“So the New York Times David D. Kirkpatrick wants us to believe that the Times somehow embedded a reporter into a random protest that turned out to be a highly organized attack motivated by an internet video no one had seen. And for the last 15 months, they kept that secret. What a bunch of lying schmucks.”
Saw that story on Global TV the other night. I was gobsmacked. I know how extremist the NYT is but I couldn’t believe my ears just the same. Did I miss winter? Is it April 1 already?
http://video.foxnews.com/v/2991957548001/ny-times-doing-pr-work-for-hillary-wh-on-benghazi/
NY Times doing PR work for Hillary, WH on Benghazi?
Who benefits most from the ‘Paper of Record’s’ report that Al Qaeda was not involved in the deadly Sept. 11 Benghazi attack?
No one in their right minds are going to believe that the NYT aren’t running interference for Hillary…think gun running out of Benghazi to Syria.
Cheers
Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”
Sending a queer guy to deal with the Arabs over guns, especially trying to get the Stingers corralled….and he got dead…..what did you think would happen to him unless you had a really substantial armed guard.
The NYT is pushing the envelope to the point that it wouldn’t surprise me to see some serious push back in an attempt to rescue the country from the critters that seem hell-bent on destroying it.
So now we have a new story for the American voters.
NYT had boots on the ground in Benghazi?
Don’t laugh at this great reporter, he deserves the Medal of Freedom, or the Pulitzer Prize, ?if his story is true.
Either that, or they are trying to float this thing, and see where it lands.
And we all know that sometimes shit floats.
This story came straight from the very top of the toilet.
Secret meetings in the White House, late night phone calls with the editors.
They are in panic mode.
It has to prove the truth about/behind the terrorist video,
the one year in prison served by its terrorist maker, or Obaba and his forty thieves will be the joke of 2014-2015.
This is their only defense, I never realized how desperate they really are.
“NY Times admits involvement in attack on Ambassador Stevens”
The NY Times is no better than Pravda or the Volkischer Beobachter. It is party organ.
I was there too! That Youtube video really pissed off an otherwise calm group of locals. Now just showing a picture of Obama has the same effect.
Happy 2014 to all!
Dave
Yeah yeah see and and the reporters name was ,… Morgan Fairchiiilllld, yeah that’s the ticket.
Liar Liar, media industrial complex on fire
(Almost worth getting a twitter account, over)
Let us all rejoice the arrival of New York’s new avowed communist mayor.
We can now look forward to a few years of a peaceful socialist paradise in the big apple.
It would have seemed impossible for New Yorkers to choose a mayor even worse than nanny Bloomberg.
On the other hand, the voters stateside certainly appear to want the land of the free to now change to a workers paradise akin to Nicaragua. It looks like they’re going to get their wish.
It is past time that Canada build a stockpile of nukes to force our admittance into the mutually assured destruction club.
Since commies always run out of other people’s money, Canada will become a prime target and needs to offer up a deterrence.
So IF the NYT had a reporter on the ground during the fight whose side was (s)he on?
Trick question the NYT’s default position is always anti-American.
I have a bridge for sale!!!!!!
I’d say Nicaragua is arguably freer than New York City. You can buy a Big Gulp there. And a gun.
Miley Cyrus was there too, who was she twerking for?
Right, an embedded reporter identified a Libyan AQ leader, who planned and carried out the attack, for which he denied involvement (they always admit it right?), and this is evidence that this was NOT an AQ inspired attack?
With months of hearings and testimony and this or that research, we hear now there was a NYT embed on the scene? This is going to be good.
My main question is; why now has the NYT decided to run this badly flawed, even hoax article to try to and defend H. Clinton? Didn’t she close the book when she declared it didn’t matter now that people were already dead?
What’s the real story now?
More journalists embedded with terrorists please.
Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.
The left is so void of even tricks that we all know by now. Only out right lying is left to them.
The death head culture is showing its yellow stripe again.
This would be funny if you didn’t know some people will believe it.
The NYT needs to die out as :The Paper of Propaganda with revisionism.
Its only true record is one of lies for Marx.
Why now? Why conjure up this story now? Are some new developments coming down the pipeline?
So a video prompted the carnage? They still can’t explain where Obama was and what he was doing nor why Hillary denied help for the Americans dying.
Why would anyone be surprised ? The NYT has been in Obama’s pocket since day one. They are probably the best example of what’s wrong with the MSM and the deterioration of neutral unbiased reporting.