Some links of possible interest, from dogmatic faculty and the joys of modern schooling to incendiary literature and the unbecoming urges of Hillary Clinton.
Some links of possible interest, from dogmatic faculty and the joys of modern schooling to incendiary literature and the unbecoming urges of Hillary Clinton.
Yeah well, in a related matter, I am finding it difficult to maintain an open view about the mentioned “Sandy Hook shootings”.
Howcum no trauma helicopters were involved?
Why were the approaches to the school blocked by vehicles keeping ambulances at the nearby firehall?
By what miracle of triage did all them kids and adults get pronounced dead within 8 minutes?
Where were all the hundreds of pupils alleged to have attended that school (800+)?
Crisis actors posing as parents?
Why was the school razed so promptly and the demolition workers sworn to secrecy?
With the passage of time and further revelations, this is taking on aspects of the JFK thing.
” but the question is Hillary Clinton’s fitness for the highest office, and her statement reveals a grandiose and profoundly repressive mindset.”
Let us,by whom I mean American voters, not forget that Hillary Clinton was fired from the Watergate investigating committee at age 27.
Clinton’s boss was ,”Jerry Zeifman, a Democrat, who was a counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee.”
“Zeifman published a book in 2006 titled Hillary’s Pursuit of Power. On his website, which is no longer on the Internet, Zeifman said “Hillary Clinton is ethically unfit to be either a Senator or President–and if she were to become President, the last vestiges of the traditional moral authority of the party of Roosevelt, Truman and Johnson will be destroyed.”
But many Americans tout this woman to be the next President. Are we really considered so stupid we’d believe Hillary has “evolved” ethically?