Cause, you know, that worked out so well for the Hapsburgs and Romanovs.
"Criminal law is not the appropriate means to preserve a social taboo," the German Ethics Council said in a statement. "The fundamental right of adult siblings to sexual self-determination is to be weighed more heavily than the abstract idea of protection of the family."
SJW 1, Biology 1. The score is under review and likely to be overturned.











"Abstract" idea of family? Family is the bedrock foundation of civilization. Destroy it, and everything else collapses.
The thread headline describes this controversy well. Although it is interesting that France under Napoleon I abolished laws against incest.
It seems that western society is slowly but surely becoming morally sicker and sicker.
The West is becoming a cesspool of depravity and corruption and greed ... looks like the Jihad boys are right about us.
Or was this simply Germany's first step toward allowing man-goat sexual self-determination to appease the muslims. You never know with these absolutely warped leftist gang of social engineers that dominate weak governments.
"Criminal law is not the appropriate means to preserve a social taboo,"
Non-Governmental Wealth Redistribution is also a social taboo. It is mentioned in those Xtianist Ten Commandments. Does that mean we should decriminalize theft?
Actually, I'm kinda good with this. I figure the Universe will smack them a lot more harshly than anything I'd be willing to do. Stupidity is usually it's own best punishment And it's cheaper. Win win.
It would be even cheaper if these perverts were kicked off welfare too, but that'll never happen.
An example of how dangerous Trudeau and Mulcair would be to Canada is there for all to see in our HOC daily gong show called QP when their Leftist doctrine coupled with political ambitions trump doing the right thing,getting together across political lines and fighting evil along with our allies.
You can't sit back and watch evil, you can't have peace without fighting for it, fighting against this latest scourge of unspeakable evil in the name of Islam cannot be ignored, to ignore it will bring it to us. Fighting the 1st and 2nd World wars are the reasons we live in freedom.
I've read that Germany regulates every minute facet of people's lives. It's strange that incest wouldn't be included in their fascist treasure trove of laws.
BTW, why in hell are we discussing anything publicly regarding our actions against the deranged Islamists? Our special forces are put in danger by discussing the fact they've been deployed in this fight, part of the reason they're effective is it's top secret. You do not win wars by advising the enemy exactly what you're going do and when.
You might be a progressive if you think it's just fine for Jimmy to get busy with his sister in the gym equipment storage room but think the state needs to step in if he brings a cupcake in his lunch box.
Exactly, in spades. I repeat my society sickness comment.
Well somebody has got to play devil's advocate....sooooo....no where in any religous text is incest said to be bad or against God,Allah,Yahwe,etc. Laws against incest where brought in to stop the reproduction of retards(leftards).It is a simple fact of biology and natural selection.Think of it as male lions killing off their male cubs Or look at Britain and their royals.
It was a good editorial. I particularly enjoyed the banjo music in the background.
"....sooooo....no where in any religous text is incest said to be bad or against God,Allah,Yahwe,etc....."
O can pnly assume this is sarcasm, irony er something....
For those who actually believe that.....
Leviticus 18
actually with modern medicine as it is capable of today, banjo players need not even be considered in this discussion.
Mike M...thing you miss with your post, it is because the PTB thought they needed to regulate morality under criminal law that opened the door to them thinking they need to regulate our lunch pails. Even the kristian god allows his/her follers to make choices, and they are not limited to only the correct choice, so why would you think that you and your government should over ride your god?????
"...a government ethics committee..."
Ha, ha, haaaa....Ho, ho, hoooo....He, heee, heeeeee....
Now that's a good one. Ranks right up there with:
a good lawyer
military intelligence
UN Human Rights Council
I met one of the Hapsburgs about 7 years ago. Yes, the family is still around (unlike the Romanovs, Michael Ignatieff notwithstanding). He was a Count and a thoroughly useless human being, living off of his wife's father's money (the FIL is a Raj - yes, there are still Rajes).
I am with Phantom on this one. Seriously, do we believe that if two siblings want to … ehmmm … exchange fluids, they will decide not to do it because the government passed a law?
Should government be protecting the idea of a family in the first place?
Baloney. It's clearly stated in the Bible, in the Old Testament, that you can't sleep with relatives. Uncle-niece and first-cousin marrying are indeed permitted, but very little used. But aunt-nephew is prohibited, and all the rest too. The language could not be plainer. I should mention chapter and verse, Google will probably turn it up. Peace.
Messed up big time..it's the thought proess that boggles my mind with these people...We are going the way of the Roman Empire..down the tubes.