the crime for which they were sentenced.
IF, as you suggest, people will later be getting life sentences as we slide down your slope for rape>thievery>black marketing>illicit summery offences>pamphleteering>wrong voting, then we are waaay past worrying about incarceration for life and it's time to worry about us residing in mass graves.
By the way, congratulations for conflating violent offenders with non-violent offenders and a strawman into a single flaccid argument.
The choice, however, is between not fixing the current status quo of releasing unreconstructed incurable violent career criminals into our midst and actually protecting the public from them in a realistic manner.
You have not offered a solution. I welcome you to do so.
Slaw. You raise some valid points BUT you do not provide a solution to the problem. It's one thing to point out problems but another greater thing to provide a solution, which you have not done. Please provide for us merciless creatures your perfect solution.
Singapore and Malaysia us caning to deter repeat offenders. Seems to me to be a solution. Does it work? ... I don't have the statistics.
The issue if jail "works" is a red herring.
No shootings would have happened if he had been in jail. Jail doesn't have to "work". It just needs to prevent assholes murdering cops.
"It just needs to prevent assholes murdering cops."
Or people in general right? I'm sure you think the rest of our lives are just as valuable as a cop's life is, yes?
Knight99 and Oz, I said Rehn was a slow learner because he was stupid enough to keep getting caught 96 times after the first time, ie.,failed to learn from experience.
I heard the suggestion that he may have been part of a gang planning to rob the casino and that, after shooting the cops, he became a liability. It would be nice to think that his "friends" did him in.
Hey, administrator - why did my reply to Knight99 and Oz disappear into "review"? No nasty words in there that I could see. I merely observed that someone who gets caught 96 times after the first time was not "learning from experience".
[A certain word used by a lot of spammers - it starts with "c" and ends in "o" - caught the filter. As always, the filter is triggered automatically, so it's never personal. -- EBD]
Neo said: "somebody tell me... why are we warehousing paul bernardo and russell williams. if we're lucky, maybe they'll piss somebody off and get shanked... before the lunatic left releases them back into the largely defenseless herd."
1. Because government, as mentioned several times above, can't be trusted with the power of life and death.
2. But mostly because Liberals have used the "feeeeeel bad for the poor cwiminals" stick to successfully beat up conservatives these past 70 years. The Liberals have been able to do this because Canada historically has been a super safe place, with very little call for the death penalty.
The only reason we're having trouble with d1cks like this Rehn guy is that the OTHER HALF of the Liberal equation is missing now. Previously, oppressive sentences were not particularly needed because the citizenry were not helpless. Violent offenders were few because they mostly got waxed while doing their crimes.
Government has everything backwards. They arrogate unto themselves the power that properly rests with the "defenseless herd". This is not meant to make us safer. Its meant to make -government- safer.
Jail works. Self defense also works. Life terms are not optimal but they are better than having the wrong guy regularly killed because Constable Plod couldn't be bothered to find the right one.
@Doug - There is no solution to the problem. There will always be an assortment of criminals, lunatics, and ne'er-do-wells running around hurting people and causing trouble. It was ever thus. Just ask Abel.
@Oz - A lot in your post to digest (e.g. it is gracious of you to allow that innocent people would be released) but I'll leave it at this: you have a lot more faith in politicians and LEOs than I do. The violent crime rate (and crime rate in general) has been in general decline for decades. I have no inclination to give the third rate minds at the Crown, the RCMP, or local and provincial police departments any additional powers to fight a problem that is decreasing in severity every year....
we have to get of the liberal progressive judges off the bench.
"gracious of you to allow that innocent people would be released"
I didn't say they would be released, I said they could(can) be released.(unlike dead people)
I don't have more faith in pols and their agents than any observant person would have.
That violent crime is statistically 'decreasing' is irrelevant. That it is a problem that is statistically 'decreasing in severity'(severity?) is irrelevant. This is about individuals who have individually committed severe violent crimes against other individual human beings and crime is the Way of Life of the offender.
David Milgaard was innocent and he was never going to be released because he was never going to admit and show remorse for a crime that he didn't commit. The law has not changed in that regard.
This is not about changing any laws here. This is about applying existing law, the ability to incarcerate dangerous career offenders, appropriately. The government already has this power.
Three violent crimes and you can be labeled a Dangerous Offender and incarcerated for life.
It is already a sentencing tool in their toolbox.
Canada's greatest enemy...the courts.
TheTooner >
“I think it is safe to assume not. Since the policeman himself was an armed good citizen......”
I know what you’re saying, and not to pick hairs, but only one Constable was armed while the auxiliary constable was reported to not be.
Had the second constable been armed maybe things would have turned out differently. Also citizen witnesses on the scene may have been of help as well had they been armed, it happens frequently in Concealed Carry States in the US.
The more on your side the merrier in a gun fight yes?
For that matter maybe the punk could have been waxed years ago by an armed citizen as with the reported 2003 home invasion, where he took a hostage to an ATM. I don’t know the circumstances as to why the male hostage was not armed to defend himself, but anti-gun laws aka: anti self defence laws certainly didn’t help.
"Had the second constable been armed maybe things would "
He is NOT a constable if he is not armed. They went after a stolen car, and figured the guy wasn't guilty?? So you go up to a thief and let him shoot you in the head? Darwin's law.