64 Replies to “Oh, Shiny Pony!”

  1. imagine the same ad with shiney pony , angry tom and dizzy lizzy mays picture .
    the mind boggles as they are the ones that want to determine the type of gun allowed.

  2. OMG! Politicians doing the job they were elected to do rather than having unelected bureaucrats setting policy and making laws. The horror!!!

  3. The RCMP police deciding which guns are prohibited is a political decision!
    As the High River Raids have shown, there are some in the RCMP who object to Canadians licensed to possess firearms actually doing so. Some RCMP do not believe in the rule of law.
    This, though firearms licensees are 1/2 as likely to be involved in criminal violence then are non-licenced members of the general public.
    When the Liberals brought in C-68, they declared 55 percent of the registered handgun Canadians owned to be prohibited. Those were the smaller and less powerful ones. A grain flail is a prohibited weapon due to the Police Chiefs, at one time, being afraid Canadians would all become Bruce Lee, after his movies came out.
    There is no rational criteria for what is and isn’t a gun law in Canada. A thorough review and reform is required based on hard, scientific evidence.

  4. Ah yes. The same clowns(cops included)who gave us gun control for a few votes. And made criminals out of duck hunters. When will you people realize that when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns? And yeah. I wouldn’t trust a leech politico as far as I could fart in their direction. Pandering for votes again. I like cal2’s idea. Any good photo shoppers out there?

  5. Nothing says public accountability more than giving authority to nameless, faceless bureaucrats.

  7. Very deceptively articulated statist coercion concept for the LIVs the Libranos court – but this essentially states the LPC is happy to have police make law instead of the peoples elected reps. Just another Freudian insight into Librano intent and their twisted ideas of the function of government.
    Our freedoms and rights will always be in danger as long as the Librano political cabal keep attempting to implement state tyranny under the guise of “liberalism”.

  8. With the millions of guns that are in Canada …. very few are ever used for nefarious purposes and when they are … IT IS ALWAYS BY A CRIMINAL. LEGAL GUN OWNERS ARE THE GOOD GUYS.
    If Justin Clouseau thinks that he can bring back the registry … he is whistling in a grave yard. We know there is a great desire by leftist politicians to confiscate all privately own firearms, but it’s not gonna happen …. it happened in Germany in 1936 under the far left NAZi party and we paid a hefty price for that … especially the Jews.

  9. “Gun control” = civilian disarmament. That is the RCMP/Liberal establishment goal. Owning a gun is an act of freedom. The RCMP do not want that.

  10. With all these Conservative approved firearms out there we will need armed Liberal soldiers. On our streets. I am not making this up.

  11. A country where laws are made by the police is called a police state. Is that what the lieberals want to impose on Canadians?

  12. It’s good of the Liberals and Justin Trudeau to spell out his opinion on gun ownership so clearly.We have seen the enemy and he ain’t US, he’s Justin Trudeau and the Liberals!
    Now,all of us hunters and sports shooters have to organize through our fish and game clubs or the NFA, and vote against a Police State,which the LPC clearly wants.
    No wonder JT said he admires the government of China more than any other!

  13. Well if all those guns are the same scale as that machine pistol in the center, I’m not sure what they’re good for- either very tiny rifles for gnomes or a very hard to conceal pistol.

  15. Reading the facebook comments gives me the impression that most everyone who visits the page think the liberals are out to lunch on this one as they have a very poor understanding of DEMOCRACY.

  16. Hitler was a gun control advocate. And once the populace was disarmed…all sorts of evil was perpetrated on them by the police/officials of the state. Imagine a whole city block’s worth of people shooting at the Gestapo and Brown Shirts when they started rounding up the Jews or even dissident German political voices…It might have dissuaded many young German men from joining the Wermacht had there been an active and armed disobedience to the Nazi party.

  17. Aside question I can name all the guns on the poster except for the one at the bottom right. Can anyone identify this abomination?

  19. Looks like an Uzi fitted with an extended barrel, an old Thompson sub-machine gun forestock handle and I don’t have a clue what the butt is suppose to be–it’s probably a toy they painted black to look scary.

  20. Anyone remember the Turf Mark Holland campaign? It might be time to do that to wee little Justine.

  22. From one of the comments;
    I saw a movie once where only the police and the military had guns. It was called Schindler’s List.

  27. Well at least the Liberals want to take the high road. Yeah, I’m being sarcastic.
    Bravo ofaycat.

  28. The irony of the LPC shooting itself in the foot with this juvenile piece of anti-gun advocacy has me chuckling today.

  29. Because when only the police had guns it worked out so well…circa 1933-1945
    You vill be coming vis us, ja!
    Shiny Pony and the gun hustlers will save us from ‘guns in our streets’ with the EEEEVIL dictator Stephen Harper…
    Yeah sure, that’s gonna work!
    Charlatans…
    Cheers
    Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group ‘True North’

  31. I constantly am amazed at the latest bozo erruption from Leisuresuit Larry and after each time he makes an attempt at policy I ask myself can he get anymore ridiculous? To which less than a week goes by and its confirmed, that yes, yes he can.
    Liberals like to crow about how it was they, particularly PET that repatriated and gave us the current constitution. …..would it be too much to ask that they actually read it?

  33. Neither politicians or police should be deciding on Canadians right to protect themselves!
    We need a constitutional amendment to include the inalienable right to Bear Arms, for all Canadian adults of sound mind and without violent criminal convictions.

  34. Yet another Back-to-the-Future moment with Justin Trudeau. He’s supposed to be the breath of fresh air in Canadian politics? Could have fooled me: all he ever exudes is the stench of long-dead and -discredited notions.
    This campaign has all the impenetrable denseness and hair-splitting arcaneness of their Long-Form Census whine-fest, and I’m sure it will attract a like number of votes (as in, approaching zero). Heck, the next thing you know, he’ll be claiming that the Conservatives are trying to “silence” the police, in the same way they’re supposedly “silencing” government scientists, whatever that means.
    And to be honest, I would have thought that he might have considered an approach that didn’t mimic the long-dead and -discredited 2006 election campaign of Paul Martin, Jr., who laughably attempted to fear-monger his way back into office by contriving Conservative gun-nut boogeymen under everybody’s bed. Dumb politics.
    A much better approach would have been to accept what’s being proposed, which is the way things are supposed to work, anyway (you know, a professional bureaucracy providing options and making recommendations to a minister who then makes the decision), rather than attempting to portray the situation as the Conservatives cooking up a scheme to “go rogue” by recklessly detaching themselves from the accepted decision-making process. Trudeau, Jr. (why ARE there so many Jr.s in that party, anyway?) could then have taken a position on what classes of weapons the Liberals would proscribe. But then again, that would have involved taking an actual position on the matter, having thought his was through it, rather than just calling Stephen Harper a meanie.

  35. …a constitutional amendment to include the inalienable right to Bear Arms
    That would be nice, but realistically I’d settle for a sensible re-write of C-68.

  36. Nope glasnost, it needs to be totally turfed and any new legislation have the firearms owners involved with the creation.. The libs used Windy Kookier as their go to person for that firearms act abomination, which is why its so messed up and useless.

  37. If it is just a re-write then they can re-write it again. This should be in the constitution it is an actual right unlike all the fluffy pseudo rights like the right to have taxpayers pay for your sex change operation, or the right to violate your employer’s property rights and freedom of association by forcing a labour union on him or the right to mutilate the unborn.

  38. …[C-68] needs to be totally turfed…
    “Totally turfed” can be included in the definition of “re-write”. What is unlikely to happen is a full-blown constitutional amendment so I’m hoping for some baby steps starting with de-criminalizing gun ownership.

  40. “An actual right” (such as self defense) is not given to you by the constitution-you just actually have it. If that right is annunciated in a constitution, so much the better, but you have that right regardless.
    What is preventing Canadians from realizing their right to self defense is not the absence of explicit annunciation but instead, legislation that explicitly deprives them of that right.

  42. *
    ” I can name all the guns on the poster except for the one at the bottom right. Can anyone identify this abomination?”
    i concur with commenter favill… badly drawn uzi receiver with thompson machinegun forend. probably warren kinsella’s worst dream come true.
    what’s the one directly above that? looks like a thompson contender single shot pistol with a rifle buttstock and an ar15 front sight.
    elmer keith would be bleeding fom his eyes at these frankenguns.
    if the narrative isn’t scary enough for you… make sh*t up. it worked in ferguson.
    *

  44. Liberals need to decide which side of their mouth they’re talking out of –
    Al Rock and Wendy Cookoo decided which guns were prohibited for C68. Wait a minute! Al was a…a.., politician! Cookoo was, well, just cookoo, and still is.
    The Liberals are not too happy Darren Wilson wasted the “unarmed black teenager”, with a gun… Oh, wait, Darren Wilson is (was) a police officer, with a gun. The police officer used his gun and the Liberals didn’t like it.
    So does this mean the Liberals think its ok to have the police decide who has which guns but not who gets to use them?
    Ok Justin, which fantasy is the right fantasy, er, left fantasy?

  45. What do you suppose the Liberals think of that Toronto cop who murdered Sammy Yatim in front of the cameras and about a dozen other cops?
    Kid was a member of a visible Liberal-voting minority,too!

  46. Let the police decide ??? Like how they decided to tell the voters WHOM to vote for in the last Ontario elections?
    Gives me a sickening feeling in the pit of my stomach.

  47. The whole debate is a red herring or straw man!
    Why would Canadians allow either politicians, or the police who guard and protect them?
    It’s a Coke verses Pepsi question, and I’d rather have hand squeezed Apple Juice.

  48. Voting is so easy when I see the alternatives to Harper. He may not be perfect but he seems to be the only one who’s studied history.

  49. The Spawn is accidentally half right. Politicians shouldn’t determine who should own what kind of guns nor should the RCMP or anyone else for that mater.
    The Spawn likes the way Obama divides up “his” nation so he will continue to piss all over the actual rights of Canadians while appealing to the various factions of fascism and socialism.

  50. Have to had it to the Liberal Party of Canada, they never learn from past mistakes.
    Trudeau has dug himself into a hole on the abortion issue as well.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation